Hi,

First, this should be in scam accusations, but I've already reported it to be moved.

Second, if you want to be taken seriously you should provide some kind of evidence and not just your word.

Third, what you say regarding Royse777's reputation is pure garbage. There are as of today 59 people who trust her judgement, and they are from all over the world, it is laughable that you say they are her friends.

Well, first of all I'm not sure if this thread belongs to this board, if you think it doesn't, tell me and I'll move it or report it.

The title is not quite accurate either because due to the maximum number of characters I have not been able to put everything I wanted.

It has happened to me sometimes that when I have seen the people accepted in signature campaings I have not understood very well why certain people have been accepted and not others. This has happened to me only when there are vacancies, like 1 or 2 and with decent signature campaigns, I don't mean the crappy spam like 1xBit and others like that.

In the decent signature campaigns, as I said, sometimes I have seen members with little merits in relation to the activity, for example, chosen over people who have a much better ratio, and I think the main reason could be that it is taken into account that they are customers of the business. Probably at least part of what they are going to earn in the signature campaign they are going to spend in the business (or even more if it is a casino).

I don't know what you think about this. It is clear to me that the campaign managers will not only take into account the merits in relation to the activity, but also if they post on certain boards for example and other factors.

As I say, this has only happened to me in certain cases, in campaigns that I consider decent and that, in general, have quality posters.

Is this my guess or do you think I might be right?

Is there any reliable list out there of exchanges that are truly decentralized and where these things can't happen?

My country is not there either, but there is one thing that has caught my attention.


It is normal that it is more or less the same, since gambling is a game of negative mathematical expectation, which means that if we consider the big numbers, as in this case, which is considered what a whole country bets in a year, there is a direct correlation between the money bet and the money lost.


I am struck by the case of the United States, which although it is not the first in terms of gambling per adult, it is the first in terms of total losses. I guess it is because being a rich country, there are many whales with money that gamble and end up losing a lot of money. . This is consistent with my experience with poker. Although one may think that US players are good at playing poker because it is a tradition in their country, the average player there is very bad, he is more of a recreational player who plays for fun or to pass the time.

I like to eat organic products apart from following a keto/carnivore diet, mainly because I think it's healthier, but I recognize that the world is not ready to move on to what I do in a short period of time.

The OP is right, although I don't like the way he expresses it.. Mass production is what has made 8 billion people live in the world today, and that there is less and less hunger in the world and that is based on intensive agriculture with large extensions of monocultures and chemical fertilizers and pesticides.

I hope that the shift is made little by little. As countries become richer, the population tends to grow less and even decrease. Gradually, with improved techniques, I believe that more and more crops will be grown ecologically, but also because of an increase in demand and not so much because of political will.

Again? We have had several such queries in this section recently. If you had simply looked at a few threads you would have the information:

new bitcoin casino system

Do You Think New Casino Should Partnered With Bounty Managers To Gain Trust?

How do you advertise your casino?

In short, crypto gambling is a very competitive space and if you want to try to launch a casino you will have to make a good investment, not only to set it up, but also in advertising to attract customers. Now, if you manage to make it work fairly well, casinos are money making machines, but for that, once you have attracted customers, you will have to give them a good user experience.

I believe that Musk's influence on the price of Bitcoin, as of today, is small. He had it last year, and it is inevitable that people will look at what he does and react in the short term to actions such as when he announced he was buying Bitcoin for Tesla and accepting Bitcoin payments. I personally don't care what he does and I don't think he's going to move the price of Bitcoin much some tweets.

Well, the OP is repeating something I've heard Saylor say a lot, which has its logic, but doesn't necessarily have to be so. There are many who don't care about Bitcoin, and who are immensely wealthy by other means, by having created a company or several that are extremely profitable, money making machines. Many have real estate properties everywhere that give them cash flow as well.

I think it stands to reason that as time goes on demand by wealthy people for Bitcoin will increase, but the math doesn't have to be as the OP (or Saylor) puts it.

I do not agree with the suspension either, as it will surely affect people who are not to blame for the war and do not agree with it, both athletes and spectators. In addition to the fact that it may give rise to a feeling of grievance.


Yes, statistics, and more so as in this case, must be taken with a grain of salt. Although I certainly don't find it surprising that support for the war among citizens of Russia is higher than outside the country.

This is normal in times of crisis, normally almost all sectors are going down and people are looking for liquidity. But there will always be some small sector that goes up, the bad thing is to find which one. Some shitcoin, some small cap, but to get it right or you have a very precise knowledge, or it will be like playing roulette.

To me, this all sounds pretty shoddy. First of all because the only way to advertise his site has been to create this thread, when we know that there are better ways to advertise a new betting page on the forum, but it requires spending money. Also, his site:


And he said this on April 25 without having appeared on the forum since April 10. It looks quite unprofessional to me.

Lol, but is that the case? Two months to handle a ban evading case seems too much to me. I don't know if any moderator or someone who has experience with ban evasion reporting can clarify this for us.

I think we just need to zoom out. Perceived correlations between Bitcoin and indices such as the Nasdaq or S&P 500 have occurred only over short periods of time. If we take long periods, of at least one cycle, we see that there is no such correlation but small coincidences.

Regarding this year, we have not yet seen a crash per se, but we have seen a downturn and bear market, although it was to be expected in the stock market after the recent returns. If there was a crash such as a 30/50% drop from where we are in a short period of time, I believe that Bitcoin would also go down, but that as happened with the coronavirus, the subsequent rise would be much higher than that of the stock market and other assets.

Precisely in those threads that you comment I have recommended them to spend the money if they want the casino to be successful. They are not only bounty managers as you say or signature campaigns, they can also buy advertising on the forum and giveaways to advertise. Crypto casinos move a lot of money but they are in a very competitive market. Anyone who wants to launch a new casino better think about an initial investment in advertising, otherwise I see it unlikely to succeed.

I do. Although they are essentially the same shit, there is still cash left in today's fiat monetary system. Although people are paying more and more with digital means (cards, cell phones, smartwatch...), those who want privacy can pay with bills and coins and leave no trace of their activity, unless they ask for an invoice in their name. With CBDCs, however, absolutely all payments made by citizens will be recorded.

In my case and honoring my nickname, I think the best is poker because it depends on your skill versus other players and does not have a certain mathematical loss in the long run due to HE as in casino games. Although poker is a shrinking market and every year that passes the tables are harder and the profitability decreases (on average, there are always those who start and can climb levels in this world).

A good advice I can give you is to use this forum frequently, in a sincere way to learn and share the things you know and eventually you will be able to move up the ranks and work in signature campaigns, which pay you in Bitcoin, but for working writing from home, a task that you can combine with other jobs.

You could easily (with time) get paid between $50 and $100 a week. It is not "free" but it is a good option.

Just don't cheat, don't plagiarize. There are many people who are tempted, take this fast dishonest way and end up getting caught.

In fact, this is the way it should be: transparency regarding the RTP. If I were a casino owner I would try to give the highest RTP possible and would advertise. It would be a good way to attract players, as you give them a better user experience.

Casinos are money-making machines. The only thing to make sure is that players go there frequently. The way to attract them is advertising and the way to keep them coming back is to give them a good user experience. A good RTP is a good complement to both points.

I don't quite understand it. On February 24 YOSHIE reported him for ban evasion in the thread that the OP himself has linked to: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5094661.msg59350267#msg59350267

So he should have been banned, and I don't know why he was not. Maybe they gave him the benefit of the doubt in case the banned account was his "brother"? 

But if plagiarism is now added to it, I don't see much future for this account.

It is curious because there have also been other forum members bumping the signatures campaigns threads of these casinos that are no longer active:

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5995/59952665.html

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5993/59939972.html

It's probably a coincidence, but with a little care these things wouldn't happen, for example if the signature campaign threads had been locked.

It's the same old story again, there was a giveaway in the games and rounds section that kept being bumped by bots and people who didn't know it had ended, but being bumped was free advertising and it wasn't locked or anything, at least for a while. In the end I don't know if the moderators locked it or not but it's not there any more.