I'm also quite slow lately, not enough free time to report and have fun with the plagiarists  To many deadlines at work and many projects at home so it looks like I won't be at full power reporting any time soon. I make some small bursts of reports when I get 5 mins free time but, most of the reports need a deeper investigation.. |
|
|
|
@morvillz7z it's good to have a place where to report those. I'm quite busy IRL lately, but hopefully someone can take a look at those accounts. We are taking them down slowly  |
|
|
|
Thanks.. oook just 2 min. play and there you go > Number 4 busted  and I actually started from him The Original > So do you plan to import the indicators from tradingview or you are going to create your own in your exchange ?
Plagiarsit > So do you plan to import the indicators from tradingview or you are going to create your own in your exchange ?
I think we need to have a Club investigation board with more restrictions so only those in the club can access this info. |
|
|
|
|
The "good" old times are over now, the forum is changing in something better and people like you @OP, have no place here ... au revoir!
|
|
|
|
Given that the "1 merit for signature" rule has consistently reduced the number of posts by 20-30%, we can confidently draw the conclusion that it is reducing spam.
These data demonstrate that the number of posts has decreased. Yes, we can conclude that quantitatively there`s less spam (although there`s no direct correlation between the decrease in the number of posts and spam, since it`s possible that participants generally began to write less, not less spam). But these indicators don`t say anything about the quality of written posts. Even if the number of shitposts has become less, this doesn`t mean that they have become of higher quality. Therefore, we can`t talk about solving the problem so far. In my opinion, the spam issue should be solved in two directions: it`s necessary to reduce the number of shitposts, but at the same time improve the quality of comments. And for this, an incentive is needed (in our case, the required number of merit to increase the rank). And it seems to me that 1 merit for motivation is extremely insufficient. It's really simple, those who earned money in sig. campaigns with 0 effort /newbies and Jr.members/ can no longer do it and big part of them gave up. Those who really push to do it, now pay either for merit or for Copper Membership. It's not that difficult for shitposters to get a single merit to become Junior. They might not get it legitimately but I'm seeing a lot of shitposting juniors with one suspicious merit floating around. They can also just purchase the Copper Membership for $15-$20 or whatever it is. I still think we should remove Junior's signatures and require ten merit before you can get one. This makes it ten times harder or costlier for them to abuse.
Yeah, I agree but the number of those shitposters is not so big anymore as it was before. I can find in Bitcoin Discussions more legit threads that those spam-mega-threads, the Off-topic is not so popular anymore as it used to be before. Now if you refresh it every 15 seconds there are no new posts as there were before. |
|
|
|
|
You cannot delete or deactivate your account if that's what you are trying to achieve.
|
|
|
|
Breaking forum rules:Bounty thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5047247.0They are continuously bumping thread with good project and quoted full thread. I am reporting daily. Mod. could check my history. They are not following forum rules so thread should be trashed or locked. Note: Replies have reported up to today. No one will stop the spammer ? http://archive.is/kvfo6 The bounty section is the least concern for the mods. There's no point of bumping the bounty threads. |
|
|
|
|
As I stated earlier I don't see the need at the moment.
The ranking up process is locked by the new rules. The total shitposters cannot rank up to Jr. the ones that are more advances will probably reach up to member but not more.
Those shitposters that got the merit airdropped are now being filtered, I see so many ban appeals every day, so after some time the forum will be cleaned from most of the spammers. This process will continue and more and more of those who post nonsense will be filtered naturally.
I think theymos did enough changes /restrictions/ which will have more impact in a bit longer run.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you post somewhere a wallet address you are still in control of? The exchange "wallets" does not count, as you don't own the private keys /and the wallet/.
If you have the private keys of the address, you can easily sign a message.
|
|
|
|
|
@mazdafunsun
I was wrong about the active members, I was on a mobile I couldn't get the correct info from BPIP website.
Now, according to Vod, the BPIP's Active Profiles are those who have logged in at least once for the last 3 mounts.
Here is the final update from today > 322,676 Active Profiles
|
|
|
|
~
Now Bitcoin discussion is far better than what it used to be a couple of months ago. Spam threads are quickly getting locked, duplicates reported. Although copy-pasters are getting banned, altcoin discussion board is still worse with duplicate threads and spam mega threads not getting locked. Maybe if a good number of reporters actively reporting on altcoin discussion board (not bounties and announcements), half the spam would be gone, making it better for discussions.
It's not so quick process, keep in mind that before the changes / like the announcement for the reporter badges,the new mods like Welsh and Flying Hellfish, the more detailed reports stats and some other recent changes / people were not so familiar with reporting and only a few were doing it /I was one of them/. Now more are interested in doing it in a hope to get a badge one day, which is good. Imagine when the badges are actually implemented, there will be more and more people reporting and they gonna focus on different sections of the forum. We are going the right way so it will come the time to the Altcoin section too, just wait. |
|
|
|
~
@Timelord2067 proof that i'm an alt of Quicksilver since getting 1 Merit of QS is hardly something you can call a proof
~
Just a note> Quicksilver =! Quickseller |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Rishblitz from bitcointalk.org and today is 29 Oktober 2018
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1KymP6phzMGNiruwA1GAhtci96jxiMY55N
GzcxVPLq4c3Qn8RDAdya+VhD5FQmM2Uw/CWsAgNpS7t/Jr3U5T/IxHPoAI6gu/MJsjsRVIrBE6mhyDzWLvArhdA=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Quoted, verified and archived. |
|
|
|
Great, let's try to get it locked. Everyone is welcome to report there |
|
|
|
|
There are so many fishy things with this thread but it's still there open and running.
Maybe my reports were bad formulated.
|
|
|
|
|
What I've seen till now is that theymos is taking back the control slowly. First was the politics and society section got new Mod, then Altcoins section got new Mod.
Bitcoin discussion section is much more clean now and thing are getting better.
I guess it will come the time to the Marketplace too, it's just takes time.
I'm pretty sure we'll find a solution to the Bot problem soon.
|
|
|
|
I only have a tiny number of reports and accuracy is not the best because with a tiny number of reports, one non good one will bring your percentage down. But I am proud nevertheless because I am still kind of new but have helped to handle some serious prohibited behaviour.
The percentage doesn't matter, the more you report, the cleaner forum will be. So better report and forget about scores |
|
|
|
|
I warned about this some time ago that it will be possible to use bots to discredit the good projects.
There's a lot of room to make shit with those bots.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
