For anyone not familiar with the code, what this script does is the following:
Bets 1 bit at x1.08.
If you lose, doubles the bet, still at x1.08.
If you win, returns to the base bet of 1 bit.
Repeat
There are additional options to change the max bet and tweak the multipliers, but the script will run as above unless changed.
It doesn't take a coding expert or a math genius to figure this out. If the code is that simple, 1) aTriz could easily taken 30 seconds to look at this and known not to give his vouch, and 2) this could easily have been created after the fact in order to create the appearance there was a script when there was not. Also, this is basically the same as the autobet feature available at many (most?) gambling sites. |
|
|
|
Did you really call Zeroxal on the phone?
TMAN called his mom |
|
|
|
Script var config = {
baseBet: { value: 100, type: 'balance', label: 'base bet' },
payout: { value: 1.08, type: 'multiplier' },
stop: { value: 1e2, type: 'balance', label: 'stop if bet >' },
loss: {
value: 'increase', type: 'radio', label: 'On Loss',
options: {
base: { type: 'noop', label: 'Back to base bet, noob' },
increase: { value: 2, type: 'multiplier', label: 'Increase bet by' },
}
},
win: {
value: 'base', type: 'radio', label: 'On Win',
options: {
base: { type: 'noop', label: 'Return to base bet' },
increase: { value: 1.02, type: 'multiplier', label: 'Increase bet by' },
}
}
};
log('Script is running..');
var currentBet = config.baseBet.value;
// Always try to bet when script is started
engine.bet(currentBet, config.payout.value);
engine.on('GAME_STARTING', onGameStarted);
engine.on('GAME_ENDED', onGameEnded);
function onGameStarted() {
engine.bet(currentBet, config.payout.value);
}
function onGameEnded() {
var lastGame = engine.history.first()
// If we wagered, it means we played
if (!lastGame.wager) {
return;
}
// we won..
if (lastGame.cashedAt) {
if (config.win.value === 'base') {
currentBet = config.baseBet.value;
} else {
console.assert(config.win.value === 'increase');
currentBet *= config.win.options.increase.value;
}
log('We won, so next bet will be', currentBet/100, 'bits')
} else {
// damn, looks like we lost :(
if (config.loss.value === 'base') {
currentBet = config.baseBet.value;
} else {
console.assert(config.loss.value === 'increase');
currentBet *= config.loss.options.increase.value;
}
log('We lost, so next bet will be', currentBet/100, 'bits')
}
if (currentBet > config.stop.value) {
log('Was about to bet', currentBet, 'which triggers the stop');
engine.removeListener('GAME_STARTING', onGameStarted);
engine.removeListener('GAME_ENDED', onGameEnded);
}
}hash stuff hex: e9474064aaeb4d07689d80952adb4d785d318fcd43947b90ec25c12450876f50
HEX: E9474064AAEB4D07689D80952ADB4D785D318FCD43947B90EC25C12450876F50
h:e:x: e9:47:40:64:aa:eb:4d:07:68:9d:80:95:2a:db:4d:78:5d:31:8f:cd:43:94:7b:90:ec:25:c1:24:50:87:6f:50
base64: 6UdAZKrrTQdonYCVKttNeF0xj81DlHuQ7CXBJFCHb1A= Do your worst. If this is what aTriz was vouching for, then he very clearly did not do any kind of due diligence prior to vouching for the script, and was negligent in giving his vouch. I have serious doubts that aTriz is able to provide evidence that he can produce evidence that he actually ran this script between when alia started selling the script and when he provided the vouch, that is in line with his other statements. I might be wrong about this, and being proven wrong about this would not change my opinion about aTriz. |
|
|
|
I don't think you can ever go from extorting someone to being on decent terms with them.
This case has been settled already.
However, I believe this blackmail and extortion attempt already brought fair consequences, as lauda is no longer a staff member anymore and until lauda or someone else accuses me of more apparent "crimes", I believe this case can be closed. I had enough from witch trials and don't want to get involved in another one. All I want now is to clean my name again.
However, Quickseller obviously knows more about how Zeroxal feels than Zeroxal. This might be crazy, but maybe zeroxal wanted the harassment and intimidation to stop. |
|
|
|
I don't think you can ever go from extorting someone to being on decent terms with them.
Yeah, no. Keep trying to make this worse than it actually is. I don't see how you can view this any other way... |
|
|
|
I also wonder why he'd comment on this now as we've left this on *decent terms* all things considered. I don't think you can ever go from extorting someone to being on decent terms with them. Motivation remains questionable.
Maybe he wants criminals to be held accountable, especially when he is the victim of a crime those criminals engaged in, thats just a guess. |
|
|
|
Edit from previous post: Is that a fresh statement? It seems somewhat different from what I remember.
Yes. How exactly is it different? I don't think taking the copy of a passport under the guise of confidentiality and giving it to someone who is attempting to extort him is exactly "innocent" |
|
|
|
Considering that aTriz makes his income in bitcoin (and crypto) What is your source for the implication that all of aTriz's income comes from Bitcoin?
Furthermore, is it not possible that Bitcoin can be sold and rebought? The lack of responses from aTriz is also certainly not helping his case either. he's specialFrom what I can tell, most of his income is in bitcoin, and has enough BTC income and low enough fiat based income so that he has had to convert bitcoin to fiat in the past. Sure, he can sell bitcoin and buy it back later, however this is unusual when you have income in bitcoin, and would need to pay a large premium to buy back as alia was asking for. The long delays in responses and lack of responses on the part of aTriz does not look good. He has responded, so he cannot argue the accusations are so outrageous that they do not merit a response because he has responded. The lack of responses about him running the advertising campaigns (assuming he was not personally behind these) for not one, but two what are almost certainly ponzi scams isn't helping his case either. |
|
|
|
That is most certainly not proof of: OP updated with additional proof that owlcatz and IronMarvel2 were involved in this extortion conspiracy
There was extreme drama in that chatroom before I joined back to Slack. I didn't even knew some of the people in there existed before I joined back. Stop trying to hurt innocent people. IronMarvel2 very clearly gave you zeroxal's passport (image), according to zeroxal. Owlcatz was very clearly harassing zeroxal about bogus claims of criminal activity that was the basis for the extortion attempt. I am not sure how this could be any more clear. |
|
|
|
OP updated with additional proof that owlcatz and IronMarvel2 were involved in this extortion conspiracy  |
|
|
|
For the record: I find aTriz to be highly credible when he states that he has a script, and does not reveal it due to extortionate threat of doxing.
Based on what? Can you post the script alia gave you? If not - why?
let me see if I can dig it up aTriz knew about the dox when he posted this. Would you agree? He certainly knew that alia didn't want the script when he posted this. Considering that aTriz makes his income in bitcoin (and crypto) means that it is not even credible that aTriz would have excess PayPal and would need bitcoin, it would be more likely to be the other way around, as it was in January of this year. The lack of responses from aTriz is also certainly not helping his case either. This thread has been open for over a week, but the existence of a dox only came out in the past few days, and it took a day for the claim that alia has the dox via a PayPal trade thereafter. I don't think you have even seen any credible evidence the script even exists as all claims of proof the script works were betting histories of gambling accounts that clearly were not using any kind of script/bot. |
|
|
|
words
Don't you have your own aTriz-themed thread to attend to? Shall we request the duplicate threads to be merged? I mean pointing out that aTriz’s story is clearly not the truth. |
|
|
|
|
Surely scammers receive PayPal from other people fairly frequently. I wonder why there are not more instances of scammers blackmailing those that have sent them PayPal or else a Dox will be released....
Maybe because a name is usually not very much to go on, especially considering the fairly common last name alia posted that one would infer belongs to aTriz.
From what I can tell alia is a master scammer who was able to trick aTriz into a 3 year, $10k signature deal worth next to nothing, into aTriz giving a vouch for what now appears to be a non-existent gambling script (I have seen zero evidence of the existence of said script beyond the word of two untrustworthy people), and into aTriz giving up sufficient information to dox him. Only to have her master plan foiled by a small amount of casual research by a few forum members in their spare time.
|
|
|
|
Can you guys just settle the case with Atriz and stop responding altogether to this alia chap??
If it was anybody else, they would have been buried and forgotten by now. She knows that no trusted member would skype with her but is childishly insisting on that.
Is anybody even interested in knowing whether she is real or not?? What difference does it make to the forum?? She is another potential scammer that has been identified. Case closed. End of Line.
If she attempts another one of her sophisticated e-whoring, betting scams, people would know. Stop responding to her altogether please.
We've been going in circles for 20 pages. Case is closed. Even if everything you say is true, and even if you are completely trustworthy, your brother is a known scammer across multiple accounts and multiple mediums, even going so far (you claim) to forge your ID in an attempt to gain access to your exchange accounts. You have publically stated that you share forum accounts, wallet addresses, and now payment accounts with him.
Even if everything you say is true, someone would have to be mad to trust you, knowing that a scammer has access to all your accounts. Homestly, alia has been distracting from the aTriz matter since her reputation has become something beyond repair and has been doing a good job at such. Unfortunately there are a few idiots/trolls who continue to respond to her every post and demand having the last word. |
|
|
|
Next, master-P will return
It is interesting that, you, being new here made this reference... |
|
|
|
It has now been >24 hours since aTriz agreed to answer questions, but many remain unanswered... I will answer any questions about this from anyone except quickseller, please re ask your questions since I can't find any right now.
Can you post the script alia gave you? If not - why?
Am I understanding correctly that you willingly provided your personal information to alia??? [...]
5 Is he still using the script? and what are the results? I see no reason why he should stop using it, according to him, the results are fantastic.
[...]
5. No What made you stop? I don't like gambling, and had some sort of an addiction a couple years back. Is 1NUQjfkynX6rS96p7kQRw2TzNa5wQYs1ii not your deposit address to cloubet? How did Alia come into possession of Atriz personal info?
[..]
Did he offer you sexual favours or what? Were you compromised?
[...] You seem to maintain the stance that you are not technically adept. How were you able to work with the script then? Did you receive specific instructions? Can you explain briefly the procedure of running the script?
aTriz, would you please briefly describe what happened from your perspective?
One or 2 days after the sig deal, she pmed me about a script, then she sent it to me and I tested it out for 10 mins and then posted review Are you able to document this PM, and provide the PM number/ID?
aTriz, is there any linkage between alia possessing your personal data and the unprecedented 'signature' deal you did?
I mean, in light of what has transpired, it's not unreasonable to see both the "script" vouch and the large upfront payment being hush money/favor made under threat of doxxing/whatever.
That or not, you appear to have got yourself in a right fucking mess, to be honest.
How on earth does a loose cannon newbie end up with your "personal information"??
Was it freely given?
|
|
|
|
|
lol, I am not sure why you are having people send BTC to my address for this raffle. Probably to make a point.
The coin being sold in the OP has nothing to do with me, and I did not ask the OP to send BTC to me, nor does the OP owe me any money.
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to know if anyone is willing to trust those who have been involved in extortion attempts.
TMAN -- can you add this to the OP please?
|
|
|
|
Now, when you enter primedice website, you receive this message:  well it’s certainly good they are rushing things just to get reopened. |
|
|
|
Maybe you should have done that prior to making the above comments? I remember you name so I'm sure we have had some dealings in the past as well and I would expect more from you, but monkey see, monkey do apparently.
You're correct.Yes we have done dealings before in couple of your raffles.It's just the address reused made me a bit suspicious but anyway I consider this void from my end.Sorry for the inconvenience. You really need to stop listening to Quickseller, regardless of how credible his *whatever* looks like. He always tries to make his lies seem legitimate. There is no way possible for TMAN to be the same as hhampuz, completely different personalities (although this should be clear by now). You think two accounts using the same address isn’t proof they are the same person? Is this because they are closely associated with you? Or do you apply this standard to everyone? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
