My philosophy is when you convert fiat to Bitcoin its already started to work for you.
Yes, which means when we buy Bitcoin, it is the first step to make Bitcoin work for us. Then, the next step is to think about how to manage Bitcoin to work effectively and properly for us. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Look it as a long term way to protect your money and just HODL.
It is not the way to protect money, but the way to multiple money. No one wants to hold Bitcoin for a long time without expecting profits, holding Bitcoin for a long time is our way to gain more money. If we only want to protect our money, we don't need to buy and hold Bitcoin, just store money in the banks.
|
|
|
Investing in new projects often brings high returns, but the accompanying risks are not small. Do in-depth research and be ready to take any risks with your decision.
According to my experience, it is quite rare to get high profits from a new project. Most of them ended with losses or just get low profits because many new projects dump their token values once the token is listed on an exchange. People sell their tokens in a hurry when they know it is listed on an exchange, while the team of the new projects cannot do anything to improve the price increase again. I think you should only invest a small amount and should not put too much faith in projects like this. Because they will most likely disappear soon after.
Yes. For a new project with weak fundamental, it is better to use small money only. We cannot have a big expectation for the massive increase of its token, also don't hope it will survive a long time. Because in many cases, after several pumps, the token constantly drops its price and then delisted on the exchange.
|
|
|
According to Daily Mail, Manchester City have already prepared a deal for Dortmund's superb striker Erling Haaland. He is already affordable for Manchester City and some other rich clubs now. I don't think that Manchester City will reach an agreement with him too easy. Because if Real Madrid and Bayern Munich also intervene, it would make things more difficult for Manchester City.
There is too much news or issues related to Haaland, can't really trust the media right now. I think it is only a rumor if City is leading the competition to sign Haaland. Yesterday, Haaland was linked with Barcelona, media stated he looks like to have a deal with Barcelona. But till today, there is no official statement from Haaland or from Dortmund management. So, we can conclude if the media just wants to attract us for reading their news. I agree with you if it won't be so easy to sign Haaland since Real Madrid and Bayern also want this player.
|
|
|
I'm sure the $30,000 you have in september 2021 has grown many times over.
Who knows? We only can guess it, but we don't know what happens with his investment. His money can multiply if he is smart to choose the time to buy and sell, but also can be decreased if he bought coins at the wrong time. I would like to suggest if investing in 1 coin and using that amount of money is very risky, it is better to divide it into 2 or 3 coins.
No problem to invest in 1 coin, why not? There are many people who invest in Bitcoin only because of doubt about altcoins future. This way isn't wrong, as long as we know the realistic target for our investment, investing in a single coin is okay. But make sure to choose a reputable or trusted coin, so it can be hold for a long time.
|
|
|
There have been a whale movement on coinbase the US base exchange, if this gets confirmed it becomes one of the biggest Bitcoin purchase in 2022, a total of 30k Bitcoin was purchased in three transactions as alerted by the Bitcoin market monitor site whale alerts.
You cannot say it is the biggest BTC purchase this year, the article only said if 30k BTC moved from Coinbase to unknown wallets. This means we don't know when the 30k BTC was bought, right? Those BTC may be already bought when BTC dropped below $30k a few months ago. So, don't misunderstand this large number of this BTC movement, don't too hurry to conclude that the 30k BTC was just bought at the current price.
|
|
|
Ten haag Pochettino Conte
These three are the top option and pochettino seems become the second option, -snip-
I only see 2 possible options above (Ten Haag and Pochettino). Conte still has a contract with Tottenham till 2023 and he was just introduced to the public as a new coach of Tottenham in November 2021. So, there is no way for Conte to move to Manchester United in the near future. Whatever the result of Tottenham in this season, I believe Tottenham won't fire him and keep him till 2023. Read here: https://www.tottenhamhotspur.com/news/2021/october/antonio-conte-appointed-new-head-coach/
|
|
|
Cadiz did a good show by monopolizing the ball and building coordinated attacks and shooting towards the goal to achieve the equalizer two minutes before the end of the first half, but Cadiz players were unable to maintain a tie
Agree, dude. Cadiz showed us a good game, they struggle very well today. They dominated the ball possession, 55%. And they made more goal attempts (14 shots), while Atletico only made 6 shots. Unfortunately, Cadiz players cannot execute the opportunity accurately, so they only made 1 goal. If they can have more accurate shots, they should have more than 2 goals and probably win the match. Cadiz must learn how to shots accurately, so they can win the next matches.
|
|
|
Seperti permintaan Perdana Menteri Ukraina Mykhailo Fedorov untuk memblokir seluruh dompet digotal yang dimiliki user dari Rusia bukan faktor utama penurunan. Bahkan dia memberikan peryataan bahwa mereka akan memberikan hadiah bagi orang yang tahu dompet yang di miliki oleh politisi Rusia dan belarusia.
Menurut saya, ini ide konyol dari pemerintah Ukraina. Mereka tidak punya kapasitas untuk mengintervensi exchange crypto, exchange crypto berada di posisi netral (tidak memihak negara manapun). Apalagi ide untuk mencari tau wallet dari politisi Rusia, ini sangat berlebihan. Urgensinya apa dalam hal ini? Politis Rusia bahkan bukan menjadi penyebab perang Rusia vs Ukraina. Mereka punya hak secara individu, mereka sama halnya seperti penduduk Rusia lainnya yang tidak ada kaitan dengan perang. Tapi permintaan ini sepertinya juga telah di tolak binance karena itu bertentangan dengan prinsip crypto. Selain itu sepertinya Rusia adalah pasar Utama dari Binance. Bahkan kalau saya tidak salah pengunan pertukaran rubel Rusia dan hryvnia Ukraina terhadap bitcoin telah mengalami peningkatan. Tentu kabar ini bisa menjadi angin segar untuk crypto.
Syukurlah kalau sudah ditolak Binance. Karena ini akan menjadi bumerang di kemudian hari jika Binance menerima permintaan tersebut. Pasti ke depan akan ada permintaan serupa jika permintaan ini dikabulkan Binance. Dampaknya bukan hanya ke Binance, exchange lain pasti akan dimintai hal yang sama. Pada akhirnya, exchange crypto tidak lagi netral dan semangat desentralisasi crypto makin pudar karena bisa diintervensi pihak2 tertentu.
|
|
|
I think Manchester United's statistics in this derby match are very bad...
Exactly. Man United stats was too bad. I'm surprised Man United played like a small team in EPL. Another surprise, Rashford wasn't a starter in this match, he played from the bench. Man United coach prefers to put Fernandes as a central forward in the 1st half. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) apart from only having 5 shots on goal, MU also for more than 90 minutes only had low ball possession statistics.
Man United players only take 30% ball possession, the same as EPL small team usually did. I don't know what's wrong with Man United players, they have Pogba, Fernandes, and Sancho, why these players cannot show their best in controlling the ball. I think they play individually, not as a team. So, that's why Man United is very bad in ball possession.
|
|
|
Bener om, kalau main long term itu memang harus press rasa panik kita, dan kembali sadar apa tujuan kita investasi jangka panjang.
Sebenarnya kalau mainnya long term, kita lebih mudah mengontrol rasa panik karena jelas targetnya bukan dalam waktu dekat. Asal pilih koin yang mapan dan beli di rate yang dirasa aman, tinggal hold saja sampe next bullish. Tidak perlu dicek harga koinnya tiap hari, cek aja update di channel sosmed siapa tau ada yang urgent semisal swap atau pindah chain koinnya. Hold long term itu jauh lebih simple dan lebih safe asal pinter milih koin dan momen beli koinnya.
|
|
|
Tidak ada BM yang bersedia mengkampanyekan situs yang bermasalah, penolakan irfan_pak pada 1xBit membuktikan kalau situs 1xBit memiliki masalah. Bukan hanya irfan_pak saja yang tidak mau ambil resiko dengan tuduhan yang dituju pada 1xBit, BM lain juga melakukan penolakan seperti yang dilakukan irfan_pak, makanya sampai sekarang campaign 1xBit masih dipegang timnya sendiri.
Itu sudah jelas, 1xBit memang punya beberapa masalah terkait laporan dari user mereka atau laporan dari user BTT. Agan tinggal cek aja di trust summary akun-akun mereka, tepatnya di bagian Reference. Contoh: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347222.0. Sudah pasti tidak akan ada BM professional yang berani ambil resiko mengkampanyekan sigcamp 1xBit. Sama halnya dengan Irfan, BM professional lain pun tidak mau mendapatkan Red Trust dari DT forum BTT. Dan juga mereka tidak mau kehilangan kepercayaan dari member-member BTT hanya karena mempromosikan proyek yang jelas-jelas scam.
|
|
|
Big CEXs are killing the original bitcoin spirit by forcing users to pay tax on gains, freezing user's assets, preventing users from using their service depending on their IP and more.
CEXs don't force the users to pay tax, they already inform the users about it on their rules. If the users don't agree about it, the users can choose another type of exchange. Regarding freezing assets, it is only applied for a certain case. Basically, CEX has no intention to freeze their users' assets since it only makes the users be not active in trading on the exchange. Freezing the assets is the ultimate decision for a certain case. And we need to stop using CEX and funding what we are all against.
No, we can't stop using CEX. CEX has a big role to develop crypto industry. We will have difficulties trading crypto coins if we have no CEX.
|
|
|
When the price is close to $30k there will usually be a very large quantity of buying, I'm sure that bitcoin will not drop below $30k again,
Large quantity of buying around $30k isn't the indicator/sign that $30k is the lowest price of this bearish phase. In my opinion, Bitcoin price is very possible to drop more, even it can drop to $20k for sure. We must realize that we are still at the beginning of the bearish phase, Bitcoin price drop to $30k is only the sign of the true bearish season. Since the bearish season can occur from 2022 to 2024, the chance of Bitcoin price to drop lower than $30k should be very possible. I guess the Bitcoin price may drop to $20k in Q3 - Q4 of 2022 or in Q1 - Q2 of 2023.
|
|
|
It is not surprising if Manchester United lose, they face City who have so far been quite difficult to beat,
You are right. It is easy to predict Man United will lose in this match since they play against Man City in Etihad Stadium (Man City home). Moreover, Man City is in a good shape lately, it will be very difficult for Man United to beat them. But, I am surprised with the stats and with the number of goals. Man United only made 5 shots, while Man City can make 24 shots during the match. We know Man City should dominate the match, but Man United performance was too bad in this match. How can Man United players only make 5 shot attempts during the match? ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Anway, they are lucky to score 1 goal from 5 shot attempts.
|
|
|
I don't think Chelsea will want to sell one of their best defenders to a rival like Manchester United despite the money they tend to offer him,except the player will force through a move because of the wages they'll want to pay him.
Yes, Chelsea shouldn't sell a strong defender like Rudiger to a rival in EPL. Chelsea is in 3rd place, while Man United is in 4th place, basically they are competing for a better place in EPL standings. It will be a very poor idea if Chelsea sends their strong defender to Man United. Man United may overtake Chelsea because Chelsea may lose points if they become weaker in the defense line, while Man United becomes stronger by having Rudiger. Even Man United offers big transfer fees, Chelsea mustn't accept their offer/proposal.
|
|
|
Man Utd really need new defenders for next season it because there are possibility some of players such as Phil Jones and Eric Bailly will leaving the team and the latest rumours from this Man Utd reported want Antonio Rudiger from Chelsea and Rudiger could be as the replacement of Harry Maguire
Man United will compete with Real Madrid if they want Rudiger. Considering the big name of Real Madrid, I assume Man United will be difficult to sign Rudiger. No problem if Man United wants to try signing him but I doubt they will be successful. Anyway, Maguire is Man United captain, how can Rudiger replace him? About Phil Jones and Eric Bailly, they are the players who spend their time on the bench. Rudiger will never consider joining Man United if he will be the replacement of those players.
|
|
|
They could first decide to offload some "dead wood" from the team ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) , though I don't think they could fetch a lot of funds. Do you mean selling those old players and unused players on the bench? Those players have too cheap values, Barcelona won't get enough money to pay the transfer fees and salaries of Haaland and Mazraoui. Except Barcelona wants to sell their young talented players like Fati, Frankie De Jong, or Pedri. If they sell these players, maybe they get enough money. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Barcelona has so many strikers right now, and I don't know why they want to even sign more,
Exactly. They actually don't need new strikers. They already have enough strikers, they just need to optimize the potential of those strikers.
|
|
|
long-term holding is only for those who have a stable income so that the assets that are held can remain safe without having to sell.
No, everyone can invest for the long term. You just need to divide your assets if you don't have a stable income. Make a half for a short-term goal, and a half for a long-term holding. So, you don't need to rely on the profits from your long-term asset. If you want fast profits or want fresh money soon, you can sell your short-term coins. Day trading is not suitable for everyone, many do not have much time to analyze the market and even charts.
If someone already decided to be a day trader, he must spend time for analysis the market and reading the charts. Anyway, a day trade is only one of the strategies in trading. If you are busy, you can choose other strategies or other trading types.
|
|
|
|