Well since satoshi is dead.... a heck of a lot of coins are useless..
I bet Satoshi was smart enough to prevent his coins being lost. I believe he holds the coins because he has more ideas as to how the world should change. In order to do that he waits until bitcoin is a world currency and then he has the power to really push things. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) In case he dies im sure that a lot of donations will be received by certain organisations. Though he might spread them wisely in order to not crash the bitcoin price. Im very sure he is smart enough and willing to not lose his coins.
|
|
|
Hello,
I might be new on this forum, but have made some notable success under the nickname mt-coder in the MQL community, among my well known works "Stop Hunter EA" and "AntiFragile EA", not necessarily profitable systems but more like proof of work programming.
It is a fact that people who lose money trading (or get scamed) post about it in scorecards. But those who win and continu to win money don't bother post positive reviews. Zulutrade are pioneers in the retail trading business and they are CFTC and NFA approved.
The real and important news is retail trading which allows small cap investors to bet on market futures (Forex, CFDs and also BOs)
+ social trading which allows skilled traders to lead the trends and share their skills with investor, if you are self educated trader your CV will most likely be rejected by big trading companies, but no one can reject you on social trading platforms, well except a bad trading record.
What adds excitment to the mix are the BTC trading platforms, may be we will see social trading platforms that deal manly with bitcoins ? That would be interesting...
When it comes to trust we will have to wait and see, but with pre established platforms like Zulutrade and eToro I think the trust index is at least acceptable, still every trader must understand the risk nature of any business.
In these exciting times of new money, there is much to be learned and many innovations to be put to the test.
Regards
And whats the minimum deposit you have to invest with this site and its broker (they are the same?)? I wonder why these websites always have so unperfect ratings. I mean normal trading websites dont have such negatives. Did you profit and try to withdraw them perfectly?
|
|
|
As you can see from Blockchain.info - their is a stress test going on - most blocks are close to 1MB in size. You put only 0.0001 BTC as fees - so just wait until your cheap transaction gets selected by the miners... These stress tests are annoying. They will proceed until they showed what they wanted to show it seems. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
Thanks for listening to my suggestions dooglus. The whois command works great. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thanks for implementing. The last sentence with the bot output was meant for the sound playing when you name is mentioned in chat. It doesnt make sense when a sound appears when your name is mentioned only because you made a big bet. You know already that your name is in the chat. So the sound should only play when you need to be notified. Oh, I see. That's how I did it... Reload the site now. Chat lines where people mention your name or userid are bolded. You can turn on an audible alert too using a setting in the account tab. And also edit the list of words that trigger the alerts. Great! You even brought it further, adding further functionality. Thank you dooglus! I wish security issuer would be more like you only a little bit. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Payment received, thanks for the bonus ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Are you one week late? Posts arent even counted for the actual week.
|
|
|
Didnt know that yet.
But i think, at least for amazon.com giftcards, there are reasons to sell legally received giftcards cheap. In developed countries, it seems, amazon codes are some form of currency. People there had a hard time exchanging it to fiat, they bought iphones or something and sold it then. At the end its easier to sell the code directly. Thats why purse.io can exist.
|
|
|
Maybe you would have more success when you would sign a known bitcoin address of yours from long ago. That would show that you still are the same one owning that legendary account.
You know... people on here are very cautious now when they read about the problems with Maidak.
|
|
|
Eine "kleine" Aufstockung des LTC Volumen hat sich gelohnt ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FULLPZy4.png&t=663&c=nN2EHvStn_4Acw) Wow, Gratulation! Oo Kannst du sagen welche Art von Trades den Haupterfolg gebracht haben?
|
|
|
Is it completely fake? I mean its imaginable that they have a microchip and its easiest to upload the firmware through usb. Im not so much into these things to be able to judge it. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) I bet, you already sent money to the nigerian prince, while saying "Im not so much into these things to be able to judge it. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) " ... Alright, i take your word on this then. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Thanks for listening to my suggestions dooglus. The whois command works great. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thanks for implementing. The last sentence with the bot output was meant for the sound playing when you name is mentioned in chat. It doesnt make sense when a sound appears when your name is mentioned only because you made a big bet. You know already that your name is in the chat. So the sound should only play when you need to be notified. And it seems there is no way to identify a winning user under biggest, with his ID, when he didnt post in the chat. If you search such id with !last then nothing happens. Is there another way?
You can /msg him - that tells you his name. Looking up the bet ID in chat works too as that gives the username at the top of the 'bet info' dialog. Do: /whois 1 It's a recently added command for looking up names from userids. dooglus, can you maybe change last so that it at least reveals the username? I dont want to always write the user a private message when i dont know who it was.
Yes, I'll be changing that 'soon'. And another thing that came to mind when using just-dice... you already have the option to play a sound when big bets going on. More important for me would be to have a sound when my username or id is mentioned in the chat. It would make it much easier to be noticed when someone wants something from you.
OK. Of course bot outputs should only count when you dont know about your name being written. It makes no sense for bets, but for many other things.
I don't understand. Can you give some examples please?
|
|
|
And another thing that came to mind when using just-dice... you already have the option to play a sound when big bets going on. More important for me would be to have a sound when my username or id is mentioned in the chat. It would make it much easier to be noticed when someone wants something from you.
Of course bot outputs should only count when you dont know about your name being written. It makes no sense for bets, but for many other things.
|
|
|
I believe you can possibly buy only giftcards from amazon.com. No other amazon has giftcards, they only sell giftcodes, which makes it hard for you to protect against being scammed.
Maybe im wrong but thats what i found when i tried to buy giftcards too.
|
|
|
As long as no trusted members claims this website is real everyone should assume that its not a real website and they would run away with coins they could get out of cracking a wallets lost password.
|
|
|
Why would you bother wasting time on faucets? You can double your Bitcoins in just 100 hours with BitcoinDuplex.com
Why would you waste your money on ponzies? You cant double your bitcoins in just 100 hours with BitcoinDuplex.com.
|
|
|
So does this mean we were 11% away from winning the wrong fork? Thats actually some feary news that could be created out of it.
What i dont understand... i can understand using SPV, but whats hindering the miner to mine on the new block and verify the actual block in the meanwhile. Only the miners are time sensitive, the computer controlling it most probably has spare cpu time. They could have saved quite some damage.
I think they wont disable SPV but at least implement a fix that verifies the blocks later.
|
|
|
And it seems there is no way to identify a winning user under biggest, with his ID, when he didnt post in the chat. If you search such id with !last then nothing happens. Is there another way?
You can /msg him - that tells you his name. Looking up the bet ID in chat works too as that gives the username at the top of the 'bet info' dialog. But where to get the betid? I check out biggest to see who won and who lost in the last time. Then i try to find who the one is. When the user didnt chat till then then !last ID doesnt help. In fact no reaction comes. dooglus, can you maybe change last so that it at least reveals the username? I dont want to always write the user a private message when i dont know who it was.
|
|
|
Bad news and fears hold bitcoin back. Scams, the insecurities of being your own bank account and the very difference of bitcoin. Newbies have to wrap their head around what bitcoin is and how it works. Even with an easy way to handle it.
I dont see that can be changed very much so we might have to live with it.
|
|
|
The audio recording in the response is halarious, Cypherdoc's attorney describes him as the "the LeBron James of the Bitcoin world"-- presumably that was the least redicilous claim they could deploy to provide any other rationale the amounts paid in an effort to avoid the conclusions people actually in the Bitcoin world drawing in this thread.
Its hilarious. I hope enough voices come up that explain the judge and the jury how much nonsense that claim is. Im really interested in the backstory of that. Besides tunneling coins i dont see a reason for that. So was he so big friends with the hashfast owners or is he a owner in reality? Having the CEO and the rest as scapegoats?
|
|
|
There are a number of wallet explorers that tag which Bitcoin addresses belong to semi-major sites/exchanges/ect, I don't see why someone couldn't do a similar analysis for CLAMs or at least for their CLAM addresses. I wouldn't think it would be difficult to find the majority of their CLAM addresses with blockchain analysis.
That's a good idea. Any idea whether any of them are open source or open to adding new coins? None of the CLAM block explorers that I am aware of do the address clustering / labelling thing. I don't believe that they are open source, and it is possible that they would be open to adding new coins. The one that I primarily use is walletexplorer.com. The owner/dev of walletexplorer appears to be and his email address appears to be "ales.janda zavináč kyblsoft.cz" which I would presume would translate to ales.janda@kyblsoft.cz however I am not certain. Depending on how much volume goes to their site, and if there are any coin-join like services for CLAM, it might be possible to to a spend-link analysis manually with the address provided by the OP. However even if it were to be assumed that the address in question belongs to Bittrex, I am not sure what exactly the next step would be, as AFAIK they do not require any kind of identity verification so someone could potentially create a brand-new account to deposit funds to then sell the CLAM for something like bitcoin-dark and/or bitcoin (and use a mixing service and/or coinjoin service) which would make it nearly impossible to trace the coins. Youre right, its ales.janda@kyblsoft.cz and the guy is really nice and helpful. He implemented some tips i gave him pretty fast and other things. Im sure he will help you setting something up, though i dont know if there is a free script of that kind somewhere.
|
|
|
|