Sort of out of the woods, kinda?

Damned good question. Perhaps JJG feels safe to obnoxiously scold only when certain he is expressing majority sentiment?

I ain't 'playing victim'. There is a wide gulf from permissionless innovation that you don't happen to care for, and outright lying in order to besmirch character.

I just assumed that coinosphere.tk was talking about reading the article with the thought that BobLB might choose to live in Puerto Rico for at least 183 days out of the year in order to take advantage of aforementioned specifically-congressionally-created special tax treatment for Puerto Rican residents. I mean, as long as he's contemplating a move anyhoo. I know I've been thinking about it -- hard -- for over a year.

Don't know why. Didn't sell a significant percentage. And I've actually been buying on net over the last several weeks.

Though my recent absence from WO is because I've been off enjoying my new lambo. Regrets? Life is good.

Your assertion that I work for USG is simultaneously laughable on its face, and truly deserving of ridicule. It is quite apparent you are speaking of things of which you have zero knowledge, despite the fact that the open record in this very venue provides all required to see how truly laughable the assertion be.

What asset is the USG's? You mean the Federal Reserve Note? No. No volunteering on its behalf.

Oh you mean Ver is the USG's asset? First, I find the assertion that Ver be a USG asset ludicrous. You do realize he has at times been denied entry visa, right? Do you assert that as part of his 'plausible cover backstory'? Second, while our visions of the best means to free humanity from fiat slavery seem largely aligned, I certainly do not 'volunteer for Ver'.

And I suppose you mean that Wu is a chicom asset? I really have little direct evidence to say yea or nay here. Never met the man. Nonetheless, I might point out that Bitcoin Segwit is dominated by Wu in any sense that Bitcoin Cash is dominated by Wu. Further, I certainly do not 'volunteer for Wu'.

You should probably keep your vomitous crapulation to yourself. You are only serving to make yourself appear stupid.

I have previously explained the discrepancy. Around end of 17Q3, I tendered my resignation, effective end of 18Q2. The projects I am shepherding have a long development cycle. I feel I owe it to the industry to complete two of these longer term projects. Even with the comparatively long runway to ceasing employment, at least one of these projects will continue for another quarter or two. But I will no longer be responsible in that interim for other things my (at that time previous) employer might otherwise find for me.

Yeah. Admittedly. I just tire of the incessant baseless, ignorant, and malicious slander.

^^^ FTFY.

Just keepin' it real.

XD

What makes you think that taking advantage of the specifically-congressionally-created special tax treatment for Puerto Rican residents is in any way 'below board'?

I did my selling in Dec.

cheers!

Right. Segwitcoin is not Bitcoin.

I do indeed work in standards as my day gig. However, ones of a very different nature. Without the standards I work on, none of this shit would even start working.

If you have any evidence whatsoever that I have been in any way associated with a 'tx spam job', then cough it up.

Fucking lying asshole.

XD

explorer gets it... ivomm seems lost. or maybe just bitter. Pathetic.

Yeah, yeah. Drugs are illegal. But what about mah attempted murder. Whatevs.

But seriously - when you look into the matter, there seem to be very serious issues with Ulbricht's investigation, arrest, trial, conviction, and sentencing. As in - issues that are likely appropriate to have addressed by the United States Supreme Court.

Downsize DC and its sister organization Zero Aggression Project have had recent success in getting the USSC to move the needle on recognition of freedoms. Typically working through the amicus (i.e. 'friend of the court') process, their arguments have even provided novel views that have been the hinge upon which several USSC cases have overturned lower miscarriages of justice.

Downsize DC intends to file an amicus brief in the Ulbricht case focusing on two specific issues:

4th Amendment - Does the government have a legitimate interest in warrantless suctioning of all your phone and internet traffic?

6th Amendment - Does a sentencing judge get to increase sentence guidelines on the basis of allegations never argued in court?

Downsize DC is a tiny but effective organization. They can use your help. If you value liberty, please throw them whatever dollars you can afford. You can earmark it for this amicus brief. And if you donate through ZAP (assuming you are US-ian), you can deduct the contribution on your taxes.

More info: https://downsizedc.org/silk-road-amicus/

Silk Road aside, these are important issues for any Internet or phone user in America.

Three drives? Is this the return of silver moon and three sad kittehs?

Unlikely. Probably a malleability fix at some point in the future. After more important things are addressed. But probably not segwit in the form of The Core Segwit Omnibus Changeset. Too many negative side effects.

I guffawed.