Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 03:05:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
341  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 23, 2014, 02:22:15 AM
Alpha-T's company records are certainly interesting.

Share Holder Records:
2013-11-30 :: Share Holders:
Mohammed Akram - 100 Shares (100%)

2014-05-13 :: Share Holders:
Mohammed Mubasher Akram - 75 Shares (100%)

2014-07-11 :: Share Holders:
Mohammed Mubasher Akram - 90 Shares (90%)
Andrew Laurus - 10 Shares (10%)

Other interesting occurrences:
2013.04.11 Company originally incorporated as CHESHIRE TECHNOLOGY LTD
2013.04.23 Application to dissolve the company
2013.07.19 Dissolution request withdrawn
2013.07.20 Registered office changed from, 3 MOTCOMBE FARM ROAD, HEALD GREEN, CHEADLE, to 64 DICKENSON ROAD
2013.07.22 Company name changed to Alpha Technologies (INTL) LTD.
2013.11.30 Director appointed MR MUHAMMAD AKRAM
2013.12.29 Appointment terminated, DIRECTOR MUHAMMAD AKRAM
2013.12.29 Registered office changed from, 64 DICKENSON ROAD to 66 DICKENSON ROAD
2013.12.29 Director appointed MR MOHAMMED JAFAR AKRAM
2014.04.06 Appointment terminated, DIRECTOR MOHAMMED AKRAM

Company directors and board members:
MOHAMMED MUBASHER AKRAM (current) 2013.04.11 - ongoing
MOHAMMED JAFAR AKRAM (resigned) 2013.12.29 - 2014.04.05
MUHAMMAD AKRAM (resigned) 2013.11.30 - 2013.12.29



I find the recent distribution of 10% of Alpha-T shares to Andrew Laurus, very interesting indeed.  See post news about this guy: http://www.asicbitcoinmining.info/2013/08/avalon-might-be-getting-200-million.html and elsewhere around the web.

My bet from this data:
Project went to complete shit; device was built and failed for some reason - faulty chips, crazy power consumption; who knows...  
Company is desperate, so they contracted the entire thing to a third party, offering him stake in the company for his investment.
Alpha-T falls silent on updates because they are no longer running the project.

Also, notice that the fallout with dexcel designs happened right around when MOHAMMED JAFAR AKRAM resigned from the company.  Obviously something went badly, and it seems even the Managing Director's own brother decided to distance himself from the project.  Mohammed Mubasher Akram got desperate, and attempted to outsource the entire project to someone else.



*Fetches some popcorn and gets ready for the storm*

Wasn't Andrew Laurus just a fake account to hoax wheeling and dealing in bitcoins.  I remember the name a did a search here and yup it was some kind of marketing stunt account.  Not sure wha tto make of it.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=268201.20
342  Other / Archival / Re: [ANN] MoonAsics - Scrypt ASIC 240 to 960 MH/s - Scheduled for August on: July 23, 2014, 01:51:33 AM
Code:
WHOIS search results for:MOONASICS.COM(Registered)
Is this your
domain? GO
Add hosting, email and more.
Want to buy
this domain? GO
Get it with our Domain Buy service.
Domain Name: moonasics.com
Registry Domain ID: 1866302116_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.gandi.net
Registrar URL: http://www.gandi.net
Updated Date: 2014-07-12T19:14:09Z
Creation Date: 2014-07-10T12:28:44Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2015-07-10T12:28:44Z
Registrar: GANDI SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 81
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@support.gandi.net
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.170377661
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status:
Domain Status:
Domain Status:
Domain Status:
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: Moon Asics
Registrant Organization:
Registrant Street: Gandi, 63-65 boulevard Massena
Registrant City: (Gandi) Paris
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Postal Code: (Gandi) 75013
Registrant Country: (Gandi) FR
Registrant Phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: 533932951e7c7cae2f473381f16ab6cd-1929875@contact.gandi.net
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: Moon Asics
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: Gandi, 63-65 boulevard Massena
Admin City: (Gandi) Paris
Admin State/Province:
Admin Postal Code: (Gandi) 75013
Admin Country: (Gandi) FR
Admin Phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: 533932951e7c7cae2f473381f16ab6cd-1929875@contact.gandi.net
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: Moon Asics
Tech Organization:
Tech Street: Gandi, 63-65 boulevard Massena
Tech City: (Gandi) Paris
Tech State/Province:
Tech Postal Code: (Gandi) 75013
Tech Country: (Gandi) FR
Tech Phone: (Gandi) +33.170377666
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax: (Gandi) +33.143730576
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: 533932951e7c7cae2f473381f16ab6cd-1929875@contact.gandi.net
Name Server: A.DNS.GANDI.NET
Name Server: B.DNS.GANDI.NET
Name Server: C.DNS.GANDI.NET
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
DNSSEC: Unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2014-07-22T20:16:09Z <<<

Hey what a coincidence.  EHS is from Paris France too!  What are the odds that 2 ASIC companies spring up as the same time touting amazing performance stats for Scrypt ASIC miners.  It must be some kind of French IT Hub over there...

Code:
ehsminer.com
Is this your domain name? Renew it now.


Domain Name: ehsminer.com
Registry Domain ID:
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.ovh.com
Registrar URL: http://www.ovh.com
Updated Date: 2014-03-12T15:37:07.0Z
Creation Date: 2014-03-12T15:31:12.0Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2015-03-12T15:31:12.0Z
Registrar: OVH, SAS
Registrar IANA ID: 433
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@ovh.net
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +33.899498765
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Registry Registrant ID:
Registrant Name: BEN HMIDA HAIKEL
Registrant Organization: Ethical Hacking Service
Registrant Street: 5 RUE FEUTRIER
Registrant City: PARIS
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Postal Code: 75018
Registrant Country:  FR
Registrant Phone: +33.625125397
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: 5pnwcdugqlibhyhcjeud@p.o-w-o.info
Registry Admin ID:
Admin Name: BEN HMIDA HAIKEL
Admin Organization: Ethical Hacking Service
Admin Street: 5 RUE FEUTRIER
Admin City: PARIS
Admin State/Province:
Admin Postal Code: 75018
Admin Country:  FR
Admin Phone: +33.625125397
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: wx4doi1sa3eynyl8t7ot@z.o-w-o.info
Registry Tech ID:
Tech Name: BEN HMIDA HAIKEL
Tech Organization: Ethical Hacking Service
Tech Street: 5 RUE FEUTRIER
Tech City: PARIS
Tech State/Province:
Tech Postal Code: 75018
Tech Country:  FR
Tech Phone: +33.625125397
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: wx4doi1sa3eynyl8t7ot@z.o-w-o.info
Name Server: dns200.anycast.me
Name Server: ns200.anycast.me
DNSSEC: signedDelegation
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System:
http://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2014-06-12T10:42:19.0Z <<<
343  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: French ASIC miner company ehsminer.com on: July 23, 2014, 01:46:34 AM
This company is a scam. The same guy posts on litecointalk.org. He trolls the forum begging for LTC and claiming to be a buyer of several asics but has been exposed.

He tried this scam 2 months ago but without the website.

Hi,

do you have a link ?

Thanks.

Here you go https://litecointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=26264

Quote
Posts: 63 (0.375 per day)Gender: MaleAge:26Location:on est mediocre
Age:27IRC:fr,arabic,eglish
Date Registered: February 04, 2014, 07:36:11 PMLocal Time:July 23, 2014, 01:45:53 AMLast Active: Today at 12:37:38 AM
LXbph5Ff68QpD8N9okMdZt2p9RoR3nCRza
Signature:

LITECOIN: LXbph5Ff68QpD8N9okMdZt2p9RoR3nCRza
donate please aim poor
344  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 23, 2014, 01:41:55 AM
It looks like anderl's post struck a nerve. Once again Alpha sends out another non employee to express their "personal opinions", rather than Alpha posting themselves .

Alpha Technology is a “family-involved business” including accountants and software experts as well as Akram, an electronic engineer.

Same dude: https://www.facebook.com/mohammed.j.akram.3

So much back pedalling being done there.  And it is very coincidental that he resurfaces months after that post to quickly try to distance himself from Alpha technology.  And who can blame him.  His posting on that blog was in the role of a tax "geek" as the book keeper for Alpha Technology.  So his certifications may now on the line.

So it goes from a family involved businesses to a one man show who's father and brother just happened to loan the company several thousand dollars.  yet the company only has a few dozen pounds as per the public record.  I am a little concerned that the company is raking on those debt obligations as shareholders will take precedence to customers in a liquidation of the company if it ever goes into bankruptcy.  So there better be evidence of actual financial transfers being made from the father and brothers accounts to Alpha Technology to support those claims and not that it is a bookkeeping line item that appeared as soon as insiders find that they are at risk of the company capsizing.

I've traded penny stocks in the past and I've seen corporate executives state taking on large deferred salaries, stock as compensation or load tons of money and huge interest rates to a public shell company only for public pump and dumps so they can wipe out the company and get paid before public shareholders.  I want to point out that Alpha Technology is NOT a public company and that there CANT be a pump and dump going on here.  I only state that a lot of financial activity goes on when companies are at high risk going forward.


I like this little exceprt form his post.

...and as a professional I cannot and will not advice on any area that I am not qualified to do so in. However, I would like to make the following point; the issue of whether or not people are businesses is a much wider concept than that of trading.

I like how he states that as a professional he will not give advise. he is not qualified to do.... However.  

Why do people do that.  I mean its like saying.  I'm an honest and open person and I would never lie to you... however.  you try to step back from a a place that is in some legal limbo that you want to distance yourself from but you just can't leave it alone.  You have to jump back in and put yourself back in that risky place you were trying to walk away from.

And the whole people are businesses is wider than the concept of trading.  Hey Mister tax geek.  Who said it was only in the context of trading.  HMRC did not single out trading.  They covered the whole gambit of all "Cryptocurrency activities", that includes trading, mining, storing, probably even hacking.  You do NOT have to be a business to be a trader.  In the United States you can be an individual and be qualified as a day trader by having an account with a minimum of $25,000.


This is another fun snippet.  Again with the not an expert but I'm going to give you my opinion anyway.  LOL

I am no expert in this area, however, if this situation was as simple and straightforward as some of these self-proclaimed “experts” are suggesting in certain forums, which I have just had a skim read through, and for arguments sake Alpha Technology’s solicitors who are actually experts in this area were wrong or Alpha Technology misunderstood the advice

So lets stop right there.  I never said I was an expert.  I only said that it was the first time that I saw AT identify that it was the HMRC guidelines that AT was using as the definitive clause that makes all miners businesses.  However  Grin  I do know how to read.  I think I am am somewhat expert in the language of English.  ANd I DO know what the word OR is for when it is in a sentence.  Like for example.  "will be subject to Corporation Tax, Income Tax or Capital Gains Tax ", "Gains and losses incurred on Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are chargeable or allowable for Capital Gains Tax if they accrue to an individual or, for Corporation Tax on chargeable gains if they accrue to a company."

See funny thing about the word OR.  It means there is an option, that there is one way of looking at it and at least another way.  That it can cover businesses or individuals.  That does not sound like a definitive anything.  And if Mr Tax Geek and Alpha Technology wants to prove that their expert legal team is right they can go present their position in a court of law when customers start filing claims against them.

, I am sure Trading Standards or any other regulatory body in charge of this would have forced Alpha Technology to change their terms to comply by now. I mean it has been 7 months or so since these terms went up.

OMG!!! This is another supportive argument?!?!?  "Well no one has noticed that we are doing this so it must be okay, right?!??!!  If I drive on the highway at 100KMH I'm not violating the law because no one has pulled me over saying I'm driving too fast.  I really hope that this is not the legal advice Alpha Technology is getting.  And this is also the one statement that doesn't pass the smell test and makes all this expert legal advice questionable.  Why would he come out and say that a regulatory body would have told us to stop if we were wrong.  If a legal team gave them a solid footing to stand on their would not have to make a statement like that.  If a regulator body did appear and tell them that it is wrong they could bring in their legal team and have them fight it out with the regulatory body.  But to say well we haven't been found out yet.  That just doesn't sound right.  Like they don't have confidence in the interpretation that they made or that their expert international ninja lawyer team gave them.

(Again, I am no expert and neither do I speak on behalf of Alpha Technology… Just my thoughts)

Again with not being an expert.  Very good you know how to play dumb.  Good for you.  I'm sure it wasn't that much of a stretch.  I' don't speak for Alpha Technology but I was a former director involved in the family business of Alpha Technology.  I"m posting with an Alpha Technology account on an Alpha Technology website forum touting my work for the company doing bookkeeping.

All the backpedaling, identifying he is not an expert anymore even though he branded himself as a tax geek and expert in taxation of mining, trading and holding cryptocurrencies.

Quote
...Chartered Certified Accountant, qualified since 2012. I have an extremely high interest in different areas of taxation beyond and above the taxes I deal with in my day to day work.

I am a keen student of Tax and am currently working towards the Chartered Tax Adviser qualification (which is the “elite” and highest tax qualification you can achieve in the UK) and am looking to qualify as a CTA in late 2014.

Currently, working my regular full time job in general practice and dealing with the Accounts and Taxes of small to medium sized businesses. As of yet, none of our clients accept or deal with crypto currencies, however as the market for crypto currencies matures I am sure a lot of them will start to do so.

Unfortunately, I would not have any details or be able to help you with any questions relating to the operations of the business or any engineering related questions. Please direct these questions to one of the other Admins in this forum  Smiley

What I would like to obtain from this Blog

My goal is to help people understand the tax implications of certain activities such as mining, and trading/ holding “crypto-coins” such as bitcoin's and litecoin's.

But now he is distancing himself from his expertise provided and trying to help distance his father all the while publically saying how much the company owns them.  I'm sure if it ever goes to court he is going to print out all these posts point out how he was not as involved as everyone thinks he is.

So put up or shut up tax geek.  Post publically the report from your legal team defining miners as businesses.  I mean its not like it is a trade secret.  It domes give you any economic advantage and will actually help your case as it will put a freeze to all the claims that are starting to be filed against Alpha Tech.
345  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 23, 2014, 12:55:19 AM
Ok digging into this deeper I found how Alpha Technologies assumed that miners are businesses.  They don't have a legal attorney.  They themselves imposed the ruling and all based on what they think the future regulations minght be because of some interpretation they made from the US IRS rules  https://forum.alpha-t.net/index.php?topic=503.0

I read the publication of this 'accountants guidance' a little differently than you do Anderl, perhaps its just my suspicious nature. This sounds awfully like  'If you cause problems for us with the authorities we will cause problems for you'  … combined with the implicit carrot 'We can help you with these problems … as a geeky tax guy I understand bitcoin regulations and there may be ways to mitigate your large liabilities'

 …. carrot and stick IIRC

On the other hand it could just be well intended thoughtful generous free advice.

Yes I can see that re-reading it.  So they may have an attorney that they have put on retainer and did a preliminary investigation on cryptocurrencies.  However I've never seen the attorney's law firm posted.  Alpha _technologies always call them a top legal law firm or international law firm.  So who is it that was so expert in determining that only businesses min cryptocurrency even though the precedence over the last 4 years has been that it has been a hobbyist pastime and there was never a requirement or regulation that stated you need to be incorporated to mine cryptos on a CPU or GPU.  

It's like saying that you need to be a business to fix your car even though millions of people do it all over the country.  Yes there are businesses specialized in auto repair but there is no legal requirement for.  And HMRC has NEVER come out and stated that it is illegal for individuals to mine cryptocurrencies, or stated that you must be incorporated to mine cryptocurrencies.  

If they are so confident that only businesses can mine cryptocurrency then why hasn't their lawyer publicly come out and said so.  Why doesn't ALpha Technology publically publish the position paper or draft that they paid thousands of dollars to a lawyer for that proves that they are right beyond a shadow of a doubt.  So far they haven't and I don't believe they will because I believe they do not have it.

I've read the HMRC and I see several statements that identify that individuals as well as business can conduct cryptocurrency activities which include mining.  If Alpha Technology says otherwise the onerous is on them to prove otherwise.  Because they are depending on that legal position because it prevents them from having to follow consumer protection laws.  

And that is the critical point here.  The ethics of the law is to protect individuals from businesses that can strong arm them, take their money, withhold it, sell them shoddy products or fail to deliver.  Businesses will draft lengthy agreements with each other and will have  lawyers on both sides draft those agreements so that both parts knows when they are in breach of the contract.  Individuals typically do not have the capital to higher a team of lawyers to help negotiate an agreement.  That is why there are consumer protection laws.

Alpha Technology never asked if you were a business, never asked for a business identification number, was willing to accept personal as well and corporate debt and credit cards to purchase miners.  If any investigation is don't on the Alpha Technology customer database I doubt you will find even half of the purchases have a business name.  Most have used personal names and not business names.  Most of the miners are going to residential addresses.  I have dealt with wholesalers and B2B corporations and there are forms that you have to fill out that go above and beyond just putting your name address and purchase information on.

To make my point here is a distributor I worked with.  They only work wholesale with businesses.  This is 1 of 2 pages they required me to fill out in order to establish a business to business relationship.
Notice what they are asking for on the form.  Notice how it takes 1 to 2 business days to confirm.  Notice how I had to attach a resale tax certificate/business license/company document in order to prove I was a business.  Notice how they ask me about my anticipated monthly purchases.  How they ask for a list of authorized buyers from my company.  Notice that I have to CERTIFY that I to business in a local (State/Province/Region).

Now ask yourself.  Did Alpha technology ever ask you for even a small portion of what this business asked for?

That is why I believe that the spirit of the law is on the side of the Alpha Technology customers as individuals and that Alpha Technology only identifies customers as businesses so they can bypass consumer protection laws.

346  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: (solved) NO refunds from Alpha Technology on: July 22, 2014, 12:45:29 AM
You guys need to check out this page of the Alpha Technology thread.  You are entitled to 100% refunds per the distance selling regulations.  Alpha Technology made a vague interpretation of the law and a big mistake.  You are consumers and not businesses and entitled to full refunds not matter what Alpha Tech says.
347  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 22, 2014, 12:40:51 AM
Looks like by their own employee admission that businesses and individuals can mine cryptocurrencies.

348  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 22, 2014, 12:34:11 AM
Here is the screenshot from the alpha tech forum if they want to edit it for any reason.  NOtice who likes the damning post!!!

349  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 22, 2014, 12:30:34 AM
Ok digging into this deeper I found how Alpha Technologies assumed that miners are businesses.  They don't have a legal attorney.  They themselves imposed the ruling and all based on what they think the future regulations minght be because of some interpretation they made from the US IRS rules  https://forum.alpha-t.net/index.php?topic=503.0



Quote
mjakram
Accounts Manager
Administrator
*

Cryptocurrency Tax Blog

« on: May 28, 2014, 06:56:16 PM »
A Little Bit about Myself

I am employed part time as the Accounts Manager of Alpha Technology and a Chartered Certified Accountant, qualified since 2012. I have an extremely high interest in different areas of taxation beyond and above the taxes I deal with in my day to day work.

I am a keen student of Tax and am currently working towards the Chartered Tax Adviser qualification (which is the “elite” and highest tax qualification you can achieve in the UK) and am looking to qualify as a CTA in late 2014.

Currently, working my regular full time job in general practice and dealing with the Accounts and Taxes of small to medium sized businesses. As of yet, none of our clients accept or deal with crypto currencies, however as the market for crypto currencies matures I am sure a lot of them will start to do so.

Unfortunately, I would not have any details or be able to help you with any questions relating to the operations of the business or any engineering related questions. Please direct these questions to one of the other Admins in this forum  Smiley

What I would like to obtain from this Blog

My goal is to help people understand the tax implications of certain activities such as mining, and trading/ holding “crypto-coins” such as bitcoin's and litecoin's.

My intention is to use this blog as a base whereby as a community we can educate each other, and when/if necessary provide my tax knowledge to help fellow crypto-currency users. By all means if I make a mistake or am ignorant of any information, please correct me and educate me, as this is how we learn!

I will be giving real life examples of potential scenarios throughout this blog. Initially, I will cover the VAT aspects of crypto currencies, and at a later date edit and update this blog covering Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax and Corporation Tax.

How I came into the world of crypto currencies

I first heard of Bitcoins, and Litecoins from my brother (the founder and CEO of Alpha Technology) early in 2013, and had no idea how they worked and had minimal understanding of them.

As a student of tax I was eager to gain knowledge on the tax rules surrounding this. I did contact HMRC and some notable tax specialists at the time requesting information on the tax treatment of various crypto currency transactions and businesses involved in this area.

From my conversations with  HMRC  at the time it seemed as if they were unsure how the whole thing works, which is understandable considering how new this phenomena is.

The vast majority of Tax Specialists and Accountants had not even heard of crypto-currencies at the time and even now, the first time I mention bitcoins or litecoins to my Accountant friends, the vast majority of them are like " bit what???  Shocked ".

I must be honest, when I first heard of crypto currencies, I thought of it as a game for “tech geeks” and thought it’d die away eventually. I could not contemplate, how something so virtual could hold value and operate in a real life economic ecosystem. How wrong my assumptions are proving to be!

Even today (28/05/2014), apart from briefing notes which have been issued from HMRC and the different interpretations of these notes from different tax experts, I believe (correct me if I am wrong) there is nothing which is “Law” relating to the tax treatment of crypto currency related activities in the UK.

As a result of this, I feel there will be ambiguity and uncertainty towards the tax treatment of different crypto-currency activities, UNTIL these rules are introduced into an act within tax legislation and when there is sufficient case law dealing with different crypto-situations.

Before I get cracking with explaining some of the VAT treatments of transactions related to crypto-currencies. I'd like every single UK crypto currency miner or trader to refer to this link:- http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/briefs/vat/brief0914.htm. These are the briefing notes which were issued by HMRC (which I was referring to above), and I believe in the UK this is ALL we have at the moment as Tax Advisers and Accountants to work from, from HMRC.

VAT (Value Added Tax)

Mining of crypto-currencies:-

HMRC have made it pretty clear that any type of business activities relating to the mining of crypto-currencies is EXEMPT from UK VAT and therefore outside the scope of UK VAT.

Quote
Incorrect their Mr Tax super guy.  They never said business activities.  They only said bitcoin related activities.  These activities can be done by businesses AND individuals.  In fact several times int eh brief the HMRC identifies individuals.

A very simple example:

Mr X operates a mining business. He mines 20 BTC in a tax year. He purchases mining equipment worth £500 + VAT. He incurs expenses of £1000 + VAT.

Being exempt and outside the scope of VAT means that NO output VAT will be due on the 20 BTC, and an important point to note is that No Input VAT would be reclaimable either.

This activity is NOT zero rated (it is specifically stated as exempt)which means it is outside the scope of VAT and you cannot just register your business for VAT in order to reclaim VAT on the expenses.

Please also note, if you are carrying out taxable activities alongside the exempt mining activities (i.e. you carry out exempt and taxable activities at the same time), there may be scope for recovering some input VAT provided certain tests are met, which are detailed in Reg 105A SI 1995/2518. I will not go into detail as to how this would work, however please seek advice from your tax adviser, if you feel you may fall into this category.

Exchange of Crypto-Currency to Pounds:-

Again, this is outside the scope of UK VAT and an exempt activity.

A simple example:

Mr Y, a speculative trader bought 100 Litecoins in May 2013 for £500 and sold these in December 2013 for £1000.

The above example would be outside the scope of VAT and have no VAT implications whatsoever.

Goods and Services sold in Exchange for Crypto-currency:-

If you are selling (taxable) goods or services and accepting Bitcoins as a method of payment, VAT is accounted for at the point the transaction takes place.

A simple example:

XYZ Ltd, advertise and sell Bitcoin Miners on their website and accept Bitcoins as a method of payment. Item goes on sale for £1200 (incl VAT), the date of sale 1 BTC is valued at £1200.

You would be liable to output VAT of £200 (£1200/6) on this transaction regardless of the movement in the exchange rate following that, as at the point where the sale took place the value of bitcoin was £1200.

Update 30/05/2014

Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax Implications of Cryptocurrency Mining

Before I get onto other areas of cryptocurrency related activities, I thought I'd take some time to describe the income tax and capital gains tax treatment specifically of cryptocurrency mining. Which I am sure is the area most of you would be interested in.

In terms of the information supplied by HMRC, there is very little on how bitcoin mining would exactly be taxed, so there is scope for different interpretations and different treatments by different individuals and their tax advisers.

However, the IRS has issued quite specific guidelines on how bitcoin mining activities should be treated for tax purposes. After communication with some tax advisers who deal with client's who do mine bitcoins, it seems most of them are following suit of the IRS. The general consensus was that HMRC will issue guidelines similar to those of IRS soon, in relation to bitcoin mining activities.

Quote
Oh really so what did the IRS say?  You only vaugly tell us.  But the reality is that the IRS did NOT explicitly specifc mining as a buinsess ONLY related activity.  They only said IF you are a business wanted to get into mining.


Quote
Miners

Miners that produce their own bitcoins are now subject to two different tax charges. They must include the fair market value of the virtual currency on the day that it is mined into their gross income.

Another stipulation in the IRS guidance is that capital gains are due on the sale of bitcoins viewed as a capital asset. The taxpayer must take this fair market value on the date of acquisition as the basis price for the coins. Capital gains will be due on the difference between that basis price and the eventual sale price.

This means that if and when they sell the bitcoins that they have mined, they will have to pay capital gains tax on any profit that they have made while owning them. Furthermore, if an individual mines bitcoin as a business, the net earnings from that business will be treated as self-employment income, and will be subject to self-employment tax.

You see that.  IF an INDIVIDUAL wants to mine bitcoin as a business.

Your entire house of cards is built on some guess work you made from a half ass reading of US IRS guidelines that say exactly opposite of what you said!!!!!!


An interesting read which I came across; http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA2O1LR20140325?irpc=932

I thought the best way to describe how this would actually work would be by crunching some numbers and explaining it via a simple example;

Tom mines 1000 bitcoins from home in the tax year 2013/14 (6th April 2013- 5th April 2014).

At the date's the first 800 bitcoins were mined/created, the market value of bitcoin was £500 per bitcoin.

At the date's the last 200 bitcoins were mined/created the market value of bitcoin was £300 per bitcoin.

The business expenses relating to mining activities incurred by Tom in 13/14 were as follows :

- He bought miners for £50000
- Use of Home (including electric etc) was £42000
- He travelled 10000 miles on business to purchase parts for his miner, and attend bitcoin conferences etc. Giving him an £4500 allowable mileage expense.
- Print, Postage, Stationery, Sundry, Telephone, Internet etc (P. P. S. S) totalled up to £1592
- Accountancy Fees £2500

At 5th April 2014 (last day of the tax year), Tom is still holding these coins.

His income and expenditure account would look as follows, and he would be charged to income tax as follows :

Gross Income                                                           460,000
((500*800)+(300*200))                  

Less Expenses

Use of Home                   42000
Travel                                 4500
P.P.S.S                                 1592
Accountancy                   2500
                                              
Total Expenses                                                        (50,592)
                                                                                          ................
Net Income                                                                409,408
                
Capital Allowances                                              (50,000)
(100% AIA Claim)
                                                                                         .............
Taxable Income                                                      359,408
                                                                                        .............
In the tax year 13/14, Tom would be liable to pay income tax on a profit of £359,408.

Taking this example further

In the tax year 2014 /15, Tom decides to sell all 1000 of his bitcoins for £500,000.

He sells through a 3rd party website which charges him a fees of £1000.

He will now be liable to Capital Gains Tax on this sale as follows :

Gross Proceeds                                        500,000
Incidental Disposal Costs                   (1,000)
                                                                           ............
Net proceeds                                             499,000
Amount Charged to IT                          (359,408)                      
                                                                           ...............
Chargeable Gain                                     139,592
                                                                           ..............

At this stage, a further capital gains tax charge would be due on the gain of 139,592 before taking into consideration the annual exemption.

Please note that with capital gains tax there is some scope for tax planning opportunities. For example, before disposal gifting some bitcoins to your spouse in a NIL Gain NIL Loss transfer in order to utilise his or her annual exemption. I will not go into detail with how this works, however please seek advise from your tax adviser before selling any mined bitcoins.

Concluding Comments:

Please note my above example was a very simple hypothetical situation and the figures and categories for expenses and valuations of bitcoins have no reflection to a real life situation. In reality it would be much more complex, my aim was only to provide you with an overview of how the income tax and capital gains tax situation would work.

Please note I've made reference to AIA (Annual Investment Allowance), calculated a mileage rate and given a figure for 'use of home' expense. Please contact your tax adviser if you would like further information about how these figures are calculated.

Unfortunately, you do have to keep track of the value of each bitcoin/litecoin/dogecoin at the point it is mined in order to calculate your gross income for income tax purposes (this can be a tedious task - however this can easily be done at the year end using a website which gives historic cryptocurrency rates and tallying it up against your bitcoin or litecoin wallets).

I would also like to highlight that when you do sell your cryptocurrencies you do get relief for the amount that had already been charged to income tax

I hope this working example gives you guys a good idea of how cryptocurrency mining activities are taxed now. Your comments would be appreciated.  Smiley

M J Akram (AAIA, ACCA)

Accounts Manager & Tax Geek  Wink

Disclaimer

The information on this blog should not be used in any actual transaction without the advice and guidance of your own professional tax adviser who is familiar with all the relevant facts.

Although the information contained here is presented in good faith and believed to be correct, it is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice.

Furthermore, the information contained herein may not be applicable to or suitable for the individuals' specific circumstances or needs and may require consideration of other matters. All information is only relevant to UK Tax Laws.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2014, 12:53:15 PM by mjakram »
 Logged
Likes fanfare, TheDoctor, Mubasher Akram, diego1000 and Fiaz Malik like this
350  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alpha Technologies class action lawsuit ? on: July 22, 2014, 12:08:54 AM
I hope this post helps you guys out.  I never understood how Fiaz figured out that their clients were business customers only.  I finally saw what he was quotes.  The HMRC guidance on crpyto currencies.  His supportive argument has no legs to stand on because the HMRC guidance for mining cryptocurrencies targets all miners individual and corporate and makes not distinction that miners are specifically businesses.  If this lawsuit went to to court it would be very difficult for Alpha Technology to prove the HMRC specifies miners as businesses.

All clients of Alpha Technology are considered consumers because Alpha Technology did not ask not validate if you were a business or an individual upon ordering.  You are under full legal protection of UK Consumer law and entitled to 100% of your money back.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=314402.msg7960896#msg7960896
351  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 21, 2014, 11:42:16 PM
Alpha will not refund anything - see this:

Me:
Hello Alpha,
>
> I’ve cancelled my order and want my money back. Here are the rules
> you put on the web, It’s also screenshoted on many forums:
>
here is screenshot of https://alpha-t.net/terms-order/ where is not any word about 5 month and after that nothing is refunded
> Cancellation & Refund Policy
>
> You may cancel your order at any time before shipment. Once the
> equipment has been shipped, it is no longer to possible to cancel your
> order and/or request a refund. Should you encounter a problem with
> your product, please see the warranty section for more information
> regarding warranty on our products.
>
> Should you cancel your order, you agree that we are allowed to charge
> you with a £70 GBP administrative fee. We will deduct the
> administrative fee from the amount due to be refunded to you in
> accordance with the terms above before we process the refund. We may
> also deduct transaction fees from the to be refunded amount in the
> event that your payment method or credit card issuer does not support
> refunds, thereby forcing us to refund you in another manner.
>
> So I’m expecting 1565,- £ coming to my bank account.
>
> Please note me within one week when I can expect my money , thank you.
> Just one important information – my order number is xxxxx
> Maybe just one more:
> I am not a business customer because i dont have a company
> registration number, I dont have a tax number, I even wasnt asked for
> that kind of information at the moment i placed my order, a placement
> of an order on your website doesnt turn me into a business customer,
> im still an individual.

And their reply:
Hello there,

We are very sorry but as per our cancellation policy it has been longer
than 5 months since you placed your order therefore you are no longer
eligible for a refund. We have been very clear and open with our terms
of order, it was released as a news update, it is easily available on
our website and you are urged to view it on the product page before you
order. Such regulations only apply to consumers and you are a business
customer with us. I can assure you that our legal matters are dealt with
by a leading law firm in the UK.
Our terms of order are completely legal
in the UK. It was typed up by solicitors who specialize in this area of
law. They have advised us that all our customers will be legally classed
as businesses for many reasons, one being that the hardware we are
selling can only be used for mining cryptocurrencies which is a business
practice according to HMRC
.

Best Regards,

Alpha Technology Team


...So, what now? What can I do? I'm not in UK, but Czech republic. What dou you suggest?


Sorry Fiaz but NO WHERE in the HMRC does it say that mining cryptocurrencies is only a business activity.  I think your lawyers screwed you because they were idiots when they advised you so.  Maybe you should have gotten a second opinion from a law firm outside of Moss Side.

BTW thanks for posting the email.  This is the first time I noticed Fiaz was quoting that he was referring to the HMRC guidance.  Even before their recent revision on cryptocurrencies, HMRC identified that all generation of profits from cryptocurrency transactions are taxable as corporate OR personal income tax.  There was not specification that the income generated was specifically corporate tax.  I hope this puts this B#$@#HIT that Fiaz is spouting to rest.

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/briefs/vat/brief0914.htm

Corporation Tax, Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax treatment of Bitcoin and similar cryptocurrencies
As with any other activity, whether the treatment of income received from, and charges made in connection with, activities involving Bitcoin and other similar cryptocurrencies will be subject to Corporation Tax, Income Tax or Capital Gains Tax depends on the activities and the parties involved.

Whether any profit or gain is chargeable or any loss is allowable will be looked at on a case-by-case basis taking into account the specific facts. Each case will be considered on the basis of its own individual facts and circumstances. The relevant legislation and case law will be applied to determine the correct tax treatment. Therefore, depending on the facts, a transaction may be so highly speculative that it is not taxable or any losses relievable.. For example gambling or betting wins are not taxable and gambling losses cannot be offset against other taxable profits.
For businesses which accept payment for goods or services in Bitcoin there is no change to when revenue is recognised or how taxable profits are calculated.
Corporation Tax: The profits or losses on exchange movements between currencies are taxable. For the tax treatment of virtual currencies, the general rules on foreign exchange and loan relationships apply. We have not at this stage identified any need to consider bespoke rules.

For companies, exchange movements are determined between the company’s functional currency (usually the currency in which the accounts are prepared) and the other currency in question. If there is an exchange rate between Bitcoin and the functional currency then this analysis applies. Therefore no special tax rules for Bitcoin transactions are required. The profits and losses of a company entering into transactions involving Bitcoin would be reflected in accounts and taxable under normal Corporation Tax rules.

Income Tax: The profits and losses of a non-incorporated business on Bitcoin transactions must be reflected in their accounts and will be taxable on normal income tax rules.

Chargeable gains - Corporation Tax and Capital Gains Tax: If a profit or loss on a currency contract is not within trading profits or otherwise within the loan relationship rules, it would normally be taxable as a chargeable gain or allowable as a loss for Corporation Tax or Capital Gains Tax purposes. Gains and losses incurred on Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies are chargeable or allowable for Capital Gains Tax if they accrue to an individual or, for Corporation Tax on chargeable gains if they accrue to a company.
352  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 20, 2014, 06:28:55 PM
the shipping was ALWAYS announced as q3

01/11/2013 Update:

1. Completing the design and prototyping of our ASIC chips has been our priority thus far, we will showcase this in an ASIC prototype in the coming weeks

Its kinda hard to verify Alpha-T original claimed shipping dates because Alpha-T has removed many of their original statements from the forums and their company officers are avoiding answering customer questions.



They still haven't removed this one.  But screenshot it because they may delete it soon.  So yeah bumface they always projected 7/15 so they are in breach of their contract.

NOtice the time between System Assembly and System Integration testings.  They anticipate it will take a whole month to do assembly.  If that is still the case and if by a miracle they receive chips tomorrow it will still take then 1 month to start shipping.  So the earliest anyone will get a viper is August 20th.  That will well past their new worst case scenario of July 31st.  So more smoke up the arse from Fiaz about a July 31st ship date.  They only have 11 days to receive chips and announce that they did to even have a change of shipping in Q3.

353  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: INFINITECOIN DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP on: July 19, 2014, 06:45:03 PM


* Infinitecoin will soon be mined out


Exactly when do you think it will be mined out?

I was just quoting the roadmap.  IT was what they stated.  I don't really care at this point and I don't really want to to have to go through the effort to do so.  I'm here to see how development is progressing and if they make significant changes.  I'm hopeful but skeptical.
354  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 19, 2014, 06:02:45 PM
For those of you that were banned from the Alpha site,  here is the complete post from the Doctor.

On credit card processing and a personal note...  

« on: July 18, 2014, 09:00:24 PM »


Like Unlike Quote


The card processing feature has temporarily been pulled down.
I was asked to give an update about it as I had been busy with the implementation and communicating with you all since I started working on it, so: sure, i'll get you an update. Smiley

Could make a blabla post of course with lots of sunshine, rainbows and unicorns all over the place...
... But transparency is what has been opted for since the start, so I'm going to make somewhat of a personal note along with a semi-official announcement from Alpha regarding the ability to process cards. It will not be a cheerful post. Wink
And be careful... The post is not for the faint of heart and might scream "TL;DR" to some. Smiley But I hope you will read it in full.
Parts of this post contain somewhat of a personal rant about how I vision things, those are obviously not necesarrily the opinions of Alpha Technology.

The problem in this case pretty much is that the cryptocommunity seems to be like a self-fulfilling prophecy, potentially causing the issues they're so afraid and nearly forcing it upon themselves.
On a variety of sites, all scrypt mining corps have been burned down, pretty much every single one of them is being labeled as "a scam", even while all contracts are still perfectly and strictly being adhered to...
Quote
Alpha Technologies can tout they are adhereing to contracts because they have changed the contracts so frequently.  "We will not ask for the 70% until we deliver a prototype, that didn't happen.  We will be open and transparent, they were quiet for weeks and do not provide any further updated on chips and manufacturing.
...(At least, in terms of Alpha. I don't really know how well other miner manufacturers are adhering to their contracts...)

- The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behaviour which makes the original false conception come true. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-fulfilling_prophecy

Due to all the doom mongering, the card processors already have highly elevated (and slightly discriminatory imho) extra measures against companies selling mining equipment. (That's also why it took much longer to get a processor up in the first place, *a lot* of documents to show, sign, explain, etc.)
Quote
I would like the Doctor to cite from a processor that it is directly a result of doom mongering and that the lack of current capital, previous experience in manufacturing, product delivery and poor customer service, and incoherent business plan at Alpha Technologies did not contribute to the risk.  It's easy to point to the community and not admit to and identify other problems at the company.  More of Alpha Technology not even claiming even a small ownership of the problems up to now.  It's all the community's fault

And after some fiasco's in the industry and the paranoia, on a personal note I can't really say that I blame them.
Those extra, and pretty damn high (pardon the French) if I may say so, hurdles have been overcome by Alpha (which should really mean something...!); but the processors are slightly getting cold feet here now, due to the bizarre community feedback they have apparently acquinted themselves with. (Would have been easier if they had seen that earlier.)
It does force them in a rather annoying position; after all they are the ones that have to handle the crapstorms with people trying to back out of contracts or when it indeed is/was a scam or contracts are not really being adhered to.
Quote
Really Alpha Technology overcame the recent hurdles of the industry and the paranoia around it?  How so?  Please cite what AlphaTech has done to handle the fiascos in the industry?  The Doctor is just vomiting text and not even providing a coherent document here.
due to the bizarre community feedback
(Would have been easier if they had seen that earlier.)
What you did not identify the risks to the processor ahead of time?  Why not?  Did you expect that you could just walk in and walk out of a contract without them doing the due diligence or provide them the due diligence.  Of course they are scared.  The way you approach a contract is you identify the risks ahead of time to them and show how you are handling them.  You don't try to hope you can slip by without them noticing.  Again this is terrible as a business practice.

Alpha has received the request to negotiate stop accepting credit card processing as frankly put: the feedback from the community as a whole (so let me carefully note: not from this forum nor Alpha's clients per se, but from the entire cryptocommunity: all sites, newsflashes, etc.) is scaring the living hell out of the card processors...
Quote
Yeah not from the Alpha Tech forums because you ban customers and edit your posts so that it look slike everything is pleasant.  Maybe now we know the reason what teh Announcements were archived.  They didn't want the processor to see the comments on the announcements?  It also explains FIaz recently laundering all the external forums of his accounts and posts.  Now the picture is clearer.  Things like that don't happen on a whim.  There was a reason behind the initiative of AT employees to cleanse the forums to get a processor to commit to them.
...They're very much afraid that the crypto community is indeed a self-fulfilling prophecy (frankly put.), where contracts are being made; but then payments are being charged back prematurely by people getting cold feet; which in turn could cause cash-flow issues for the manufacturer, whom will die from that as a result due to not being able to adhere to the contracts with partners (read: pay them) and thusly can't deliver to anyone; including to the people who did not back out of their contract but *did* hold up their end of the deal.
Basically, people getting cold feet while halfway in their contract due to self-proclaimed experts, a lot of which are very agressive, shouting "SCAM!!", ...
Quote
I"m sorry it is much more than people calling it a scam that is making people get cold feet.  It is the guarantees that were posted on this forum that the units would ship in July as the original worse case scenario.  It was then that the processor would be up and running by July 1st.  It was Alpha Tech bowing out of the hashrate race.  
From most of the alleged customers the biggest reason I"m seeing that they are not fullfilling on their contracts is... that for the price  Vipers are not competatively priced for current performance.

Alpah Technology wants you to pay $9319USD for 250MHs  (performance wise that is $37.28USD/1MHs) for a unit that is not even available (currently vaporware) that may not be available until August.

Here is a breakdown of units available now.  They are shipping and their price performance
GAW WarMachine $1550 for 54MHs (performance $28.70/1MHs)
GAW Falcon $850 for 27MHs (performance $31.48/1MHs)
GAW Blackwidow $450 for 13.5MHs (performance $33.33/1MHs)

What is worse is that there are a of manufacturers that will be shipping in August (same time as AT that can provide MUCH better performance ranging between $36.63USD/1MHs to as low as $9.33USD/1MHs!!!

So it is not the flame fanners that are doing this to you.  It is Alpha Technology doing this to itself by being ignorant of the industry and trying to find others to blame.
...would be the cause of the company going to hell. They themselves would cause what they're suddenly afraid of... And fulfill their own prophecy. And then as the company could not deliver due to the problems the fear mongerers caused: everyone goes on to be happy and will self-righteously claim "I told you so!!!", while in reality it should be "we caused it to be so!!!". Which is *the* classic example of a self-fulfilling prophecy. (But will probably claim I'm wrong and make very agressive hateful posts, once more. Smiley)

In Alpha's case, that does not seem to be the scenario though. (Well... Other than getting a lot of hate; the self-fulfilling prophecy won't be hitting Alpha.)
There's some flexible options thanks to the awesome partners, and Alpha has (as far as I know from what I've been able to see) paid for some highly crucial parts out of their own pockets. It could make quite a loss when the final product is ready and not enough people finalize their order as agreed per the terms: but the miners will still be there anyway, and people who did pay in full as per the terms will most certainly receive 'em. (And then orders can be opened up to mitigate the initial losses by filling 'em up with new clients, I guess.)
Quote
Spare us the wonderfuless of Alpha technology owners saving themselves from losing money.  Should we applaud you for the sacrifice you are making so that you can turn a profit for yourselves.  I'd applaud you if you convert yourselves to an non-profit, or if you took a loss so that you can be competitive by increasing hashrates to the current baseline and did not take a profit to do so.  That would be a real commitment.
It's all covered and already risk asserted, as far as I know...
So even despite all the hate trolls making it very hard for any mining company to even exist or survive: Alpha is holding it's head above the water.
So as a client... You should probably be glad the hate trolls were not able to completely destroy the market just yet. (And then refuse to blame themselves.)


Anyway, as a result of that self-fulfilling prophecy theory, card processors are not really eager to process cards as they're afraid people will (ab)use cards to do premature chargebacks to try and back out of the contract they signed up for; and they'd have to deal with going back and forth between the card issuers and Alpha. Alpha on one side simply adhering to the contractual obligations and what was signed up for and bringing that in as an valid argument, and on the other side the card issuer acting on behalf of the client who is trying to back out prematurely. (Which, when attempting a chargeback, is breaking the contract; so the card issuer will have trouble filing a legitimate chargeback and lots of communication may ensue... Which costs a lot of time. And as you all know: time is money.)
They're simply not really interested in that.

I can understand their position, accusations are constantly flying all over the interwebs towards pretty much all companies (trying to) getting in to this market; ever since the BFL debacle initiated a paranoia of epic proportions. (Understandably so by the way, I don't blame the community for being very wary, scared and extraordinary careful when it comes to companies making mining equipment; I fully understand. People got screwed over one too many times I guess... But non the less: it looks like the community lost faith in humanity as a whole and some of them are downright unreasonable because of it, heh.)
I mean... What they're seeing and saying is true. No offense intended here, but there really are a large bunch of people (elsewhere, by the way!) that are screaming "scam!!!" while not a single contract has been broken till date. Let me repeat that: not *one*...


For those people shouting "scam!", in other places on the internet than here really, let me remind you (and perhaps you should grab a dictionary if you want to play field-expert):
A "scam" is when someone deliberately is trying to steal your money. It's not a scam when contracts are being adhered to for the full 100%, but the company simply isn't doing something in the speed and/or manner that *you* would love to see... That's not a scam in any possible way. When a company adheres to the contract, it cannot be a scam. That's simply you not being satisfied with the speed (eg: you had hoped for sooner shipment... But then you shouldn't have signed up for the given terms in the first place as you *knew* it could happen and it *could* even be as late as the last day of Q3... Don't sign up if you didn't really want to or didn't want to finish the ride! And for the record: all signs point to it that shipment will not even be close to end of Q3, but *far* sooner than that, but fact remains: Alpha wouldn't breach contract when shipping on the last day of Q3... Keep that in mind.); which is somewhat ironic if you look at it... Whilst I'm sure the irony will not be seen nor appreciated and some people will probably say I'm a clown and get, despite that being rather very hypocritical, very hateful on my and/or Alpha's ass:
Attempting a chargeback while the contract/terms you signed up for are still perfectly being adhered to, means the person filing the chargeback is scamming Alpha at this point, rather than the other way around... (Yeah, I know. That's a bold statement. But it is true. You signed up to an agreement, doing a premature chargeback is illegitimately taking money away from Alpha. *That* is much closer to a scam than Alpha is... Call me an ass if you must, but it doesn't make what I just said less true. Wink)

Quote
More blaming the customer.  It's your fault customer for accepting this deal we gave you.  It's your fault for for listing to the positive messages we were posting in the beginning.  It is your fault for believing in our gurantees.  You should have known that we can edit our posts.  You should have known we can change our terms when we feel like it.  You are the scammers for not accepting the changes we made to the contract so that it looks like Alpha Tech has done no wrong.  But we are the company and you the customer don't have any rights to renegotiate terms, you have to accept the changes.  Our lawyers said so.

This is the biggest FU to the customers I have seem from AT.  At least the previous ones were sugar coated.  This is a whole hearted blaming you for chargebacks, guilting you to prevent you from doing more. Only bad customers (scammers) do chargebacks, don't be a bad customer. Wink

If Alpha would not deliver the equipment and run away with the money: Yes, that would be an absolute scam. Absolutely. But that by far isn't the case here, not a single contract has been violated by Alpha that I can see; and the miners will become available and will start shipping. Just because you're paranoid, doesn't make your thoughts true.
Even while not getting all the funds: they're still here, doing business and working their ass off for their clients to get their products on the shortest notice possible, whilst Alpha is not getting what they're entitled to... I'm not sure what else a company has to do to show that they're working for their customers.
Quote
Wow so a company only has to not be a scam to prove they are working for their customers?  A company only has to appeal to the community with a down payment plan to show how reputable they are and then demands the other 70% to show they are working for the customers?

Alpha tech representatives pointed in previously deleted posts the the 30% and refund plan allows customers to walk away if they want and only suffer a small loss rather than all the other bad ASIC manufacturers who demands full payment and no refunds.  Now Alpha Tech is saying that you legally walked into the contract with them and you own them the remaining 70%.  You can't walk away because now you are more a scammer than Alpha Technology.  Good job Doctor, you are really winning your customer base over.


Alpha has from the beginning stated how and what and clearly put down in the contracts what can happen. They warned about it from day one. Yet, some people who apparently took the plunge anyway, or didn't at all but still want to spread hate, are now backing out because they suddenly realized it could take a bit longer than they hoped for... And then, for some inexplicable reason, proceed to call it a scam; while it's certainly not Alpha backing out of the contracts here...
So, who is scamming who? Keep the slander to yourselves. Unleash your fury if Alpha should ever break those contracts, doing it now is just... Silly. Kindly phrased.
Stop dwelling in the past... Or *prove* me wrong. I'm looking at both sides objectively and I can't do anything other than conclude Alpha is currently still strictly on par with their contracts and as such: not a scam.
Quote
Yeah stop dwelling in the past, on what we touted to you to get you to buy, but you are to blame if you believed us.  We deleted all the past posts and changed our terms so you can't.  Give up, only look to what we are posting now and in the future.

Anyway, back to card processing;
So, as a result and as Alpha isn't really looking for such trouble either: it was determined to be best if credit card payments are to be suspended effective immediately, to prevent the risk for a distorted relationship with credit card processors in the future and to prevent having to invest a lot of time in to potential chargebacks as Alpha really has better things to do (like getting your mining equipment ready...); the risk assesment teams of the processors are right: there really is quite the elevated risk when you look at the general consensus in the cryptocommunity in terms of the attitude towards miner manufacturers...
Here on the Alpha forum, the mood is quite cool and a lot of reasonable people are around. (Props!) But on other sites, that's not always the case.
Quote

Yes I would like to give Props to Fiaz for his expert weidling of the ban hammer and the efficient deleting and doctoring of posts to make this forum the tranquil place it is.  Unfortunately we do not have the same control of external forums, news sites and blog posts so we can't keep customers and opinionated people in line there.  

As such, the ability to pay with Credit Card has been pulled. The processors are simply far too scared and do not want to support the pre-order model.

I'm not even sure if Alpha really had a choice there (read: I'm pretty certain it wasn't really a choice.), if they would have said they will continue processing (or attempting as such) despite the concerns, I doubt that would have remained being possible.
I really doubt Alpha was really given an actual choice, but at least it was presented as such by the processor; in a respectful way and without definitive judgements and keeping all options open and actually even guaranteeing the ability to process cards in the future.
It was asked very nicely, for which the processor deserves a lot of kudos!! ... And they gave certainty that CC processing will be available in the future.

!!PLEASE NOTE!!:
As it would certainly be unfair that some people will have been able to pay with their cards (which could give an advantage) but others will not get the same chance, or that other way around: some did pay with their cards, but now see other clients can potentially get more time to pay (which would be equally unfair, really.): everyone who paid with their credit card in the past few days to finalize their order should be receiving a full refund of the amount that was paid in the past few days, and your order status will be reset to Pending.
This equals the score, so to say; we don't want to give some people paying with credit card an extra advantage; not to the ones who paid with their card in the past few days, nor to the ones who didn't pay but wish to do so in the near future. (Bitpay and Bank Transfer are *always* open to everyone, so those people are not affected by this anyhow.)

Quote
Did you do this from the kindness of your hearts or is the processor telling you to refund the payments because they will not complete them?  Curious minds what to know if you are spinning what the processors said to you.

It has been determined that this would probably be the most reasonable solution, and also a method to show that Alpha is not greedy and solely running around to catch as much as your money as possible, but simply wants to take the most ethical approach whilst waiting for delivery and credit card payment options. (They will get to the greedy part part when the miners are shipping. Wink It is a business, after all.)
... Now I do understand that this choice may also make some people angry/dissatisified. I guess no matter what Alpha would do in this case would result in a few dissatisfied people, so I guess all I can do is ask for your understanding for the reasoning behind this choice and why it was made.


The ability to process cards will return on the day shipping starts, *maybe* a few days in advance. (Will keep you updated.) But I doubt it will be much sooner than that...
Alpha Technology will not offer other payment options than Bitpay, Bank Transfer and Payza at this time.

Quote
And more information is gleaned by reading between the BS spouted by the Doctor.  So it is appearant that the Processor did not kick you because of the community outcry and industry risk alone.  In fact it looks like they committed to acting as your processor IF, a big IFyou have a real product and not vaporware.  Seems you did not honor the terms of their contract that you need a real and tangible product and not do preorders for products not made.  NOW WE SEE!!!!

(And yes, Payza is highly limited for credit card processing. ... For a variety of (the same) reasons. Still, you *can* pay with the afformentioned options, so it's not like you don't have a choice.)
How this will affect your ability to pay, how it affects shipping (que) and how it will affect the "two weeks" deadline and whether or not they will force to pay with any of the other available methods or allow you to wait with paying until shortly before shipping: that is something for Alpha to figure out, and they will let all of you know soon how that will be handled. It's not my call, nor can I read their minds.
So, for that aspect: please by all means do not jump to any conclusions, do not get any fear for your order: please wait for Alpha to make a release about what the next step is for those who want(ed) to pay by card. I'm not sure what Alpha is going to do there, and frankly that's not for me to handle.
I'm assuming that will be released along with a planned update on the miners. Smiley

Quote
Yeah you have dug yourselves a hole.  This blame the customer diatribe is to get some message out quickly so customers do not freak out.  Good job, really won so many over.  Now we have to figure out what to do next because we never planned for this.  We thought that running a business like this would be all roses and money raining from the sky.

I wish the cryptocommunity best of luck. Because with some of the attitude I have seen in some places around the net lately... I hope the more level-headed people I have seen will always form a majority, those twho think twice and are able to stay objective in between all the trolls. That way: there certainly is a bright future. But if the hate trolls and paranoia will take over the entire community and it is being ran by fear and hate... Then I fear it will die a slow and painful dead.
And I sincerely hope that will not happen. Smiley
Quote
So does this mean you give up on the community Doctor?  Why such a final tone to that statement.  Are you leaving?  Did you get a pink slip from AT?  What this your mission statement?  And one more dig against the community.  All the customers who did not ask questions, or had concerns, and did as they were told are considered level-headed, anyone who says, hey why are you deleting posts, why are you banning people, why are you giving us less performance than the current industry, those are all trolls.  Don't be a troll, be level headed like a sheep or a cow.  They don't ask questions, they do as they are told.


Alpha sincerely apologizes for the potential major inconvenience this may cause to card holders, but if you really want to "rage" about it: don't aim the arrows at Alpha for not processing your card, but at the insane accusations flying around, and potential premature chargebacks being executed, by members of the crypto community as a whole whom are the cause of the, in my opinion rightful, fear that the processors now have for anything even close to being associated with the term "crypto" and the term "pre-order".
Quote
Yes blame the community again.  Don't blame us for all the bad decisions.  We did are part in making everything look good.  Its those evil customers that asked questions we could not answer or read between the lines.  Blame them.

Last but not least... As I do need a cheerful note in here Tongue
I would like to applaude the clients, and there are thankfully many of you like this around here, whom are level-headed and immune to the troublemakers.
Quote
Thank you for believing us.. in us I mean.  Thank you for not being concerns or asking any questions and accepting all the problems we have been having and the substandard hashing we are going to provide you a month later than our worse case scenario.
The clients who *do* adhere to the contract they signed up for are probably the ones actually making it possible for everyone to eventually get their product. (And note: for the people not being able to pay due to CC being pulled from being available to pay with: I'm not saying you're not holding up your end of the deal!! Let that be very clear!! It's not your fault.)
Quote
The clients that *do* adhere?  The contract stated I could walk away from it.  I didn't have to give the remaining 70% and I give up the original 30%.  How am I not adhering to it?  Are you accusing me of being a criminal because you can't force me to pay the remaining 70% because I lost confidence in your ability to go forward?
Its you guys who make it possible, and you really deserve a round of applause and a big thank you for that from everyone.
You guys rock, and I take my hat off to you. Stick to what you signed up for, finish the ride together with Alpha. Well done! Smiley
Quote
Yeah lets all ride this flaming bandwagon to the bitter end no matter what.  Screw the morons who jumped off early when they first noticed the fire, they are idiots.
And I very much understand your frustration with the lack of awesome news, and on behalf of Alpha for as far as possible: I'd like to apologize for that.
But... From what I understood: That news will come quicker than you might hope for now. Things are in the works, and should be released to you on short notice.
The miner manufacturing is not affected by this course of events.



If you read my post in full: thank you very much.
Please let me remind you that large chunks of this post are my personal vision and do not necesarrily reflect the opinion, nor is an official statement, of Alpha Technology.
You're of course free to disagree with me and form another opinion. I do hope you will keep it civil if you do not agree. Smiley
Quote
Not an official statement but from an employee and acting as an employee and not just a regular joe.   I'm sure if you forked over hard earned money and you were getting something substandard compared to the rest of the industry products you would be pissed to and demand more, or a refund.

Have a nice day, and no offense or hard feelings to anyone! Smiley
Quote
Nice.. FU community... but no offense.
Despite my straight from the heart words; I can understand where the paranoia comes from. Just don't let it run your lives...
... And be glad Alpha is resistant against it, despite how hard the scam shouters are making it for them, and the other start-ups, to be successful. Smiley

Thank you to *everyone* who has read this, whether you agree or not, and whether you are angry/doubtful with Alpha or not.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Despite me not agreeing: I do respect your opinion, although I don't respect the way some people on other boards express it.

Have a very nice weekend!!! Smiley

« Last Edit: July 18, 2014, 09:05:51 PM by TheDoctor »


355  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: INFINITECOIN DEVELOPMENT ROADMAP on: July 19, 2014, 05:05:06 PM
Creating a development roadmap is good start.  Most of the initiatives on the road map seem like marketing based projects or what looks like bug fixes, or optimizations in code.  I don't see anything significant in network improvements.

* Infinitecoin will soon be mined out so the price will be pushed up as there won’t be miners mining then selling

This keeps miners from maintaining the network.  IFC is stuck in dead waters (not wind or sea currents).  You need more transactions to get more rewards per block for miners to start mining again to secure the network, you need more miners to adopt IFC to provide a floor as a community, increase awareness and promote the currency.  IFC still seems to ignore miners.

But this is a good start.  Hope to see more significant initiatives in the future.
356  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 19, 2014, 01:47:08 AM
Doctor from Alpha forum.

https://forum.alpha-t.net/index.php?topic=792.0

"In Alpha's case, that does not seem to be the scenario though. (Well... Other than getting a lot of hate; the self-fulfilling prophecy won't be hitting Alpha.)
There's some flexible options thanks to the awesome partners, and Alpha has (as far as I know from what I've been able to see) paid for some highly crucial parts out of their own pockets. It could make quite a loss when the final product is ready and not enough people finalize their order as agreed per the terms: but the miners will still be there anyway, and people who did pay in full as per the terms will most certainly receive 'em. (And then orders can be opened up to mitigate the initial losses by filling 'em up with new clients, I guess.)"


Another lie as Fiaz stated previously that 70% of the orders is fully paid! So they want to convince everyone this is not enough to show working prototype or at least some components? That does not make any sense. There is much more bs in this post but everyone can read and draw the right conclusions.


i dont agree and that post is actually reasuring me.It shows me somebody is taking us seriously and is doing his best to make things happen



This is for everybody and not specificly for you:

I have said this on multiple ocasions: dont call them a scam until the shipping date has passed (and then some).

There might be some complication that we dont know about, but the crypto community uses thew word scam way way way to quickly.When i made Ultracoin i was also attacked by a legion of trolls and it drove me nuts, and my intentions were good.

And he is actually right, all these people shouting stuff is turning credit card processors away.its a circle.....

there have been some wrong choices like banning people and stuff but that is no  basis to call it a scam.Lets just give them more time. i am in a hole for the big unit which is 10000 dollar and i cant loose it.Let`s be patient.

they have always said Q3 and anybody thathas fingers can see that that is between juli august september, that has not passed.

there is a thing called auto suggestion,if you look under every rock for a scam, then all you will see are "bad omens that its a scam".

but the truth is nobody can know if its a scam until 1 oktober

I agree with you that it didn't start as a scam.  And it is not a scam per say, but they have made a lot of bad business decisions and rather than admit to it and face the music honorably, they have made excuses or were silent when questions were raised.  Recently they have been entrenching themselves, deleting posts and accounts, banning customers for asking questions.  They have become very defensive, even hostile to customers that only what legitimate answers. If they acted honorably and stated that they made mistakes most customers would be satisfied, but instead they delete the post or ban the account.  That is deceptive and that is borderline criminal.. They may not be a scam but they are surely an evil company.

BTW - notice that side stepping in that quote.  In bold.
357  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: KNC Scrypt miner advice on: July 18, 2014, 12:04:22 PM
Hi,
  I intend to buy 3 KNC litecoin miner Titan Second Batch. I really don't know if its a wise investment. I will greatly appreciate any advice and guidance.

thanks

Advise not to buy it, none of the ASIC is profitable...
In other words mining alternate cryptocurrency isn't profitable?

He means that you will not be able to make the money you paid ed for the miners back. It will be a net loss.
358  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology is Pulling Posts On Their Site on: July 17, 2014, 11:14:33 PM
Now Alpha Technology is deleting their own posts on their own forum.  They cleaned the slate of all their Announcements.

https://forum.alpha-t.net/index.php?board=38.0

My guess is they didn't like some of the negative comments attached to the Announcements, or some of the Announcements had guarantees that they were failing to deliver on.
359  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 17, 2014, 10:55:13 PM

Here is how it will probably work.  

Worst Case scenario (most likely at this point.)
  • 1 week ultimatum to make a final payment
  • if they do not get enough funds, they will offer up a second ultimatum for final payment, they really mean it this time.
  • Big discounts on remaining batch 1 units.  All those cancelled orders, and orders that are not completed.
  • 3 weeks from now, they go bankrupt because they do not have the funds to get ships and assemble units.

Best Case scenario (rainbow farting unicorns)
  • They get the funds to complete Drexel payment in 1 week
  • 2 weeks from now they get delivery of the chips.  It is August 1st at this point
  • At the same time get get cases and boards
  • They hand assemble everything because they cannot afford a factory to build the units.  Yes a bunch of accountants will be working day and night putting chips on boards and putting them in cases and shipping them out.
  • 5 unskilled laborers adding chips to PCBs.  They will be lucky to get 10 vipers done a day.
  • August 15th - 70 vipers shipped
  • August 25th - 70 vipers shipped, first 70 vipers stuck in customs
  • Sept 5th - second batch of vipers stuck in customs, first 70 vipers released from customs.
  • Sept 15th - first 70 vipers delivered. second 70 vipers released from customs.
  • Sept 25th - first customers complain about overheating, hardware nounce errors, poor hashrates, immediately get banned from AT forums.
  • Oct 5th - Fiaz stops assembling duties and focuses 24 hours a day on banning disgruntled customers and deleting posts.  Fiaz says that they only guaranteed 5MHs minimum and that the recent upgrades were best case scenario hashrates.
  • Oct 15th - Fiaz changes terms and conditions hardware warranty to 10 days limited.

I like how Alpha Technology is taking the high road scenario.  LOL.  This is going to end badly.  Oh very badly....

At least they gave a 2 week ultimatum and not one week.  THeir hearts are not that cold.  Or are they just greedy.
360  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Alpha Technology Litecoin (Scrypt) ASIC Miner Order Batch 1 Now! on: July 17, 2014, 10:48:07 PM
T&C for orders placed after the 1st of July 2014.

"We hope shipping will start in the second or third quarter of 2014."

So by the 1st of July they don't know when they will be able to dispatch and give pretty wide time frame. They also use magical word HOPE as the wide time frame alone would not be enough. This is more than confirmation that we can forget about 31 of July scenario - the date, we have last time heard about when they were asking for final payments.

"We shall not be liable to you for any loss of profit or for indirect or consequential loss suffered by you whether as a result of any breach of these terms by us or as a result of our negligence."

So the deal is literally: give us your money and we are not responsible for anything, even if we f...up badly. By the way - the T&C concerns only you - our customer. Ciao! Smiley

These accountants are poor at math, I don't know how apt they are to even run a business.  orders placed after July1st <-- first month in the 3rd quarter, we hope shipping will start in the second or...Huh?  How the hell can they even post that as a term.  Why even bother putting second quarter in there.  Just leave the damn 2Q off already.  People already know you failed to get it out in the 2nd Quarter.  They will be lucky if the get their vipers in the 3rd quarter since you hope to get it out then.  So Oct 1st we will be here still waiting on Vipers..
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!