On this rig, I am running a bitcoin node (has a wallet). My router is forwarding port 8332 to this rig, so the node has 8 connections.
On my working PC, I am running the node that "connects" to the rig's node. It shows only one connection, and my rig's shows 9 connections when this one is on. The wallet I use for payouts is on my working computer.
I may never know. And I accept this now.
Kind of curious, are your Bitcoin clients "generating coins"? Sam Nope. That uses CPU power, and I'm not "generating" with them. I don't know how to tell. There is no "received with" line, it's only "Generated." When I double click it, all I see is generic info like: Status: 322 confirmations
Date: 7/27/2011 23:03
Source: Generated
Credit: 0.02331947
Net amount: +0.02331947
Generated coins must wait 120 blocks before they can be spent. When you
generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block
chain. If it fails to get into the chain, it will change to "not accepted" and not
be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block
within a few seconds of yours.
I think this is explained in this article https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_feeIt sounds like that you did solve the block and receive a Transaction Fee. The article show's a screen shot of the same message you got. Sam |
|
|
|
This morning I found that one of my nodes Generated 0.02331947 coins. This is weird, I have never generated anything. Now, my question is this... was this a block that I found FOR THE POOL? If so, why did I get the fees (i'm assuming they were the fees) Have you ever mined in luke's pool ? If you did one week ago then this is his payout. On this rig, I am running a bitcoin node (has a wallet). My router is forwarding port 8332 to this rig, so the node has 8 connections. On my working PC, I am running the node that "connects" to the rig's node. It shows only one connection, and my rig's shows 9 connections when this one is on. The wallet I use for payouts is on my working computer. I may never know. And I accept this now. Kind of curious, are your Bitcoin clients "generating coins"? Sam |
|
|
|
I got a question. I'm mining at Deepbit and on TM, with two separate GPUs, one per rig. I am also running two BC nodes (one is backup).
This morning I found that one of my nodes Generated 0.02331947 coins. This is weird, I have never generated anything. Now, my question is this... was this a block that I found FOR THE POOL? If so, why did I get the fees (i'm assuming they were the fees)
I thought the pools kept the fees for themselves as part of their income? Sam |
|
|
|
Does the current PPS amount quoted include the fee, or is it calculated after? Current rate is 0.00003262705594458 BTC per share.
Would I get 0.00003262705594458, or 0.00003262705594458*0.9?
Thanks
The current pay per share is 0.00002661294865101. That is on the deepbit's main page. Sam |
|
|
|
I'm not sure if the ufasoft miner is currently fully supported or not.
Using my GPU, it did report everything correctly. When I switched to CPU only mode, it kept saying 0.00 MH/s all the time (and "Workers not connected"), so perhaps something is still not right?
Are you using the 0.18 version? I'm CPU only mining with it without problems, so far anyway. Sam |
|
|
|
You pool
You mean youR. Really.... finish elementary school before coming to this forum.  There are a great many folks on this forum who don't speak/write English as their primary language. Sam |
|
|
|
Will the new release (0.18) of the Ufasoft miner work with Deepbit?
Thanks,
Sam
Well I guess it does. It appears to be working now. Sam |
|
|
|
|
Will the new release (0.18) of the Ufasoft miner work with Deepbit?
Thanks,
Sam
|
|
|
|
I'm getting Error 80190191 too but only on 1 out of my 3 machines.
2 of them are dedicated CPU miners, the desktop worker is running fine but the server worker refuses to connect with any worker account. I have even deleted and recreated the account on DeepBit as well as created an entirely new worker account and I still get the Error 80190191.
My 3rd machine is a GPU miner but I switched it to my CPU using the same worker account the server is and it connects fine. Doesn't seem to be an account problem since I can use the account on other machines without a problem.
Ufasoft miner has been disabled on deepbit till further notice. |
|
|
|
I'm not the only one admin here. Does that mean that [Tycho] is more than just one person? I am one person, but I'm not the only who is working on the pool. Glad to hear it |
|
|
|
But what kenya do, Stay on Diaphasic sleep?. Not entierly worth it I'm not the only one admin here. Does that mean that [Tycho] is more than just one person? Sam |
|
|
|
Are there connection problems at the moment? I keep getting this Mining for http://pit.deepbit.net:83322 CPU threads, Using SSE2 Error 80190191 0 MHash/s Error 80190191 0 MHash/s Error 80190191 Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
Tycho, is this due to the varying DDoS on the website that is going on, or is there another issue. Prior to this start of the DDoS, my linux clients were the highest producing Mhash/sec and they are essentially reduced in effectiveness to 30% The LP issue may be caused not by DDoS. Some versions of Ufasoft miner are trying to use LP incorrectly, thus we had to disable LP for Ufasoft miner at the pool side. what version? and if its a older version is it possible to just disable the older one? Yes, if the problem version could be identified I could make a point of using a different version. I have .13, .14 and .16 on hand. I've been using 0.16 lately. No, it's the newer versions, at least two of them. I tried to explain the correct behavior to ufasoft's author, but it's still not fixed yet. I'll try to write one more message to him Ok, I just rolled back to 0.13 for now. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
Tycho, is this due to the varying DDoS on the website that is going on, or is there another issue. Prior to this start of the DDoS, my linux clients were the highest producing Mhash/sec and they are essentially reduced in effectiveness to 30% The LP issue may be caused not by DDoS. Some versions of Ufasoft miner are trying to use LP incorrectly, thus we had to disable LP for Ufasoft miner at the pool side. what version? and if its a older version is it possible to just disable the older one? Yes, if the problem version could be identified I could make a point of using a different version. I have .13, .14 and .16 on hand. I've been using 0.16 lately. Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
|
Is there a reason the automatic payment hasn't gone out yet?
Thanks,
Sam
|
|
|
|
The pie chart is wrong because the total pool speed is calculated from the last x hours, and deepbit was online at that time.
OTOH, the pool speeds are real-time. Since deepbit is missing, the script thinks that lots of hashing power comes from "other" pools. Wait for deepbit to go back online, or wait x hours for the total network speed to adjust with deepbit being offline.
So is the current hash rate still at 11.2 THhs/s? or not? Thanks for a partial explanation. Sam |
|
|
|
I have a question? On http://bitcoinwatch.com/ they show that Deepbit isn't even on the pie chart anymore and the deepbit hash rate is really low right now since it has been largely knocked off line. But the total hash network has rate is still around 11.2Ths/s! Who is picking up the slack that is in the now larger than 50% of "Other", correction now >75% "Other"? If everyone was wrapped around the axle about deepbit being over 50% I would think people would be panicking in the streets about the unknown "other" being 50 to 75% of the total hash rate. Seems to me it would be better to know who is at the high rate of total hash's. My 0.02BTC worth, Sam |
|
|
|
Version 0.16 with BFI_INT uploaded.
I just downloaded .16. With .13 and .14 I got a peak of 5.65 MH/s on my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T8300 @ 2.40GHz. With .16 I peak a 5.74 Mhash/s. Still won't work with my Radeon HD 4670 though. Thanks for the update. Sam |
|
|
|
|
Does this miner support the Radeon HD 4670? I haven't gotten it to work yet. I there a listing of GPU's that it will support/work with.
Thanks,
Sam
|
|
|
|
Why u wouldn't release lastest 0.14 source?
Was there a post saying .14 was released? I didn't see one. Thanks for the comment so that I now know. What are the differences between .13 and .14? Thanks, Sam |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
