That's what I heard and that's why I didn't even try to make money on doing surveys. But it was long time ago. Several years have passed since the last time I researched it, and maybe things have changed. Now when I google it I see very different payments mentioned: from 41 cents per hour to more than $20 per survey. And probably you are right, this job is for English-speaking countries mostly, but it would be interesting to hear from someone who really was doing this job.

15)  Charles Oliveira
14)  Amanda Nunes
13)  Santiago Ponzinibbio
12)  Kai Kara France
11)  Raulian Paiva
10)  Dan Ige
9)  Dominick Cruz
  Tai Tuivasa
7)  Bruno Silva
6)  Andre Muniz
5)  Miranda Maverick
4)  Alex Perez
3)  Darrick Minner
2)  Randy Costa
1)  Priscila Cachoeira

1) Who will receive the ball first?  Steelers
2) Will the Vikings cover the -3 point spread?  Yes
3)  Game total 44?  Under
4)  Highest scoring Quarter?  2nd
5) Steelers total points?  Even
6)  Vikings total points?  Even
7)  Ben Roethlisberger to throw for 240 yards?  Over
8 )   Kirk Cousins to throw for 275 yards?  Over
9)  Najee Harris to score a TD?  No  
10)  Alexander Mattison to score a TD?  Yes

Final Score prediction  28-16 Vikings

It's not that costly, actually. Just add 2 sats to your bet in the Multiply BTC game, and you can potentially win 10k sats. Add 13 stas, and you'll win 100k sats if you are lucky.

Today I tried to hit it, and was pretty close at one point,



but nope, I didn't win it. It was fun, though.

I've earned 8.5 points this time



One of my best results so far. If I was winning 8.5 in every round, I'd be close to the top 20 right now. And yet I'm still sitting on the 44th place



You guys are terrific predictors. It's so hard to compete with you.

And it's not like I'm not trying. Quite the contrary. I analyze the historic results, the odds etc. ... and yet, 44th place in several rounds in a row. Well, we are not halfway yet, so, I'm not losing my hope.

Guys look at how big MEGA and MAJOR Jackpots have become!



I really hope one of us here will win one of those prizes.

Today I played Caribbean Anne 2 for some time. Didn't won a Jackpot, but as @LFC_Bitcoin said above it's a great game to play. I mean, you just can't stop when you have this



already, right? In the end my best win was only 2x of my bet, but I had my fun. I call it "meditation on slots", and it's always worth the money spent.

Well, it's still poker, so you can't win without bluffing occasionally, but you are right, good players are doing it less often these days.


I don't think poker is like chess. They are very different games, actually. Just read our discussion with @mak013 above, and then come back here.

But if you don't have time for that, I'll tell you this: chess is a game of complete information, meaning that luck plays zero part in it. It is determined how to play in this or that situation, you just have to know it. Memorize all the games played during the past 100 years by the best chess players, and you are guaranteed to win most of the time. But you can't do that trick with poker.

It's better late than never. Congrats on that decision, mate! Of course, what we can afford to lose is always a big question. Can I afford to lose my daily wage? Sure. But it will hurt. And if I'll be losing it daily? Well ...


That's nice actually, because gambling should be about good feelings, not about making money with it.

And again my stake returned on the two latest ones:



I love this game. There are not so many busts(for me at least). It feels like you either win or you get your money back.

Just look at the latest results:


Normally, for 9 Blackjacks we could expect around 190 busts. Clearly it's a positive EV game.

Thanks for sharing! I wasn't able to watch any fights this time, so I was just reading this article to find out what happened, and then I saw your post. Very helpful. All the needed info in one place.

So, this time I got 8 of them right:


But I'm especially glad that I was right about Clay Guida, "a caveman", as he is called sometimes. Few people believed in his victory, but I did. I like betting on the underdog. Now I regret that I didn't bet on Chris Curtis. I just didn't have the balls. And he won! Damn.

It's a strategy that no one has invented yet. Luck is still a big factor in cryptocurrency trading, and this will hardly change any time soon, if ever. So, I agree with you on the "normal business" part. Imo, it should be the primary source of income. Same with stocks trading: most people are doing it as a hobby, having a regular job at the same time.

Maybe I don't know them personally, but I can see what is their reputation here, and make my conclusions. Hang around here for a while, build up some reputation, a good one, then open a thread with practically the same words, and I will never say that there's something wrong with that. Only I'm pretty sure that after spending some time reading this forum, your words won't be the same. At least regarding the organizer fee, they won't.

Is it true? I've never tried it myself because I've always thought that it's like $1 per hour at best. Well, at one point I was making probably less than $1/hour solving captures, so it would be interesting to know what did I miss back then.


Trading is a way, but a very risky one. To potentially earn good money, you have to risk significant amounts. It's never guaranteed that you won't lose a big part of them.

It is better to find a job where you can apply skills that you have and earn money with that.

Betwrong

Betwrong

I have won 480k sats, , from free rolls, but it's only 4 times more than you have while you've made like  8 times less rolls, so you are lucky.

As of Jackpots, I won them 2 times, 100k and 10k sats, and here's my stats for them:



Also I think you must be missing something regarding Jackpots.



The minimum prize for rolling 8888 has always been 10k sats.

Tell me about it, mate. Yet again, being a Liverpool fan, I wasn't confident enough in my favourite team. I predicted 1-3 for their away win. Only one guy from our pool



was exactly right with his prediction.


Congrats, @icopress! With this pace you can find yourself in the top 3 in no time. I'm rooting for you, mate!


Why not? All of you guys in the top 15 are super close to each other, and in a round or two anyone can be in the top 3. And my goal is to be in the top 30 in a round or two.

@Hhampuz, I'm sorry if it's a stupid question, but can we submit entries with negative ROI for this one?

After reading your post and seeing that not a single Jackpot has been won yet, and also that all Jackpots have become significantly higher



I tried again, but to no avail. Idk, maybe it's because I'm not accustomed to play slots with such high bets. I usually play $0.10 or $0.20 max, and here, if I'm not mistaken, the minimum bet is almost $0.60?



When I play with those bets, man, my balance is decreasing so fast!

Well, you are right, someone should hit it. But maybe it won't be me this time".

Money back on 2 previous games.



That's not that bad. I lost several bets recently, but I'm still in profit from participating in Soccer Blackjack, because most of the time I was getting my money back, and one time I won. Hope to win again with this "Fulham v Bournemouth" game.