((165,000+250,000+415,000)÷(21,000,000×0.08)) = USD 0.494047619 per coin. Anything less than that on a free market and the devs lose.
Arbitrarily attaching value to things. Solid. Arbitrarily calling non-arbitrary things arbitrary. Solid. (The $0.494047619 value isn't arbitrary, as the post you quoted but failed to comprehend clearly explained.)
|
|
|
Thanks to TBTB_need_Anonymint
iCEBREAKER's got himself a new hero. Not a very analytically literate one, but a hero all the same. At least he'll keep you entertained for a while ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Typical DashHole response. You ignore the message and attack the messenger(s). Why don't you address the content, rather than gossip about who thinks who is a "hero" (in the manner Duffield is a hero to Evan's Gate cultists)? Oh that's right, you'd rather ignore this looming problem while you cash out the instamine. the SEC will be coming after you eventually for very clearly running an unregistered illegal investment security (and you come from the finance world so you know very well that you are skirting the securities law). Hope you've paid off the regulators with the $million you mined from the gullible speculators in crypto. Personally I don't see how it has been worth it. The $million you've perhaps pocketed will never sustain you to be rich for the rest of your life, and you will constantly have hanging over your head the threat of SEC action at any time in the future. That is criminal liability in exchange for $million. Not worth it. You are nearing the end of the road for your run.
I have studied the SEC regulations and all these marketing to speculators is clearly a violation of the Howey test for being an unregistered illegal investment security. It doesn't matter how you've obfuscated it by pretending the masternodes are in control, the Supreme Court has consistently said that the test overlooks any attempts to obfuscate the economic reality of the situation. Then on top of that is the evidence of deception with the premine and the advertised money supply protocol being altered ex post facto, etc.
And afaik you are a USA citizen, so thus you incur the maximum culpability.
|
|
|
icebreaker: I have you on ignore. I don't know what you said. I don't care what you said. Why don't you leave this forum? You are not welcome here. Please leave.
Then it's a good thing people quoted my link, so you can still read about Dash's "bad crypto." ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) You are a single-purpose Dash-coin cheerleader sock puppet account. Why don't you participate in threads besides Evan's Gate? Nobody cares who you have on ignore, or how you feel about my presence on this public forum. You can't credibly claim to be ignoring me while simultaneously writing me love letters. That's a performative contradiction! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Are you butthurt that Anonymint is making fun of your precious Dash cargo cult? Good! Thanks to TBTB_need_Anonymint for tearing Evan Maddoffield a new DashHole! IX requires 6 of 10 signatures to create a transaction lock.
Which is exactly what I wrote it must do, and exactly what I wrote when I surmised that your white paper was implying the highly jammable design of 10-of-10. But as I pointed out in the correct math (which is clear you still haven't grasped), even 6-of-10 can be jammed 62% of the time (and multiply spent the other 38% of the time) given a 50% attack on the masternodes (i.e. the 50% attack on masternodes can attack 100% of the InstantX transactions). Even at 10% attack on masternodes, then every 666th UTXO can be jammed and roughly every 10,000th UTXO can be multiply spent. So if there are 66,600 UXTO, then a 10% attack on the masternodes (i.e. controlling 10% of the masternodes) roughly can jam 100 of the available UXTO and double-spend (actually multiply spend, i.e. unlimited lies can be announced by masternodes) 7 of them. These sort of flaws are amateurish. You are in over your head. You are a programmer and some sort of finance person and a reasonably good marketer mining the gullible speculators (but not to actual users of currency), but you are not capable enough on the block chain theory. This entire argument is based on an invalid premise! So your jamming attack doesn't work...
Nope. My entire argument is you apparently still don't know how to do basic probability math. Will you attempt to copy my design and order Dash's masternode announcements? Then will you try to copy my design and merge all the orphans? If not, you will still have attack flaws in your design. Will you replace the deposit for controlling a masternodes with a nomination by PoW, so as to avoid the flaw of externalities that can finance the purchase of masternodes, e.g. shorting the coin. Well even if you do manage to copy my design, you still can't fix the fact that attacking masternodes is a one-time cost and not sublinear (ongoing cost) as per attacking a correctly designed PoW coin (which is the point that has been made by myself, monsterer, and smooth). And thus Dash is a proof-of-stake security model, not a proof-of-work. Thus it can be undermined by for example combining shorting with attacking masternodes. And you won't get all the small details correct, because you simply don't have enough smart people helping you, because apparently the smart people don't want to work on your closed source during development (and very well documented allegations: fraud) coin. I would never work on your coin, because you have no usership. It is all marketing to speculators to mine the speculators. What is the point? We are supposed to be creating crypto to change the world and entice millions or billions of users. But that has never been your marketing plan. You've always been mining the speculators instead. And also I do believe the SEC will be coming after you eventually for very clearly running an unregistered illegal investment security (and you come from the finance world so you know very well that you are skirting the securities law). Hope you've paid off the regulators with the $million you mined from the gullible speculators in crypto. Personally I don't see how it has been worth it. The $million you've perhaps pocketed will never sustain you to be rich for the rest of your life, and you will constantly have hanging over your head the threat of SEC action at any time in the future. That is criminal liability in exchange for $million. Not worth it. You are nearing the end of the road for your run.
When I originally assisted you on some of the errors in your original design which caused you to invent masternodes, I viewed you as a nice guy who was trying to develop something. When all these allegations of fraud and premine crap came out, I was very shamed that I had let you get away with promoting Dash. I always knew that Dash was a barely literate design (come on do you really want me to explain how your new anonymity design will be just as flawed as the current on in Dash!), but I didn't want to interfere because I am not the altcoin police (unlike smooth who sometimes tries to act like a sheriff). But really I have to tell you frankly, that I am ashamed that you have mined the speculators and not proposed any real impact for mass usership. And now you have the audacity to go pumping up this Evolution design as some great innovation and fooling more gullible speculators. I mean if you hadn't of done the fraud thing, I would probably not be hitting you so hard now. Again I don't go around harping on the fraud thing, because I am not the altcoin police. But pleeeaaaseee do not try to argue that you are capable on block chain theory tech. You are not. I don't want to help you because you are doing evil in terms of the goals we as a community are trying to reach. You are siphoning away money from the community and not putting it towards actual innovation (both marketing and technical) that could really help us deal with the problem of a State gone amok. Help us to reach the ideals of crypto. Instead you are just mining the speculators and they seem to believe you are technically capable. You are capable enough to produce code, and you are capable enough to correct mistakes that are pointed out to you. But you are not capable enough to get the really smart people to work with you on ongoing basis, because you are not going in the correct direction in terms of the purpose of why we are here supporting crypto in the first place, which is to get millions of users to use crypto and to better the world (while also making money from increased adoption, not from mining from each other i.e. extracting money from each other in zero-sum game on this forum). Maybe if you mea culpa on the premine crap and work towards bettering the world instead fooling (ahem marketing to the) the speculators, then maybe I would feel like helping you. But any way, I am moving forward on trying to move the crypto world forward in the direction it needs to be going. Maybe you should help me! I helped you before and you made a lot of money from me standing aside and not criticizing Dash in the early days. Maybe now it is time for you to pay back to the community. And most definitely you can't duplicate my marketing plan directly to millions of users. This is the end of the road for Dash.
It will be evident some weeks from now that Dash has no future.Edit: I will look at your source code links when I have time. I need to head out the door to do errands. If I discover that any of my points are incorrect, I will mea culpa. Again I don't hate you, but I feel I must be frank about the technology because we really need innovation that help us reach the goals of crypto and not just half-assed tech from guys who design schemes to siphon off the capital of crypto into their pockets. And again I have studied the SEC regulations and all these marketing to speculators is clearly a violation of the Howey test for being an unregistered illegal investment security. It doesn't matter how you've obfuscated it by pretending the masternodes are in control, the Supreme Court has consistently said that the test overlooks any attempts to obfuscate the economic reality of the situation. Then on top of that is the evidence of deception with the premine and the advertised money supply protocol being altered ex post facto, etc. And afaik you are a USA citizen, so thus you incur the maximum culpability. Evan Madoffield ![Embarrassed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/embarrassed.gif) DASH ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif)
|
|
|
For real?? I had bookmarked that paper for a read, but after your quote i'm not sure if i should read it ... What kind of paper is this if they can't even get the name of DASH right ... Such a sloppy research on DASH that they even can't get the name right is just so amateurish ... I'll notify the author to adjust it. Agree it is a bit sloppy, but he isn't the only one who got it wrong. Maybe it's not sloppy, but a dig at Dash's snake oil and your cargo cult's bad 'bamboo version' of crypto. Regardless, it's a good example of why stealing the Dash-coin name for Darkcoin's rebrand was a bad idea.
|
|
|
The Dash governance system has been a great success.
Nonsense on stilts. Dash's governance system is broken because two entities (Duffield and Otoh) control too many Masternodes. And this problem is compounded by the 1% chance of an 'easter egg' double payment, which causes the rich to get richer. If you want to see PoW-PoS hybrid vote-by-blockchain governance being done right, check out Decred. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358
|
|
|
Still some XMR outstanding that are used for short position. I am quite confident of this because these mini-orders (< 0.0001 BTC) that appear on the trading logs / bitcoinwisdom are margin settlements. That is, the polo engine buys XMR for you (if you don't have any available) to pay your interest.
I also noticed those mini-orders. Seems self-defeating to let the polo engine drive up with market buys the price of the thing you bet will go down. The orders are really tiny and would take a long time to even take out one ask order. Other than creating a slightly misleading tape (for people who merely look at last tick direction without paying attention to the volume) it doesn't really drive up the market. Yes, the micro-orders are too tiny to meet the minimum for normal trades. But they do paint the tape and I'm sure some non-negligible percent of volume-blind bots, plus Cryptsy and Mintpal types, trade based on the 'hurr-durr buy the green sell the red' strategy. The information being leaked by the micro-orders seems like a bigger issue tho. Of course lenders can also share/utilize those numbers directly....
|
|
|
I will buy 1 viacoin for every xt troll that get banned by btcdrack on r/btc ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) r/btc is the xt troll mothership. Which is why banning hellobitcoinworld from there was such EPIC FUNS. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) drak was foolish to engage the toxic Gavinista malcontent community as if it held any potential for construction discussion. Hey drak, how is the view from underneath the Bitcoin Judas bus? Is the tread looking OK or does it need new tires? What about the brake pads? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Go fuck yourself.
He already doing that right here. lazy Russian clowns
Thank you for proving the overwhelming capabilities of your genius level intellect. I must bow down before the academic superiority of your central planning skills. I hear they save lots of time and money! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Perhaps in time, I too can learn to hate economic freedom and despise those who promote it over socialism/communism. Meanwhile, it's time for more Pictures from Russia. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F2NIIWAZ.jpg&t=663&c=wW3AOZ4V_7kmkg) Russian soldiers supporting an uprising instigated by Trotsky against the Tsar in St. Petersburg, 1917. What a nice pile of dead kulaks. They could have been reeducated to appreciate the wonders of Marxism, but that would take too much time and money. Murdering them is almost 100% efficient.
|
|
|
Still some XMR outstanding that are used for short position. I am quite confident of this because these mini-orders (< 0.0001 BTC) that appear on the trading logs / bitcoinwisdom are margin settlements. That is, the polo engine buys XMR for you (if you don't have any available) to pay your interest.
I also noticed those mini-orders. Seems self-defeating to let the polo engine drive up with market buys the price of the thing you bet will go down. Perhaps a clever monitoring program could watch the lending market, then use mini-order data to extrapolate outstanding shorts. Of course that could be Sybil attacked by some jerk lending to themselves just to spread disinformation. And we don't know how many shorts are using their own stack for interest payments. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Good news: Dash-coin is finally being mentioned in actual cryptographic literature. Bad news: Dash-coin is mentioned only as an example of what Peter Todd calls "bad crypto." https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098.pdfOne benefit of using the above types of ring signatures over other anonymizing techniques, such as CoinJoin or using coin mixing services, is that they allow for “spontaneous” mixing. With CoinJoin or coin mixers, it is similarly possible to hide the originator of a given transaction, however these techniques in practice need some sort of centralized group manager, such as a centralized CoinJoin server, where transactions are combined by a trusted party. In the case that the trusted party is compromised, the anonymity of the transaction is also compromised.
Some coins such as Dashcoin, attempt to negate this by using a larger number of trusted mixers (in this case masternodes) but this number is still much smaller than the users of the coin.
In contrast, with a spontaneous ring signature, transactions can be created by the owner of a given pubkey (this is the spontaneous, or “ad-hoc” property) without relying on any trusted server, and thus providing for safer anonymity.
|
|
|
So now we know what happened to Paycoin's graphic design and marketing team. 'OH LOOK SHINY PRECIOUS DIAMONDS AND HAPPY CARTOON WHALES, HERE PLEASE TAKE MY 2 BITCOINS' [/s]
|
|
|
Let's be careful with our arguments here. Nearly everyone supports increasing the block size. Arguing against people who don't support an increase is a straw argument that misses the point. The point, rather, is precisely how increasing the block size ought to be implemented. imho, the most insightful and thoughtful opinion on the matter has come from Dr. Adam Back.
And yet, the Gavinistas compete to out-do one another in the stridency of their condemnations of Dr. Backamoto. Plus, you have uber-shitlord hearn@sigint.google.mil encouraging such insufferable ingratitude and exorbitant contempt for Adam's demonstrated expertise. coblee's recent " Eating the Bitcoin Cake" op-ed is also very good, as it summarizes and builds upon Backamoto's work, while making it accessible for the ELI5 crowd. Bitcoin Is Not One-Size-Fits-All
I contend that we should design Bitcoin for security and decentralization above all else. Transactions that need the highest security and decentralization will need to pay the higher transaction fees required to use the Bitcoin network. Not all transactions can afford this fee, but then they likely don’t need the security and decentralization. And that’s perfectly fine. They can use Litecoin and altcoins, sidechains, payment channels, lightening networks, off-blockchain networks, and other yet to be created networks to send those transactions. Heck, they can still use Visa if merchants are willing to pay the fees.
You would use bitcoin to buy a house or a car. A 60-minute wait and a $1 fee for an extremely secure, decentralized, and irreversible transaction is perfectly fine. If you are buying coffee and need a cheap but fast transaction but don’t care about security or decentralization, you can use Litecoin, lightening networks, sidechains, or even Starbucks off-blockchain transactions. As long as everything is seamless, users don’t care. Transactions will be routed to the payment network that makes the most sense based on the needs of that transaction type. Technologies like on-chain swaps, lightening networks, payment channels, and sidechains will allow seamless and cheap/free conversions between Bitcoin and everything else. Wallets will hide all that complexity from the users. We are not there yet, but that future is very exciting. Not every transaction will be native Bitcoin transactions but every person will use Bitcoin.
|
|
|
That's quite the domination post. TPTB_need_Anonymint's is close, but not as exhaustive nor as concise. Still, we needed an update to debunk Dash's latest Evolusham vaporware con. And here it is: I claim that Dash is spyware because the anonymity is trusted to masternodes which are an obvious target for the NSA or anyone who can profit on breaking anonymity (e.g. those who want to blackmail you or whatever).
I don't need to dig in the source. It is a conceptual truth in terms of the way the anonymity has been described (at least the last time I paid attention). Evan mentioned he was going to improve it for Evolution, but even if he shifts to onion routing across masternodes, that won't entirely absolve the attacks on anonymity from colluding masternodes (although it can improve the statistics on the masternode coverage needed for breaking anonymity). Ditto any mixnet he employs, including if he prefers to implement CoinShuffle. Instead if he implements Cryptonote then he won't have RingCT's features. If implements RingCT, then he is copying Monero's recent research. Also I doubt he is capable of understanding the RingCT white paper and implementing it. He will probably have to work by copying source code or hiring some expert crypto assistance. In any case, that won't correct the other flaws in InstantX and mass-scale transactions that are his other big selling points of Evolution. And none of that will correct the fact that masternodes reduces Dash to an inferior proof-of-stake security/politics model.Domination and debunking continues: When all the masternodes are hosted, it is not crap to say the NSA can probably get access trivially. When most are hosted on one cloud provider (something I read, don't know if it is true), then even an employee could potentially get access trivially.
You simply can't get anonymity without cryptography. The masternodes see everything in clear text. Dash is more likely to be spyware than anonymity. In fact, I've conjectured the wild speculation that Evan hasn't been worried about SEC because he might be on the dole of the NSA (but that is too conspiratorial to assert as likely).
Dark my ass. Dark where the NSA got its fist up the users' buttholes. I have often returned to the wild speculation that Dark(Vader)Coin was really a big data harvesting coin.
The official definition of spyware is any software that exposes your data out on the wire. It doesn't have to actually be intended to do that. Just opening the security hole is sufficient to meet the definition.
|
|
|
Feel free to try and attack a PoS chain and let me know how successful you are.
That happens all the time. PoS coins have to use (increasingly convoluted) checkpoint schemes to fight 'nothing-at-stake' type attacks. NovaCoin, for example, just got #rekt by one. And Balthazar is 100 times smarter and better at coding than Dash's trash developer. It would be such a terrible tragedy if Dash suffered catastrophic consensus failure about an hour before Madoffield's Miami talk starts... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FYwbjYRw.png&t=663&c=jHoZMrLIVc6GAA) Thanks to TBTB_need_Anonymint for tearing Evan Maddoffield a new asshole! IX requires 6 of 10 signatures to create a transaction lock.
Which is exactly what I wrote it must do, and exactly what I wrote when I surmised that your white paper was implying the highly jammable design of 10-of-10. But as I pointed out in the correct math (which is clear you still haven't grasped), even 6-of-10 can be jammed 62% of the time (and multiply spent the other 38% of the time) given a 50% attack on the masternodes (i.e. the 50% attack on masternodes can attack 100% of the InstantX transactions). Even at 10% attack on masternodes, then every 666th UTXO can be jammed and roughly every 10,000th UTXO can be multiply spent. So if there are 66,600 UXTO, then a 10% attack on the masternodes (i.e. controlling 10% of the masternodes) roughly can jam 100 of the available UXTO and double-spend (actually multiply spend, i.e. unlimited lies can be announced by masternodes) 7 of them. These sort of flaws are amateurish. You are in over your head. You are a programmer and some sort of finance person and a reasonably good marketer mining the gullible speculators (but not to actual users of currency), but you are not capable enough on the block chain theory. This entire argument is based on an invalid premise! So your jamming attack doesn't work...
Nope. My entire argument is you apparently still don't know how to do basic probability math. Will you attempt to copy my design and order Dash's masternode announcements? Then will you try to copy my design and merge all the orphans? If not, you will still have attack flaws in your design. Will you replace the deposit for controlling a masternodes with a nomination by PoW, so as to avoid the flaw of externalities that can finance the purchase of masternodes, e.g. shorting the coin. Well even if you do manage to copy my design, you still can't fix the fact that attacking masternodes is a one-time cost and not sublinear (ongoing cost) as per attacking a correctly designed PoW coin (which is the point that has been made by myself, monsterer, and smooth). And thus Dash is a proof-of-stake security model, not a proof-of-work. Thus it can be undermined by for example combining shorting with attacking masternodes. And you won't get all the small details correct, because you simply don't have enough smart people helping you, because apparently the smart people don't want to work on your closed source during development (and very well documented allegations: fraud) coin. I would never work on your coin, because you have no usership. It is all marketing to speculators to mine the speculators. What is the point? We are supposed to be creating crypto to change the world and entice millions or billions of users. But that has never been your marketing plan. You've always been mining the speculators instead. And also I do believe the SEC will be coming after you eventually for very clearly running an unregistered illegal investment security (and you come from the finance world so you know very well that you are skirting the securities law). Hope you've paid off the regulators with the $million you mined from the gullible speculators in crypto. Personally I don't see how it has been worth it. The $million you've perhaps pocketed will never sustain you to be rich for the rest of your life, and you will constantly have hanging over your head the threat of SEC action at any time in the future. That is criminal liability in exchange for $million. Not worth it. You are nearing the end of the road for your run.
When I originally assisted you on some of the errors in your original design which caused you to invent masternodes, I viewed you as a nice guy who was trying to develop something. When all these allegations of fraud and premine crap came out, I was very shamed that I had let you get away with promoting Dash. I always knew that Dash was a barely literate design (come on do you really want me to explain how your new anonymity design will be just as flawed as the current on in Dash!), but I didn't want to interfere because I am not the altcoin police (unlike smooth who sometimes tries to act like a sheriff). But really I have to tell you frankly, that I am ashamed that you have mined the speculators and not proposed any real impact for mass usership. And now you have the audacity to go pumping up this Evolution design as some great innovation and fooling more gullible speculators. I mean if you hadn't of done the fraud thing, I would probably not be hitting you so hard now. Again I don't go around harping on the fraud thing, because I am not the altcoin police. But pleeeaaaseee do not try to argue that you are capable on block chain theory tech. You are not. I don't want to help you because you are doing evil in terms of the goals we as a community are trying to reach. You are siphoning away money from the community and not putting it towards actual innovation (both marketing and technical) that could really help us deal with the problem of a State gone amok. Help us to reach the ideals of crypto. Instead you are just mining the speculators and they seem to believe you are technically capable. You are capable enough to produce code, and you are capable enough to correct mistakes that are pointed out to you. But you are not capable enough to get the really smart people to work with you on ongoing basis, because you are not going in the correct direction in terms of the purpose of why we are here supporting crypto in the first place, which is to get millions of users to use crypto and to better the world (while also making money from increased adoption, not from mining from each other i.e. extracting money from each other in zero-sum game on this forum). Maybe if you mea culpa on the premine crap and work towards bettering the world instead fooling (ahem marketing to the) the speculators, then maybe I would feel like helping you. But any way, I am moving forward on trying to move the crypto world forward in the direction it needs to be going. Maybe you should help me! I helped you before and you made a lot of money from me standing aside and not criticizing Dash in the early days. Maybe now it is time for you to pay back to the community. And most definitely you can't duplicate my marketing plan directly to millions of users. This is the end of the road for Dash.
It will be evident some weeks from now that Dash has no future.Edit: I will look at your source code links when I have time. I need to head out the door to do errands. If I discover that any of my points are incorrect, I will mea culpa. Again I don't hate you, but I feel I must be frank about the technology because we really need innovation that help us reach the goals of crypto and not just half-assed tech from guys who design schemes to siphon off the capital of crypto into their pockets. And again I have studied the SEC regulations and all these marketing to speculators is clearly a violation of the Howey test for being an unregistered illegal investment security. It doesn't matter how you've obfuscated it by pretending the masternodes are in control, the Supreme Court has consistently said that the test overlooks any attempts to obfuscate the economic reality of the situation. Then on top of that is the evidence of deception with the premine and the advertised money supply protocol being altered ex post facto, etc. And afaik you are a USA citizen, so thus you incur the maximum culpability.
|
|
|
if even a small percentage of the "big block crowd" in Bitcoin decide that Monero is the solution to the 1 MB blocksize limit in Bitcoin then anyone caught short Monero is in for a real shock.
A small percent is all I would expect. Many among the "big block crowd" are Bitcoin Maximalist Monopolist Supremacists (EG Frap.doc) and despise any threat to their One True Coin. The BBC also hates the Core small blockers who have said nice things about Monero (Peter The Todd, Gmax, thermos, wlad).
|
|
|
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Pro Tip: you can get Bitcoin out of Craptsy by exchanging them for Monero, and then selling those on Poloniex.
|
|
|
The historical evidence is that during a Bitcoin boom alt-coins for the most part have increased sharply in value with respect to Bitcoin. The current low price of Monero with respect to Bitcoin is the market not factoring in the development that has occurred in Monero over the last year. This is likely due the very old "official" binaries. The 0.8.8.6 version of Monero (the last official binaries) require over 9.2 GB in RAM. Seriously how many computers can handle that? Now compare that to the memory requirements of a Monero binary that is complied from the current source code.
My take is that staying "short" on Monero at this point in time is playing with fire.
The market has had plenty of time to anticipate and price in the new version. I expect a crash, as the normal 'buy the rumor, sell the news' thing plays out. There are plenty of XMR available to borrow. Hard to get caught short when the interest rates are so low you can easily afford to wait until prices fall. I've never seen such low total bids. ~30BTC in dumps between here and 0.0001. Yikes! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Looks like we're going to retest last year's all time low of 0.00091. Get ready to ride the Monerocoaster!
|
|
|
Here is the typical result of your glorious central planning and state-run enterprises.
Put too some pictures of private-run Fukushima business. This is a typical demagogic attempt. As far as I understand, that river has just been wasted with radioactive shit, there was no 9th grade earthquake there to ruin a huge nuclear station on its shores. Yet, the picture is pretty atmospheric. Good point. It took a huge earthquake/tsunami to mess up the (sort of but not really) private Fukushima reactor. To ruin that river with radioactive shit it took a couple of lazy Russian clowns showing up to work at their government job drunk, and then falling asleep.
|
|
|
|