Thats the hackers IP, not his , unless you meant it in the other way.

Ah, just saw his last paragraph. No idea why is the op still wasting his time here then, when he should be out there enjoying the beach.
Seems all his post history has been hate towards bitcoin.

The post from theymos says the last used IP, and the registration IP. So I don't think any IP other than those 2 were leaked.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1067985.msg11445725#msg11445725

The article doesn't say anything about banning bitcoin. I believe if the same case was involved with fiat, then the punishment would still be the same . If he is found guilty for the majority of 7 counts , then he is definitely going in for a long time.

It all depends on adoption. Seems that the adoption is increasing amongst individual business owners but its still slow for large business owners specially those in-store businesses, that probably do not see the benefit of adding bitcoin as a payment option. It would be hard to put a time line of when it might happen, but once a couple of big store chains like Walmart and Mcdonalds start accepting it, it will spread like a domino effect.

I did expect bitcoin to be a savior for professional players as well, but seems not a lot of people have moved their poker games on bitcoin sites. There was definitely a lot of traffic post Pokerstars banning US players, but seems an year or 2 later, the interest has died out.
I still wonder where they head for all the action post black friday.

I don't do Horse betting, and wouldn't know . I have only seen it on Directbet for bitcoins myself. I guess you can always convert your funds to Neteller and try your luck on one of the famous gambling sites like Bet365.

Jetwin does not have Horse betting on their site. And you can actually just browse the games without having to create an account.
sports.jetwin.ps

I have heard these ransom are really spreading all over the world, and happening every day. Happens more to small businesses who are likely to pay the 100-1000$ ranson.


People would probably fear that he might sell his other coins. Unlike a corporate executive, we know nothing about satoshi.

For attracting new people, what works out is getting people to try out your casino, and if they get hooked , they will likely stay. So some giveaways or free bonuses on site usually works well in that way.

Its not completely anonymous, but yes it can definitely be exploited in some manner.


But how would someone who does not know of the service know that he is being called using this site or service ?  To him it will just be another number that he is getting a call from.

What Directbet does isn't exactly called Negotiating. What happens is that the gambler selects the odds he wants to bet on, now once the odds from the odd provider go above these odds, only then the bet gets confirmed at those odds. There is no negotiation whatsoever.

Even though its hosted on the Google App Engine, I assume its not their service that you are using for calling. So if I was to make an anonymous call to someone, will someone be able to get to you, and then to me through the number and the IP ?
Not that I plan on doing something wrong, just would like to know.

Actually there are ways which people can use to avoid Bots in play. Captchas are one way that might be done after every few turns, but it does get really annoying then.

Would be nice to get an estimate on how much the rates are going to be before placing the call. International calling is definitely much more expensive than other services around. Do you also save IP's of the person who makes the call using your service ?

Nice to have 2 new services popping up recently. Seems Bitcoin Dial rather just launched today.
They also seem to be much expensive. XcoinCall is still fine with the rates.

Seems the OP hasn't been online since March, perhaps Micon can just request an admin to lock the thread and continue all discussion on the new SWC thread.

Even though there is no longest streak, getting over 40 losses in a row at 50% is Very much impossible of sorts.
The max number of losses I have heard is around 32. Now consider the number of rolls happening on All the sites, must be Billions, and none of them have seen or atleast reported losses of more than 35 ever happening at 50%.

No its not always easy to spot colluders.   I guess the playing style can point out towards it, but as a player sitting on the site, it is very hard to point to a 100% colluder.

I suppose its because there are not a lot of secure options in other countries to use as a web wallet . Also I haven't ever used the wallet, but I assume it does not clearly state that other country residents are not allowed to use it(but I might be wrong with this) .