Da Decred hier offtopic ist, hier noch etwas von mir zum Kurs. Es läuft die Schlacht um die 450 Dollar.  das mining cartel sieht die felle davonschwimmen (neue konkurrenz + halving event) und stemmt sich dagegen. ich bin auf die zeit nach juli gespannt. |
|
|
|
Ich habe gehört Prince sei tot
if you ask taavet hinrikus, CEO of Warner Bros. Records, "the artist formerly known as prince, i think we can say, is dead. there is no traction, no one is using the artist formerly known as prince. the the artist formerly known as prince experiment, i think we can say, is over."  Nils Ruf ist seit seinem spruch über Roger Ciceros tod geächtet.  |
|
|
|
where is the interface in English language? link? im not able to ask the following because of this interface in Chinese language only: anyone able to assist? EDIT: sorry I have to correct something. Gavin visited the CIA not the NSA. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6652.0there is also no prove that this event forced SN to disappear. maybe SN disappeared earlier. but it seems the last email from Gavin to SN was about the CIA visit. SN never responded ever again. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113609.0 |
|
|
|
|
gibt es irgendwas neues über den fall YM? der wechsel des GF und der umzug in einen briefkasten nach berlin scheint ein guter schachzug gewesen zu sein im hinblick auf verschleppung. der jetzige GF aus österreich war damals auch in den entführungsfall involviert oder?
|
|
|
|
Sollte diese Spekulation tatsächlich ins Schwarze treffen, dann wird die Zeit sie lehren, dass der Handel gegen die Massen langfristig nicht zum Erfolg führt. Oder, um es in den Worten eine ehemaligen beliebten deutschen Politikers (ein Oxymoron) zu sagen, den Bitcoin in seinem Lauf hält weder Ochs noch Esel auf.  aber bei Bitcoin bewahrheitet es sich tatsächlich. |
|
|
|
so, jetzt geht es eventuell los. auf bitfinex und bitstamp werden die käufer aktiv und die chinesischen börsen halten dagegen. mal sehen wann ihnen das pulver ausgeht. EDIT: und dann geht auf bitfinex und bitstamp der dampf aus. |
|
|
|
BITFURY, i would endorse you to sell Miners for the "Home Miner" in large scale at under 0,15$/GH shipped! You may ask, why this crazy guy wants you to do so, well i'll try to give you an answer to this. Every time the price hits 2795, somebody sells a large portion of BTC to keep the price under this level, and that seems to be a succesful strategy. I personally suspect some big miners in china to regulate the market this way, and therefore keep the rest of the world outside of the mining business. That sounds somewhat like a monopol, and i truely do believe that is the case (i think you guys know that too, so no surprise here). BITMAIN is the largest ASIC manufacturer and miner at present it seems, and BITMAIN is getting more and more the dictator of this business, so the natural strategy should be to change this. What can you guys do to make that happen? 1.) Build a Miner for "Home Miners" with a price less than 0,15$/GH shipped, and a power consumption less than 1600 watts each, to keep that thing running at home. 2.) Offer a bulk sale in logarithmic steps, so small mining farms are able to buy at decent prices to grow. 3.) Offer a great support to your customers, and i believe you will be sold out in a few days. On the long run that builds a counter part to BITMAIN and we will see a shift from china to the rest of the world in small steps, but we will see it. Secondly it will lift you on top of the market, and take some air from BITMAIN to breathe. Thirdly, and i believe this will happen, all after that the price of BTC will hold a steady level (at the moment speaking, this is left to market makers as BITMAIN is one) Conclusion: Support the home miner and you will get some strategic pressure on the guys from China yes, the chart proves it. https://snag.gy/4tpVj5huobi, daily chart. |
|
|
|
chinese cartel in action. preventing a price above 2793-2795 to avoid new miners coming into the game. seems the have tons of bitcoins available. https://snag.gy/4tpVj5Hmm... I was counting on a Chinese pump to break above 2820 CNY within 2 days. If this won't happen, then the market will have made a lower high, and then probably a lower low, which means a downtrend will become apparent. IMO the point is to get the most out of Bitcoin until the halving event. no new miners allowed until then. |
|
|
|
chinese cartel in action. preventing a price above 2793-2795 to avoid new miners coming into the game. seems they have tons of bitcoins available. https://snag.gy/4tpVj5 |
|
|
|
auf den chinesischen börsen ist sehr schön ein kartell-haftes vorgehen zu erkennen. geht der kurs über 2793 - 2795 werden die bitcoin schleusen geöffnet um die nachfrage zu befriedigen. sie scheinen die bitcoinlager gut gefüllt zu haben um den preis tief zu halten damit die konkurrenz nicht auf die idee kommt wieder zu minen weil es sich wieder lohnt durch einen höheren preis. https://snag.gy/4tpVj5 |
|
|
|
What is it? They are testing big blocks in another chain or simulator, or what? this is a testnet for segwit. before a release to public or on the mainnet Core is testing all the improvements. Do you know how much of it is witness data and how relevant this would be to the kind of usage patterns we have today? Are these kinds of segwit block sizes perhaps more relevant for when LN is launched? LN is a other story because it is off-chain. just the start and the end is manifested in the blockchain. the other whole lifecycle of certain LN activities do not affect the blockchain. SegWit is a speration of data from the blockchain which is not immediate necessary for txs. and because of this you can see blocks of 3.6 MB. the data which is necessary is stored in the blockchain and the other data is seperated. in sum you have data of 3.6 MB for example but the necessary data is just 0.9 MB. The reason I ask is that, as I understood, the ins and outs of the LN streams are some of the few txs which would use that much witness data. In any event I'm guessing these tests will be used to block any notion of a maxblocksize hf as it's pretty close to the 4mb total they agreed upon with the miners earlier this year. It will be interesting to see what LN does to centralization over the coming years. I hope it's not the beginning of the end. i guess as soon segwit is activated and LN nodes occur we will see stress tests to attack the mainnet. then we know what for a amout of txs (on-chain and off-chain) is possible with 1MB+SegWit+LN. imagine if we will come to a consensus to reduce the blocksize to 0.5 MB in 2017/2018 because of fees are to low. |
|
|
|
What is it? They are testing big blocks in another chain or simulator, or what? this is a testnet for segwit. before a release to public or on the mainnet Core is testing all the improvements. Do you know how much of it is witness data and how relevant this would be to the kind of usage patterns we have today? Are these kinds of segwit block sizes perhaps more relevant for when LN is launched? LN is an other story because it is off-chain. just the start and the end is manifested in the blockchain. the other whole lifecycle of certain LN activities does not affect the blockchain. SegWit is a speration of data from the blockchain which is not immediate necessary for txs. and because of this you can see blocks of 3.6 MB. the data which is necessary is stored in the blockchain and the other data is seperated. for example in sum you have data of 3.6 MB but the necessary data which is stored in the block is just 0.9 MB. EDIT: I cannot see the exact amount of data which is stored in the block and the exact amout of data whic is excluded from the block https://segnet.smartbit.com.au/block/00000072e17929d0d4c1a8f3e5f59c4fc10dd4d32861a40da855d55309a97562 |
|
|
|
What is it? They are testing big blocks in another chain or simulator, or what? this is a testnet for segwit. before a release to public or on the mainnet Core is testing all the improvements. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
