1082732 03/01/2016 12:32:46 0.0000 0.00 NaN
1082729 03/01/2016 12:32:15 0.0000 0.00 NaN What happened with these last two blocks? Give it some time, they are added "on-the-fly" ... payout cron has yet to catch them up  |
|
|
|
Whats the final time for RPF-5 ? I'm currently working on it but would need a little more time to finish it properly.
12:00 PM CST March 4th, 2016. Let me know if that poses a problem, since this one has parties that have been expressed interest for quite a while now. Trying to move quickly so interested hackers can dig in. Because it's big enough, it'll likely be possible to have multiple components completed by multiple people. It would require bringing everyone to the table and agreeing on things - but one step at a time! Thats perfectly fine for me. Most things are already done here, we just have to get the heads together - what about a big meetup "ETH" style ?  I'll send the proposal within the next 24h OCMiner, withdraws seem stuck again. PM / Mail with TXID and I'll have a look, there's currently a batch job running every 4 hours |
|
|
|
Whats the final time for RPF-5 ? I'm currently working on it but would need a little more time to finish it properly.
12:00 PM CST March 4th, 2016. Let me know if that poses a problem, since this one has parties that have been expressed interest for quite a while now. Trying to move quickly so interested hackers can dig in. Because it's big enough, it'll likely be possible to have multiple components completed by multiple people. It would require bringing everyone to the table and agreeing on things - but one step at a time! Thats perfectly fine for me. Most things are already done here, we just have to get the heads together - what about a big meetup "ETH" style ? I'll send the proposal within the next 24h |
|
|
|
|
Whats the final time for RPF-5 ? I'm currently working on it but would need a little more time to finish it properly.
|
|
|
|
trying to compile the github source of cygnus got errors like
obj/checkpoints.o: In function `CTxDB::TxnAbort()':
/opt/coins/Cygnus/src/txdb-leveldb.h:170: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
obj/checkpoints.o: In function `~CTxDB':
/opt/coins/Cygnus/src/txdb-leveldb.h:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()'
any advise ?
cd leveldb make clean cd .. make -f makefille.unix |
|
|
|
|
Never run anything as root ..
The latest commit is compiling and running fine now finally
|
|
|
|
dev this lines is required
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
return 1; ?
Yes, it takes a 32 byte big endian scalar hash and returns two 32 byte big endian scalars that describe a point on the eliptic curve secp256k1. with this commit https://github.com/EclipseCrypto/eclipse/commit/e7897d90e3b89abd23cd9eb82d87c0908b84c235 this error solved ? sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
Nope, error is still there |
|
|
|
Ahhh a pity I thought a ninja |
|
|
|
After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix
Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail i compiled by removing this line the dev can say if this function is needed i try to help Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually Post an error message next time. If you wait until literally Sunday morning to post a helpful error message, do you think you are going to get help immediately? Legit devs have legit lives. You had all weekend to post an error message. You had all time since launch to get your repo cloned onto a vm/vps and do a simple test compile there. It's not my job getting bugs/flaws ironed out you implement or do testing which you didn't Nevertheless with all the love in this thread and your attitude, good luck with this project. |
|
|
|
After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix
Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail i compiled by removing this line the dev can say if this function is needed i try to help Yeah cheers and thanks for your help, you've helped a lot more than the dev actually |
|
|
|
After secp problem solving i fetch a error
sigringu.cpp: In function ‘int hashToEC(const uint8_t*, uint32_t, BIGNUM*, EC_POINT*)’:
sigringu.cpp:150:60: error: ‘secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes’ was not declared in this scope
if (!secp256k1_hash_to_ec_xy_bytes(b32_x, b32_y, pcHash))
^
make: *** [obj/sigringu.o] Error 1
i remove the line 150-151 from sigringu.cpp and then make -f makefile.unix
Yeah but this cannot work, you're just removing that function from the source.. If the source/binary ever needs this function it will fail |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 i have compile eclipsed So what were your steps to do so ? cd eclipse/src/secp256k1 replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working ./eclipsed getinfo { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Hmm interesting.. Than the secp is NOT special and just a normal version... Which version/revision of secp did you use, I just tried with the latest version from the secp github but it looks like it is too new, its getting some unresolved symbols. Already that money supply at block height ? wow... Serious doubt if it makes any sense to still add this coin... i have the bitcoin source on my pc and i copy the secp from bitcoin and paste it on eclipse Yup, the standard bitcoin secp does it.. So whats the story about the "special version" ? If I would have known its the standard bitcoin version... |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 i have compile eclipsed So what were your steps to do so ? cd eclipse/src/secp256k1 replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working ./eclipsed getinfo { "version" : "v1.0.0.0-g", "mode" : "full", "state" : "Full Node", "protocolversion" : 60017, "walletversion" : 10500, "balance" : 0.00000000, "eclipsebalance" : 0.00000000, "newmint" : 0.00000000, "stake" : 0.00000000, "reserve" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 739, "timeoffset" : -2, "moneysupply" : 1275959.00550400, "connections" : 10, "datareceived" : "111.24 KB", "datasent" : "60.44 KB", "proxy" : "", "ip" : "iebbi7wttlv5rdfg.onion", "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 16337219.17622585, "proof-of-stake" : 128405.33843578 }, "testnet" : false, "keypoolsize" : 101, "paytxfee" : 0.00020000, "mininput" : 0.00000000, "errors" : "" } Hmm interesting.. Than the secp is NOT special and just a normal version... Which version/revision of secp did you use, I just tried with the latest version from the secp github but it looks like it is too new, its getting some unresolved symbols. Already that money supply at block height ? wow... Serious doubt if it makes any sense to still add this coin... |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 i have compile eclipsed So what were your steps to do so ? cd eclipse/src/secp256k1 replace the secp256k1 folder with bitcoin secp256k1 folder on makefile.unix remove the line 274 make -f makefile.unix I was thinking about replacing the secp with bitcoin's secp but the dev states it's a special version with some mods.. so it would make no sense if that's actually working |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 i have compile eclipsed So what were your steps to do so ? |
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
Did you manually compile the secp256k library that we included in the repository? Also, just for clarifications, can you provide autoconf and automake versions? I tried both, manually and just automatic through your makefile. autoconf --version autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 automake --version automake (GNU automake) 1.15 |
|
|
|
All other people no have problem ,you could protect your wallet DEUR 2 no ScammmmmNo scam - just dead and no development like all your other coins |
|
|
|
would be really interesting if someone could merge mine vanilla and dcr
Not possible, algo is different |
|
|
|
|
This thing is still failling to compile for me:
./configure: line 12320: SECP_64BIT_ASM_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12349: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12377: SECP_INT128_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12402: SECP_GMP_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12508: SECP_OPENSSL_CHECK: command not found
./configure: line 12526: AX_JNI_INCLUDE_DIR: command not found
Seems that secp is somehow broken, I downloaded with --recursive already and manually tried to compile secp first - no luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
