Errmm, you’re kind of just prolonging it. The main thing is that Bitcoin is a decentralized payment method, it’s basically all about transaction and nothing more. The good thing about it is the fact that it brought decentralization. Having decentralization gave freedom to its users.

By making use of Bitcoin people are able to have the complete control over their asset, the government cannot do anything to money stored in Bitcoin, it’s out of their control and can’t be frozen like they would do fiat stored in a bank account. One thing that I think makes Bitcoin quite special in the cryptocurrency space, is the fact that it is the only truly decentralized currency.

You have to chill. We all know that Bitcoin will get to $100,000 for sure, but it is not going to happen in a hurry, it takes time for the market make every move.

It took a very long time before we arrived at this current price we are at today (and reaching an ATH of over $60,000). Same way that you are aware of inflation, I believe that other people out there are also aware of it, even if they are not investing in Bitcoin.

People have been surviving inflation for many years now, so I don’t think this one is going to be anything different, people will also survive. All of us won’t be investing in Bitcoin, everyone have what they feel is best for them to do, and it’s good you chose Bitcoin, so try to focus.

I do not know if it is his first week, however I have been here since 2013 and I can tell you that Lightlord type of deal never happened, why? Because, we are talking about a situation where we know the guy is great, we know he won't scam us, we know that they are fair and legit.

When you have something like that, it is quite hard to actually figure out something to do, we are talking about something that is not straight up bad situation. He may get sick again, or go somewhere without internet connection, or even die and we would never really understand what would happen in that case, like just forget about our money? Isn't that sort of like scam as well? I mean yeah it is not stealing your money and the money is just in the accounts untouched by anyone in that case but still, if his death causes us to lose all of our money that is different.

Better for them. If they banned Bitcoin it is not going to make the millions of people who are already Bitcoin investors there to stop buying and selling Bitcoin. People would still continue as long as they have started. I know a few where the government banned Bitcoin all of a sudden and people quickly decided that it was best for them to switch to peer-to-peer exchanges.

So, the government’s are just wasting their time with banning Bitcoin, because it never works. The smart ones would not ban Bitcoin, rather they would legalize it and welcome crypto companies and exchanges into their country, and use that as an opportunity to benefit from cryptocurrency.

Most CBDCs are not going to be using blockchain, so far the ones I know of are not making use of blockchain. The CBDC that we are all talking about are still the same fiat, but in a digital form. They have no connection with Bitcoin, so there is no way that these digital currencies are going to have any effect on Bitcoin.

Like you said, Bitcoin is decentralized and those who wants to make use of decentralized money will continue to make use of Bitcoin, while those that have chosen to make use of fiat will continue with that. It’s a matter of choice, none is stopping the other. Except, maybe Bitcoin is banned in your country. But even if it’s banned in your country, you can still make use of it.

There are not that many places that actually care about what the customers says. And that makes duelbits a bit more different. Now, don't get me wrong because there are a few places that does support very well, and support is something else. If you have a complaint about the website or the casino then there are some places which helps you greatly and there are nothing wrong with that at all. However, listening to what the customers says is something unique.

There are only like handful of places in all of crypto that actually responds to what you say, if they agree then they will do it right away, and if they do not do it at least they give you a reason for why they are not doing it.

Honestly LFC have been missing that game for a long time now. Even United managed to beat Leeds so I believe that it shouldn't be a tough game. I am wagering first half/second half on Liverpool, and also 2.5+ goals/Liverpool bets, both of them will happen for sure in my mind.

I am expecting 1 or 2 goals from LFC on first half, and then another 2 goals or so at least on second half, maybe even three. That way the result will be somewhere between 3 to 5 goals by Liverpool, maybe one goal by Leeds but I believe that LFC will get both halves and score more than 3 and win the game those three stats will surely happen in this game and wagering on them seems like a logical way to approach it.

Selling something, like what exactly? I do sell my services to clients and I get paid for it. As for NFT, that’s something that I am not into, but I have seen a lot of people who are into it, especially digital artists and it has been fetching them a lot of money. NFT is something that has really favoured the digital art niche, and I would advise anyone who is into such to try it out and start selling their arts on NFT platforms like OpenSea.

Whenever the market is in a low position, it is the right time to start thinking of ways to be creative so that you can earn as much coins as possible that you would hold and even make profit when the market starts to recover again.

Unfortunately it is not easy to find the difference between the good and the bad projects in the NFT world most of the time. Rollbots could be good and we all know that for two main reasons, one of them is that there were one before and it turned out to be a good one, and secondly it is tied to rollbit and that is why we know that they will do their best to keep it popular.

However when we are talking about something else then it becomes a bit more tough to find the difference. Like I have seen some good NFT collections (by good I mean the art was good) and they were worth nearly nothing whereas I still do not get the cryptopunks. Like, not the idea but why THAT one was picked and not another one.

I guess that what you saw was the old news. Indeed there was a time that they proposed to ban bitcoin, but that was around earlier this year, and they have later changed their mind. With the recent news about the position of cryptocurrency in the country, they have decided that it is best for them to regulate it, which is definitely the best thing that they would do now.

There are already lots of miners in this country, so I think that if they really went ahead to ban cryptocurrency in their country, it really would have affected the market a bit, although it wouldn’t be anything serious as the market would still catch up very soon. Currently Russia holds a top position in bitcoin mining.

It is not the jpg that makes it worth that much, it is the tech behind it that makes it worth that much. I mean there is nothing that we should be really claiming that we know in the NFT world because some things just happen without any reason at all and makes everyone shocked. I consider them like that banana taped to the wall that the guy ate which was worth 150k.

We all know that it was not really "art", it was banana taped to the wall, and even the owner said that banana could be changed it was the "idea" that was the art and not THAT banana that makes it art. Do you really believe that a banana taped to wall worths a ton of money? We all know it shouldn't however it became viral and probably worths even more right now, art is a bit weird like that.

To be honest, they have been one of the best at support and always responded quickly. There are only a few places in the crypto world that have quick returns, not because they are bad or anything, just that they do not have enough staff. Like for example could you say Binance is bad? I wouldn't say they are bad and yet they respond slower than duelbits, because lets be honest they have more customers to care about and not enough staff.

Duelbits is at the core of that ratio, they have both a good amount of customers but also a good amount of staff, not too many customers and few staff, or few customers and a lot of staff, they have a great ratio and that is how they end up helping us all.

Right from the first time when I started investing in Bitcoin, my plan has never been to get rich quick or whatsoever, because I never let the greed take over me. But I had it in mind that as time goes on I would be able to make some good profit from Bitcoin, enough for me to be okay at least. And that was what happened, I was able to make a good profit from Bitcoin and right now I can say that I’m OK, I am very much better than I used to be before.

And one thing for sure is that as time goes on my wealth will continue to increase. It is never something that I have to rush, I just need to take my time and things will keep on working out and that is it.

In this case I will use Bitcoin and Ethereum as an example: both Bitcoin and Ethereum has been the undisputed biggest two in the market for a very long time now, and among these two big coins in the market, there are people who thinks that Ethereum should be topping bitcoin in the market, but that hasn’t been the case, in fact Bitcoin keeps having more dominance in the market compared to Ethereum. The reason for this is because Bitcoin is the first Cryptocurrency in the market.

So, why Dai would find it difficult to beat USDT is because USDT is the first stable coin that was created. It’s having that same first-comer advantage that bitcoin has, over every other stablecoins in the market.

This will turn into the next generation of marketing as well. Not only you are making money from it, but you are also getting a lot of attention as well. Rollbit did the first NFT version and got so much money from minting I bet, and not only they made money but they got attention and a lot of different people as well.

So, I have to say that there is a good case to be made on this situation, you just have to consider the fact that rollbots could be done for the V2 and then V3 and then more and more. Who would say no to more money and more customers? I mean even if the casino part gets a lot less profit, the NFT income makes that back very easily anyway.

Not bad that you took out your time to point out the mistake that a lot of people have been making in this forum, at least it wouldn’t be bad for those who don’t know it to learn today and avoid making such a mistake, no knowledge is a waste. I do notice that a some of the people do make that error when they are making a post in the forum, they would be talking about an asset and they would say a ‘coin’ and on the same post they would also refer to that same asset as a ‘token’.

I believe that the mistake is because they don’t understand yet that the both of them are different. I do come across it and ignore, but it's good that you pointed it out for those of them to learn. Example of tokens are the ERC-20 tokens .

I have to say that there is really not that much of an easy "if x happens then y token is scam" type of thing. A project could look like there is nothing wrong with it for years before they end up rug pulling and you would be disappointed.

You have to realize that the early days are the riskiest because they could get out and people would expect that at this point. However, if the project has been around for a year and made millions of dollars to the project founders then it would be harder for it to be a scam. In that case if you invest into something older in the BSC world then there is a lower chance you could lose your money, you won't 100x that easily, but you could at least not be scammed at the same time as well.

I would guess that when we are talking about something free like fun token they are distributing, there shouldn't even be a max limit. I mean it is free and if you win then you could win forever, like you could have a few billions if you can, there is nothing wrong with that, have few trillions, who cares?

It is all free and if you are first then you would get real money but at until that point there is nothing that you can get and that is why there shouldn't be a max. That could actually make things a lot better because we would be able to see people doing crazy bets, like first leading the day would end up wagering ALL their money all at once on the last hours and suddenly the top level will be even higher to reach. All the people would go crazy and that way the numbers would be a lot higher.

I mean there is still at least 3 points difference even if Liverpool wins the extra game. Doesn't mean that they are going to end up winning or end up losing neither, it is still quite in the middle for now and there is absolutely nothing to say for now. However, it was definitely too early to pay out that quickly .

I mean think about it, the difference was so quick that even after a few games we are now closer and the decision is being questioned and not like City ended up losing too much neither, just one loss on the last game and one tie in the last 5 games, if they went on a 2-3 game losing streak then I would understand and say "how would they know this would happen" but it is just one loss . If your whole pay out early is destroyed by one loss then I am pretty sure it was too quick to make a decision like that and maybe you should have waited a bit longer .

Since, it is "freebitco.in" people sometimes think about this place as a way to make free bitcoin. I mean I do understand the logic, at first, I considered it that way as well, I didn't see this as a casino at all. For me this place was a place to get free bitcoins (satoshis) and as a side thing they also had a casino implemented as well, not a casino by heart but a faucet by heart at first. Then I realized that wouldn't work as a business, you guys would have been bankrupt long time ago if that was the case.

This is why now I do understand why you do certain things but that is of course because I understand the point of view right now, some people may still not understand it.