anyone know if the lion instructions work on mountain lion?
They worked for me on both. how did you get sip to work? I can't get it to work on mountain lion Error: Failed executing: make install (sip.rb:41)
EDIT: Nevermind I had to update my GCC
|
|
|
Would you suggest the same thing to your Boyfriend/Girlfriend Husband/Wife? Or would you be offended if someone told you your other should be a stripper? I don't know maybe I was raised with these things called Manners but there few and far between as we can see from above. Have A Nice day and good by *bye and it is called hustle, you do what you have to do
|
|
|
No need to be offensive.
Explain how that was offensive? Wait so are you judging the girls on there for their hustle to make bitcoins? They make good bitcoins. I was being serious it probably easier than a lending credit site.
|
|
|
You can judge me on how I write all you want, I was injured it makes it hard for me to type. I could make you feel like a real *** for making that comment ,but I won't cause I'm a bigger person then that. This is my Girlfriends project, she wanted to get involved with the Bitcoin world this was an open area I seen. Here some more cookies
tell your gf to get into http://www.reddit.com/r/girlsgonebitcoin that is better for her she probably make more there than a lending credit site
|
|
|
Its ok dude, just breath......... If I was to tell you how I would fix everyone of the problems you laid out, whats to stop you from going and making a site and system?
clearly you have no idea how to fix them, and believe me no one will steal your idea LOL There is being critical and being constructive, when people usually ask for input it means constructive. When you ask someone for some money or why you failed then critical comes into play. If anyone has anything constructive to add to this convo then Ill be glad to respond, and I never attacked you.
Critical thinking is how you solve issues, I really wasn't going to judge you on how you write, but I am rethinking that quickly. If you were smart you be searching the other threads, and looking at real world situations. Plus your starting another company I really don't see how you have time to put into an issue that requires a lot of time. HENCE why not everyone has lending credit site.
|
|
|
Well..... That's kinda why I asked for input lol for research just saying. Some people will hopefully post with some information that may be helpful while others just bash the idea and person to toss it out there. Kinda like vokains post or badbitcoin they don't just bash the suggest. So like I learned from good old Uncle Sams Misguided Children don't complain about the problem unless you have a solution other wise its just noise.
I didn't bash it, I am critical of it and most people agreed with what I said. If you searched the forum, before posting your idea, you would have find out that people have posted the same exact idea a couple of times, and you have the same holes as them. If your a smart business person you would then probably go back tweak it, and post it again, instead of attacking me, who was helping you by pointing those gapping holes out to you since you clearly didn't see them.
|
|
|
"that is anonymity of the my location of my computer,"
I understand this but with anything, if you want something and there is restrictions to getting it, you must go with them. If you are willing to lend to someone with 100% anonymity then you got to expect some losses. Im pretty sure thats why when you get credit they want to know where you live, Just saying.
Im really not sure why your so negative about a something that could be helpful. But I'm glad you bring up points to be looked into.
I don't know about gweedo but I've thought of similar proposals and put some work into thinking about how it could work, and nothing I thought of is as practical as just getting an "eye" of sorts, like when patrick or hash get their "red flags." The new lenders will still get just as burnt with your system, except they would have someone else besides themselves to blame for their misfortune. Sorting out lending it one of those things that would take all the energy and time to solve someone will do probably not BitcoinINV, but I think it can be done. Glade you know me so well LMFAO dude your insight on my work ethic is classic, ill feed you all day this has nothing to do with work ethic, this has to do with research and knowledge and from your first post, I can tell you didn't do the research to make this system work. PLUS I have hear the same exactly system posted 10000000 times before you posted and clearly those never worked out so I do have some insight.
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=99542.0 just leaving what I said, and the funny thing is bombartier357 did the same thing and had the same holes as you, so many you two can talk and figure out a good system that may actually work
|
|
|
"that is anonymity of the my location of my computer,"
I understand this but with anything, if you want something and there is restrictions to getting it, you must go with them. If you are willing to lend to someone with 100% anonymity then you got to expect some losses. Im pretty sure thats why when you get credit they want to know where you live, Just saying.
Im really not sure why your so negative about a something that could be helpful. But I'm glad you bring up points to be looked into.
I don't know about gweedo but I've thought of similar proposals and put some work into thinking about how it could work, and nothing I thought of is as practical as just getting an "eye" of sorts, like when patrick or hash get their "red flags." The new lenders will still get just as burnt with your system, except they would have someone else besides themselves to blame for their misfortune. Sorting out lending it one of those things that would take all the energy and time to solve someone will do probably not BitcoinINV, but I think it can be done.
|
|
|
that is anonymity of the my location of my computer,
I understand this but with anything, if you want something and there is restrictions to getting it, you must go with them. If you are willing to lend to someone with 100% anonymity then you got to expect some losses. Im pretty sure thats why when you get credit they want to know where you live, Just saying. if i figured it out then you wouldn't be having this discussion Im really not sure why your so negative about a something that could be helpful. But I'm glad you bring up points to be looked into.
I am not being negative, i am being critical and pointing out the flaws you would would encounter and fix as you build.
|
|
|
Social security number has nothing to do with lending and it is use to keep track of citizens for society rights. Second your talking about a credit score, but the problem is the anonymity of the internet. What if I register a lot account and flood your service with a lot of fake data making it seem that I am amazing lendee, build it up so I can get a loan of 1000 BTC no questions asked cause your service would make me look like a great lendee. But then you combat it with facebook login, now your going against the anonymity that bitcoin provides. This is one of those questions that takes a lot of hard work and time to figure out and I would just move on cause you don't sound like you did enough work to really see the flaws (many more that I can point out) or research on lending and credit.
IP specific usernames with anymous and proxy blocks will take care of most of that. that is anonymity of the my location of my computer, what about you asking for my address, name, location, age, that breaks the anonymity of what bitcoin has created. With that being said there is never 100% block agianst fraud if you make it they will break it!
Yea but your idea is full of holes, and doesn't even block 50% of the fraud, many people bring this same idea up, again and again and the same holes are present, either go back to the drawing board, do research, and come up with a new better way to do loans. That is all we are saying
|
|
|
Social security number has nothing to do with lending and it is use to keep track of citizens for society rights. Second your talking about a credit score, but the problem is the anonymity of the internet. What if I register a lot account and flood your service with a lot of fake data making it seem that I am amazing lendee, build it up so I can get a loan of 1000 BTC no questions asked cause your service would make me look like a great lendee. But then you combat it with facebook login, now your going against the anonymity that bitcoin provides. This is one of those questions that takes a lot of hard work and time to figure out and I would just move on cause you don't sound like you did enough work to really see the flaws (many more that I can point out) or research on lending and credit.
If someone is completely anonymous, they don't deserve a high credit score. Most serious lenders require ID. It is called fake ids, it isn't too hard especially since most people are two far to see the actual id, so you have to scan it anyway so yea.
|
|
|
Social security number has nothing to do with lending and it is use to keep track of citizens for society rights. Second your talking about a credit score, but the problem is the anonymity of the internet. What if I register a lot account and flood your service with a lot of fake data making it seem that I am amazing lendee, build it up so I can get a loan of 1000 BTC no questions asked cause your service would make me look like a great lendee. But then you combat it with facebook login, now your going against the anonymity that bitcoin provides. This is one of those questions that takes a lot of hard work and time to figure out and I would just move on cause you don't sound like you did enough work to really see the flaws (many more that I can point out) or research on lending and credit.
|
|
|
Yes, the the satoshi dice thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=77870.msg1086135#msg1086135Dooglus suggested a change in the clients source and after all else failed i built that (took me hours to make bitcoin build in windows) and it seems the problem is solved, if it ignores the single satoshi's it doesn't freeze (well hasn't in the last 24 hours at least) Just waiting on his bitcoin address the issue isn't bitcoind, it is windows, should have used linux fyi it froze slightly quicker in ubuntu, but at least used 100% cpu instead of just one core still should have used linux, aka Gentoo or Centos, but if this is a big bug, is it reported? Cause I am using the latest bitcoind and I never have this problem on my VPS and I get ~1000 php rpc calls. I use hardly any CPU.
|
|
|
only post about buying or selling if not get the fuck out of my thread
looks legit LMAO
|
|
|
Yes, the the satoshi dice thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=77870.msg1086135#msg1086135Dooglus suggested a change in the clients source and after all else failed i built that (took me hours to make bitcoin build in windows) and it seems the problem is solved, if it ignores the single satoshi's it doesn't freeze (well hasn't in the last 24 hours at least) Just waiting on his bitcoin address the issue isn't bitcoind, it is windows, should have used linux
|
|
|
my BTC.02:
I host my GPG key in my Dropbox. I also keep the revocation there, in case I lose the private key.
and they're talking about this:
HG8pfFS28cYYUqaH+4jVJbHTBI9CBRt7xAzy6kZ1lDeSRm/I1Pp0G1Z9zIqJfcTGBrUacgN4CYIGlreIv4a91EQ=
That is a signed message from Bitcoin-qt using my private key that has the public key of 1mantis assigned to it. you do know to verify a signed message, we need your bitcoin address you signed with, the message you signed, and signature. The only thing you gave us is the signature we can't do anything with that. Well i didn't know that. Is there a tutorial out there that explains how to use bitcoin signed messages properly? As you can see I am trying to put all my verifiable credentials in my signature. short tutorial, sign your message with unique information to the address, so no one can steal your signature and pass it off as them. To verify a sign message you need the signature, the message, and bitcoin address and with the official bitcoin client can only be done with RPC commands.
|
|
|
my BTC.02:
I host my GPG key in my Dropbox. I also keep the revocation there, in case I lose the private key.
and they're talking about this:
HG8pfFS28cYYUqaH+4jVJbHTBI9CBRt7xAzy6kZ1lDeSRm/I1Pp0G1Z9zIqJfcTGBrUacgN4CYIGlreIv4a91EQ=
That is a signed message from Bitcoin-qt using my private key that has the public key of 1mantis assigned to it. you do know to verify a signed message, we need your bitcoin address you signed with, the message you signed, and signature. The only thing you gave us is the signature we can't do anything with that.
|
|
|
why doesn't anyone make an INTRANET version of a web terminal like that bit-pay version?
|
|
|
|