We hope the above would explain why we remain anonymous
This has nothing to do with staying anonymous, you used pictures of other people who have nothing to do with this "project" and presented them as your team members for reasons known only to you, while on the other hand you are trying to collect millions of dollars from investors without escrow - nothing guaranties you won't run away with money as soon as you collect money. Just like Satoshi Nakamoto — the inventor of Bitcoin remained anonymous up until today, it isn’t important to know his real identity
It's nothing like Satoshi Nakamoto, stop making this shitty excuses. Satoshi didn't use pictures of other people. Satoshi didn't have ICO. Satoshi's identity is irrelevant and no one needs to know it. We wish to be anonymous to avoid unnecessary trouble/threats bring forth by the government/regulations that will compromise what COINTROOPS do for the community, for example to submit the KYC details, IP addresses and transaction detials of our customers to the authority
In other words - you don't want to pay tax. But lets talk about user's anonymity. ToS:To use our services, or to access this Website or some of the resources it has to offer, You may be asked to provide registration details in order to register a user account ("Account"). It is a condition of use of this Website and our Services that all the details You provide are correct, current and complete. If we believe the details are not correct[/b], current or complete, we have the right to refuse You access to the site or any of its resources and to terminate or suspend Your account. Why would you need such details if you claim to be anonymous exchange for anonymous users? This is part I don't understand, you said... Cointroops, the Decentralized P2P Exchange that go against the mainstream of reporting users with KYC to authority.
...while your ToS is pointing to something completely different: Cointroops may in the future request additional documentation to verify your identity or any other documents required in order to comply with local Anti-Money Laundering, Counter-Terrorist Financing, Proceeds of Crime legislation and any other such regulations, [/b]guidelines and internal policies that we are bound by or in our sole discretion deem to be necessary.
Your failure to provide relevant documentation and information may result in (a) immediate termination of Cointroops account; (b) seizure of digital assets deposited into Cointroops account; or both. Not only you faked your team members, you are also lying to investors that this exchange(if it exists at all) will be anonymous. |
|
|
|
~
Isn't that like 4,386 BTC sent to itself? And yet the blockchain says "Total Received 3,405.40731067 BTC"?
No, it is 1488 + 1689 + 100 + 100 + 100 = 3486 BTC (total received) while blockchain.info shows total received 3,405 BTC - my calculation is not correct calculation either, probably because not all funds were moved at some point. Or better, if you like, 100 + 100 + 100 - 1689 -100 - 100 + 1488 - 1497 = -1598, so approximately 1598 btc was in that address. Don't break your head too much, if you want correct calculation why it shows 3,405.4 BTC you will have to go trough all 3128 transactions. You can't just pick one which you like and ask questions. |
|
|
|
Sorry for redacting quote, I don't think it is necessary to center scam accusation topic, it looks like a song. I didn't check other team members - but here is another place with Kevin Zhang's picture: https://www.college.columbia.edu/alumni/connect/recent-gradsMaybe they can explain how Kevin become Sung Min-Kyu? |
|
|
|
Accounts are proven alts
We know that  so if they enrolled the same yahoo's campaing they abused it
Did they?
Marlboroza, I respect your opinion
It's not my opinion - connection is not good. Look at this logic(don't ask me how I figured this): Account TheUltraElite ID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=878630Account marlboroza ID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736 User ID's are very close. TheUltraElite was last time active September 01, 2018, 06:46:58 PM...  ...while my last post was posted only 5 minutes before that on: September 01, 2018, 06:41:06 PM  Both of us were in FortuneJack's signature campaign(Theultraelite still is). They use ["hr"] the same as I do, also " "[1], they make this grammar mistakes "Dont", "Its", "Thats" which I used to do 2 years ago etc. Also, if you look at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=878630;sa=showPosts;start=3380 you will see that they started this "journey" [1] in microearning section, the same as I did. I can probably connect dozens accounts like this with my account, the same way I can connect dozens accounts with your account or anyone else's account, such connections are very dangerous - I am not sure why timelord sometimes connects accounts this way and it is first reason why I countered this - second reason is I can't find where both accounts enrolled in yahoo's campaign - I see only 2 PM's which in my opinion isn't reason to tag someone. red tag is appropriate here. Well, about that, I can only repeat what LoyceV said  I too respect your opinion, so let's agree to disagree |
|
|
|
~
Abusing the same signature campaign isn't contested here, so I assume that part is true.
Where is abuse part?  I don't see it and I can't find it. For example, if DarkStar_ close chipmixer signature campaign and after some time reopens it, and you ask them from this account "do I need to join again" and after few minutes you ask them the same question from main account, should both accounts be tagged for abusing campaigns? From all information collected I see only 1 account was in that campaign. |
|
|
|
The projects aren't given any "rating", so should that give any benefit of the doubt?
This is from their site: ICOholder is a platform that was established to provide its users reliable information about the best Initial Coin Offering projects and help ICOs attract more investors ICOethics has discovered this(I'll point to their topic for better visibility and you can find links to scam accusations there): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2264556.msg44361900#msg44361900Now, this is new info for mentioned "project" (the other one as well):  How(Or better, when?) 4.27/5, with 5/5 rating for their fake team turned into - "it might be scam"? |
|
|
|
|
ICO rating sites shouldn't be trusted at all, especially this one - as they allow scammers to verify their fake team members and they are giving them high rates if they do that. For all verified stock pictures they will rate ICO team with 5/5 - this is proven.
To be honest, I don't think they are blackmailing anyone here, do you have proof of your claim?
If you find more accounts send me PM I'll tag them all.
|
|
|
|
Yahoo's screenshot is solid proof of connection between OP and account preditor422. Connection between OP and other 7-8 accounts is: Name: nikjain422
Last Active: April 29, 2018, 06:28:59 AM
Name: LamontFalkner
Last Active: April 29, 2018, 08:08:14 PM
Name: MarlonDamon
Last Active: April 29, 2018, 10:24:39 PM
 Are we going to take "nikjain422 was active on 6 AM and LamontFalkner was active on 8 PM" as solid proof? I don't think so. More likely is that Glomerulus22 accidentally copied his alt account's ID "U=1277719"(nikjain422, preditor422) while investigating. But that is only assumption. *
Yahoo has also red trusted me saying I have cheated eroiy campaign but I have not. Instead of sending him the btc address through my account I accidentally sent him the address through my alt account. He red trusted me for that and I do not deserve it.
This is not so hard to prove. I don't see any of these accounts here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3002004.0;all or here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3002007.0;all so looking at reference link, I figured there was another signature thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827626.msg28977175#msg28977175Looking at that screenshot https://imgur.com/kFjoDTp account predito422 was in Eroiy signature campaign while account nikjain422 was in EBCOIN signature campaign. PM " do we have to apply again or we get in directly" indicates that someone who was already in Eroiy's campaign wants to know answer, and they probably logged in to wrong accounts. So, question is - did both accounts enroll or have tried to enroll in campaign? My logic is telling me they figured that they sent PM from wrong account and then they sent identical PM from alt account only few minutes later. edited(4-5 times) * |
|
|
|
I have reported campaign manager. He is taking to action. I suppose he will do it when he will start calculating stakes, or when this week ends.
I reported all accounts to moderator, as this is blatant copy/paste of other people's posts. If you ask me all these accounts should be banned, but to be honest I am not sure moderator will take this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg44867408#msg44867408 as a solid proof of connection. Please quote whole conversation, as many of us don't have cyrillic keyboard |
|
|
|
You missed many scams, if you want to do full list may I suggest you to take a look into suchmoon's, cryptodevil's and my trust wall? Honestly I am too lazy to write down all exposed scams lately, there are just too many of them. Also, check this site https://icoethics.com, I believe you will find approximately 150 scam ICO's. I'll decide if this still necessary or should be locked.
It is good thread, just keep it updated  |
|
|
|
 Another users who's almost certainly just been told by someone they can earn here and they literally have no fucking clue what to do. He'll be on a signature soon and be getting paid for this crap. I think they accidentally created poll, question should have been - "I am newbie, help me to go away".
We have to help these people to find their answers, don't just bash them:  See? It is very easy. You just have to tick one. I really love these polls, especially when they have the same options and "multi-ticking", I usually tick all the same answers. |
|
|
|
Both projects are very likely joke. Look at piedpipercoins's team members, they are obviously acting in TV show Silicon Valley https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2575988/ . Check this app:  It is redirecting to "not hotdog" application:  Apparently this app is telling you if hotdog is on picture: Description
What would you say if I told you there is a app on the market that tell you if you have a hotdog or not a hotdog. It is very good and I do not want to work on it any more. You can hire someone else. 
As for https://www.piperchain.io/ ICO look at description of their team members: CEO: The Pied Piper, or ‘PP’ for short, has been in the blockchain space for a while. Growing up in a family of Satanists, he developed multipersonality disorder at the age of 10. His personalities are: Richard, Gilfoyle, Dinesh, Jared, Eurlich, Big Head and Jin-Yang. PP has lived through all the pumps and dumps, fake announcements and fake partnerships to know to not f*** this coin up. PP studied Psychology, Finance and Economics at an early age. Now PP is developing the coin to end all coins, the one true bit…shit I did not mean to go all Roger Ver here…uhh, PP is developing the coin to end all coins with the exception of Bitcoin CTO: The Stallion is PP’s right hand man. Known as “Dude I’m not funny, please stop asking me to be come up with a funny bio” man. He was coding since the age of six years old. He has coded on a few multi-billion dollar projects and created a coin of his own at an early age that once was in the top 100 marketcap. The Stallion now leads the technical direction of $PPI under the leadership of PP  Their roadmap is even better: Q1 - 2018
Shilling hard on twitter, paying people to shill as well. Getting on to exchanges. Pumping our bags tremendously. Acquire more partnerships. Current partnerships include: Bitconnect, Charlie Lee, and Michael Suppo. Looking to partner with Satoshi Nakamoto, I heard his real name is Craig...lame. Was there any ICO at all? |
|
|
|
Stupid people like you say anything without any single proof : do you have even a single instance where I have scammed someone ? No ? Please get lost !
Looking at proofs... I think this is far better idea to call at least 10 DT members to verify the basis on which a person is negative tagged .
Verifying proofs....reading Lauda's reference opinion....reading ibminer's reference opinion....reading The Pharmacist's reference opinion... Nah, everything is just fine with your trust wall, especially this part http://archive.is/j7AEM. There you go, now go and find 6 other opinions and see if someone will counter negative feedback |
|
|
|
i dont care about the money
Yes you do, you wouldn't be here if you don't telegram is full of messages that you get XX.XX$ and that this is more than you have invested. But in BTC you lost 55%.
Can you clarify this? For example, if you invested 1BTC you should get 1BTC refund and forked coins. What is this $ nonsense? Can you say, if it is not secret, how many bitcoins you had invested and how many bitcoins you will receive back? |
|
|
|
Are you sure? How do you explain that these teams are fake scams? is there any real evidence that strengthens, can you explain to me, sorry and thank you.
Are you blind? They are shitposting to increase their post count for signature campaign, talking to them is like talking to a brick wall - in 99.9% you won't get any response, and remaining 0.1% - well, you see... I wonder where is moderator. |
|
|
|
It is funny how you scammers are always talking about how trust system should work. Besides, OP is exactly what people are fighting against - payed ICO bump service, shilling for scam projects, spamming forum, bumping threads with nonsense, misleading investors etc. I think there shoud be a voting system for DT members to survive each month .
Who will vote? You and your alt account army? Shitposters with 50+ accounts? Quacky and his alt account army? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
