My pub PGP key: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v2
mQENBFaWoqUBCACRqeadcb4hWu+JTtMosxnDhxxZGTLpmLjURjMEt4TxVAxuAGe3
Zl5G/1TnCLK6gewgHgPucWipwwX+Wd//FIJFxdFP6Fpv/eU8eeUO5rLc04zloXRL
Loc2eAGZ3evryJCCr2o1B1ZblZvhh13pm0Y/KyUE7mN0V6BWt3DN7pyPheDfph9G
pNQR6iqgu3ULXTIWBD70y0fEwcSzb6fMhUKilJkFlc96obcYUfms7H7qGMiUhvm+
Ri0tzKArHGX+hCNq0iG5vFwK6SSzp2zi+pJlTI6jugxtbZSCSwCRn+93qbGZTQam
EkybFEEv2dTq8fTt0xfVL52AGbKiDbeCHvx1ABEBAAG0H2F0cDE5MTYgPGpzZnJh
cHRvcjI2QGdtYWlsLmNvbT6JATkEEwEIACMFAlaWoqUCGwMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJ
CgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCWt64ed8O2lSkHB/0YLFXxYN24Rdf+Y5hPOGJgX2PI
XkUyAxcrNKGC0wC6kNp2tVnY/wopJNaMVmfQt484bLe8v7okF6QIzzBY29MDNtHE
o2fUQgEwbE4H4Tx7CFDrpfKD/KMutB2nI2sBF2itIr9ojXl2nXWBE7ulKhWZOsR1
RO9lIFn5Xx3nesj7xVTY+ylaPexGyjHQjU9bpdhHetoKa0mAnaqCZAjQG1jbKjP0
5zWrNqlTKdPmE1SR4UY6CBLo7Ga+nrQHxuGHOjZXAGys1/u8RXtznSyWxu7qRsRA
hGob0KYPExfgnTFjNQIxWPED4PsG7h2wIpGgFUhdHgI06uT8n1GhQeftDebhuQEN
BFaWoqUBCAD8/BLRATewA8Khm9NhreVg8OkIyxGITW8L06byOJG5XoMUWELNk49e
evXz1rerN/Y2IwAPxiBCV8NWLeIsBp4OawoxuPq88XmHyN9H9cOeSYEr/b1F9e9b
FZKnlbLhIbPgkpHuSPvog1UIXIzZhqWGmBIwBWv67W5BxsvuQXnn/3uhiCHJZG4Q
ymZujXf49naGi9Nd+3j+bzKV3flutV56/NHPaDxNqK2vmtncDA+I9IQRqLMP/VHk
l/ynUgcVuJdAcDUOi86TV10AJbvYqb+AlF9Z/SwCeae4ae9JCix23uv/BtPe/3aY
kFiP1Xrg2XRTFxtRYB2VDISG7yZQwn8ZABEBAAGJAR8EGAEIAAkFAlaWoqUCGwwA
CgkQlreuHnfDtpW5YQf+OPnAmnrJHdrUx/n2LoRWcMO4pklE9UCI1y0UFS5TIQPo
igCUaBLMjCjnPytlCLfUgScaLt0o0kwetowIN0o5OFuWPAZ1RMq07VIdMBdLmykU
WRBHlkqW6nNxF3XcxZBkKA7NT4W8NmZcLJePrpA7GXmEUp5E6nZpDLqqTDlCvIgm
GorcTjPlJLYKp005tIcMwqEtikJSjLFMY7RSKFWFeppVpkAFN4t+kMbRo1Y7zkD3
ibeeqyT6zhvNbz5fCz6VhHreuQtLN6JWpaykXdYC01nyaEAT0gwa14NqDr3Cxahi
pQK+c5uYJjgTmoMGcPS4tJt0ncW8VsKgPWzo3dYSzA==
=SlF/
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- |
|
|
|
you should wait for at least one confirmation and please double check the receiving address (i dont kow him.. maybe he is a trusted trader here) edit: missing word Wallet address seems fine but he sent it w/o fee or with low fee & its still not showing up in my a/c. Just wondering can this be reversed? Its unconfirmed, so yes it can be dropped by the network and not confirm. I wouldnt do your part unless its confirmed. That is, if you still can. |
|
|
|
Why do you trust staff more than other users?
This is because ADMINS were the one who appointed them and there will be a sure a valid point of appointing them as a staff/moderator of bitcointalk. Sure they have been selected because they were deemed fits as moderators, does that automatically make them trustworthy to work as escrow? If you think that they are still not enough then ADMINS maybe.
Scammers are not banned, because admins cant decide which user is legit and which is not. Admins have a strict "dont get involved" policy, why should they change it now? hmm.I think i have to run up my brain gears again lol  .But i will think and come back again . I just came over a thought and thought that this might be it . Anyways will again think of it. IMHO if anything multisig in its different forms is an advancement. |
|
|
|
Why do you trust staff more than other users?
This is because ADMINS were the one who appointed them and there will be a sure a valid point of appointing them as a staff/moderator of bitcointalk. Sure they have been selected because they were deemed fits as moderators, does that automatically make them trustworthy to work as escrow? If you think that they are still not enough then ADMINS maybe.
Scammers are not banned, because admins cant decide which user is legit and which is not. Admins have a strict "dont get involved" policy, why should they change it now? |
|
|
|
I don't really see your point. I bought 11 from Coinbase, and in meantime i sent 11 BTC from my wallet to satelexchange. So you have an actual wallet, great. Sign a message with the address. The whole point for me was to keep the same amount of BTC i own.
They are not the SAME btc, the point is that i still own the same amount of BTC and i made $400 in meantime with trading.
My point is that you only claim you own 11 BTC and I dont believe you. In fact the TX ID you provided makes this less believable. Is that clear enough for you?
No. What is wrong with you people here?
You are here since 2014 and dont know yet? Did you buy the account as well? Maybe you want me to take a picture of myself naked holding a "hi shorena" sign?
I personally prefer a signed message that proofs you actually owned 11 BTC while the price was like you claim it was. If you insist, feel free to post photos, but it will not make your story more believable. If you are not interested in my story, just do not comment. Bsh*ters are not needed in my threads, thank you.
So we are at the insults stage already, huh? |
|
|
|
|
Why do you trust staff more than other users?
|
|
|
|
I bought 11 BTC from coinbase [at $430 each] and i sold them at satelexchange [at $466 each]. The total profit i got is $400 and i managed to do this in less than 2 hours! My first step was to buy BTC with USD [from https://www.coinbase.com if you are able to, or somewhere where the price is similar to $429]. My second step was to sell those same BTC for paypal USD [at https://www.satelexchange.com]. So basically you can buy 1 BTC for $429 and sell it for $466. The profit is around $37 per BTC. TX IDs or it didnt happen. Thank you so much. I will try this later and will report back.
Nice try. |
|
|
|
If the API does not allow to use unconfirmed inputs to be used there is nothing you can do but switch do a different API or use bitcoin core directly. It might be risky to use unconfirmed inputs though.
I am not receiving the payments. When i try sending money from a wallet it sends it successfully, but i cant send another transaction unless the first one is confirmed. I want to be able to use the remaining money to send another transaction without waiting first one to confirm. Yes, you want to spend unconfirmed inputs. You "receive" change the same way you receive payments from someone else. You can somewhat mitigate this if you have several inputs available, but that might make your transactions bigger (in byte) and thus more expensive (in fees) over time. |
|
|
|
Can somebody please stake me.
Thanks!
14nRWyoRNinwJo5MPQMRTYHwWK4Uh7CLVN
|
|
|
|
So i am back at home and here is the signed message that sho asked to provide -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
this is aakashsangwan (UID: 496523) from bitcointalk and today is 2016.01.13. I sell the bitcointalk account equator (UID: 530039) to the person named Premlatha N. on facebook. The agreed price is 0.038 btc. The price is not tied to the BTC value in other currencies. The amount has to be paid as soon as possible by earnings via signature campaigns or other means. I am aware that this can take a long time and will not try to regain access to the account or try to reclaim for any reasons. Payment is to be done to my bitcoin address: <1MEv8g6PZYcBeYknbosQzB1YY16iP41Aqv>
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
H17ENZ9x1mOGtdRzfctnViBf0SuH82OPV5I/8mBJDv3bAhEB8XoyoZhEyTUq/rlGFiueUsd7RyoT9GSuVZjlTD0=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- So can @shorena make the negative trust to neutral?? -snip-
i am so sorry i forget to mention my address, here it is 1MEv8g6PZYcBeYknbosQzB1YY16iP41Aqv
Np figured it out with a bit of trial and error. Message verifies, changing the rating now. |
|
|
|
The only way this could run as legitimate service would be for the owner of the site to escrow funds that are held inside wallets for
each individual case. Otherwise it's just another service that has 99% chance to sucker you up.
I wonder how that could work. Imagine he receives a wallet containing claimed 100 Bitcoins. He tries to open it, but can't. Then how can he get the escrow funds back? He can claim he deleted the wallet but still, it could be possible that he gets the escrow funds back and then suddenly the 100 bitcoins vanish from the wallet he claimed he couldn't bruteforce. I would not accept such an escrow. Or at least make the risk clear to the one with the blocked wallet. If he understands and agrees that i can't be held responsible for that risk then i might do it. Its also not the only way. For some wallets its possible to work on a private key that holds no funds to get the password. The password is the same for the entire wallet, but its useless without the encrypted private key that holds the 100 BTC. The change address you used 1 year ago and now has 10000 satoshi left is perfectly fine. See e.g. the post by knightdk above. |
|
|
|
|
If the API does not allow to use unconfirmed inputs to be used there is nothing you can do but switch do a different API or use bitcoin core directly. It might be risky to use unconfirmed inputs though.
|
|
|
|
-snip- just wondering about original address,is there any original address and never remake or editing by software?i think some address below is not original,so i will wait for someone posting their original unique address  beause i dont have unique address What is an "original" address? |
|
|
|
Die Frage ist, was das escrow leisten soll. Extrembeispiel: Der Miner könnte von Anfang an einen versteckten Mangel haben und innerhalb von 6 Monaten durchschmoren. Wenn Du das im Rahmen von escrow ausschließen willst, musst Du die Auszahlung der BTC zumindest um die 6 Monate blocken.
Grds. wird escrow oder Treuhand als eine Dienstleistung verstanden, die das Risiko der Vorleistung abmindern soll. Die Treuhand soll gerade nicht als (Schieds-)Gericht fungieren. Sie zahlt daher den Betrag nur aus, wenn zwischen den Parteien Konsens besteht (z.B. durch die Freigabeerklärung des Geschäftspartners), manchmal auch, wenn sich die Parteien auf ein bestimmtes Ereignis geeinigt haben (Erhalt des Paketes).
Ist dies nicht der Fall, ist der Treuhänder verpflichtet, den Betrag zu blocken, mehr nicht. Wenn jetzt eine der Parteien an das Geld will, muss man sich entweder (außer-)gerichtlich einigen oder ein Urteil erwirken. In dem Urteil würde dann mit Rechtskraft stehen, ob die Gegenleistung (vollständig) erbracht wurde oder nicht und an wenn wieviel Geld zu zahlen ist.
I seh Escrow auch immer als eine Art Mediator oder Vermittler zwischen den Parteien. Im Allgemeinen würde ich dir aber Recht geben, das Prüfen liegt beim Empfänger und es sollte immer eine Einigung angestrebt werden. Meistens ist man als Escrow aber ohnehin kaum involviert, sondern sorgt lediglich für einen stabilen Rahmen für die Händler. Soweit der Treuhänder sich in irgendeiner Weise auch als Richter aufspielen will, macht er sich ggfs. schadenersatzpflichtig.
Darüber hinaus ist es auch weder Aufgabe eines Treuhänders noch eines (Schieds-)Richters, eine Beweissicherung vorzunehmen. Wenn z.B. der Empfänger fürchtet, einen Ziegelstein geschickt zu bekommen, kann er den Versender bitten, das Paket versiegelt zu schicken und es dann mit einem Zeugen und/oder vor laufender WEBcam oder oder zu öffnen. Auch hier steht es den Parteien frei, zu regeln, was für sie als Beweis hinreichend ist.
Wenn all diese Maßnahmen vorab nicht getroffen wurden und der Sachverhalt nicht beweisbar ist, dann hat ein (Schieds-)Richter anhand der sogenannten Beweislast zu urteilen. Diese ist gesetzlich vorgegeben.
Ich weiß nicht, wie oft escrow jetzt hier vorkommt, aber wenn es gewünscht wird, könnten sich alle escrower mal virtuell zusammensetzen und wir würden AGBs für sie entwerfen. Ich biete auch einen Schiedsgerichtsdienst an. D.h. die Schadenersatzpflicht könnten die Escrower im Streitfall auch abwälzen.
Das mag für den deutschen Bereich gerade noch funktionieren, aber spätestens wenn du alle international tätigen Escrow Anbieter zusammen kriegen willst, wird das scheitern. Es ist vermutlich auch nicht im interesse der Escrow Anbieter wenn der Service nicht mehr unterscheidbar ist. Dazu kommt das solche AGBs zum großen Teil vermutlich eh nicht gelesen werden. Ich habe z.B. oft die Erfahrung gemacht das nicht mal ein simpler 5 Punkte Ablauf gelesen wird oder das der 3. vor dem 1. Schritt gemacht wird. Gerade für solche Händler ist Escrow aber wichtig um die nötige Ruhe in den Handel zu bringen. |
|
|
|
It seems we re running a bit dry on new and well funded campaigns. I thought this advertising method s been working quite well. What s the reason behind this?
IMHO sig campaigns are just a big waste of money. P.S: You should make a new thread concerning this question For many services like casinos they are only viable for some time. After that time most users know about you and it makes no sense to continue with the campaign. |
|
|
|
Some users in the Bit-x campaign are reporting over 3 weeks of no payments, and some still haven't got full payment. They should be given an asterix
One idefix for Bit-x -> http://pastebin.com/qwAYPMeH |
|
|
|
The last five numerals/letters come up the same if I change the single letter/numeral and come back to the first. 1ForTheMoney444444444444443yCnh1H What's the purpose of these? (Yes, I can see it says burn - really? Just throw away BTC ?) *edit* Last between five and seven numbers/letters The last few symbols are the checksum. It can be used to check if there is a typo in the address. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
