Nice to meet more peole here Have a nice day everyone ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) welcome mate ... have good one yourself ... #crysx
|
|
|
Made you?
ditto ... 'made you' ? ... there are only a few things that you are FORCED to do in this life ... so to say he 'made me' is far fetched at the best of it ... you took his advice - did what you did - lost btc from it - and now you scream scam ... here is some sound advice from me mate ... research you investments - follow NO ONE - but absorb their advice and dissect all the information in front of you ... make peace with the fact that WHAT EVER the outcome - its because YOU made the decision to follow through with it ... what im saying is simple - be diligent with whatever you enter into ... whether it be advice - investments - or even a restaurant ... be diligent ... you 'lost' you btc - ok ... so be it ... you lost it because YOU decided that ... no one 'made' you put a bitcoin address into YOUR wallet and transfer the funds out ... you did ... accept it and move on ... if mt777 held a gun to your head and threatened your family and their lives if you didnt transfer the btc - then yes he MADE you do it ... but i speculate that those events have not happened - and never would ... i hope your trading efforts are better placed - with or without advice - next time ... #crysx
|
|
|
ummm ...
how many times do you guys want to advertise the same thing? ...
#crysx
|
|
|
payment is necessary ... and it is the best blockexplorer place around ... #crysx
|
|
|
It would be nice to revamp C-Note.......
Unfortunately quark algo coins have no future due to algorithm issues and lack of developement It would be nice to change it to neoscrypt. there is nothing really 'wrong' with quark ... its a good stable algo - and is now in the hands of asic miners also ... so if there was interest in the coin - there would be the miners involved as well ... lack of development is correct though - as the interst by the dev / interested parties wanes due to the lack of supporting infrastructure ... too many coins held by one or two people? ... maybe that is part of it as well ... #crysx
|
|
|
HI everyone , We are group of HOLDERS , TRADERS AND INVESTORS from INDIA . Working only on EGC coin to increase its price upto 1$ , why we choose EGC ?BECAUSE OF ITS AMAZING FUTURE PROJECTS (2017)---- NEW WEBSITE AND ANDROID WALLET
GOOD SUPPORT FROM DEVELOPER(STEVEN) AND HIS TEAM
LOW IN SUPPLY(13 MILLION) AND MINEABLE CURRENCY (Annually pays 7% staking bonus )
FASTEST TRANSACTIONS and SUPPORTS EVER GREEN TECHNOLOGY so those who want to support us can contact us via HERE IS THE LINK WHATSUP :- https://chat.whatsapp.com/KMqxFyyyCywGGgfxyoegJz TELEGRAM :- https://telegram.me/EverGreenCoin SKYPE :- https://join.skype.com/F85deDdxOGVznow skype - much better ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ... egc the only coin you will be supporting huh? ... #crysx
|
|
|
Could I mine with Baikal Mini Miner ?
Yep on this chain and the new when it ready i got 3 on it now thanks Paul Could you tell me the settings for Baikal pls ? MonetaryUnit is more profitable than DASH. In the web config for the baikal miner, just point it to a pool (stratum+tcp://stratum.weminemue.com:3033) and have the algorithm set to quark. Add a valid MUE address as a username and you're good to go! Please see here for some for info: http://www.weminemue.com/getting_starteddo you own any? ... if so - how do you find them as miners? ... are there any readings as to power consumption from the wall ( not the software ) for the different algos - as well as readings on the average hashrate for each algo? im interested ... #crysx
|
|
|
Why when I go to b3 nodes in the wallet it has nothing listed ? I added all the nodes I have like 30. Or it this just a glitch or something ? It does not show manual adds ? I don't see an option to add a b3 node within the wallet. Everything is working I'm just curious.
thats like saying i cant drive the car - and its not working ... without actually saying HOW you you tried to drive the car and WHAT is actually wrong when you tried ... what method of 'manual add' did you do - what happened - and what was the result if any ... publish them here - and let the devs / community help you ... josh and i are discussing various things regarding nodes and acessibility to nodes to help with ease of sync - but all this comes at a price ... so pushing for these things NOW NOW NOW is not going to help much ... there are others involved also - so have some patience - and above all - EXPLAIN in DETAIL what the issues are that you are having ... this is for ALL issues that ALL members are having ... i would luv to hear the tech calls anyone has when asking for help on their computers ... my computer doesnt work - fix it ... hehehe ... ummm - how? ... when you havent even explained what the process of the issue is that YOU have taken ... as others dont seem to have a great deal of issues with theirs .... ive heard them all before in my line of technical support ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ... anyway - please make it a detailed explanation - so that help is easy ... if anyone is willing to donate coin to get these nodes running - please let the devs know ... community input for these would be less of a burden on the devs - and allow more to be done ... #crysx Lol yes I know you right xP I ment I added the nodes to the .conf file manually. I have never seen a node list with in a wallet so I was curious about it . After I went to that other site with all the nodes that one guy told me to visit it has been working there plenty nodes. im glad it worked out ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ... im working on the compile today ... im having a few issues - but slowly pulling through ... once it compiles and runs - ill sync - test - and let josh know that its all functional ... this will mean you will not need to add any nodes to any of the configs in the next version of the wallet - if the devs decide to permanently hardcode the nodes ... chainworksindustries.com nameservers have been changed over and propagating worldwide as we speak ... dns systems are up and running - and the nodes will be running when i can get them compiled ... will let you know how it all goes later this weekend ... #crysx
|
|
|
1) We need someone to set up a better block explorer. 2) I'm pretty sure I can set up dual-mining with quark & secure coin 3) I'm pretty sure I can also talk to Poloniex...and get it relisted... that would be a start....
lets have a chat - and possibly come to a deal then ... #crysx
|
|
|
hi sampey ...
can CAT be setup and run in console under linux ( fedora 23 / 24 x64 or centos 7 x64 ) automatically via a config file? ...
i have a server that can do that - but no gui - which is a preferrable way of working on a big dedicated system ...
i just want it to do specific type of trades at specific intervals - 24 / 7 ...
can this be done - and if so - how? ...
#crysx
Hi, no sorry, there's no command line operation. You must use the GUI ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) is there any way to convince you to create such a system based off cat? ... #crysx
|
|
|
I am pretty sure that i can release the pool this evening. Wallet is synced now (took very very long to get any connection) and now i want to test the stratum proxy before and find a block on the pool. As soon as i am finished i will release the link to the pool here :-) As soon as it's public you can always add the pools address to your addnodes, as it will stay there for a while ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Good work ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I have been contacting YOBIT concerning B3 update to B3 v3.2.1, and I got this response from Dominik of Yobit: 2016-10-19 11:08:57 dominikherzog update is moved to admin that's good news. i recently helped out with beats, noticing their fork had resulted in none of three exchanges updating, no block on the official chain for over 9 days, and the non-official chain mining and minting fine. they reverted back to the pre-fork chain which was far easier than dealing with the amazing discrepancy between official and non-official chain. :p later today / this evening - ill be looking at compiling the core daemon on the older gcc53 on centos 7 x64 - which all my vps / nodes are based on ... if this compiles - and syncs successfully - ill create a pool that will be active this coming weekend ... currently all the cwi pools are based on the http://mpos.granitecoin.com/ dns and domain - but we have just setup the nameservers and dns systems for chainworks industries - which will mean the pools will be moved to http://pool.chainworksindustries.com/ ... so as of this weekend - after the dns propagates across the world - the official pools will be http://pool.chainworksindustries.com/ ... they are denoted as 'alpha' - but that is because they are all on the low difficulty stratums ... when the high difficulty stratums are active ( hidiff - for asic and high hashrate farms ) - the pools will change colour and be denoted as 'beta' pools for a 7week testing period - in which ( if all is well ) they will change colour again and denote the titles to 'production' or 'official' pools ... currently - there are a number of changes to be done - but ALL pools are active on that page - with two 'official' pools running ... once again - if the b3 daemon compiles under centos 7 x64 - we will have a pool running this weekend for it ... your help with any of this bumba - is always appreciated as usual ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ... #crysx heh. i stick with ubuntu 14 .. i had a vps with 16 and it made too many annoying issues lol. hehehe ... if the os has gcc61 as a standard / default compiler - then there will be issues with a LOT of coins code - let alone b3 ... the syntax that gcc61 uses is different to gcc53 - so c++ compiles in a different way and interprets the code differently ... im working on the scrypt now to compile a static build for b3 in centos 7 x64 ... if it works - we will have a the first node setup in a matter of hours ... and depending on the b3 coin status / donations for the nodes - we can have another 4 setup right after that ... but again - if it works ... we will know some time tonight before i go to bed ... #crysx
|
|
|
hi sampey ...
can CAT be setup and run in console under linux ( fedora 23 / 24 x64 or centos 7 x64 ) automatically via a config file? ...
i have a server that can do that - but no gui - which is a preferrable way of working on a big dedicated system ...
i just want it to do specific type of trades at specific intervals - 24 / 7 ...
can this be done - and if so - how? ...
#crysx
|
|
|
I am pretty sure that i can release the pool this evening. Wallet is synced now (took very very long to get any connection) and now i want to test the stratum proxy before and find a block on the pool. As soon as i am finished i will release the link to the pool here :-) As soon as it's public you can always add the pools address to your addnodes, as it will stay there for a while ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Good work ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I have been contacting YOBIT concerning B3 update to B3 v3.2.1, and I got this response from Dominik of Yobit: 2016-10-19 11:08:57 dominikherzog update is moved to admin that's good news. i recently helped out with beats, noticing their fork had resulted in none of three exchanges updating, no block on the official chain for over 9 days, and the non-official chain mining and minting fine. they reverted back to the pre-fork chain which was far easier than dealing with the amazing discrepancy between official and non-official chain. :p later today / this evening - ill be looking at compiling the core daemon on the older gcc53 on centos 7 x64 - which all my vps / nodes are based on ... if this compiles - and syncs successfully - ill create a pool that will be active this coming weekend ... currently all the cwi pools are based on the http://mpos.granitecoin.com/ dns and domain - but we have just setup the nameservers and dns systems for chainworks industries - which will mean the pools will be moved to http://pool.chainworksindustries.com/ ... so as of this weekend - after the dns propagates across the world - the official pools will be http://pool.chainworksindustries.com/ ... they are denoted as 'alpha' - but that is because they are all on the low difficulty stratums ... when the high difficulty stratums are active ( hidiff - for asic and high hashrate farms ) - the pools will change colour and be denoted as 'beta' pools for a 7week testing period - in which ( if all is well ) they will change colour again and denote the titles to 'production' or 'official' pools ... currently - there are a number of changes to be done - but ALL pools are active on that page - with two 'official' pools running ... once again - if the b3 daemon compiles under centos 7 x64 - we will have a pool running this weekend for it ... your help with any of this bumba - is always appreciated as usual ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ... #crysx
|
|
|
I am willing to revamp and relaunch!
how? ... #crysx
|
|
|
Why when I go to b3 nodes in the wallet it has nothing listed ? I added all the nodes I have like 30. Or it this just a glitch or something ? It does not show manual adds ? I don't see an option to add a b3 node within the wallet. Everything is working I'm just curious.
thats like saying i cant drive the car - and its not working ... without actually saying HOW you you tried to drive the car and WHAT is actually wrong when you tried ... what method of 'manual add' did you do - what happened - and what was the result if any ... publish them here - and let the devs / community help you ... josh and i are discussing various things regarding nodes and acessibility to nodes to help with ease of sync - but all this comes at a price ... so pushing for these things NOW NOW NOW is not going to help much ... there are others involved also - so have some patience - and above all - EXPLAIN in DETAIL what the issues are that you are having ... this is for ALL issues that ALL members are having ... i would luv to hear the tech calls anyone has when asking for help on their computers ... my computer doesnt work - fix it ... hehehe ... ummm - how? ... when you havent even explained what the process of the issue is that YOU have taken ... as others dont seem to have a great deal of issues with theirs .... ive heard them all before in my line of technical support ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ... anyway - please make it a detailed explanation - so that help is easy ... if anyone is willing to donate coin to get these nodes running - please let the devs know ... community input for these would be less of a burden on the devs - and allow more to be done ... #crysx
|
|
|
Hi @Crysx just pass by and want to say Hi ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I want to ask about linux or windwos wallet for OZC? Any news ? I have tried to compile with QT creator in linux, but it rise some errors. You told that you will build wallets for US that don't know much about compiling things ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) And another one, will I be able to transfer my OZC from old wallet to that new one when you build it? Thnx in advance keep a good work Cheers B hi kingbb ... glad you popped in again ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ... the windows wallets are placed in dropbox - but dropbox ALWAYS seems to have connection issues ... so as we are moving the entire project and thread to teh ChainWorks Industries system and thread - so will the repository and all downloads as well ... we will not be continuing with dropbox when its all finished ... as for the current wallet - if you cannot compile it in linux on your machine - i will help as much as i can ... i need to know what linux install you have and what errors you are getting - as well as how you are trying to compile the wallet ... currently i have fedora 24 x64 - and also have qt4 and qt5 installed into this system ... this new fedora 24 comes standard with gcc61 and compiles VERY differently from the previous gcc53 versions ... in any case - its a matter of figuring out what you are doing to compile - whether you have all the dependencies installed - and what errors you receive when you try and compile ... this thread will be locked soon - so please take the questions to the main cwi thread ... it will 'seem' a little messy at first - but that is the thread that we will be running ALL the projects from ... cwi - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1563601 ... ill be updating all that need to in due time - as i have very little time currently ... let us know ... tanx ... #crysx Hi Crysx Thnx for reply, I am usig Arch linux currently but seems you are in big mess with project transfer and everything, I will not bother you with this. I have some coins in Yobit and will trade with that for now. I am hoppiing that you will soon finish your transfer and that all will be available on new thread. I will wait a little, and will try once more to compile it by myself ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) We'll be in touch ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Keep a good work, thnx once again Cheers hi kingbb ... the transfer is an ongoing process - and wont be finished anytime soon ... so helping out will be my pleasure - and pretty much anything i can do - i will ... i am unsure about the arch distro - but it should be very similar to that of debian based os - like ubuntu ... i have fedora 24 x64 - and with a small tweak - i can get it compiled with the current gcc61 that fedora 24 x64 now uses ... prior to that fedora 23 x64 compiled without issue - especially if using qt4 ... though qt5 should work without issue also ... this is old code - so it is prone to some tweaks to make it work ... granite is the focus currently - and when that is at a level im happy with - ozziecoin will be looked at - even though we are keeping the coin more on a 'prototype' level most of the time ... which means anything we need to implement will be tested and integrated on ozc first - unless of course we assimilate the coin altogether - in which case a swap is more than likely for granite ... let me know the process and the errors - and ill help where i can ... tanx ... #crysx
|
|
|
@daffadile I am very sorry for that, but I also seems powerless against node problem.
get me on skype josh ... im off to bed now ... been too damned busy with everything else ... lets chat and come to some sort of arrangement ... #crysx
|
|
|
Where is everyone? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) busy building mate ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ... #crysx
|
|
|
we support a few coins with seednodes that are hardcoded into the wallets for a few coins ...
the issue is simply that it is done in the hope that it will support the network and backbone - and not for a 'profit' situation ...
Yes that is the plan. That is why I am asking. Its always better to have different users running the seeds under different independent domains. I could get hit by a bus tomorrow and maybe forget to renew nevacoin.pw ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I will contact you asap. Anyone else that is already running a Neva node 24/7 and has a domain and wants to be included as a seed in the next release, feel free to PM me. hehehe ... buses usually dont hit people - people hit buses ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) ... i hope that will never be the case for you mate ... it seems our timezones are askew ... im now in gold coast - queensland - australia ... but added to skype now ... #crysx
|
|
|
Hi i lost all my coins (over 1M in total) in the online wallet, is there still a way to redeem them with my login details?
im really sad to hear that mate ... which online wallet? ... we dont promote nor market ANY online wallets currently ... chainworks industries havent finished the builds of our systems - so we cannot endorse anything we know nothing about ... unless the owners of that wallet system is willing to give you the funds back - then they are lost ... if you supply ALL the details - i can do some research and see if there is any recourse to getting any of it back ... short of that - we can nothing else ... mine more - they are easy to mine currently and are worth nothing much ... so buying and mining are the only other options ... if there is no proof of investment and loss - then we cant do much on our side here ... unfortunately ANYONE can come here and make a statement like this - unless you have the proof to back it ... i cant chase it otherwise ... #crysx
|
|
|
|