Also, maybe, he should have stopped at 33 BTC and probably started with a new account  , so as to atleast sell this strategy and make some profit out of people, who would have blindly believed in him. I don't think anyone will buy the strategy, especially after a couple of guys have explained there can never be a winning strategy in a pure-luck game with -EV. Well you never know. People who are new to gambling, think that a martingale is a fail safe method to make money, unless they actually lose to a bad streak. They night believe in it, and might have bought it, but for a lesser amount of course. |
|
|
|
|
I would suggest adding the Hubsan X4, the basic camera model. Also, you can add the CX-10 and the Q4 as someone suggested for a great range of micro quads.
|
|
|
|
. I can get good articles for $5 or so and are good quality and length. Or you can pay for views on the article (Analytics allows you to check this).
Are you sure about this, that they will be of good quality? You contradict yourself here: You won't be getting a good news article if you can only pay $5. If you want someone for cheap, go pay someone with cheap English.
Also, you only have those views, probably because of the twitter promotion you did. Can you provide detailed stats for the entire week visitor count? |
|
|
|
Most of his profits come from the long losing streaks. If he was base betting at 2.821x (from picture posted) and almost doubling his bet size, then after every loss, the next win would get him a big profit. So a win at 1 BTC bet, would give him a profit of around 0.6-0.8 BTC. If he loses that, then the next win at around 2 BTC would give him a profit of around 1.7ish BTC. I guess his bets , when he was at 12 BTC profit, had these long streaks, and that is what got him back. But only 2 more losses, were all that was needed, for his next bet to be 6 BTC and 12 BTC. So unless, he takes those risks again, and get lucky. He will still continue to lose more. Also, maybe, he should have stopped at 33 BTC and probably started with a new account , so as to atleast sell this strategy and make some profit out of people, who would have blindly believed in him. |
|
|
|
Looking to find a poker site to play , any nice introduce ?
A lot depends on what kind of play you like more: are you cashgame player, a MTT player or a sng one? SNG's and MTT's are good on almost all sites, as they have the prizepool equal to the number of people joining them, and the GTD ones are better as if the number of people joining are less, then you get a higher piece of the prize pool on winning. |
|
|
|
It seems that candystripes is a true scammer now
Trust: -6: -1 / +0(0)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution!
IMO he has always been a true scammer. It is just now that he has actually gotten an actual scammer tag aka actual negative trust from someone on default trust Being a scammer is not an opinion, it is a fact. I am not a scammer, I have never sacmmed anyone. Some dude thinks I am Thoughtful, don't know who that is.... To clarify, it has always been my opinion that you were someone who was looking for opportunities to scam and were someone that probably has scammed in the past. I am fairly certain that no one thinks you are thoughtful as the majority of your posts are spam. I would second that, he hasn't shown ethical behavior in the past and himself acts like a 5 year old. He started 3-4 threads against Bad Bear : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873361https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873759https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=873763He also created this site: Crypto-Buzz, did a giveaway, which was in no Way Fair,and got a lot of twitter followers from that, then he posted on selling it. He also created a service discussion, about starting a site: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=842707And asked people if they believe and have trust in him, and would invest in him. He got a negative response, and never posted anything again in that thread. Rather, he just went ahead and started the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=858627And still came across negative feedback. He also goes to signature campaigns, and asks for an extra amount, to join. His posts come to me as he is desperately trying to earn money. Not saying he is a scammer, but I would certainly not doubt anyone claiming him to be. |
|
|
|
When our 30 days are finished, how do we reapply?
I just want to know in advanced.
Thanks.
You will have to apply fresh. Currently, the campaign does not allow users to reserve a spot for reapplying. |
|
|
|
How's the action? How many tables and stakes are running per average?
That depends a lot on different times of the day. But I think you can look this up yourself, without depositing on the site. Just sign in, and go to the play now window. |
|
|
|
can any1 suggest a best sport bet site for me?
The best sports site has to be Nitrogen sports. Been here the longest and never had problems using it. |
|
|
|
Is there any thread with all strategies in one place?
There isn't a strategy that wins more. Its just short term profits. It also depends on what your bankroll is. |
|
|
|
|
Its funny that Dean would suddenly jump in to reply to dooglus's post on the thread just to avoid that negative rep, but wouldn't reply to claims by me , Bay or any of the other members. Instead, like always start talking shit about them, or anyone who might go against him in general.
|
|
|
|
3. finnile demanded the bounty "now" before it was fixed. No bug bounty program would give you a bounty before it's fixed. It doesn't work that way. Since finnile didn't want to follow normal bug bounty procedures, he didn't get paid. His mistake, not Dean's mistake.
I have been on the site, since the dice started. I didn't care if Dean paid me later on. But, I had to request it before, incase any changes were made to the database to cover up for those skipped bets(which at the time, was a UI error, and I had no reason to believe why it couldn't just be missed nonces) Incase, I had asked dicebitco.in for a bounty, and didn't post the video before, they could easily activate a kill switch which would automatically cover up for those missing rolls. They could have refused to any such activity happening, and it would still be running well, and no one would believe any of what I said. I was not even paid a bounty for dicebitco.in, just because, I didn't wait for the site owner to come online, and tell him about the problem. manl refused a payment to me, for the same reason, that I went public with it first. But do you think, it was right for me, to not go public? I am not a computer geek, and wouldn't have any ways of proving any of the problems later. |
|
|
|
I removed his affiliate because he setup a page that warned people not to play at PRC and claimed I was not trustworthy and redirected to a competitors site. He also marked this btctalk account with negative trust. I don't know how anyone can think he should still have affiliate pay for that.
I think you're clearly twisting facts here, he did all that because you said you wouldn't pay him for an unrelated and petty reason. Cause meet effect. I would have thought the Dooglus issue was a good lesson, when you're in the wrong you're better off just admitting it, people will forgive you and everyone can move on. If you keep act like an arrogant brat people will think of you as such. There is nothing new in that. Here is how things started going bad for me on the site: https://i.imgur.com/jtT5ewM.png - Me agreeing to 1 BTC, and asking him to send it now, as errors like these can be covered up in the database incase it was an actual nonce skip. https://i.imgur.com/PntlSko.png - Him, lying in the chat, that I asked for more, when he offered 1 BTC , and he said that was the reason I was not paid. Perhaps, if my trust gave him a red sign, things would have been different. The site now averages 20 players, which was about 40 a month back, and over 60 around 6 weeks back. Its pretty obvious with whats happening. |
|
|
|
If new players are capable of reading English I would have to disagree. I would wipe any affiliate earnings linked to that account. It used to be a link saying don't deposit, and that Dean Nolan will steal your coins. Dean even paid out his affiliates during this time.
If that's what the BitcoinTalk "trust" system is, I can't see why anyone would want any part of it. It's sort of funny in a way that the only legitimate dice site operator who allows crowdsourced bankrolling has negative trust. All the scammers were shilled for by multiple different members here, only for them to conveniently forget about how many people they unintentionally screwed over.
just saying that it is maybe preventing the site from growing  he should work something out with this BAC dude in order to get the trust removed. That would really help the sites reputation (because not everyone will bother to read a long thread just to know if BACs accusations are true) I doubt thats happening now. The trust says "Not going to remove this regardless of payment or not." He did change his original trust rating to neutral before, but doesn't look like he will be doing it again. |
|
|
|
Would he redirect if they did not pay him?
Would you pay me anything at all to redirect any useless domain I paid a few bucks for? He isn't even generating affiliates now, just redirecting because he was allegedly duped out of a few cents. I removed his affiliate because he setup a page that warned people not to play at PRC and claimed I was not trustworthy and redirected to a competitors site. He also marked this btctalk account with negative trust. I don't know how anyone can think he should still have affiliate pay for that. If it's true that Bitdice.me are renting that then: 1)They are wasting their money as PRC will be re-branded soon (when v2 is launched) and no marketing will be done for any PRC domain. 2)It's pretty scummy and doesn't seem like a trustworthy site if they are willing to directly mislead customers like that. Bay also offered it to Stunna and other dice owners who all said no. So Dean agrees to pay BAC his affliate money to get the negative trust removed, then later goes back on his words and cuts his pay again. So "Dean'ish" Dooglus, maybe you should keep checking/withdraw your funds too, you might have a similar message stating, that the 1 btc was now taken back as we don't like you anymore. |
|
|
|
This would be more suitable for ricky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyn61hv_VrkWould he redirect if they did not pay him?
I think BAC used to use the prcdice.com site to generate affliates. However, he seems to be earning more if he lets it redirect to bitdice. |
|
|
|
poor BAC no payment for him. You better sell that site becoz right now doing its nothing for you
I think dean fixed the affliate pay for him and PRCdice.com currently redirects to bitdice. |
|
|
|
I would find it hard to keep track of each server seed if I run an automatic bot. How do I verify each roll in that case?
Yes it's so hard to track server seed with auto-bet, we need to working on some API calls to solve this untrust. Wait... So you guys could potentially observe the betting pattern of players and change the server seed to make them lose? Can't the server modify the result and show a server seed when the user requests for it via the API and gives the user the losing result when calculated? ] No. We use the same server seed until you opt to change it. The client seed is nonced in order to create different rolls. There is no way for PD to show a different server seed without you noticing. I think that post was for Bikinidice, as they change server seed on each roll. |
|
|
|
I would find it hard to keep track of each server seed if I run an automatic bot. How do I verify each roll in that case?
Yes it's so hard to track server seed with auto-bet, we need to working on some API calls to solve this untrust. Wait... So you guys could potentially observe the betting pattern of players and change the server seed to make them lose? Can't the server modify the result and show a server seed when the user requests for it via the API and gives the user the losing result when calculated? There is a possibility of that happening. It would be better for the user to change the client seed frequently, if thats the case. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
