If you... know how a cunt tastes like nullius does?



There is no such a thing as global currency of circulation.


If people like you stop bumping scam ICOs, it would be great. you are posting on every scam ICO's thread like a bot.

Not only that, I bet that he knows how to jump alia if he can find her around.

---

A fair warning for the OP. you should know if you are joining the challenge of the humble BTCforJoe. he used to put his balls in 100 underprivileged families mouths every morning before pouring them some soup, probably mixed with his cum. after writing some posts with good English and getting your merits. go the nearest public kitchen and open your mouth.

Next time, when you go to somebody's house, don't tell them what a shitty house they have. every new member posting a thread like this, it would make this forum a welcoming forum.

---

*welcome to the forum and remember we are here to teach newbies to improve themselves to earn more money and be encouraged to reproduce.

*there is no alt account to post that. I had to post it with my only account.

He forgot to renew it, how can you expect theymos to announce something on twitter while just knowing about it, would have resulted in fixing the problem? if you are not satisfied with an apology, I could send alia to your bed next.

May alia find her way to your bed for running this forum for us to post and get paid. 2 Million registered members and 2 admins. one of them even apologizes. thank you man.

What if, I'm buying 3M Bitcoins with Billions of dollars to push the price up to $20,000 and then give them all to you for $60B? you would have to start selling them because you need money now, you would sell them for any price, because you couldn't receive money from me. the whole world is calling you a terrorist, giving money to you directly could have unwanted consequences, such as getting tagged by Lauda and having no salary in any signature campaign and nothing for you.

I'm a lawmaker here. you should tell the lawmakers in your country to add a new law. any woman or girl above the age of 18, should have no pants on at home. it would make it harder for the intruder to jump them if they have pants.


Would it be morally right, if you attack with the intent to injure just to give the intruder enough excuse to kill you? when you have a young wife and young girls in your house, forget about morality, save their pussies from getting jumped hard.

Not by you or any other DT2 member who is also a campaign manager. you have tagged a member who is a manager, recently he was fired from a managing job because of red trust. you could have taken his job if he wasn't tagged by you.

There is nothing for you in tagging other managers, if there was something in it for you, it would be abusing of your power, tagging them and then taking their jobs. let somebody else tag him so you can have his job. have you asked his employer to see if they are fine paying those cheaters or not? if they are fine paying them, no need to tag anybody.

~LM.

Since you don't have anything to lose other than a full member account of a value less than $250.


They are not here to make you feel something else, don't give them the reason by not asking somebody to trust you if you are not trusted.


That is correct, regular users with no reputation should use escrow.

Don't tell me this forum is like a government, I have already appointed myself as the lawmaker, I have been proposing major policy changes. no government can survive without the tax money. people say that forum has money. it's just not for spending.

It can't live on with trust system and merit system. it needs money. people say that if you are going to charge members with money, what you will have to charge them with, is what they need to survive. for how long this forum could support starving people for free? they wouldn't stop farming accounts and posting garbage. they are not paying any tax. I would love to stop repeating myself. if there was any better solution other than taxing people.

Konami should close it's toilets doors to the public because people are moving in to live nearby just to use Konami's resources. their excuse? a man has got to shit right? in forum, a man is shitting like 10 people. merit is going to force them out. don't expect any good result after 3 months.

Without knowing the IP address, you couldn't post here. forum is using Cloudflare for DDOS. if you are concerned for the security of this forum, read this pinned topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=309785.msg3326091#msg3326091


Who or what is the disabled?

To do what? bragging about it in front of a few prostitutes?


It is, like an 18 years old virgin.


Yes, with a pre-ICO and no POW mining.


I can only pay with my new Bitcoins. I also have the *leaked video of nullius doing alia hard with no mercy.
This is just a few short moments, if you want to watch the full video in HD, I can sell it for 1BTC
*


As fack.


Why not just give merits to constructive posts of your alts to avoid getting caught? you should ask that question when you see so many people giving merits to their own alts for garbage posts.

About my 5 sent merits to Tom and Jerry, lol. he was almost crying, he didn't beg and was complaining about so many unfair and high amount merit transactions. I gave him 5 merits to cheer him up. note that Naitik has received merits from other merit sources too. he is not a blatant and cheerful garbage poster trying to beat the community. second lol. I gave him 5 merits, you'll know why if you read his post. but he is not an account farmer.

Note again, this was my criteria at the time:

But I started to see more and more of these reasonable and understandable comments from variety of forum members and ranks. so I had to change my criteria.

OP has changed his/her password recently. third lol. I'd like to know if I'm misusing my source merits constantly. via PM. and I will reward you for your quality posts. @anybody else, if I have promised you merits for your reports on merit abusers. I'm really sorry, because I'm not going to hold that promise. there are too many abuse. there will be too many reports, if I merit one of the reporters, it would be unfair to other reporters not getting any merits from me for doing the same.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2477796.0

You need to go to them.

Companies that create such a good site would know better that they shouldn't self-escrow. I'm not sure if a hero or a legendary member would participate to post 35 constructive posts for $16.

Negative trust for self-escrow and a ban for your campaign is a reasonable result.

What if Konami hires 10 of these little and unimportant fellas to clean their toilets but only one of them did the cleaning while the rest of them made more mess? they are doing that in this forum. one person would register 20-40 accounts and starts to post garbage. would you endorse 2000 people shitting in Konami's toilets and even get paid a salary and Konami's coders and real employers would have to waste their time to find a place to work on their great games?


If theymos wont do it, I will. I am begging those people to leave and let this revolution to have a chance in development. every time I go to Bitcoin section, I can only see generic and garbage topics with hundreds of garbage replies. I'm a nobody but if I'm not finding any fine quality discussions, I would be forced to leave this forum. what this forum does for me and people like me is what I really need if I'm going to help the movement of decentralization of currency.


How many people do you think crypto can support?


It has spread, news about earning money to the wrong people. while the work force is busy doing something nobody wants, all the coders are self entitled to launching ICOs and sell something every other coder could develop. there are even some of the Konami's plumbers impersonating coders and selling Konami's games as their own, people only see Konami's name and would buy them.


Crypto industry is an industry because of this forum and it's founder and then administration keeping it alive for years. this industry has been sucking the life out of this forum. admins are trying to keep it that way, they would rather slow down it's growth and keep it free. 2 admins are not enough for 2 Million registered forum accounts. 20 new moderators are needed for this forum but the policy to keep it free doesn't allow them to keep it free and let it grow.


I was an ignorant when I came here, they were the same to me as they are now to newbies. they have trust issues. I'm a low(life) skilled member and I'm not trusted after 2 years of expressing my generic opinions. lol.

Motherfacker you don't even know how to spell Ethereum and say to collect money. you don't even know what is coin and what is token. should I wake Jamal and his cell to order them to find you wherever you are and tell them to ass-jump you for trying to scam people by announcing a garbage ICO? how could you be in IT you illiterate scammer, and where are your other existing projects?

---

I would like to officially reserve all the translations, my mother tongue is not English master Hodur, I'm only interested in the bounties and not doing anything. I want you to give me money and ask for nothing in return. master a man has got to eat, right?

What you are doing is contradictory. you have the same post-activity counts. you are an alt account. only your friends have merited you. you have 1-3 posts in average when you are actually active. what kind of consistent interactions could you possibly have with this community to have the audacity to talk about consistent standards of DT members? you are not active enough to know about their good deeds, but you have a deep understanding about their friends, enough to conclude there is a conflict of interest.

You caught the retribution from my post above. why don't you consider the circumstance? if Lauda has left negative feedback on somebody for selling one account 3 years ago. Lauda should do the same to Blazed. but if Blazed is willing to pay a fine and exonerate himself and if Lauda agrees on it, there is nothing you could do other than paying the same amount for the same wrong doing if you were tagged by Lauda for selling account 3 years ago. if there is any evidence of any wrong doings by DT members which has to have happened on the same day as Lauda leaving negative trust on somebody else for the same wrong doing, provide us with that evidence.

OP is saying that Blazed did something in the past, Yahoo did something in the past and OP is asking Lauda to tag them because she has tagged others for the same reasons. I'm telling @OP, show us a negative trust by Lauda on the same dates and for the same reasons on other members. show me evidence of Blazed selling an account yesterday and a negative trust by Lauda on another member for selling an account yesterday. if there is such evidence and you couldn't get justice in this community would be an obvious abuse by the ones in power.


I didn't say that community should deem that amount to be sufficient or any amount. I said what if. I sold an account 3 years ago but just now Lauda tagged me for that. Lauda should tag Blazed too. that never happened.


Wrong. if Blazed is doing something as selling accounts today, Lauda should tag him. do we have any evidence to prove that to be true? saying that Blazed has done so many good things for this community, let him sell accounts today and look the other way, that is what you are saying. or you are saying that Lauda should be the only judge to decide if somebody is posting garbage or not? isn't that the reason to have merit system, to stop garbage posters slowly and don't tag them just for posting garbage?


If you change the timing of both actions to be on the same day, it is not a fallacy.

Default trust members should not tag normal members for merit related cases, people were posting garbage and DT members tagged them, theymos made merit system and said that he had to speed up the process because he didn't want DT members tagging garbage posters. misusing merits is the same as posting garbage. majority of members will abuse this system because they don't really know what is happening, they only see that their accounts need merits to rank up and since they don't have anything to contribute, they would keep doing what they were doing.

After running out of merit supply, they have nothing else, even if somebody provides merits for them, it would be expensive, we have to find merit sellers after a few more months when only sources have sMerits to distribute. please don't tag people now. what if theymos disables merit requirement to rank up for a month or what would have happened if he'd introduced it one month late?

Let people do what they want with their sMerits, or tag them but don't act surprised if theymos removed you as DT1-2.

This is how it works every where, when you have done something against the rules (DT2 made up rules) you would pay a ^[1]fine.
There is no written law to determine the amount here, I'm writing them now and it could be agreed upon by consensus voting. if Lauda has tagged any member of this forum for selling an account 3 years ago, should Lauda remove their tags if they agree to compensate for their wrong doings according to Lauda? if Blazed agrees to pay $200 and Lauda accepts that to be enough for community's retribution. anybody with negative trust for selling an account 3 years ago, has to pay $200. or any amount determined by Lauda and it should be paid to the forum.
I don't know about any recent account selling, Blazed has only confessed about the one for 3 years ago. you want Lauda to give Blazed negative trust for something he did 3 years ago or you want Blazed gone? this is the solution.

---

^[1]


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine_(penalty)


And we should find alia (the real young girl on camera) for you as a bonus for your valuable inputs. you don't get to decide here, there is a conflict of interest, you would benefit from the result of your solution. should I call the forum's fella to explain this to you?

~B ~LM for beggar and the forum's law maker.

What if Blazed donates $200 to the forum to get no negative trust? then everybody who has ever received negative trust for account selling should do the same. if Blazed donates $1000 to the forum. nobody would do the same. they don't sell accounts for such amounts.