From tape out to mass production can be done within seven weeks if all goes well. So that means it is possible for the first units to start shipping in April. As they taped out in February come on your flogging a dead horse horse now spamming FUD. For all you know they tapped out on February 1st  So why did they announce a datacentre "Plan B" on 5th February if they had already taped out? They knew they were so close to taping out and built a datacentre as a backup plan. They had until June to deliver and announced a datacentre backup plan in more or less January - 5 months before they would need it. What's that about? Oh, you really believe they're only building the datacenter for plan B really you're flogging a dead horse now. Who pay's you to write this crap or do you just get satisfaction spreading FUD and trolling. I've come to the conclusion that KnC pays Avanger. Since so few are saying bad things they said it's ok to pay Avanger to balance the karma  |
|
|
|
I know i am going to get a lot of hate from saying this. I paid for my system on November the 24th and I have still being waiting for my system. I haven't given up on the company yet. I still believe they can give me my system that i have paid for. I understand that it is hard to get to the right amount of hash/s for the advertised amount. So for all the people that are asking for refunds and complaining. I recommend you become patient and just let VMC do it's thing. They aren't a bad company, all companies do this pre order stuff and make you wait ages, just give them time. Also for people that still have faith in this company. My order is said to be delivered on the 20th of march, so i am excited P.S. i know i am going to get a lot of hate How much did you paid for your system? What are you going to do if you won't get it by 20th March? |
|
|
|
Someone translate what 1440 cores mean regarding the speed. Also 43% less power consumption means ~0.74W/GH at wall (1.3W/GH minus 43%)
196 Cores in a Jupiter based on the November Jupiter of 680GH/s = 3.469GH/s per core x Neptune 1440 Cores = 4996.5GH/s
These are just my Numbers and are more than likely just Bullshit.
But the Neptune should be greater than 3TH/s.
A Jupiter has 4 asics, each with 196 cores, so 768 cores in total and approx 768/680GH/s = ~1.3GH/s per. core. So they will most likely do 1.3GH/s per core x 1440 = 1872GH/s per. asic. Neptune will have 2 asics and do 3744GH/s max with power consumption at 2770W ? Only 2 asics? I missed that information. How are they gonna dissipate 1385W? |
|
|
|
HF chips are actually four dies. I don't know about CoinTerra but the comparison is unfair and irrelevant given the context.
HashFast's chip consists of multiple dies on a singe substrate and performs at 750GH/s. Cointerra's chip consists of multiple dies on a singe substrate and perform at much less than 750GH/s. KnC's chip consists of multiple dies on a singe substrate and performs at much, much less than 750GH/s. The comparison of hardware is trivial, however the contrast in performance is striking!  I'll just leave this here: https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-78 No idea of the speed, but i have a feeling that it will crush your chip HashFast. What will you say then? |
|
|
|
Someone translate what 1440 cores mean regarding the speed. Also 43% less power consumption means ~0.74W/GH at wall (1.3W/GH minus 43%) |
|
|
|
|
ImI don't worry with so many refunds maybe we will get twice the Neptunes and a special price to order more!
|
|
|
|
Knc could be dominating the in stock bitcoin mining hardware market by shipping jupiters as fast as they can make them, but they chose to misuse Neptune preorder money to build their own private mining farm.
yes, that was definitly a cooler Still better than other coolers... haha! others were a DESASTER. nevertheless i am a liitle dissapointed of the moves KNC has dome the last 3 months. their miningfarms are HUGE and will kill alot of the profits of their own customers imo. I am a bit dissapointed too. Just a few more Jupiters per customer at cost and everyone could be happy. There is nothing exiting exciting these days. I miss the days with updates from burnin and KnC, but i still have faith! Waiting for the 5TH monster at 2kW Edit: Thinking about the future i found myself thinking about the consumables from our Jupiters. Are the fans running at 100%? How long till they start to die? Does anyone know the exact models of the fans? Are there any other consumables that i should stock up? |
|
|
|
Hey marto74 how long until we see some gen2 bitfury boards running?
I don't think a 25% improvement per chip is enough to make them competitive unless they cut their price so Marto can put 32 chip/110GH on a board or slash the 16 chip board price drastically. Really disappointed they are still at 55nm, could have put 40nm in the same package. The 4x A1 130GH/s board looks the best right now (8x A1 has cooling requirements not suitable for home use!). FriedCat is working on a 40nm chip that might be competitive. Was talking similar specs to A1 but at 40nm should make it much cheaper than 28nm. I see they priced the BitFury 2 test chips at €5. 32x €5 = €160/$220 for about 110GH/s, expect double for other costs and Martos time, would make them about $4/GH per board. http://www.bitfurystrikesback.com/product/bitfury-55nm-rev2-samples/I was thinking the same thing. PCB and components do have a fixed cost that will influence the final cost per GH/s very much. Having a 2.5GH/s chip at ~0.7W/GH pushes the 3$/GH limit very much. Paying for more per GH/s is just throwing money on the window. Let's hope for a dump price for the chips! |
|
|
|
Knc could be dominating the in stock bitcoin mining hardware market by shipping jupiters as fast as they can make them, but they chose to misuse Neptune preorder money to build their own private mining farm.
yes, that was definitly a cooler Still better than other coolers... (...)
hi phoenix, whats wrong? i remember you as polite and friendly person in this thread. what happend? how is mining going? greets ImI I was just about to ask the same question. Small mining profits make one angry Phoenix. |
|
|
|
Interested...
Glad to see you back. Can't wait for your products! |
|
|
|
How hard would it be to make it support multiple instances?
It can be done, but it's made intentionally difficult, because running two instances of Armory using the same wallets is guaranteed to corrupt your wallets. And of course, all the extra data... most of the time the user simply double-clicked to open it again, not realizing it's already open. If you really want to do it for whatever reason, then you can open the second Armory instance using --datadir=/path/to/second/armory --interport=7890 Interport can be any unused port, and is only for detecting multiple instances (which is why you must change it to run multiple). You must change both datadir and interport at the same time if you don't want to corrupt your existing wallets. Thank you. Nice and "user easy" way of detecting multiple instances  |
|
|
|
|
Hey marto74 how long until we see some gen2 bitfury boards running?
|
|
|
|
Will someone translate what 864 rolled hash cores means? What's the speed and what's the difference between rolled and un-rolled cores?
An unrolled core would calculate one hash at each clock, so running at 1MHz one core is 1MH/s A rolled core calculates the hash in several clock cycles - for Bitfury chips this is 65 cycles, so single core running at 1Mhz will produce close to 15.4 kH/s If the chip runs at 200MHz - 864 cores are equal to 200*864/65 = 2658.46 MH/s or 2.66 GH/s For comparison the first revision had 756 cores which at 200MHz is 2.33 GH/s so 15% increase is expected Thank you very much! Can't wait for the populated DYI cheap boards! |
|
|
|
|
Where is the guy that was happy to send 50k$ via OKPay to MtGOX? How are you feeling now and what are you doing to recover your money?
|
|
|
|
|
Will someone translate what 864 rolled hash cores means? What's the speed and what's the difference between rolled and un-rolled cores?
|
|
|
|
Get your crap spam out of here
Cointerra's ASIC hashrate is "greater than 500 GH/s?" False.HashFast's ASIC hashrate is "greater than 500 GH/s?" True.The objective truth is not "spam" regardless of your subjective personal emotional reaction. HashFast_CL how do you think that people are receiving your posts when they see this: Trust: -22: -4 / +0(0)
Warning: Trade with extreme caution! |
|
|
|
lies and wank
Go fuck yourself criminal. Do not reply to any of my posts unless it's send the 40BTC bounty you promised to the people who got your stolen coins back. How did that end up? The scammers refunded the money and that's it? And Phoenix didn't paid the bounty. He said that the scammers "willingly refunded" so no reward was needed to be paid. He was in bed with the scammers who "willingly refunded". He paid out some small hush money and that was the end of that. Thank you. Well that doesn't seem right at all IF the scammers refunded the money after they were discovered by Avanger and Augusto Croppo. |
|
|
|
Also, whether it would be possible for existing customers with 1.4Th rigs to upgrade to the 2Th - e.g. by mailing in the device - ideally crossmailing so no hash rate is lost. It seems like once they get the old rigs in they should be able to pretty easily upgrade them in house at little cost, as long as they can remove the chip and put it on the new boards...
Cheers,
Will
I don't think there will be such a thing as 2TH. I am quite certain everyone will get the same 1.6TH and no board upgrade etc will solve this problem. The board upgrades etc may make the system more stable at best. Wouldn't be selling 400Ghs PCI-E for $1699 if they had a solution for this problem. The title of this thread says "CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s." Has Cointerra actually demonstrated their chip running at " greater than 500 GH/s?" AFAIK, the *only* ASIC in the world running at " greater than 500 GH/s" is HashFast's 750GH/s EVO.  This is worse than cypherdoc! |
|
|
|
lies and wank
Go fuck yourself criminal. Do not reply to any of my posts unless it's send the 40BTC bounty you promised to the people who got your stolen coins back. How did that end up? The scammers refunded the money and that's it? And Phoenix didn't paid the bounty. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
