I think if a post is deleted for whatever reason then people should lose that merit as well. I think some people are purposely deleting their merited posts after they've received merit for it for whatever reason. Anyone can just merit some random trash post then delete it to get rid of the evidence. People could also just copy content then deleted the post once it's been merited. It's ripe for abuse if the merit stays after the post has gone. I agree with your point but will add a secondary opinion: For a post to be deleted means that it is not meritorious. Whether the thread be trashed or the post deleted, it simply means that the post does not contribute to a discussion. This may not be the case for all posts but should encompass most deleted posts. All the more reason to remove the merit for such posts. Simply means that they're not high-quality.
|
|
|
a. a97756b765e2d96252227ed9ca20abec071759371f2e24bd7c3f804cb8c44316 Hopefully, I can win a raffle this year. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Wait, let me get this straight. You want someone to kill Jack Dorsey because he is suspending accounts? Doesn't that seem a bit extreme? And a question I would like to aim toward OP: if censorship results in the death penalty, then what in your opinion would be the consequences of rape and murder?
|
|
|
Should be in decent or better condition. Obviously, no missing/damaged pieces or board.
Would like RPG/strategy games over others. Send offers with names and prices – I'll check if I'm interested or not.
Send first or pay for escrow.
Specifically looking for:
The 7th Continent Gloomhaven Arkham Horror Cheers. Feel free to reply if there are any questions or concerns.
Note: Self-moderated to prevent spam. Will add any deleted replies to a[code]box.
|
|
|
I am not taking your challenge sir because i do not know your standards in giving of your merits [...] i am also needing a help to get some merits if you can check my profile then i would glad too if you will put some merits. Uhh... what? Your posts seem to be set in a roundabout way. In my opinion, they're large and clunky.
And posting in spam megathreads will never be good. You cannot add to a lack of discussion. One last thing: Mining bitcoin does literally mining and producing block for bitcoin? I thought that mining is all about confirming bitcoin transactions and receuve transaction fee from the bitcoin transactions confirmation if someone has trading or selling bitcoin. I guess i need more data and information on how the system works. However, if mining does really mean mining those bitcoin chainblock then i guess there is no something special about it. As we all know bitcoin.market price movement relying on its demand and supply of bitcoin. So if bitcoin demand is high of course its price will raise and go high. 1) The topic is "Will the price be stable?" and you are writing in response to the "discussion" in the very last part of your post. 2) That's a wall of text. As the bard had once written, "brevity is the soul of wit"
|
|
|
for business I find google the most simple and effective What's with the sudden surge of all these spam bots in Meta? And with copying replies that are NOT from the Meta section?
|
|
|
So your entire proof lies in the fact that they both used a very common mIRC expression? Well, that seems rock-solid and water-tight to me! (/s) Poe's law in action here. I honestly can't tell if you are being serious or pulling our collective legs. Given your previous complete lack of insight, I suspect it is the former, which is embarrassing for you but even funnier for everyone else. That is a satire thread. It seems very much like a joke. endlasuresh might as well be quoting my thread for evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2612664.0
|
|
|
Hello guise im newbie, may i ask to this thread how can i get merit to rank up , anybody can tell me about them .
Thanks 😇
You'll get merit when you create useful posts or when someone likes your post. This is unlikely to happen when you post the following: Im looking forward to this project , this is very interesting project. Good luck Because that post does not add anything to the discussion.
I plan on doing another chunk of post review soon.
|
|
|
Or alternatively, learn English. Duolingo has some stuff for a number of languages. If someone's language isn't on there, then they should do a simple Google search. It shouldn't be difficult to take ~2 weeks to learn some basic grammar and sentence structure components.
|
|
|
No. This is basic agency law. The employer should have prevented said action. Was Bitblisscoin.com under ALU as opposed to purely aTriz? I am not quite clear on this one. And I would like to know which campaigns of aTriz's (which were scummy/scams) were in fact under ALU rule. If the parties were not involved in the campaigns then they shouldn't be held responsible.
|
|
|
When People involved in a management, then they are responsible for the theft. BTW who is the head of ALU services? Vicarious liability is an interesting thing. But don't you think in instances in which an employee does something unexpected or irrational, that it wouldn't make sense for the employer to be punished? Every instance of vicarious liability should be case-by-case. You posted in the this thread the negative will be sometime for aTriz why? Did aTriz didnot made scam? You read one reply but you don't read the other. The other reply states that by "some time" I mean a long period, or forever. When you read the sentence, do you think to yourself that "some time" = short duration? If it is a purchased how you all trust that account? Didn't know. But, here's an example of a purchased account that has done good for the forum: AvirunesAnd all of the trusted feedback has been after the account was bought, meaning that they weren't relying on past reputation. Isn't this like with aTriz?
|
|
|
Is it really so? Then it is so injustice with the newcommers ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fm.popkey.co%2F1385a7%2FrOg0X.gif&t=663&c=ZCr-McS7CEhm6g) Is it really so?
Yeah. It's in favor of older users. The ones that have been around longer and should have more experience. After all, you wouldn't call someone who joined 30 days ago a Sr. Member, would you?
Also, nice spam posting: Singer. I still want to become a singer but my voice is so hoarse it is not funny. The best line for ever is Where there is a will there is always a way. There is no specific goal. There are many things that I want to do.
|
|
|
I didnt get why you are thanking this guy Theymos -_- can anybody explain Nobody's thanking theymos here? [explicitly] They're just congratulating the head forum administrator on reaching 2M total signups. What's wrong with that? (Maybe you should start reading instead of posting)
|
|
|
Betcoin uses this sportsbook. So does CloudBet. Those sites are not trusted though.. But that's not really an internal issue as it is the sites themselves being scammers. IIRC the actual sports section isn't a scam but rather when withdrawing/crediting they'll seize funds. (There was some case about Betcoin preventing a win. I think they voided the ticket.)
|
|
|
Who are those "a lot people"? Please be specific, with quotes. Humoring a blanket statement post? ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
100 % True since Lauda might already know that is a purchased acount. Might = 100%. I see now the basis for your proof. With this, I now state the following: Ripple will rise to $1000 with 100% certainty. I suspect Lauda is playing with people since in the past a lot people mentioned aTriz is Lauda. The fact that people mention aTriz = Lauda shouldn't really be a foundation for your claims. They're unsubstantiated claims regardless with little to no evidence of being true. Moreover, this is a sort of selection bias in which you cherry pick the data from all the wild accusations that have been done. If you're willing to suspect Lauda of being aTriz on the basis of all those accusations, then you should also suspect that Lauda is The Pharmacist, DarkStar_, myself, owlcatz, satoshi, theymos.
|
|
|
are you from Indonesia? I think you should move this thread to the local board. No. Meta pertains to topics relating to the forum. This offers exposure to more staff rather than confining it to a Local board.
|
|
|
Master Vod, please don't worry, you are the only one to have the authorities in your desired position. there is strangely no body talking about staff being representatives of the FORUM here. hypocrite much? I've already read this post 4 times and I still don't understand what you're trying to say. What does hypocrisy have to do with your previous statement? It seems a little bit irrelevant. And moreover, what do your first two statements even mean?
|
|
|
If you don't believe in a supernatural God and the afterlife, it doesn't make you automatically untrustworthy, it makes you potentially untrustworthy. those who believe in afterlife and would even kill hundreds to get some young virgins in their imaginary heavens are walking around with the same potential. you either don't believe and insist on not believing, so you could do whatever you want, no consequence, no God. you want to have sex with a married woman. if you could manage to have sex without her husband finding out, nobody around to see. the potential in you is stronger to go along with it. if you get your hands on a few Millions, temptation to take the money for yourself and spend it because you only live once, is stronger. That seems a little judgmental. And for someone who is supposed to be objective, wouldn't you say that this affects your moderating ability? You seem to be basing a lot of your criticisms by using your religion. It seems rather foolish to do so. I won't get into it further because that discussion would be better reserved for P&S. Or, if we are going to discuss you and/or Flying Hellfish, we can make a thread in Reputation. If you would like to create a topic and link it, I would be glad to jump in.
I'm not sure why you're so vehemently attacking Flying Hellfish. You are allowed to have your opinions heard. I didn't say that we should have your post removed. but if I'm a mod and see any hints of other users trying to follow your example, I would delete it. What is this in relation to? Non-religious sentiment? The expanded section also seems a little strawman-like. All this ad hominem for a desperate potential job-grab... :/
|
|
|
The reviews are fake, right? There's clearly no comment section and those are about the fakest names and responses I've ever seen. https://archive.is/0E1Xh (for reference) Updated Date: 2018-01-27 Created Date: 2017-11-25 Registrar Expiration Date: 2018-11-25 And having a one-year expiry date is also interesting. (Though it can be renewed annually).
|
|
|
|