![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FAWgyw4J.png&t=663&c=ajVArUc-PDZvfw) please help me,thanks! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) "-u djm34" ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
I'm using ccminer30 from djm34.
Same.
|
|
|
Not sure. I guess my wallet doesn't receive relevant information in time from peers so all my machines keep solving old blocks. I have 119 coin wallets which I all mined at some point yet I've never seen this many orphans.
Dude, seems like you maked a fork with many machines... In case of a fork I'd be finding blocks on the forked chain.
|
|
|
I give up on this amateur nonsense. Found 1 real block and 140+ orphans while the nodes are going for as long as minutes without relaying any data whatsoever. Unfortunately the debug.log doesn't include orphans to show.
HOW it can be 140 orphans if blocks count is 72? What's your bandwith? I have only 9 boooo. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.sc%2Fimg%2F7ff0dd8bb25eaaa7e6f67d6f1328989a.png&t=663&c=KARS1Q8r3ZBlfg) Not sure. I guess my wallet doesn't receive relevant information in time from peers so all my machines keep solving old blocks. I have 119 coin wallets which I all mined at some point yet I've never seen this many orphans.
|
|
|
how many coins can I mine with 2 k/h?
Currently about 2-3 coins a day.
|
|
|
I give up on this amateur nonsense. Found 1 real block and 140+ orphans while the nodes are going for as long as minutes without relaying any data whatsoever. Unfortunately the debug.log doesn't include orphans to show.
|
|
|
only 1 node = orphans everywhere except for the dev.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.sc%2Fimg%2Fd96300b3b709cee39688b8fc7d5b7e7e.png&t=663&c=-FZL6x7Ph9wVnQ) Same, except I have like 95% orphan rate with a single node with ~400 ms delay.
|
|
|
only 1 node = orphans everywhere except for the dev.
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.sc%2Fimg%2Fc0c201c8daa772aa8eba3a343de9cee1.png&t=663&c=G2eAYzZvExVH0w) Black screen and then stops... Driver crash. Try lower throughput. I use 1.8 for 750 Ti's and the default is 2.45.
|
|
|
Wat?
Already the next pluck coin? That was Quick...
Thanks to Earlz for PLUCK, we have seen that it is a great algorithm free of ASIC's etc. Which ensures the fairest distribution compared to many other algorithms. We hope to lead the development with AuxPoW for future PLUCK coins (as we all know there will be plenty). We're yet to see if it is an ASIC free algorithm and power consumption will very likely reach the usual levels once the miners will be further optimized.
|
|
|
You know it's not the algo that's giving supcoin value, it's the dev behind it. An anon newbie account is not going to cut it. Wat?
Already the next pluck coin? That was Quick...
Maybe it's an elaborate plan to reduce the nethash of supcoin ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
Looking at the hash on Suprnova, I see the top 15 > 12KH/s. This is on one pool so there might be other farms doing just solo. This pretty much shows that after the first few hours the coin is already out of reach of CPU mining. The GPU's have taken over in order to get that kind of hash. Unless of course you setup CPUs on 30 PCs running on this but that would not be feasible energy wise.
Anyways, at least I got about 4 coins right at the start and now just dust. Ill leave the mix of CPUs on it for a few days for another coin or two and then shut the CPU miners down.
There probably is some data to get out of this test, but so far the prima facie similarities with monero and all those other X coins are striking. When I left those coins way back they were all text based. What I like about Sup though is the nice graphical wallet and I can see a lot of hard work went into it. There were also excellent work done on the pools to have everything work so smoothly. I am super impressed by the pools especially with Suprnova. I am just disappointed with effort that went into getting GPU miners working before the launch as it took the CPUs out way too early. The distribution of the coins will be very narrow to the GPU miners which is a pity as broad based distribution (BBD) is a key factor to reduce the risk of a coin being manipulated or being dumped on by some unscrupulous miners. I think the hash rates are supporting my concerns and disappointment and indicative of an BBD opportunity missed. I will keep watching it though and look for opportunities in the markets once listed.
Lets hope that his next coin is released in a manner that is fair to all. This was supposed to be a test before the BIG one - hopefully lessons will be learned. When the scabs sell cheap i'll buy if the coin shows promise I doubt anything will stay 100% cpu at this point in the game. Someone is either going to write the code to use a gpu or eventually ASIC's will come about through some form of manipulation to run the game. The only two major problems I am seeing at this point is that only the Nvidia GPU miner was available at the beginning which forces a good chunk of people like me to be stuck running CPU only and the Majority of people hopped on the Suprnova pool rather than spreading the hash out to the other two that are available on the main page. Right now the advertised has for Suprnova is around 600Kh while the others are at around 8Kh and 3Kh. With 215 workers on the Suprnova pool that equals about 3Kh per user average even if the top 20 are running GPU at 10 to 15Kh that leaves a lot of others still running cpu. All I have to say otherwise is look a the other available pools and SPREAD THE HASH people. CPUs are terrible at parallelization compared to GPUs so it's expected that virtually every hashing algorithm is better suited for GPUs. It's like running physics on CPU vs GPU.
|
|
|
It looks somewhat interesting but it seems the Instabuy system must be backed by huge amounts of bitcoin or $ to ensure it can always buy back and not crash.
Edit: Nevermind, "Instabuy must ONLY accept BYC from verified MERCHANTS and not "normal" users." so only verified merchants are guranteed to exchange their coins back to fiat with a floor. Normal users can only use a special BYC exchange.
|
|
|
-X11 -Advanced asic proof PoW/PoS coin ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FUMPBx.gif&t=663&c=VDGYIhY1ZsnmlQ)
|
|
|
Good job!
ccminer r39 on 750 Ti at +150 core and stock memory solomining to avoid vardiff fluctuation:
fresh 3770 groestl 8200 jackpot 5900 keccak 170000 lyra2 713 nist5 9900 quark 6100 qubit 4780 s3 9400 x11 3150 x13 2500 x14 2450 x15 2120 bitcoin 216000
spreadminer v5: 1730
On a sidenote, starting ccminer with --cpu-priority 5 sometimes freezes the PC without ever starting hashing so I'm not using it and I manually set the process priority to realtime after it started.
|
|
|
Just tested and can confirm that BTC withdrawals are working perfectly for me.
Logged in Initiated a withdrawal Confirmed through email link Got my BTC
Entire process took under 7 minutes.
In my opinion, Bittrex is fully legit and dependable.
TT
you are lucky. i cannot receive withdrawal email. now i cannot log in. and no more response from the support. Sounds like your account got compromised and the offender changed your email and login details for the account. That's why you have to have 2FA.
|
|
|
In order to raise tangible funds to motivate GPU miner devs, I am now hosting a donation address for Bitcoin. 1K6cUbtsn5xinD8XfjnTn7UnsMriLhZaGDThe first GPU miner to be created (AMD or Nvidia) and published under an open source license will receive all the money from this fund. I'm putting in 0.25 BTC of my own money. I encourage everyone to donate what you can to help make this a lucrative bounty.
|
|
|
I can't connect since yesterday. The website works but the miner can't reach the server and I can't ping the address. It was fine for months though.
|
|
|
TBF wouldn't let me connect (Bad Access) and on hamsterpools whatever diff I try I can't get the pool to show my real hashrate. The closest I could get was with -f 0.01, anything lower means lower hashrate and anything higher introduces low difficulty shares.
|
|
|
|