Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 12:33:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
341  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Ask English related questions on: July 07, 2018, 01:42:38 PM
Oh come on guys, why so much hate on someone who's willing to help? let him be.

The forum is flooded by non-english speakers who are trying hard to post in english and utterly fails to relay what they have on mind. I think this would be great for the members as well as the forum.

PS: Hope you can help members who are willing to learn! Godbless!
My initial thought is also tally with yours. "tarball" atleast trying to help other members by sharing his/her knowledge regarding English language. So what is the problem guys? We should encourage this kind of practices. He/she not started a thread saying "how to get merits? How to add vedios?, What is activity count?" Which is identified as the trend of newcomers nowadays( actually those type of threads we can called as redundend threads since those questions answered several times in the forum). So I'm looking forward this thread and hope you will succeed.

BTW check this blog started by "Jetcash" and it helps me lot.
Link>>>http://fittotalk.com/english-talk/index.php
342  Other / Meta / Re: Application For Merit Source [Philippines Local Board] on: July 07, 2018, 11:18:39 AM
@OP ~ I think he is pertaining to this pic ( http://imgur.com/pf65Qjn). Honestly, I'm also bothered by this.
Actually you didn't see the whole picture and it's not 3 sMerits but 6 sMerits.



Quote
I think this is not good practice for spend your smerit and it will prevent you from become merit source.
I'm also a Filipino, but no offense, I agree with Coolcryptovator this time because I see his point.

Regarding giveaway, can you pointed me where he announced he will send merit for support him ?  I can't find his post. But I saw on his thread he was given some merit for reply and that was not big. I think it's not much problem. Even it's look not fine.  But I think it will not prevent him to become merit source if his other condition is fine.
Actually Coolcryptovator defended crwth's merit distribution rather pointing out what he has been done with or without his intentions. Check above reply from Coolcryptovator in my thread.

Quote
For me there's nothing wrong for giving merits to someone who agreed on your opinion or someone who complemented you but since you are now applying to become a merit source then be ready for the changes (if ever you will be accepted).
Agreed and that's what I have been highlighting in my thread ( later Coolcryptovator too) . Because if you are requesting for become a Merit source, you should behave as a role model for other merit abusers.

Quote
As a future merit source, much better if you will now practice better judgement and being more careful in weighing of post quality. Sir don't get me wrong, actually I understand that you only want to show appreciation for those good respondents
I think "crwth" imotionally attached that perticular thread due to his great eager to become a Merit source. That type of judgements when taking decisions should be wiped off from his behaviors, If he becomes a Merit source. Because sometimes imotions and eagerness clouded our judgements.

Quote
mods or other members of this forum (especailly outside our local board) might have a bad impression to you,
I don't get that "especially outside our local board" Is that means, whatever happens inside the local board is fair and others won't questioning about the distribution of Merits. Please can you enlighten me.

Quote
Just a reminder, a good merit source always based on the construction and essence of others' post not mainly depends on whether it agrees on his own perspective or not. Smiley
Agreed with both hands.

Quote
I admire you because you stepped up in order to give recognition for those quality posters in our local board and to give inspiration for others <...>
I know "crwth" can do it. Always give recognition only to the quality posters, by that way we can make this forum such a wonderful place to learners but not for spammers.
343  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Are bitcointalk username can be change ? on: July 07, 2018, 02:39:49 AM
You can register with the new name that you're hoping to use (but it can't be a name that already used) . Creating "alt" account is allowed according to the forum moderation policy.

Or just become a donetor Cheesy

<...>

Q: I want to change my forum username. What should I do?
A: You can either donate 50 BTC to become a VIP or PM theymos asking to change your username (although he rarely accepts such requests nowadays).

<...>
344  Other / Meta / Re: language difficulties on: July 06, 2018, 06:16:26 PM
I think you should focus on improving your English first.

I think the user is asking if this is allowed to post the same in different local boards, for the link he provided is from a user posting in English in a Japanese one.
But it is a guess,
If your wild guess is right I think bigmaster23 has a point which we should discussed.


<•••snip•••>

9. Discussions in the main boards must be in english. All other language discussions should be posted in the appropriate Local board.

<•••snip•••>

So if main boards are only allowed to post in English, then posters in all other languages are considered as secondary which is not allowed.

In vise versa why we are allowing English posts in local boards where it should considered as one of secondory language to that perticular board. I think we should not maintained double standards for English language and we can't considered English is superior than any other.
345  Other / Meta / Re: url removed by t he board on: July 06, 2018, 05:45:17 PM
This topic has been already discussed several times in the Beginners and Help section. So you better use  "search" function before starting a separate thread for questions already answered. I think you should move your topic to the Beginners and Help section rather cloging the Meta.

Btw I think this will help you Smiley

Url and E-mail Linking

Code:
[URL]http://www.example.com[/URL]
[URL=http://www.example.com]click here for more details[/URL]
[EMAIL=youremail@gmail.com]Email me[/EMAIL]
[EMAIL=youremail@yahoo.com]Contact me[/EMAIL]
http://www.example.com
click here for more details
Email me
Contact me

346  Other / Beginners & Help / 'Hash function' explained simply for Beginners ( + Hash calculator) on: July 06, 2018, 04:09:44 PM

Hash


Every block in a block chain has a hash. It's like a finger print. We can say cryptographic hash is like a signature for a text or data file. It identify the block and all it's content and it's always unique just as like fingerprint. Once a block is created it's hash is calculated. Changing something(data) inside the block will cause hash to change, in other other words we can say hashes are very useful when you want to detect changes in the block.


Hashing function


I think it's the most important mathematical operation used in Bitcoin network. It needs for proof of work. We can say it's some kind of mathematical transformation of data. We can select some inputs and transform those inputs into a 64 characters long number. In fact some of them are letters and numerical digits in hexadecimal[1]. We can input limitless inputs through this mathematical system and can get a output number ( 64 characters long). If we even change small thing, just imagine changing one lowercase in to upper case in a single character in a input, it will ultimately change the whole output number completely. So no one can predict the output from what the given in input.


SHA-256


SHA(Secure Hash Algorithm) is one of a cryptographic hash functions which known as one of the strongest hash functions available. SHA-256 algorithm generates an almost unique, fixed size 256 bit hash. We can call hash as one way function so it cannot be decrypted back. Therefore it's more suitable for password validation, anti-tamper, digital signatures.


SHA-256 Calculator


This is the link >>> "+++hash calculator+++".

Just type whatever you like. So I will type my Bitcointalk username as "vphasitha01" and you can see the resulting hash at the bottom.


If I change one lowercase character ( say "v") into a uppercase character (say"V"), the resulting hash changes completely and just has no resemblance to what happens before.


So let's put some Bitcoin transactions as follows,

Code:
James ->5btc for Alex
Hari ->0.5 btc for Devon
Clair ->1.256 btc Jack

and below that we can input some random number, nonsense number. In fact in Bitcoin network we called as "nonce".

Then we change this number with objective to get the output hash starting with zero. So keep changing until we get the starting number as zero. So using this "nonce" we can able to get hash which stats from zero.


This is actually what Bitcoin miners are doing. They are trying to take their transactions and tries to find the right "nonce". So with those transactions they gets the hash which starts with zeros. In Bitcoin case it's more than one zero it's something like 19 zeros as time of writing. So it will take very long time to even for few zeros. 19 zeros? You will never would be able to do it by your own. There are special hardwares to do this process quickly called as "ASICs" (Application Specific Integrated Circuit chips).

Bitcoin network is calibrated to only miner within the span of ten minutes will be able to find the right hashes with 19 zeros. That gives them the ability to announce their transactions with reference to the Bitcoin network. They actually packaged them into a block with the "nonce" and sent it out to across the network. All the other miners verify for himself. So transaction is valid and has a appropriate hash and add up that block to the chain of blocks to the block chain and that's how blocks grows in the network. This is known as " Proof of Work" ,they proving that doing some work to create a block which leads to consensus.



[1] - It uses sixteen distinct symbols,most often the symbols 0-9 to represent the values zero to nine, and A-F to represent values ten to fifteen.
Link 1>>>https://www.xorbin.com/tools/sha256-hash-calculator
Link 2>>>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecimal
347  Other / Meta / Re: Please, mods, stop this on: July 04, 2018, 06:43:16 PM
I have already asked the same question from the admins, regarding this annoying posts by only saying " how I get banned, How to recover my account....bla bla." So here's the summery what I have got from other senior members.

By considering all the facts my initial impression about new subforum has been changed to two best possible methods suggested by Welsh and LTU_btc as follows,(Thanks for your practical solutions)

- Showing the reasons of banned when someone login into a banned account
- Showing massage to contact Theymos/Cyrus when someone gets banned

So I'm hoping someone having powers will see this thread and take actions someday. Lets together make Meta section clog free(at least less) Smiley

Link>>>Subforum for account ban request

- Is locking them enough? I truly believe those ones need to be trashed, to be honest.
Mods sometimes not locking the one actually needed to be locked and you know I also have unsolved mystery regarding locking of some threads, including mine. I think you know what I meaned.

Quote
- Do we actually need a dedicated mod in here?
Hell yeah we actually need dedicated mod (my suggestions are "Welsh" or "LoiceV")
348  Other / Meta / Re: Application For Merit Source [Philippines Local Board] on: July 04, 2018, 04:39:29 PM
Quote from: Coolcryptovator  link=topic=4588684.msg41482464#msg41482464 date=1530692467
Hello crwth,
Can you please explain me why you are merited some of reply on your thread ? Because of they support you ?
Did you read the thread about Merit & new rank requirements

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.

If you become merit source how we expect you will fairly distribute merit after become merit source ?

I expect appropriate  explanation from you. I think this is not good practice for spend your smerit and it will prevent you from become merit source.
I think you should not have double standards for different threads when discussions are going on about the same issue. You throw me the exact opposite questions and criticising my post in my thread regarding crwth's Merit distribution trend and I already answered there.

In the other hand I should respect crwth has cleared some doubts by replying to my thread(though some clouds are still there).
349  Other / Archival / Re: profile url on: July 04, 2018, 03:05:37 PM
This is not a "testing board" and you better get out here if you found your profile link without spaming the Bigginers and Help section. You better read before posting.  
350  Other / Meta / Re: Merit source applications of senior members.... on: July 04, 2018, 01:46:02 PM
I don’t merit just because they say they support me, I do it because their replies are good.
Yeah everything is comparative. So we can say they are good if we compare with them posts in ANN threads or shitposters or oneliners posts saying "good project, go to the moon..etc" . I feeled like they are not added any value to the conversation.

Quote
It’s one, not twenty merit. If you think a post adds value, then go for it, merit.
It's not about the "number" mate, it's about the principle of merit distribution.

do you really want to be a merit source ?
it's a brave friend. being a merit source not only gives merit to constructive and innovative posts but also gives post examples that are useful for forum members.
btw I really support you fully friends. you dare. Good luck
For that one, i don’t know. Probably he or she is trying to post well but doesn’t know English very much.
[/u]"doesn't know English very much" you still giving away your Merit, do you think that will added value to the international forum like bitcointalk and does it encourage people to learn English?( I'm not saying I'm good at English, I'm also learning since it's not my native language) Lastly do you believed anyother Merit source will Merit this kind of posts? If "Jetcash" sees these kind of replies he surely ignore that member.[1]

However at the end of the day it's your Merit. You have full right to spend those since those Merits were earned by your reputation and giving good contribution to the forum. I have a respect for that Smiley

Quote
Yeah, I was surprised by this thread and I’m not implying anything when I gave merit to the messages/vouches.  
May be your intentions are true and honest, but the problem is this kind of incentives will motivate others (members who are hoping to become merit sources) to do the same in future which I believed as a disaster.



[1]- Edited and I think I owe you an apology since the part of my post was incorrect which was now strucked through ( I correct my mistake )
351  Other / Meta / Re: Merit source applications of senior members.... on: July 04, 2018, 10:27:45 AM
I know the responsibilities and the distribution of the merit should be equal.
Thats great and happy to heard out the story from your side. Hope you understand that I'm highlighting only one perticular issue regarding the distribution of Merits in your own thread, which created for the Merit source application.

Quote
I'm not biased in the posts that I have given merit, I gave them because I believe that there is.
There is what? "Just saying I agreed..., Gud luck mate..., I support you..."

Quote
I collected ten posts that are under merited and why shouldn't I give the posts that I applied with to not be given? I think the posts that I have included are definitely deserving for their posts.
Absolutely yes and give them Merits. I also believed they are under merited and deserved more.
352  Other / Meta / Re: Merit source applications of senior members.... on: July 04, 2018, 09:01:01 AM
When I had my Merit source application open, I made it a point to never Merit any of the posts in that thread.
Actually I think that's how it should be ethically and technically.

I thought that we can merit a post if they find that your post is useful and sometimes a hilarious one.
Yes we can unless that thread created for the "Application for Merit source" . That's how I sees that. Sometimes I can be wrong.

Quote
I think its just a Filipino culture to show some kind of appreciation Smiley
I think you can give your appreciation to the Merit source applicant by giving few Merits for his thread, but the best appreciation can do by the Merit source applicant to the community who supports his application is not giving any sMerits for the replies of his thread. In that way he/she can enlighten the forum members that he knows about the value of Merits and how it should spend where actually deserved.
353  Other / Meta / Re: Merit source applications of senior members.... on: July 04, 2018, 08:41:31 AM
He can apply. I think also you can apply if you are potential
 and established  member around forum.
I have no intention to disagree with his merit source application or his contribution to the forum
I didn't say anywhare in my post that he couldn't apply. I think you just go through my post but not read it.

Quote
Regarding local board theymos is more eager about local board to assign merit source.
Agreed with both hands Smiley

Quote
So there is no problem for apply.
Again the same question Grin. I don't understand who is here saying "there is a problem with his application" are you? Because I don't see any problem for applying. So I think you are just beat around the bush. Try to see the point which I am highlighting.

Quote
About merit distribution admin also describe well,

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.
How do you miss this "not just posts that you agree with."

Quote
Regarding giveaway, can you pointed me where he announced he will send merit for support him ?  I can't find his post.
He didn't announce it in his thread. But "Actions speaks louder than words"

Quote
But I saw on his thread he was given some merit for reply and that was not big. I think it's not much problem.
It's called "conflict of interest" and I believed that is a big problem at least when you're requesting for become Merit source.
354  Other / Meta / Merit source applications of senior members.... on: July 04, 2018, 07:11:51 AM
I recently seen that crwth started a threadApplication For Merit Source [Philippines Local Board]. In that thread he is giving away his sMerits for the posts that saying just appreciation of his works. I have no intention to disagree with his merit source application or his contribution to the forum as a senior member. But the point I want to highlight is if any member(specially who willing to become merit source) giving away his/her sMerits for the posts that saying  "I am a supporter of your work, I agreed with your application...." that would be a big issue when we consider the future of Merit distribution. At least it is not ethical and believed it as a Merit abuse.



I think when someone want to be a Merit source,he/she should maintained thier high standard when it comes to the distribution of merit, Merit sources are shouldn't biased, The most importantly he/she should only give Merits which actually deserved. This is only my way of looking at a Merit source. I am more than happy to know what other members thinking about this.
355  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Is it easier to earn Merit without a signature? on: July 04, 2018, 03:21:26 AM
I appreciate the helpful comment. I saw a post awhile ago about someone talking about how participating in a signature bounty lowers the chances of earning merit because it shows that the user wants to do bounties, rather than providing value to the forum or something like that.

I don't give merits to members of signature campaigns for exactly that reason. I know that there are at least a few other people that also do not give merits to members of signature campaigns, but I don't know how much of a difference it makes overall.
Honestly I didn't agree with you. Wether some member doing signature campaigns or not should be the base for giving Merits. I think sometimes person who didn't do bounties does not mean that member contributes to the forum greater ways. May be that member is shitposting more than the member who do the signature campaigns.

I think some members looking at their reputation in the forum ( I also think it matters ) before giving away their sMerits. Though Bitcointalk is not a money making place, I don't think getting some passive income while contributing to the forum is not a big issue. I don't need to do any signature campaigns to earn few bucks since I covered my income sources. But sometimes we didn't know about other members story from their point of view.

I don't encourage to do Bounties or signature campaigns since most of the occasions it ends up creating spammers/shitposters. That's how typical behavior of humans when it comes to the money. Finally I want to quote what our great "Theymos" said about Merits. However at the end of the day, it's up to the members how they should spend their hard earned Merits since it's theirs not the people who commentating( including me) about how they should spend Smiley

While we will not be directly moderating this, I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.
356  Other / Meta / Re: Insert video in the thread? on: July 03, 2018, 09:07:46 AM
I want to ask can I insert youtube video in the thread? If yes, how to do it?
You can do it without uploading images to the any proxy by following method Smiley hope you get the answers.

How to embed youtube video in post
357  Other / Meta / Re: Should ANN and services threads be excluded from the merit system ? on: July 03, 2018, 08:28:18 AM
I've stated several times that I believe that merits should not be awarded for posts in the ANN sections, In fact I believe that all TwitBook and bounty posting should not be awarded with any merit, and should not be counted for activity.

I have already suggested that admins should not counted the posts in ANN threads as activity.

I think this is a very serious issue that is bothering almost everyone on this forum.
This is very serious issue only for Bounty Hunters and Spam Masters not for members who actually knows the value of Bitcointalk

Quote
the earlier the forum becomes easy place to learn.
"the earlier the forum becomes easy place to learn spam, gets rank up and earning money without contribute to the forum"

I don't agree with the OP regarding the post count thing, if we remove the merit requirements for ranking up will ultimately clogged the forum by shitposters with their bots and bounty reports. So they pumps the posts and rank up quickly to earn money. Earning money through bitcointalk is not the problem,but when it becomes the sole purpose without contribution or sharing anything to the forum is the problem.

I would like to share my thoughts regarding the post count thing. If someone think number of posts proportional to the learning potential, believe me it's not. If anyone really wants to learn, the best think I can say is Read Before Ask. I have an another suggestion, if we could make an amendment to the activity thing by introducing new rule that posts which are posting on the ANN threads doesn't count as activity or few number(mods can decide) of posts taken as one activity, there will be decrease of new alt creation which creates only for Bounties and ultimately less spam in the forum. So what you guys are thinking?
358  Other / Meta / Re: Wall of fame / shame. Shit posts so bad that they are actually funny on: July 02, 2018, 06:22:39 PM
I have found few members who are posting replies like they are wake up in a coma, for a thread actually posted in 2012 Cheesy.

link>>>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99920.0

How nice Uzivaj Estates Avatar. I think he is the only newbie holds an Avatar.( Don't know how he got it even earlier days it requires to become full member to get an Avatar.
359  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: One (1) Merit point to Rank-up Service, READ THE RULES BEFORE YOU APPLY!! on: July 02, 2018, 04:30:50 PM
We need more merit bounties. Thanks for your work.
Your username and post history are as alike as two peas in a pod. Grin. btw this is not a merit bounty thread and this is only a innovative thread which helps by it all means to rank up  members who actually deserved. So I thing you better move Bounty sections actually where you're, without cloging the thread.
360  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: The Merkle and the Nonce on: July 02, 2018, 04:11:22 PM
Before I explaining the "Merkle tree" or Merkle root" it is better to explaining what is "hash".Every block in a block chain has a hash. It's like a finger print. It identify the block and all it's content and it's always unique just as like fingerprint. Once a block is created it's hash is calculated. Changing something(data) inside the block will cause hash to change, in other other words we can say hashes are very useful when you want to detect changes in the block

So let's now move to the "Merkle tree" and Merkle root". Say we have 1600 transactions in a block( normally we can get avarage[1] as around 1600 transaction per block, however it's depend on the size of the transactions). First we put each transaction through a hash function[2] to get a transaction hash or transaction ID which is used itself to identify a transaction.

Then we put them all into pairs and perform a hash of that pair of hashes. We do put up them again and hash them again and keep doing this until all of the transactions in a block meets at a single hash. This single hash called as " Merkle root" and the cascade network called as " Markle tree".

That produced Markle root put in to a block header which is the part of a Bitcoin block that gets hash in process of mining. Having a Markle root in the block header, basically makes transactions temper proof. If you want to change value of it that would be reflected in the hash of that transaction or transaction ID. That change would cascade up the Markle tree to the Markle root, ultimately changing the value of Markle root. In thus in validating the block, everybody would be able to see that your transaction is not valid. It's not in a valid block since you're tempered with some how.

So if you're want to verify a perticular transaction, you only need to look at the branches that the transaction on the Markle tree. You don't need to look at the entire Markle tree just only the branches.

I think I have explained what i understood about "Markle tree" and "Markle root".



[1]-Link>>>https://www.blockchain.com/charts/n-transactions-per-block
[2]-Link>>>https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptographic_hash_function
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!