There obviously was some communication before the video was taken. The guy might have actually had a knife. But the things that he is doing show both, that he is afraid of the cops while at the same time communicating back and forth with them. He seems on the verge of allowing himself to be taken into custody by them. They simply shot him, while he had his hands up. There was no reason for them to shoot. They could have easily waited for the back-up that came shortly after the shooting. The could have easily wrestled the guy to the ground. Later, after the video is released to the public by the TV station, the sheriff condemns the TV station for releasing the video. Of course, the cops that did the shooting will probably go on paid vacation. It seems we have a new brand of local terrorist here. Read the comments, both at the Youtube location linked to the picture, and at the Prison Planet site http://www.prisonplanet.com/video-shows-texas-cops-shoot-man-with-hands-up.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ft_9quXUfU |
|
|
|
I think usually people hate because they are jealous or envy other people can be better than theirs
That seems to be a major reason. The Bible says that Cain killed Abel because of envy, that God liked Abel's sacrifice better. |
|
|
|
 GMO corporations jealous of results from Fukushima farmers. Wow! is that what the radiation did? We need a few meltdowns over here in the States.  |
|
|
|
Yes, but then "who is Satan"? What does it represent?
Just a mythological figure you're teach to irrationally fear and hate. So whatever someone claims to be satanist you're meant to have an irrational hate towards it.
In many ways it's like an "ancient Hitler", except for the part that Hitler did actually existed.
If we pick the Old Testament God vs Christian Devil, God killed way more people, caused way more havoc, and yet you are meant to hate Satan. Pavlovian to its best!
We have barely gotten to the point where we can clearly talk about the 3 scientific laws that prove that God exists. Questions about Satan will need to be answered from personal belief. Satan is the fallen angel who plays the largest part in corrupting the perfect earth, the perfect people. "Fallen" means that he has turned himself to be against God. While "angel" may mean space alien, it means a whole lot more than we think about when we say "space alien." Satan is not myth, although proving that he exists might be more difficult even than proving God exists. |
|
|
|
no more than i would hate a cockroach. keep your mud hut religion in the third world where it belongs.
I agree! Islam=Satanic This is correct. A religion that makes itself out to simply be expressing ways to live this life, might not be wrong at all. But any religion that expresses a way to Heaven other than through faith in Jesus and the sacrifice He made, is from Satan. And all the more, if like Islam, it has violence directives to conquer the world for itself. I want to ask sir there is any proof that islam is satanic? make me sure The red part, above. |
|
|
|
Anyone can pick up and fire a gun, lets be honest, in a lot of cases it's purely situational whether you'll have one or not in this day and age the majority of the time if you're attacked you won't have a weapon at all and you'll either be surrounded or up against someone a lot tougher than you. It's takes proper skill though to fight hand to hand or with knives so if you run out of ammo you'd be fucked if all you did was learn how to shoot.
Truth. But a lot of peaceful people in the world haven't had to experience violence, and will never do knife or hand-to-hand until it is too late. But having a gun is easy, and an emergency just might prompt them to act when necessary. Hand-to-had, or knife fighting, is something they simply would not do because of their peacefulness. |
|
|
|
In most of the world a gun is a luxury most people don't have. Their only options is "die"
They have another option. Learn to make a gun. |
|
|
|
You say that Jesus is savior but I have no proof of your claim. That's okay. You wouldn't accept the proof if it came right up to you and bit you in the eye.You say that the Bible is inerrant but I have not seen the proof. Religion isn't about proof. It is about strong evidence.You say that I am going to hell and that I am destroying myself, but how is that so? How many times do I have to tell you this? If you won't accept the work Jesus Christ did for you on the cross, you will never get into Heaven!You say that the journals are false but how exactly would that work? How many times do I have to tell you this? If anything expresses a way to Heaven other than through Jesus Christ and the work He did on the cross, it is falsehood.You say that jesus saves us but to me this sounds like magical thinking. You are so funny.  The Journals express way more magic-like thinking than the Bible ever could.You uttered a contradiction about free will, and did not clarify, so to me it sounds like you are spreading confusion. Since you haven't mentioned the supposed contradiction, everybody who reads this totally accepts as truth the thing you say - NOT. |
|
|
|
 They went to the gym yesterday He'll never get old, just because he is losing muscle mass. |
|
|
|
The perpetrator looks black, but more than likely his real race is Muslim. |
|
|
|
no more than i would hate a cockroach. keep your mud hut religion in the third world where it belongs.
I agree! Islam=Satanic This is correct. A religion that makes itself out to simply be expressing ways to live this life, might not be wrong at all. But any religion that expresses a way to Heaven other than through faith in Jesus and the sacrifice He made, is from Satan. And all the more, if like Islam, it has violence directives to conquer the world for itself. |
|
|
|
Wait a second BADecker, I just told you that you were not using reason, and you are accusing me of not thinking? You find GOD by following the CHRIST "way", as you so aptly quoted from Psalms 1. You don't get to choose to be saved by accepting the "Son of God"; that is "magical thinking". If you will not think upon the audio I referenced, I will summarize it for you: The early Christians practiced "Jewish Messiahnism", they were a Jewish sect, not a separate religion. Christian Gnosticism grew up along "mainstream" Christianity and these two were of equal validity in the early church. One was chosen over the other for political reasons. Actually, the term "Christian" came much later, from Syria. Now, with all of the confusion in this late-day Christian belief, you denounce Hatonn as Satanic because he wishes to go back and believe the Christ teachings coming forth from holy GOD as a form of life being-ness, emotional sanctity and goodness according to the golden rule?  The proof of your insincerity comes across almost every time you post in response to me. Constantly you are stating that I said things that I did not. Constantly you are taking things out of contest that I say. Constantly you are asking me "this or that" questions that have little to do with anything that I was speaking about. Imagine for a minute, that your Journals are something that you are filling yourself on, spiritually. This means that they are training you to attempt manipulation, to cloud the issue, to spread falsehood about the things which we speak of. Even if you are not caught up in intentionally making a bunch of lies, you are being directed to do so, automatically, by your adherence to the principles in the Journals. That isn't something that God teaches. That is expressly the thing that the devil teaches. Wake up and see how you are being used, ultimately to your own destruction. |
|
|
|
Your teaching is wicked and evil in trying to hide the evident things of salvation as the Bible teaches them, from everybody who listens to your garbage.
As I said, there is some truth in everything. Afterlife truth is the most important. If your writings don't proclaim Jesus of the Bible as the way to salvation, but proclaim some other way, then your writings are false, even if they have many particles of truth in them. Hi BADecker, You suffer from a fanatical refusal to think correctly with regards to obtaining knowledge; you think all truth is contained within one book. I must inform you that the message of that book was dramatically altered by Paul, and this is backed up by modern Biblical scholarship; for details and references, listen to the "First Christians" audios here. Even the NAME of your "savior" was changed by Paul: The name "Jesus" was not appended to Esu Emmanuel until after he was no longer in the "Holy Land". That is a totally fabricated label given (historically authenticated) by Saul of Tarsus (Paul) during his travels in Greece. You do not use reason (thus, you end up contradicting yourself as pointed out by Buffer Overflow); you only care about what is written in your book!! You do not love me by throwing your book at me and telling me that I am going to Hell; remember that Emmanuel said "As I have loved you, so you must love one another"; he never said "believe that I am your savior"; Emmanuel said that God's kingdom and laws are within YOU, not in the Torah! Yours is not Christian behavior but the mere denouncing of a brother efforting to find his God Truth. I cannot count how many times I have asked you to learn more about the "First Christians" so that you may be aware of how the teachings of Christ were changed. You have been given the wrong information and you accept that interpretation "on faith", i.e. without thought or reason, but notice how it is the interpretation that the 'authorities' want you to have so that you can go back to sleep and forget about your responsibility to God and your fellow man. Christ realized that God was within him and he tried to TEACH you that God is within you too; you cannot rely on another to take your responsibility for following the laws: I suggest that I cannot overemphasize my role in this "Plan". It is not my being which has any merit--it is my oneness with Creator which is represented in your language as "Christ Knowing"--the label makes no difference be it pronounced differently in all and every language. I repeat something that you perhaps missed in your following of incorrect information givers. EXCEPT THROUGH ME (CHRIST ACTIONS AS GIVEN IN BALANCE; THE LAWS OF HARMONY AND BALANCE OF THE GREAT SPIRIT AND MOTHER/FATHER CREATION/CREATOR), SHALL YE PASS INTO THE PERFECTION OF THE SO-CALLED HOUSE OF GOD. You may tout and preach anything you wish--but I SHALL DECIDE, WITH MY BRETHREN OF THE LIGHTED BROTHERHOOD--WHO WILL COME ABOARD "MY CLOUD". You tell us that Jesus has forgiven you, so there is no need to be responsible for your actions; however, forgiveness of actions is not the same thing as condoning lack of responsibility! Furthermore, you cannot arrive at "GOD" by following a MAN--any MAN, not even a "Jesus". You find GOD by following the CHRIST "way" toward all things and actions chosen, intended and honored. You don't get to choose to be saved by accepting the "Son of God"; that is magical thinking; that is a corruption of Jesus's teachings that was introduced by Paul, as I have stated many times. Christ never wrote down his teachings, so we have to use reason and think critically about the early Christians. Like I said: Maybe your way and "wisdom" didn't work? Maybe you are judging me and telling me that I am going to Hell because you forgot about that part in the Bible where Emmanuel says "don't judge" and "love one another". Why should I keep on playing your stupid game with you?, since you suffer from the inability to think Godly. |
|
|
|
Here's why trump is just as bad as all the rest of them. He knows this, just like they all do, or could if they simply looked at it. Whenever you sign a bank instrument - promissory note - the banker takes the note, opens up a temporary bank account for you, deposits your note like it were a check, withdraws it again in the form of cash or a bank check, and pays off the loan you made to them when you gave them the signed promissory note. If you hadn't signed it, he couldn't do this; the note would be useless. The whole operation is a creation of new money. Do you owe anything? No, but the bank does. The bank does because under false claims it has been collecting money from you. If you had been donating to the bank, or if they had in truth clarified the whole process to you, then things might be okay. As it stands, 100% of the loans are loans from you to the lending institution, loans that they pay off almost always the same day. When you pay them over the months and years, they are defrauding you, and even more with the interest. Google "Modern Money Mechanics" and "Two Faces of Debt" to see that I am telling you the truth. The whole economy of the world (except parts of the Middle East) is built like this. They lie to you right up front. And you want to play the game of electing! Idiots! |
|
|
|
I will quote your own quote, because you are named Making Money. 1 Timothy 6:10 : For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs.
So in the end you are a hypocrite , brainwashed false spreader of the word i as the truth is whit me commands you to stop decieving innocent ! I'm not a hypocrite. I have no love of money. I thought the idea behind Bitcoin was the best idea to get away from the inflation problems that the cash society created. "Making money" refers to creating or making a currency called Bitcoin. You should really learn about a person before calling them a hypocrite. I'm in debt, and probably will be until the day I die. I don't think I can ever make enough to pay off the people who kindly helped me out. So please think before calling someone out like that. You are not in debt. Your loans talk about paying things off in money. Since there is only fiat, and no money, the debt is useless. On top of that, whenever you sign an instrument - promissory note - the banker takes the note, opens up a temporary bank account for you, deposits your note like it were a check, withdraws it again in the form of cash or a bank check, and pays off the loan you made to them when you gave them the signed promissory note. If you hadn't signed it, he couldn't do this; the note would be useless. The whole operation is a creation of new money. Do you owe anything? No, but the bank does. The bank does because under false claims it has been collecting money from you. If you had been donating to the bank, or if they had in truth clarified the whole process to you, then things might be okay. As it stands, 100% of the loans are loans from you to the lending institution, loans that they pay off almost always the same day. When you pay them over the months and years, they are defrauding you, and even more with the interest. Google "Modern Money Mechanics" and "Two Faces of Debt" to see that I am telling you the truth. |
|
|
|
1 Corinthians 11:6 - from http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/11258/what-happened-to-the-the-practice-of-women-covering-their-heads: ...
The way I accept this unchanging rule, while opposing the enforcement of the cultural rule, only relevant in the Middle East, is this way. First, Paul in referring to nature is simply pointing out what most people realize. In general men look silly with long hair (with some exceptions) and in general women look beautiful with long, flowing, gorgeous hair (with some exceptions). Nobody would ever be able to deny this, just looked at models in magazines. Why is this the case? Paul argues it is a natural symbol that shows a woman under the headship of the man. In a man's case his headship is not in this world but invisible, so when praying to God the open air is a better symbol. Not that a woman does not ultimately have Christ as her head as well but that she came from the man, i.e. wo-man, as symbols of societies organization from the original template of Adam and Eve.
... Read more at http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/11258/what-happened-to-the-the-practice-of-women-covering-their-heads. The problem is that puts some guys opinion superior to Gods infallible word. It makes me wonder what other things I could change. Could I have sex with my sister? Why not, Couldn't I just come up with some words that justify it. That is what has happened for many rules found in the Bible, like the one we are discussing. I don't recall any passage in the Bible that allows any person to change the word of God. There is no ambiguity in the passage, women MUST cover their heads. The problem is with the translations. The question is, if you were one of the people speaking the original language that Paul said this in, and if you were one who was actually hearing him speak it, and if you were one of those who listened to his explanations of what he meant - which explanations are not in the bible, BTW - what did he really say. The translations are words that come down to us by the translators. Yes, most of the time they do their best. But their understanding of what was said is a hand-me-down understanding. From BibleGateway https://www.biblegateway.com: 1 Corinthians 11:6-9 The Message (MSG)
3-9 In a marriage relationship, there is authority from Christ to husband, and from husband to wife. The authority of Christ is the authority of God. Any man who speaks with God or about God in a way that shows a lack of respect for the authority of Christ, dishonors Christ. In the same way, a wife who speaks with God in a way that shows a lack of respect for the authority of her husband, dishonors her husband. Worse, she dishonors herself—an ugly sight, like a woman with her head shaved. This is basically the origin of these customs we have of women wearing head coverings in worship, while men take their hats off. By these symbolic acts, men and women, who far too often butt heads with each other, submit their “heads” to the Head: God.
1 Corinthians 11:6 Amplified Bible (AMP)
6 For if a woman will not wear [a head] covering, then she should cut off her hair too; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her head shorn or shaven, let her cover [her head].
1 Corinthians 11:6Modern English Version (MEV)
6 For if the woman is not covered, let her also cut off her hair. But if it is a shame for a woman to have her hair cut off or shaved, let her be covered.
Again, St. Paul was writing to the Corinthian people. Their customs are not like that of America. The customs were like that of today's Middle East. In the case of hair, it is the customs that make the validity. God is not making another commandment for people. The whole new testament was about upholding and fulfilling the commandments, not making new ones. The big point in all of this is, get yourself out of guilt and feelings of guilt. If it is wrong in your eyes to do something, don't do it. If it is right to do something else, do it. Don't feel guilty. Rather, live for peace and tranquility among the people you live among. |
|
|
|
It's the nature of humans, also the reality of nature. Only the strong survives. From the day 1 we learn how to survive in this life. We build an armor to defend our mind, body and soul. If we were weak we couldn't survive in this life.
Why do you think the strong survive? The strong all die, just like the weak. It is the humble who are strong. People walk all over grass. Yet there are far more blades of grass in the world than there are people. EDIT: And think of the cockroaches. The non-human ones, I mean. |
|
|
|
after reading some comments , i see some of you dont know much about islam , they think its a killing religion , but anyways i believe people who hate islam are just so confused , im not telling you to be a muslim or anything but hey! give it a chance and read my friend .... (dont get angry)
Islam = 1 god (have no son , no wife , no mother .... think about it)
Islam = Dont kill Noone! (its in quran, not internet or media...) but Only if they wanted to kill you (and thats your right) .
Islam = Peace , Love , ..... read and you will see your it self. (Dont read on websites that hate islam .... )
I love islam and i love your religion .... I am confused Why do some Muslim women wear burqas or head gear, are they required to do so? Depends on who you ask. Christians are absolutely forbidden from eating shellfish. But most Christians don't even know that. Christian women are REQUIRED to cover their heads also. But again, since most Christians don't know this and we have little cultural connection with the writers of the bible it is ignored. (Spoiler Alert Most Christians are going straight to hell, lol) Most Muslims would say that you must dress modestly. What does that mean? Depends on who you ask again. A conservative Muslim might say that you should cover up your body as much as practical. This is not a rule for women, men should also be covered. They should wear long pants, long shirts, and wrap their heads. Another Muslim might say you don't have to cover up except at the mosque, but you should not wear skimpy clothing in public. 1 Corinthians 11:6 King James version "For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered." 1 Corinthians 11:6 - from http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/11258/what-happened-to-the-the-practice-of-women-covering-their-heads: ...
The way I accept this unchanging rule, while opposing the enforcement of the cultural rule, only relevant in the Middle East, is this way. First, Paul in referring to nature is simply pointing out what most people realize. In general men look silly with long hair (with some exceptions) and in general women look beautiful with long, flowing, gorgeous hair (with some exceptions). Nobody would ever be able to deny this, just looked at models in magazines. Why is this the case? Paul argues it is a natural symbol that shows a woman under the headship of the man. In a man's case his headship is not in this world but invisible, so when praying to God the open air is a better symbol. Not that a woman does not ultimately have Christ as her head as well but that she came from the man, i.e. wo-man, as symbols of societies organization from the original template of Adam and Eve.
... Read more at http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/11258/what-happened-to-the-the-practice-of-women-covering-their-heads. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
