Payments for bi-Week 17 have been released: https://btc.com/86d82466951e017c16385a88a2a5c50cf203dd3a72eaaa199dfa0a4283896a3d.
To clarify: Even though it is being used in the spreadsheet, it is just there as a (symbolic) metric. You shouldn't care about your total post count (campaign-wise); you should care about the posts that you've made in the current round. If you lose some posts from the past, it does not affect you. If you lose posts within the current round, then you may be affected if your total made doesn't meet the minimum requirement. Due to the circumstances (post recounting by theymos), I have issued some partial payments this time. Keep in mind that this campaign, in its current setup, does not have partial payments (thus, don't ask for them if you don't receive them). I've been thinking about introducing 50% payment for those that reach 75% of the post requirement for some time now though.
The current funding is adequate for 1 more week. Assuming it doesn't get topped up, we will end with a Weekly round. If it does get topped up, we continue normally (as we usually did so far). |
|
|
|
|
All these long arguments, that are not interesting given that they have been repeated ad naseum put aside, nullius has one undeniably correct point: The necessity for the merit requirement to reach Jr. Member. It is not uncommon for altcoin campaigns to allow users of these ranks as well. There are huge waves of farmers and bot accounts being enrolled in campaigns[1], and which are therefore spamming the forum.
[1] I had someone attempt to enroll ~40 jr. Member accounts in 30 minutes about a week ago.
|
|
|
|
Hi Lauda i can see that theres still one spot left for full member, i wanted to apply for the position.
Hoping i get accepted..thank you!
Bitcointalk Username: rosepetals
Rank:Full Member
Merit:100
Current post count:275+1
BTC Address (SegWit):3JNsUz887mGErhnfrr6T99twJJjowJJBJD
You have been permanently blacklisted. Go away.
@Searing I'll answer your messages soon. |
|
|
|
Changing of ETH address in Credito Bounty
Previous ETH address: 0xa077c5aC99Fa4F927b26Db5006E78BFa4fcE1480
New ETH address: 0x931e9dD50640Fc99BD715517c3b28D6190954262
Bounties participated in:
Credito Twitter Campaign
Week 1. Spreadsheet: 97
Week 2. Spreadsheet: 98
Week 4. Spreadsheet: 3
Week 5. Spreadsheet: 89
Week 6. Spreadsheet: 100
Week 7. Spreadsheet: 99
Week 8. Spreadsheet: 33
Week 9. Spreadsheet: 82
Credito Facebook Campaign
Week 1. Spreadsheet: 82
Week 2. Spreadsheet: 85
Week 4. Spreadsheet: 4
Week 5. Spreadsheet: 80
Week 6. Spreadsheet: 99
Week 7. Spreadsheet: 107
Week 8. Spreadsheet: 41
Week 9. Spreadsheet: 90
Handled the Twitter part. For the Facebook changes you will need to contact aTriz. |
|
|
|
|
Which campaigns and which managers?
|
|
|
|
...sorry guys but all this is very strange.  No. You are turning into Quicksy and developing an unhealthy paranoia. Next up: Why is that specific color aTriz's favorite? Don't let mentally degenerates subtly place certain things into your mind. ..the most advanced thing I know regarding code is "!" means no in code.
This is a nice way of distracting everyone for the last +-7 days. The mission was a success I guess. |
|
|
|
I don't think you can ever go from extorting someone to being on decent terms with them.
Yeah, no. Keep trying to make this worse than it actually is. I don't see how you can view this any other way... You can see it for exactly what it is. All this is, in its entirety, is a desperate revenge attack for the questions raised against *you-know-who*. You are so desperate and shameless that you are willing to hurt innocent people in order to accomplish your malicious goals. Then you come to me, question my ratings and complain about some kind of bias somewhere. Ironic, predictable, and petty.
|
|
|
|
I don't think you can ever go from extorting someone to being on decent terms with them.
Yeah, no. Keep trying to make this worse than it actually is. Maybe he wants criminals to be held accountable, especially when he is the victim of a crime those criminals engaged in, thats just a guess.
If he wants criminals to be accountable, then he should contact the financial institutions of two other countries.  All this is, in its entirety, is a desperate revenge attack for the questions raised against *you-know-who*. You are so desperate and shameless that you are willing to hurt innocent people in order to accomplish your malicious goals. Then you come to me, question my ratings and complain about some kind of bias somewhere. Ironic, predictable, and petty. |
|
|
|
Edit from previous post: Is that a fresh statement? It seems somewhat different from what I remember.
Yes. How exactly is it different? I don't recall stating that Bobby Lee is a ponzi scammer for example. I also wonder why he'd comment on this now as we've left this on *decent terms* all things considered. Motivation remains questionable. I don't think taking the copy of a passport under the guise of confidentiality and giving it to someone who is attempting to extort him is exactly "innocent"
You make a lot of assumptions, none backed up with evidence. |
|
|
|
IronMarvel2 very clearly gave you zeroxal's passport (image), according to zeroxal. Owlcatz was very clearly harassing zeroxal about bogus claims of criminal activity that was the basis for the extortion attempt.
I am not sure how this could be any more clear.
Relevance? Are you saying everyone who despised his history (whatever was dug up by whoever at the time) is involved? Again, there was extreme drama long before I even knew what was going on. Noone who participated in that chatroom is involved except TMAN and I. I will state this again: Stop trying to hurt innocent people.
Edit from previous post: Is that a fresh statement? It seems somewhat different from what I remember. |
|
|
|
That is most certainly not proof of: OP updated with additional proof that owlcatz and IronMarvel2 were involved in this extortion conspiracy
There was extreme drama in that chatroom before I joined back to Slack. I didn't even knew some of the people in there existed before I joined back. Stop trying to hurt innocent people. |
|
|
|
Maybe you should have done that prior to making the above comments? I remember you name so I'm sure we have had some dealings in the past as well and I would expect more from you, but monkey see, monkey do apparently.
You're correct.Yes we have done dealings before in couple of your raffles.It's just the address reused made me a bit suspicious but anyway I consider this void from my end.Sorry for the inconvenience. You really need to stop listening to Quickseller, regardless of how credible his *whatever* looks like. He always tries to make his lies seem legitimate. There is no way possible for TMAN to be the same as hhampuz, completely different personalities (although this should be clear by now). @OP Do you *allow* posting investigation requests here? I have a 40-50 account investigation request along with their addresses. Very obvious behavior, but I do not have the time to check them right now (or soon that is).
OP MIA? |
|
|
|
...If you don't pay up, I'll have to take action myself - and you know what that action is.
Welcome to blackmail land.
This is why, assuming he still has the script, it is not possible to post it. @nullius, suchmoon, ibminer. |
|
|
|
Dear BM
What does it mean when fb acc only used to spam for icos? Does it mean i cant participate for the bounty anymore? So bounty hunters cant participate on this bounty sir?
There is no such thing as a bounty hunter (made up, self-entitled position); there are only spammers. Someone who uses an account solely to spam for every possible bounty that they can get their hands on is not desirable, and their advertising impact is negligible or next-to-zero. |
|
|
|
Which begs the question, what was user aTriz's role in this scam?
Collateral damage. Stop being butthurt and then going on vengeance runs via shills. |
|
|
|
But you instantaenously taking the matter into your own hand by opening a thread that try to defame us.
Making nonsensical statements won't make OP look like they're shady; rather, it will make you guys look worse. A known tactic that no longer works, at least not with me. So i dont think this thread even neccessary and putting up the heading ‘scammer’ is appropriate
If you unrightfully deny payment for the work that he/she did, then the heading is very much appropriate. |
|
|
|
People are free to try offer better deals and services though often times they'll likely be much worse.
Offering better deals in this area almost always means offering horrible services.. I don't think it is fine to do this, especially not when the user was already hired. If you allow this, then you essentially allow users to do this out of spite; slippery slope here and there, you reject someone's entry in a bounty because of them being a farmed account: They attempt to get you ("legitimately; by offering "better" services") fired. It's a shitty thing to do but not illegal. The only issue I would have is if you had a deal with a company and they got rid of you during the campaign just to save a bit of money. That would be a breach of contract. I didn't tend to imply that it was illegal, but rather that it should be unethical and thus tag-worthy. Good hint on the contracts; I believe that bounty managers should create a binding standard. I think there should be more scrutiny on new managers popping up to run campaigns because nefarious individuals are getting involved and successfully scamming money from people or siphoning off money to their alts, and then there's the shitmanagers who do absolutely nothing about spam and accept and pay for any old shit. If something had been done about these users we wouldn't have even needed the merit system in the first place.
I completely agree. Given the current situation, there is no need for any new bounty managers (yet). Thus, those coming with the 'because it is needed' or 'because I'm trustworthy and want to help' stories should be tagged. It is definitely allowed to prove your 'campaign managers' that they're better than the current manager handling the campaign.If the team doubts your capabilities,they will definitely hire the 'beggars' .It's not anyone's fault if you turn out as a disappointment to the team.Obviously no one in the right mind will replace you if you're coming off with flying colours.
Read my previous post. This has nothing to do with the competency of the manager. |
|
|
|
Your case is only remotely related, and thus it should have a thread of its own. Summarize and present evidence in a new thread in this section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=129.0. Don't forget this: P.S. OP, you should prepare a list of AmaZix bitcointalk accounts.
Else we won't know who to tag. |
|
|
|
OP is right with his statement that anyone can do this in order to sabotage you. Did this happen here? Possibly. Unless AmaZix has actual proof of OP being the owner of that other account[1], they are at fault here.
[1] Why would someone who is reporting others for account farming, use the same/similar method in order to farm in the same bounty? Use your head (@AmaZix team). P.S. OP, you should prepare a list of AmaZix bitcointalk accounts. |
|
|
|
No, I don't think anyone should be de-ranked. What you have contributed remains what it is, it should not be taken away.
Wrong. Activity/ranks =/= contributions. Then again, given your post history I am not surprised by this comment.
De-ranking is actually a good idea; it goes well with merit points (i.e. more damage to the rot of this forum). However, the proposed requirement is bad. Or you could simply implement a minimum merit/month feature to maintain your current rank, if you don't earn a certain amount of merit within the month you drop to the previous user level......
Seriously dude, do you think satoshi's account should get demoted because he doesn't use it anymore? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
