....
you have a link?
this guy is so disgusting....
MacAffee is very imperfect man, but he is brilliant and there is much to learn from him. |
|
|
|
Furthermore it is not even a reply to the premise presented.
we are talking here about trump and his wall, i said, if the wall is build the monopolistic rule of the central bank.... No relation between the wall and the central bank. |
|
|
|
I haven't had time to watch it, but I will.
I strongly believe that Obama was a puppet, a facade for the real power behind the Democratic party. The behavior of the FBI in recent years only demonstrates the infestation of corruption in our government. If you are still asking who that power is, you aren't paying attention.
It's anti-American interests, I believe originating outside the USA. |
|
|
|
Well if I agree with you, then we agree that the "Green new deal 10 year crash program" is also completely stupid.
I think I'll agree with you.
Can't say, haven't read it.But if it somehow implies that you will shut down your reactors BEFORE finishing the research, that's the dumbest idea I've heard coming from anyone else than TECSHARE for a looooooong time. Yes you've just heard the dumbest idea you'll hear in a long time. Not worth reading the stupid thing. See, somehow in the USA green libtards are all anti-nuclear, which one of the few redeeming things about France, is that France is pro-nuclear. Here, they'll lie and duck and dodge about the matter, but it's basically just plain true to say Green == anti-nuclear. Side note: I always have suspected that was due to back door funding of our Dems from Saudi oil interests, since it was rational that to the extent America went off nuclear, we went on oil ( eg Saudi oil). |
|
|
|
....
And there is no way a ten year program can lead to a guaranteed success in such complex field. A ten year crash program is completely stupid. That's basically saying "ok guys, scientists are going to find this revolutionnary tech in 10 years I'm confident, let's stop everything as we won't need it once they found the answer".
Subsidize research. A lot. Once the tech is mastered, crash all the old reactors.
Well if I agree with you, then we agree that the "Green new deal 10 year crash program" is also completely stupid. I think I'll agree with you. |
|
|
|
....
Well cost aside, its still an equity issue. You are telling people they cannot go to any school in a big city which happens to be where most of the best schools and job opportunities are.
No nobody is saying "any school in a big city." Yes you are... When saying "don't do anything and just let the market do" you're simply saying "poor students will go to schools in poor areas". In short you're saying that really poor students will never go to big city schools. The rest only depends on what exactly you say with "poor" and "big city" but the idea is the same. Sorry, reality differs. Los Angeles. UCLA is over by Hollywood. USC is right in the ghetto. U of LA is downtown. You want to argue that the students have "a right" to live in Hollywood? |
|
|
|
BWAHAHA now you care about logical fallacies do you? That wasn't an argument, that was literally me just asking you what nation you are from. You seem to purposely obfuscate it while constantly criticizing other nations. I am curious.
Absolutely not, I'm criticizing the bizarre state of mind of American patriot who want so much to act like the "funding fathers" wanted them to while not doing what they really did. France if your question has any interest.
Also what does that have to do with the fact that thorium reactors are not future technology?
Well it was probably not clear but as your answer were just 2 Wikipedia links I acted the same. Thorium aren't future technology indeed. But when you say Thorium reactors, 98% of the time you in fact mean either subcritical reactors ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerator-driven_subcritical_reactor) which are still in research or molten salt reactors ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor) which are in the end of research cycle but still not operationnal. .... Leaving nit picking aside I'd absolutely love to see a ten year crash program to bring molten salt reactors operational. So would a whole lot of other people. |
|
|
|
jes but the priority who gets the short becoming labor isnt changing, its still focused on the central banks, and the billionaires. thats the issue.be
the central bank is the master of the usa.
..... the capitalists will keep their privileged access to consumption capacities and services. doesnt matter what happens. Has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. It's just what you want to talk about. |
|
|
|
The other thing is that women without education and access to reproductive healthcare have a lot more children so providing those things to everyone is a right would be the easiest solution.
I'll just leave this here for all to enjoy, as a wise man once said: ..... The green new deal has already brought the conversation right back into mainstream focus and like healthcare will help the GOP take another epic lose in 2020 like they did in 2018! Derail. |
|
|
|
....
Trump did run his campaign on the notion that he wanted to restore the individual western values (aka human rights under int. law.)
Interesting point of view. |
|
|
|
....
Well cost aside, its still an equity issue. You are telling people they cannot go to any school in a big city which happens to be where most of the best schools and job opportunities are.
No nobody is saying "any school in a big city." |
|
|
|
If there was an election today. He would crush it.
He would crush it today, and he's gonna crush it in 2020. There isn't a single Democrat on the scene that has the American people's interests listed as a priority. Not one. All they care about is stopping Trump. Their policies aren't even well thought out, the only prerequisite to their policies is that they oppose Trump's. Democrats care more about damaging the image of Republican's than they do about solving problems that plague Americans. I didn't vote for Trump in '16, I thought he was just another bag of hot air. I will most certainly vote for him 2020, and his successor in 2024! But what if he isn't building the wall to keep illegals out? What if he is building it to keep citizens in?  Then a lot of people will be trapped inside. Here is the reality of what will happen. The Gulf of Mexico will have a lot more boat traffic. So when people want to sneak in they will have to pay the boatman to get in. This means boatmen smuggling people in will make good money. The next prez will need more coast guard There's no issue at all with the Coast Guard protecting those areas and monitoring every single boat. Okay do you mean you don’t mind the coast guard checking each and every boat in the gulf of New Mexico. Once it is not in international waters? We would need a shit ton of coast guard boats. Way more costly then a wall. The wall would bring up huge costs for the coast guard..... I'm not concerned about that. Put it this way. The Border Patrol says they need a wall. The Coast Guard isn't saying they need more boats and they're not saying a wall will hurt them. For the Coast Guard, you are basically looking at the Texas coast. One or two hundred miles of that lead into the King Ranch, which is bad or worse as trying to go through the New Mexico desert. Granted, other areas a boat could be beached and illegals could start walking inland. But FYI, there's free and simple access across the border for all the Mexicans, they just can't pass the checkpoints that are 50 miles inland. That's where they get turned around. So Mexicans just come across and then try to figure how to sneak past those checkpoints, or they just live on our side. I think the issue is folks from Central and South America. |
|
|
|
Theorizing aside... what is not a theory is that humans have shown the capacity and will for genocide and depopulation on a massive scale in the past. Pretending it will never happen again is the exact kind of mistake that will allow it to happen again. The difference is this time they will have a better marketing strategy. I am sure it is just a coincidence "environmentalism" and mass depopulation have parallel goals...
That's the crux of the issue, isn't it? It isn't climate change, it's control. Control not only of your modes of transportation, but also your thoughts. They know they won't win a debate peddling a transparent socialist agenda. So they attempt to peddle it to you hidden and obfuscated by legislating moral virtues. The newspeak Green New Deal is nothing but a Red Old Scam. .... If you look at the proposed power structures only and ignore the nonsense, that's correct. The claim is "my way will save the planet so give me total control of the planet." Yes, they think people are that stupid. |
|
|
|
....
Fusion and thorium are also far into the future.
Thorium is today. But we could use a crash 10 year program for nuclear. |
|
|
|
This is interesting, I think it's a pretty good move by McConnel to force people to vote on this. It was a joke of a release though, I don't think this is going to help them in the least.
It's a big fat nothing burger as usual.... So a vote on the GREEN NO BURGERS plan is a no burger? |
|
|
|
If there was an election today. He would crush it.
He would crush it today, and he's gonna crush it in 2020. There isn't a single Democrat on the scene that has the American people's interests listed as a priority. Not one. All they care about is stopping Trump. Their policies aren't even well thought out, the only prerequisite to their policies is that they oppose Trump's. Democrats care more about damaging the image of Republican's than they do about solving problems that plague Americans. I didn't vote for Trump in '16, I thought he was just another bag of hot air. I will most certainly vote for him 2020, and his successor in 2024! But what if he isn't building the wall to keep illegals out? What if he is building it to keep citizens in? Then a lot of people will be trapped inside. Here is the reality of what will happen. The Gulf of Mexico will have a lot more boat traffic. So when people want to sneak in they will have to pay the boatman to get in. This means boatmen smuggling people in will make good money. The next prez will need more coast guard There's no issue at all with the Coast Guard protecting those areas and monitoring every single boat. |
|
|
|
It's not the color of the Canadians' skin that makes us not want them here, it's the fact that most of them are commies.
All Canadian citizens in the US are welcome back home any time they want or need, the only one we don't want back is Ted Cruz, you HAVE to keep him. Odd you would mention that, I have just completed mass production of 1,000,000 Ted Cruz clone humans. They shipped out this afternoon for Canada. Just a minor MAGA scheme to subvert Canada into a ultra right wing powerhouse. Don't worry, there will be room for you in one of the Soros funded caravans. And I hear it's free to live in the Tent Cities From The Obama Era. |
|
|
|
.....they then try to decentralise that financial system with then realising they dont have the labour force for their "cryptos" so they run around looking for labourers again, making the wall a big question.
You must be a troll, please tell me you're a troll so I don't have to think you're a human being that is on this earth with these ideas. Does not make sense to me but here's a thought BEFORE weed was legalized in various US states, there might have been an undercurrent resistance to "A Wall." People wanted to get high. NOW WITH weed fairly well legitimized, nobody really cares about the illegal weed coming across the border. Various US weed business interests would like it stopped. Therefore we can lean toward building the wall. |
|
|
|
...
I agree with Trump, I don't think it's a national emergency either. ....
It takes a special kind of Trumptard to try and untwist that logic pretzel!
I must be one of those Trumptards then, because I don't even see pretzels! |
|
|
|
My favourite part of the declaration was when he said "I didn't need to do this", I mean the man is so stupid he said out loud he didn't need to declare an emergency....
Why? I would assume he didn't need to do it if that's what he said. Why would you or anyone think differently? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
