Aero Community,
We are pleased to announce the Proof-of-Developer ratings has just come through.
The PoD Analysis was kindly carried out by CryptoAsian The 5+ Pod rating criteria had been meet and thus was awarded.
The "plus" (+) aspect of this rating is also important to mention as this now means we have another element to offer in terms of community awareness.
It also means we have the "option" of participating in various screen casts hosted by CryptoAsian..
I for one hope this gives you all a better understanding of the kind of team which are behind Aero.
Feel free to take a look over the freshly "minted" Proof-of-Developer 5+ pod seal of approval!
http://cryptoasian.com/aero-aerocoin/
Thanks,
Majika.
 Dev How about Super Net?  |
|
|
|
Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf?
If you don't know how, hire a developer to help you? Anyone with a cl and profiling experience could likely offer significant improvements. This said, wolf0 ALWAYS seems to exaggerate his hashrate claims. His apparent optimized XMR miner was "over 2x as fast", but nobody ever saw such a drastic improvement over lucas's build, not in reported hashrate, and certainly not in actual hashes submitted to the pool. Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf?
anywhere he did not publish What does this even mean? I think he meant that you can't get x11 > 4.8MH/s on a 7950 from wolf0, because he didn't publish his solutions. But, he has hinted that if you PM him he might sell them to you. he refused to sell it to me |
|
|
|
I tell you, if wolf0 codes anything like he communicates, I wouldn't touch anything he developed with a 10ft pole. Good thing his shitty XMR optimizations (woo! Mostly adding gcc flags is so hard!) were quickly dwarfed by far superior software that was developed from scratch by a real coder - not some want-to-be braggariet.
Where can I get a miner for linux that hashes x11 at > 4.8mh on a 7950 other than from wolf? anywhere he did not publish |
|
|
|
Congratulations Pallas.
Do you have it on Github already?
Thanks. No git yet. I was thinking it's not necessary for a single file, but now there are bins and maybe multiple versions so I may end up doing it. congratulations excellent optimization, but what about the other algorithms |
|
|
|
100% a scam, I feel sorry for the guys who are still holding on, someone is going to loose out, only going down from here, dev is hardly active, refuses to do POD and hasnt made any progress or updates. dead coin, he was hoping for bittrex so he could dump that premine.
deer you scam,  |
|
|
|
why no news ?  |
|
|
|
Running 8x R9 290X is going to cost $300/month in electricity to make maybe .5 BTC at most; and now that BTC is in the shitter at $420/USD we're losing nearly 30% by mining alone.
It'd be nice for some of the dedicated and die-hard supporters of the thread to band together and see what we can do about it, but you're right, by more people having a higher hashrate - everybody loses.
What a conundrum.
miner should be those who have less GPU, I suppose one farm with 4 cards |
|
|
|
290X doing 7.6MH/s - I should have tried -g 2 earlier! Really hot here, though, so I can't run it like that constantly yet.
Hey "-g 2" is the same as "GPU Thread's 2" Yeah ? Right. EDIT: Got 290s doing 7.1MH/s at 1050/1250 - I know a 290X can crack 8, but I have to wait until it's cooler... you would be better to show the source code of the people and not your ability to hvastatsya programirovat If you're good at something... well, you know the end of the quote. Proof of 7.1MH/s on 290 (nsfw, as usual): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11290wolf.pngwho needs that proof here, and all those last several pages of bs about optimizations, ppl want christmas gift, not the proof of it Of course they do. Who wouldn't want to profit off of someone else's work and leave them nothing? Miners love that shit. would pay I do not mind |
|
|
|
290X doing 7.6MH/s - I should have tried -g 2 earlier! Really hot here, though, so I can't run it like that constantly yet.
Hey "-g 2" is the same as "GPU Thread's 2" Yeah ? Right. EDIT: Got 290s doing 7.1MH/s at 1050/1250 - I know a 290X can crack 8, but I have to wait until it's cooler... you would be better to show the source code of the people and not your ability to hvastatsya programirovat If you're good at something... well, you know the end of the quote. Proof of 7.1MH/s on 290 (nsfw, as usual): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11290wolf.pngwho needs that proof here, and all those last several pages of bs about optimizations, ppl want christmas gift, not the proof of it +1 |
|
|
|
290X doing 7.6MH/s - I should have tried -g 2 earlier! Really hot here, though, so I can't run it like that constantly yet.
Hey "-g 2" is the same as "GPU Thread's 2" Yeah ? Right. EDIT: Got 290s doing 7.1MH/s at 1050/1250 - I know a 290X can crack 8, but I have to wait until it's cooler... you would be better to show the source code of the people and not your ability to hvastatsya programirovat If you're good at something... well, you know the end of the quote. Proof of 7.1MH/s on 290 (nsfw, as usual): https://ottrbutt.com/tmp/x11290wolf.pngon your miner 290 can give more, you just have to pick the best settings |
|
|
|
290X doing 7.6MH/s - I should have tried -g 2 earlier! Really hot here, though, so I can't run it like that constantly yet.
Hey "-g 2" is the same as "GPU Thread's 2" Yeah ? Right. EDIT: Got 290s doing 7.1MH/s at 1050/1250 - I know a 290X can crack 8, but I have to wait until it's cooler... you would be better to show the source code of the people and not your ability to hvastatsya programirovat |
|
|
|
290X doing 7.6MH/s - I should have tried -g 2 earlier! Really hot here, though, so I can't run it like that constantly yet.
If u share it, somebody can run it constantly @badman Did u find some tweaks for the hashrates? 20-30% increase is alot what wolf is getting. Maybe other devs. Just feel sorry for the man to put the source code or a miner himself, after some time, the miner, and so will |
|
|
|
Hi claymore, will it work with the new m7n will you make with work ?
Thanks
+1 |
|
|
|
What settings do you use for 270? get 3Mh/s "kernel": "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "102",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"gpu-engine" : "1250",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-fan" : "35-85", With xintensity -> 64 slightly less than 102 Please, share your kernel fix  That engine clock is pretty high... I'm running 1165/1500. Please, share your miner |
|
|
|
What settings do you use for 270? get 3Mh/s "kernel": "darkcoin-mod",
"xintensity" : "102",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"gpu-engine" : "1250",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-fan" : "35-85", With xintensity -> 64 slightly less than 102 Please, share your kernel fix +1 |
|
|
|
Can I get more than ~4,5 for r9 290 and ~4,2 for 280x x11 algo ?
Is it possible? Sure, my 280X is currently doing 4.83MH/s on X11. EDIT: 4.9MH/s, now. care to share your config? try the mod version in my sig and be sure to put this in your config "xintensity" : "64", "worksize": "64", "hamsi-expand-big" : "7", "hamsi-short" : true, "blake-compact" : true, "keccak-unroll" : "8", "luffa-parallel" : true, "gpu-threads" : "2", I worked off of yours, I'm pretty sure my X11 is in the ballpark of 35.20% faster. X13 around 38.51%, and X15 about 42.87%. with mine you should get 5.2mh/s on x11 with 290 (stock clocks) and 6.2mh/s on 290x (oc to 1040/1375) What about 280X? EDIT: I cloned the develop branch of your repo - is this a joke? 4.55MH/s on X11 on my 290X, tops. It's at 1000/1500. EDIT2: Though I am liking the xI 64 - getting 6.14MH/s almost on my 290X, 1000/1500. use the master branch... although it shouldnt be too different i get 5.8 to 5.9mh/s on my 290x with 1040/1375 and I 16 and 6.18 to 6.2mh/s with xI 64 edit: my mods arent on the develop branch anymore as i started over with the 5.0.0 update All right, I'll give it a shot later. Getting 6.15 with mine on 290X now, at 1000/1500, so still not bad. Checked out your darkcoin-mod.cl, and didn't see too much of a difference between it and sgminer's dev branch, but I'll try it later. In the meantime, I completely rewrote one hash - now getting 5.5MH/s out of my 280X  that publish it your miner or kernels |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
