I believe Argentina should have an easy win tonight, and thus I am betting on Argentina -1 @ 2.51.
Colombia won against Brazil, why not against Argentina too? I prefer under 2 at 2.25 or Colombia +0.5 at 2.15 Agree with you bet, but not about colombia can won of argentina. Im confidence this match score 0-0 or 1-1 Damn it. Both of you are right and my bet loses lol. I am so surprised to see it ended as 0-0 after 90 minutes. |
|
|
|
Maaan you played just 69 hands and call it unfair and to stay away, you never played even 1% of what you needed to make the claim of unfairness. Your test was flawed as you never got a proper average just a few bad hands. Come back with them unfair and cheat claims after playing 2000+ hands not 69  Was the site you played provably fair? i agree only 69 hands can have too much coincidence to call it already unfair, you should have played at least 1000 Nope he shouldn't try to play on that site, not even 1 hand, since he knows it is not provably fair and there are multiple provably fair BJ sites out there for him to choose from. |
|
|
|
|
I believe Argentina should have an easy win tonight, and thus I am betting on Argentina -1 @ 2.51.
|
|
|
|
^ Your work is impressive. Work done. Your quote above is EXACTLY why I do what I do. Because almost no one actually LOOKS at the provably fair tab, and actually tries to understand it.
Sadly, the term "almost" could be removed there. I mean, 999dice started in Dec 2013 but no one check how their so-called provably fair system works in details, until you did that in Feb 2015. |
|
|
|
*Best faucet = dadice's. I got a 7.2k faucet there just for win.
How much have you wagered in total, and how much time have you spent on it to get to your current level? |
|
|
|
The concept is very innovative and cool, and the site looks nice. But OP need to address the concern raised by turtlehurricane, to make the game fair. i would like to know where the data source of the site is getting the weather data and all  however this is a unique and fresh concept and hopefully it catches on as im enjoying it i can see out the window to make sure its provably fair lol The site is using https://openweathermap.org. |
|
|
|
I've had a sneaky little 0.1 bitcoin bet on Uruguay to win Copa America, it was too tempting at 14x odds.
Suarez & Cavani are lethal strikers & even though the rest of their team sometimes isn't always the best Suarez & Cavani can win a match on their own.
I'm not 100% expecting Uruguay to win but the odds were tempting & I feel they have a great chance.
Suarez was total shit during the world cup last year. I think Suarez is still suspended for the national team,i think he cant play couple of games,because of the biting on the world cup thats why he didnt play against paragvay i think Yup he has been banned for 9 international matches for the bite, and thus he has to miss not just the first match but the whole 2015 Copa America. As you can see on http://www.ca2015.com/en/team/URU/Uruguay, he is not in the team squad. What the hell? Does this guy think he is Mike Tyson or something? Now I have to find the video on youtube! So from what I read here Uraguay seems to be the underdog with a good chance to win? It might be a fun way to place a bet, but I don't know anything about soccer so it would be exciting to not know who the teams are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4aYvyEjX4U wow and he did it multiple times? What an idiot. Uraguay does look like a good team though! He has been caught 3 times already. First time when he was playing for Ajax in 2010, second time when he was playing for Liverpool in 2013 and third time when he was playing for Uruguay in 2014 World Cup. You can watch all 3 in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uy31pdfntUw. |
|
|
|
|
Dennis7777
Thanks for the promo
|
|
|
|
my friend who is a successful (profitable) gambler has said it does work
It does work, if you have good luck. And if you have good luck, all kinds of betting strategy should work for you no matter how you bet. TL;DR: Stop looking for a strategy in a luck only game. |
|
|
|
|
Dennis7777
Thanks for the promo
|
|
|
|
Hello Admin!
I'm waiting already more than 34h for a manual withdrawal.
Could you please check?
Greets,
galaxy
Just curious, is your withdrawal considerably big or are all withdrawals processed manually now? |
|
|
|
I see here a lot of mistakes, but they quickly corrected them, I'll try it.
Sorry about that. Issues will be corrected quicker from now on. Call me paranoid if you want, but can SatoshiDICE_PR confirm that this person is actually from SD but not an impersonator putting "Sysadmin satoshidice.com" maliciously in his sig space? |
|
|
|
|
OP do you have any plan to make the game provably fair? And what is the house edge % of your slot?
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis7777
Thanks for the promo
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis7777
Thanks for the promo
|
|
|
|
We're rapidly approaching the 100,000 BTC wagered mark (probably only a month off), anyone have some good ideas how we should celebrate this milestone?
Sorry for a dumb question, where can we see the site total wagered? you can see the status here https://www.bustabit.com/statsThanks. That could get expensive quickly, not sure I could afford that for long  But I like the idea very much. I could perhaps do something like 10,000 bits per game given out for two or three hundred games. What would you prefer, if it was given out weighted by the amount bet? (e.g. If someone bets .9 BTC and someone else bets .1 BTC, the larger gambler gets 9000 free bits, and the smaller gambler 1000 free bits). Or would you prefer it more of a lottery, where each bit you bet gives you 1 ticket? (So the person who bets .9 BTC would have a 90% chance of winning, and the smaller gambler a 10%) Or something else? The lottery style isnt a good system, the reward should be given to those who wagered higher . So the first is better because if someone risk a higher stake than the other, he deserve to win more than the others but the problem will be what if several people bet the maximum amount 1 btc and cash out at 1.01 x? In the lottery style version, the number of tickets you get depends on the number of bits you wagered in that round. So those players wagering more will have a higher chance to win the 10000 bits in that round. |
|
|
|
Anytime at any game starts, every player who played in it will receive 100,000 BITS divided by total players who played , that can be a cool celebration.
That could get expensive quickly, not sure I could afford that for long But I like the idea very much. I could perhaps do something like 10,000 bits per game given out for two or three hundred games. What would you prefer, if it was given out weighted by the amount bet? (e.g. If someone bets .9 BTC and someone else bets .1 BTC, the larger gambler gets 9000 free bits, and the smaller gambler 1000 free bits). Or would you prefer it more of a lottery, where each bit you bet gives you 1 ticket? (So the person who bets .9 BTC would have a 90% chance of winning, and the smaller gambler a 10%) Or something else? The lottery-style bonus sounds more attractive to me. We're rapidly approaching the 100,000 BTC wagered mark (probably only a month off), anyone have some good ideas how we should celebrate this milestone?
Sorry for a dumb question, where can we see the site total wagered? |
|
|
|
Even with negative house edge is difficult to make profit,because you have to know to have a strategy
moneypot has a way to have negative edge,but even that way,it is really difficult to make profit
No, its not hard, just bet flat bets and you will eventually start making profit forever depending on how big the negative house edge is, will happen sooner or later More precisely, the bet size should be determined using Kelly formula (FYI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_criterion), and you should be making a easy profit with very very small risk. |
|
|
|
|
My personal list: Primedice, Safedice, Dadice (bitcoin dice), Just-dice (clam dice), Nitrogensports (sports).
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
