... That is interesting. Here is a link to "reccession, 2015" that I just ran, same kind of recent spike up: http://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=reccession%2C+2015#q=reccession%2C%202015&cmpt=q&tz=* * * On the other hand, interest in a specific time frame is going to skew the results. Here is a link to "reccession, 2014": http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=reccession%2C%202014&cmpt=q&tz=Note that the graph shows a LOT of interest back in 2014, not so much before or since. * * * "global economy" yields a declining interest over the past few years: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=global%20economy* * * "measles": http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=measlesBIG spike in 2015! * * * "bitcoin":http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bitcoinDisclosure: I cannot comment on the predictive power of Google Trends. Predicting the future is hard, particularly since it has not happened yet. Yogi Berra is purported to have said something like that, smile,,, i think that you are using trends in the wrong way... you need to use the search engine joining the term recession and 2015... or you will get a nonsense result . of course, the google search who contains "2015" are more and more than the google search who contains "recession" and it is correct who the search of the term "2015" rise approaching 2015... it is not the same if you search with the terms joined...
|
|
|
ty CIYAM... i know the thread... I thought there were other developers besides vbcs and you .. sorry!!! keep it up!!! thanks!!!
|
|
|
Hi all. i do some simplest search using google trends... i have searched simple terms like: crush 2015 recessio 2015 2015 dump 2015 collapse and i can see they are all increasing in the end of 2014... just a coincidence??? or not... USA economy it at the max... we are ready for a new global recession? and the oil price, are suggesting us, exactly this?? and over all... how bitcoin price will react??
|
|
|
In regards to adding a Donation button to the UI (prior to 100% funding goal reached) - unless we have that as being a general idea for all ATs (i.e. to "donate" to their creators) then it should not be done for an already published ATs (as you can't "update" an AT) - it could only thus appear in a future crowdfund.
The entire point of "consensus" is that you can't just go and change it (otherwise people would not trust ATs at all).
As we are working on a complete new design for AT UI (that will get rid of the need to download .html files) the AT team is not going to focus on such "small issues" for now (feel free to bring them up again when our new UI implementation appears).
i think could be useful to the community to have a small presentation of team crew... for now i understand who AT team it is composed from you and vbcs. there are other devs? why you do not presents you on a dedicated post? i think burst community will appreciate and maybe you will be able to gather some donations..
|
|
|
Has anyone already got on his PD account the bitcent? No yet!
|
|
|
dont try invest to this site !!!
it is so dangerous
cz many people said that the site has ben indicated as Scam Site
sure! this is ponzi scheme site!!! all this kind of investment, without any kind of added value, are a ponzi scammer schema!! be aware!!! or use it just with faucet...
|
|
|
Last chance to get in! Noticed a lot of people who won't be elegible (Obvious sig campaign spammers owned by same people). So it's not too late to try get ya bonus!
hi stunna!!! can you tell us if the payment will be posted here and you give us txID? so we can verify it! thanks!!!
|
|
|
I had someone ask for my opinion earlier today regarding this coin.
After taking a look distribution, it looks to be another get rich quick scheme, but it did work for ripple.
Anyone thinking of investing should contact the companies supposedly associated with the coin.
Seems ripe for a PnD.
can you explain better how this schema work? thanks. They can exit at any value and profit, which they will if the project is a scam or fails. Otherwise, They will use their large market share to manipulate the price in any direction they please. It's just highly risky investing in a crypto currency that is distributed in such an uneven fashion. Their roadmap looks rather juvenile for such an expensive ico, doesn't have much substinance. I wouldn't hold longterm. thank you anticlimax!!! now i understand the distribution schema!!! and i agree who 79,99999% of the coin in the hands of few guyz it is not so good!!!
|
|
|
Does anyone know how to make Blagos miner 'error out' faster on fast blocks? When a fastblock happens and if the previous mine hasn't completed, the miner will just sit there anywhere from 0-30 seconds playing with itself before it realizes it should move on. I've been watching this happen like clockwork over the past week or so, precious mine time is lost on the new block. If there are two fast blocks in a row, it may be even skip the middle one completely.
This can't be fixed from the user end? Did not observe such problems. You can pm to me screenshot and log file when this happens? Not sure how to take pictures of this. Sometimes the miner will just 'stop' mining when a new block happens, occasionally it will start immediately on the new block, but usually it'll just sit there for a little bit. Sometimes it'll spit out some 'fast block or corrupt file. When this happens the % will sometimes sit there after it moves onto a new block, other times there wont be a percentage or a readout (where there normally is) when the new block starts). Even when it moves onto the next block without displaying the 'fastblock or corrupt file' message and the percentage just freezes, it wont always move on right away to the next block. From what I've seen it doesn't transition smoothly. This 'transition' isn't consistent. I can watch two different computers mine and even if both get stuck because of a fast block, one sometimes moves on a lot faster (sometimes immediately) compared to the other. I recommend using the print function to post screenshots!!!! surely, the phone flash will not make the image incomprehensible
|
|
|
just received my first transaction
0.00013420 BTC
really thanks to BTC-Flow.com!!!
really attractive layout and REAL btc to withdraw!!!
thanks again!
|
|
|
username: mineIt
many thanx
|
|
|
To answer the most questions here, this coin aint about new tech and inovations just a clean honest coin in scrypt, based on LTC that is a proven codebase for stability.
maybe are you telling us "nothing new here?"
|
|
|
FAQ: How it work ? It’s very easy, you send BTC from your wallet, and when next people send their BTC you get back x1.25 of your deposit. Example: invest 0.01 and get back 0.0125. What is the minimum and maximum deposit amount? The minimum is 0.005BTC, the maximum is 2BTC . How many days a week do you pay? We pay 7 calendar days a week (including holidays). Can I make an additional deposit to BTCProfit if i already have an active deposit ? Yes you can make an unlimited number of deposit What happen if I sent mistakenly, less than minimum or more than maximum? You’ll be refunded, of course: All you need is just reply to this thread by typing/reporting your transaction hash, and you’ll receive back your amount. Do I need to register in your website? No, for play you just send your btc from your wallet and waiting. How long should I wait for payout? Simply when there are enough BTC to pay your payout, we don’t have rounds, blocks or a minimun waiting time. Can I use a web wallet? Using the Blockchain.info web wallet is OK! Other web wallets are good BUT shared wallet are denied because you’d be deposit from a shared address and we have no way of knowing what’s the address we can send your payout to. naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa other ponzi!!! let go to give some info about ponzi!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
|
|
|
Varoufakis is delusional. There's no way they are going to intimidate the Troika. Plus there is legit debt that they owe to them, not all is scam debt.
hi manselr! maybe 'ru german?
|
|
|
quando pensavo di aver capito tutto.. il miner stasera mi continua a dire "no deadlines" cosa può essere successo?
Sono successo io Ho inserito una deadline minima di 2592000 secondi, ossia 30 giorni, per ottimizzare le performance del server. A quanti GB sei arrivato? E' strano che non trovi neanche una deadline sotto i 30 giorni zip con quella DL quanti TB ci vogliono ... così a braccio 12TB possono bastare? facce sape!!! Certo, ne bastano molti meno, comunque considerate che le deadline superiori a 1 mese, anche se accettate, darebbero diritto a delle share bassissime, quindi in fase di pagamento sarebbero qualche burst al massimo. ok.. ottimo.. senti hai ualche scrypt sotto windos che attiva il miner solo quando la network size è sotto un certo tot? thanks
|
|
|
scrypt??
can you tell me the really new innovation of this coin??? thanks!!!
|
|
|
I'd like to give/explain another AT example. This is AT code for 'fund management'. The AT will store coins, and have 5 authorized users. If 3 of the 5 users send it the same message containing a destination address and an amount, the AT will make a transaction of that amount to that address. If no funds are transfered out for a set amount of time, the AT can be sent a message and the AT will assume it became inaccessable(lost keys, etc), and transfer it's funds to a set address. FUN @txIterTime get_Block_Timestamp ^declare scratch ^declare counter
at the top we store the current time for use when iterating transactions. declare can be used to force variable in specific positions, which can be useful to force variables to the begining if you want to pass initial data on at creation to have them initialized before the AT starts, but we don't do that here, so it's only for demo puposes
SET @numUsers #0000000000000005 SET @neededVotes #0000000000000003 SET @dormantTransferAddress #0000000000000000 SET @dormantTransferMinutes #0000000000000028
we set up some constants used, num users, num votes needed, address to tranfer for inactivity, and minutes of inactivity until transfer(should be much higher, but had it low for testing)
SET @dormantDeadline $txIterTime FUN @dormantDeadline add_Minutes_to_Timestamp $dormantDeadline $dormantTransferMinutes
we set a deadline for when we'll transfer to fallback if no transfers out occur
^allocate allowedUsers 5 ^allocate votesAccount 5 ^allocate votesAmount 5
allocate sets aside the specified number of spaces and also adds a SET command setting the variable name specified to the starting address of the block so it can be used as a pointer to an array
^comment set user ids in scratch assignments CLR @counter SET @scratch #a9d3c7e1052e59b6 SET @($allowedUsers + $counter) $scratch INC @counter SET @scratch #d588a72e511f576a SET @($allowedUsers + $counter) $scratch INC @counter SET @scratch #878344bc465ee397 SET @($allowedUsers + $counter) $scratch INC @counter SET @scratch #5b4a79c0ad8542ea SET @($allowedUsers + $counter) $scratch INC @counter SET @scratch #fca2612346d6d33b SET @($allowedUsers + $counter) $scratch ^comment end user id assignments
here we just hardcoded some user ids. for demo purposes these are the id numbers for burst accounts with passphrases a, as, asd, asdf, and asdfg.
ERR :dormantTransfer
we set an error handler. if for some reason the at get stuck and is unable to continue(trying to access address out of address space, divide by 0, etc), it will jump there instead of dieing. The risk of something like that happening here is low due to the simplicity of this at, but it's always a good idea to have a handler dumping the coins somewhere, otherwise they'll all end up in transaction fees going to the miners if you did make a mistake somewhere
PCS
pcs sets a new start point. the AT will resume from here instead of the top when we do finish calls, skipping over the initialization.
txloop: FUN A_to_Tx_after_Timestamp $txIterTime FUN @scratch check_A_Is_Zero FIZ $scratch FUN @txIterTime get_Timestamp_for_Tx_in_A FUN @scratch get_Type_for_Tx_in_A BZR $scratch :txloop
here we have a loop that tries to get the next transaction. an id of 0 is returned if there is none, so we finish if none was retrieved(FIZ = finish if zero). if we did get a tx id, we store the timestamp to use for the next tx retrieval attempt, and then check what type of tx we have. a normal payment is 0, but if there is a message attached it is a type 1. we ignore normal payments transfering funds in, but continue on processing if there is a message
CLR @counter FUN B_to_Address_of_Tx_in_A FUN @address get_B1 findUserLoop: SET @scratch $($allowedUsers + $counter) BEQ $address $scratch :foundUser INC @counter BLT $counter $numUsers :findUserLoop
here we check to see if the user is on the authorized list. we retrieve the address who sent us the tx, and loop through authorized users, and jump to :founduser if we found them in the list
^comment check dormant time BLE $txIterTime $dormantDeadline :notFoundUser JMP :dormantTransfer notFoundUser: JMP :txloop
if the user wasn't found, we check the timestamp against the inactivity timestamp. due to a limit on the distance a branch op can jump and limitations of the currently available assembler, a workaround needed to be used here of branching over a jmp. the most recent but not yet publically available version can automatically convert too far branches to branch jmp combinations, so this is a temporary issue if the inactivity deadline is up, we jump to :dormanttransfer, and if not we return to the tx loop.
foundUser: SET @userIndex $counter FUN message_from_Tx_in_A_to_B FUN @address get_B1 FUN @amount get_B2 SET @($votesAccount + $userIndex) $address SET @($votesAmount + $userIndex) $amount
if the user was found in the authorized list, we save the counter from the loop to use as the array index for that user's state. We get their message and save the intended destination and amount as that user's current vote
CLR @voteCount CLR @counter countVotesLoop: SET @scratch $($votesAccount + $counter) BNE $scratch $address :notSameVote SET @scratch $($votesAmount + $counter) BNE $scratch $amount :notSameVote INC @voteCount notSameVote: INC @counter BLT $counter $numUsers :countVotesLoop BGE $voteCount $neededVotes :votePassed JMP :txloop
now we loop through all the votes, and count up the amount which are identical to the one we just recorded. If the amoount is at least the threshold specified in the constants at the top, we jump to :votePassed, otherwise we head back to the tx loop
votePassed: FUN clear_B FUN set_B1 $address FUN send_to_Address_in_B $amount
when the vote is passed, we send that amount
CLR @counter CLR @scratch clearLoop: SET @($votesAccount + $counter) $scratch SET @($votesAmount + $counter) $scratch INC @counter BLT $counter $numUsers :clearLoop
we clear out all the votes after a send
^comment update dormant transfer deadline SET @dormantDeadline $txIterTime FUN @dormantDeadline add_Minutes_to_Timestamp $dormantDeadline $dormantTransferMinutes JMP :txloop
then we set a new inactivity deadline, and head back to the tx loop
dormantTransfer: FUN clear_B FUN set_B1 $dormantTransferAddress PCS sendAll: FUN send_All_to_Address_in_B JMP :sendAll
if the inactivity deadline runs out a jump from above can take us here, and this is also the error handler. we set the fallback address as destination, and put ourselves in an infinite loop sending there. the script will halt due to lack of funds immediatly after the send, so it will only get activated when it receives more, which it will then proceed to send, then halt I like more and more the concept of AT!!!! is a new form of democracy... really democracy. and if it is implemented correctly, it will not be possible buy-bribe votes-decisions if you have some time to spend... read this gbianchi project... oraclyze. it is liek http://www.augur.net/as soon as possible i will post english material!!
|
|
|
postatelo anche nella sezione internazionale.. c'è una traduzione in inglese del progetto?
|
|
|
|