I suppose twitter is real as I've found it on ico bench where Joseph passed KYC test. Scammers are running out of ideas as they moved from stock images to stealing identities of people who can be easily reached. Their announcement thread is full of shills - they probably use one of payed bumping services. Can you report them to moderator? I'll write warning in their bounty thread  |
|
|
|
|
Arsenal v West Ham - 2:0
Newcastle v Chelsea - 1:3
Man Utd v Tottenham - 3:1
Bournemouth v Everton - 1:1
|
|
|
|
All the alt coins were converted to BTC last year after the ICO...total investment was 3055 BTC per a post from Lauda.
Nope not true , they did not got converted last year. The Post from Lauda back than was only the conversion rates so everybody could calculate how much nvst he will get it never states that they directly convert the alts to btc and they didnt convert them. Hello newbie account activated after 10 months of inactivity:  And straight to scam accusation board:  Nope not true , they did not got converted last year. Can you explain us from where did you get this information and can you show us proofs of your claim?
And these are the altcoin escrow addresses, the dates they were created and the initial balances: | Coin | Address | Date created | Balance | | DASH | XvL4uRRnwhwDiCUTSJB4Kp2JeWom9ZBkrC | 2017-07-02 04:34:38 | 1,916.58818631 dash | | DOGE | DLN2kTLDiMm6qsGoR1uCgPm1sZqa3ouxzF | 2017-07-04 14:36:34 | 23,580,328.23162458 doge | | ETH | 0x3EAE795303522b8FBff85bB113E2EE4eabfAce9A | 2017-08-08 06:36:20 | 6,478.235883 eth | | ETC | 0x00d3B8f4739870D66383e15C4693CEd012178ba1 | 10 Aug 2017, 10:53 | 4,126.0107 ETC | | LTC | LiUAhNeKWXEC2Kj875QGM4inoPEXiPhw2w | 2017-07-01 22:48:07 | 7,807.37375203 LTC | | maidsafecoin | 1Mt7MCS6b6hemmL63hZjAdLtbqxCVmh2CZ | 11/27/2016 7:42:57 AM | 765,482 maid | | waves | 3PB7m9gLbUs3VVQEKkSuWL4QTvc4xg3UvGC | 2017-07-05 11:15:15 | 31,108.76280603 waves | | ripple | rwdLr5vj7tg63FrEN7hdJaVQVPHieXgBAL | 2017-08-08 15:45 | 1,270,586 xrp |
Pls note that all of the escrowed altcoins with the exception of ETC and some MAID were sent to Bittrex in July and August of 2017. Looking at trust feedback "alt of.." I suppose this is correct info, right? @OP who was used to escrow doge, dash and waves? @lauda All the alt coins were converted to BTC last year after the ICO...total investment was 3055 BTC per a post from Lauda.
Which is nonsense that I have never said. Unfortunately, they were not all liquidated instantly (had they been, there would be more money to repay). They were sent to exchange in different dates. Were they liquidated as they reached exchange? How many btc are in escrow wallet at the moment? |
|
|
|
Something reminded me of other topic, @ICOethics guess what, I checked their MVP and look what I have found:  Or better:  Unfortunately there is nothing to do here, ICO ended I hope they didn't raise too much money. You have to be stupid as a donkey to invest in "lorem ipsum" project run by team from shutterstock. |
|
|
|
Can you please stop this nonsense and see what Howeycoins ICO really is? If you actually try to buy tokens you will be redirected to this site https://www.investor.gov/howeycoins with following message... ICO – Howeycoins
If you responded to an investment offer like this, you could have been scammed – HoweyCoins are completely fake! ...with most red flags investors should look at. Preico timer is set to 14 days and it is always on 14 days. Everything is fake on purpose. We created the bogus HoweyCoins.com site as an educational tool to alert investors to possible fraud involving digital assets like crypto-currencies and coin offerings. Oh, to add this - there is no bounty as token doesn't exist. |
|
|
|
^ I don't understand something, they allow to enter credit card number and cv but then site redirects to " Whoops, looks like something went wrong." I didn't check other paying methods but for bitcoin deposits I got next results/depo addys: For blockchain - BLOCKCHAIN API HAVING ISSUE. PLEASE TRY LATERFor coingate - 2MstFenQj5dd7KnXCE93TtxubtpfZggcBYL  For coinpayments - Y ou have not selected a payment method! For block.io - 39t9eorj3yhxUfsQnrWUnUquXadrXzHouGAnd as you mentioned Htfx.online(they accept perfect money only) maybe this: unless you think all of these similar websites are part of a big scam attempt @icoethics have you found more sites using this template? I mean, live ICO's? |
|
|
|
Perhaps, it's best to not label them at the moment
Why not? ICO is live. Their project is exactly this: ABOUT ICO
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Possimus repudiandae accusamus eius facilis ipsa, omnis nemo [...] Road Map
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Provident, ut. Tenetur facere, asperiores temporibus ipsam itaque voluptate[...] Our Awesome Team
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit. Provident, ut. Tenetur facere, asperiores temporibus ipsam itaque voluptate[...] Their white-paper, well, read it..you will get the picture. No SSL, they accept credit cards and other payment methods. Obvious scam is obvious. |
|
|
|
Further investigations should be made here and maybe we can prove that these two is most likely a scam.
I don't see relationship between yobet and top100exchange, except from the same content on bounty page, as top100exchange created bounty topic a month after yobet's bounty, there is possibility they simple c/p it. In addition to morvilz7z's finding, best exchange platform is new platform: Domain: bitexchannel.com
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registration Date: 2017-12-21
Expiration Date: 2018-12-21
Updated Date: 2017-12-21top100exchange domain was registered only 1 month after:
Domain: top100exchange.co.uk
Registrar: Key-Systems GmbH [Tag = KEY-SYSTEMS-DE]
Registration Date: 2018-01-17
Expiration Date: 2019-01-17
Updated Date: 2018-02-13And as for yobet: I am the Bitsler's main admin and we do NOT have any partnership with yobet.io. This is fake : Not to mention, we have ongoing partnership with the leading organizations in the online casino sector, including Betway Casino, William Hill, Bitsler, Gambling Site, etc. These invaluable partners will enable us to gain more insights and practical knowledge in order to triumph in this arduous Cryptocurrency market.
Source : https://medium.com/yobet-io/why-did-we-decide-to-release-yobet-during-the-markets-bearish-trend-4d6b0bc20ccaIf I were you I would trust these guys. I don't think there is anything to investigate, team who lied about their partnership shouldn't be trusted, and there is also that plagiarism part in their white paper... |
|
|
|
I don't think that is necessary, just like ICOEthics posted above I think it is clear that their "verification" process isn't reliable.
Why not? They said they passed verification process at icoholder and I want them to explain to investors how they passed it, as many obviously don't know what is required to pass it - but they do know, that's why they tried to find escape from this situation hopping no one will check it. It's simple as that. Besides, it wasn't really a question  |
|
|
|
~
They even Verify FAKE TEAM / STOCK PHOTOS (lol) and also gives some good ratings. (if the price is right)
It is a shame that a company that try to promoto an ICO as valid, but at the same time will accept any ICO for the right price.
I don't think they are doing this for money:  How to verify account: Each team member must verify his or her participation on their own. Send the link to your ICO page to the team members. Everyone needs to click on the red button "unverified". After that each member of the team can leave a couple of lines about oneself and his role in the project.
That's all! Keep tracking of how your rating is growing. Next step is to allow ICO runners to rate their own projects
when i see team have verify members, i think we can trust them. Sometimes I ask myself if all this is worth of everyone's time and effort |
|
|
|
Account Heyyyrenz https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1005172 Name: Heyyyrenz
Posts: 590
Activity: 308
Merit: 267
Position: Sr. Member
Date Registered: May 18, 2017, 04:42:17 AM
Last Active: Today at 08:32:01 PM Archived post http://archive.is/56dVHOnly account who can see this as +1 trust is account man22555 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=446333 or anyone who has man22555 in his trust settings  Right? Got to check merits. Has given 3 merit 2 times, to 2 profiles ( 1.5 merit/profile)
Has received 17 merit 12 times, from 11 profiles
Has at least 5 sMerit available  Are numbers correct? 26 smerits left? Hm, how much smerits senior member received? I am lazy to search. |
|
|
|
Could you be so kind to explain us verification process at icoholder?   Your team member Wang Yaxiong is using different name in their linkedin https://www.linkedin.com/in/mack-wang-723007159/ mack wang and have only 5 connections. Zhou Jian doesn't even have pictures on linkedin and icoholder, so who is verified? On Frank van der Meer's linkedin there is nothing about this project. Where is Roman Buzhora's linkedin picture? 33 connections. On Jingo Cabiles's linkedin nothing about project. There are 7 team members and team leader Flyye has only 3 connections: 
You can message to Harral with linkedin.I will tell him to reply you.
Can you tell Mr. Harral to come to bitcointalk to discuss something with potential investors? And we are limit fund.And the team is growing.The project is growing too.Even we lack something now.But nothing can stop us.We know what is the most important.We will make yooba service people quickly.Even some place is not good enough or bad.it will be better .
What does this mean? Sounds like shitpost used by ICO bumping services. But for start: Could you be so kind to explain us verification process at icoholder? |
|
|
|
Another FAKE TEAM - STOCK IMAGES
TEAM WAS 100% Verified by ICOHOLDER
Verified doesn't really mean verified:  Unless they enforce KYC on their team members like icobench is sometimes doing non of these rating sites should be taken for serious. Their verification can be passed by ten year old kid and they will give them high rating just because they've wrote few lines about themselves. For example, ICO bench is removing scams from their site...  ...although it would be better to keep them separated from rest of ICO's. I can't believe they have so high ratings at icoholder.Does icoholder * have account on this forum? Never mind, I've found it. ** edited * ** |
|
|
|
|
OP don't you think admin first have to return hacked accounts back to users who are waiting them for months? This is much bigger issue than ban account trading.
And to be honest this has been discussed 2 years ago.
|
|
|
|
I have been reviewing a fascinating new project and I now support it and promote it. The reason I like it, is they work to clean up a significant chunk of the environment by turning a common type of pollution into cryptocurrency, empowering the participants who help clean the Earth we all share!
Then you won't mind to address this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4919771.0 |
|
|
|
Their premium plan is crazy, 12550% ROI in only 75 days and minimum investment is only 1$. I will invest 1$, compound it 4 times and in a year I will earn more or less $248,000,000 and best part is, as principle is included, I will get my 1$ back  Obvious scam is obvious. |
|
|
|
Look at the pharmacist's trust feedback below..  Sorry for editing post, picture was too big and it went out of monitor, I had to chase it around the room. Kids helped too and it was actually very funny  Perfect example of power abuse of a DT member..
I know, your pharmacist forget to give you pills and now you are picking on every pharmacist you can find. FACT7 : only few DT members are good here like hilarous and loyceV if you asked me.
Hm...maybe they have your pills?
FACT3 : the forum allows [... ]FACT4 : theymos said [...] FACT5 : theymos said [...] FACT6 : theymos has [...] How is that you butthurts always miss FACT7: "it is allowed to scam people on this forum" and FACT8 "trust is not moderated"? I am sure TP had a good reason to tag those accounts, but why don't we first hear yours and OP's reason for trust abuse, as both of you like to send fake feedback: aTriz 2018-01-17 0.00000000 aTriz and Lauda are both the same person. marlboroza 2018-05-27 0.00000000 He is extorting me because I fucked his wife and make her get AIDS. Now he
will die after very little time. Good bye damn amateur hero Marlboroza.
Hell is waiting for you soon. Vod 2018-08-07 1.00000000 IDIOT VOD,ONE OF THE FUCKERS IN THIS FORUM.
HE DOESNT TRUST ME BECAUSE I AM TELLING THE TRUTH BEHIND DT MEMBERS.
VOD IS A TOTAL MORON,TOGETHER WITH THE PHARMACIST. It seems both of you have serious brain damage. |
|
|
|
This initial coin offering is scam
Read more about swish and other ICO's from this group of scammers in scam accusation topic
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4850535.0
Member who continues to advertise this ICO after this post will be tagged with negative feedback |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
