Isn't it interesting that the church doesn't like free speech when people choose to oppose them, but embraces free speech with great enthusiasm when it likes to spew out it's hate and bile against homosexuality for example. Isn't that interesting.  Actually, no. Only a tiny minority of people who call themselves Christians spew out hate and bile against homosexuality, as the basic tenets of the religion aren't very oriented toward propagating hate and bile... Exactly! A tiny minority. The same as the tiny minority that stick their cocks in religious statues. So why all the hand wringing over it in this thread? are you wearing flip flops? you're all over the place ? Well, you started with a blanket statement about christianity, then got called on it, and attempted to cover your tracks by performing a complete 180 |
|
|
|
Isn't it interesting that the church doesn't like free speech when people choose to oppose them, but embraces free speech with great enthusiasm when it likes to spew out it's hate and bile against homosexuality for example. Isn't that interesting. Actually, no. Only a tiny minority of people who call themselves Christians spew out hate and bile against homosexuality, as the basic tenets of the religion aren't very oriented toward propagating hate and bile... Exactly! A tiny minority. The same as the tiny minority that stick their cocks in religious statues. So why all the hand wringing over it in this thread? are you wearing flip flops? you're all over the place |
|
|
|
Isn't it interesting that the church doesn't like free speech when people choose to oppose them, but embraces free speech with great enthusiasm when it likes to spew out it's hate and bile against homosexuality for example. Isn't that interesting. You sound "butthurt"(some pun intended) |
|
|
|
He should be sentenced to some community service and home confinement for fair amount of time at most a relatively short stay in jail if you ask me. This is pretty disturbing to think a judge would even consider allowing such a long jail sentence and that DA should be worried about losing his job for having such horrible judgment on the matter.
I'm ashamed to admit how hard I laughed at the pics because that is a gross act in so many ways. But there is no way a person should go to jail for that long over something like this, that is the real crime..
WHY? WHy should he see any sort of punishment? Please do tell. Because his rights end where my feelings begin LMAO.. no Pretty sure that was sarcasm The most amusing part is that the said 'sarcasm' applies to themselves the best, as evidenced by this thread, but leave it up to these fools to spit lying down thinking it's clever `spit lying down`? is that slang for scat sex?  |
|
|
|
PrimeDice, of course.
No one is better and more trustworth.
How about win88 casino? Have you played there? I personally have not, in fact i am just hearing about it for the first time. |
|
|
|
|
tomatocage is pretty much the authority on scams. he can spot them from a mile away.
FWIW, i've been working on an application for a while now that can compromise proxies and reveal the originating ip. I may offer it to the forum as a means of tracking and identifying suspected scammers, and discovering their personal information. I've already tested it against a basic proxy and i am able to get the ip address of the user hiding behind the proxy. this method involves sending crafted headers that force a request to an addition resource, exploiting a flaw in http 1.1 and therein bypassing the proxy.
|
|
|
|
Just to chuck in my tiny  thoughts on what's been said recently... My only objection is to the use of Skype. There are plenty of non-corporate open-source apps out there that are more in keeping with the ethos of the cryptosphere. One of my faves is the encrypted RetroShare & we used to use Pidgin for high-level Zeit craic. Think fudding is just the modern equivalent of 'knock & nash' - by nature they're not actually brave enough to stick around to face the consequences of their stupidity. Which is a shame coz I'm just in the Monday mood for some bloody dismemberment. (For those who doubt, I'm a 6'+, 300lb former 'rogue biker', ex-soldier & semi-pro fullback/MLB)That's just fucking hilarious |
|
|
|
Bet you he'll think twice about fucking with Jesus. All you dumb ass liberals crying can go EAD. You play with fire you get burned. You have the right to free speech, but you don't have the right to trespass and feign sexual acts on statues. |
|
|
|
it amazes me how retarded they are with basic security shit over there.
especially, given all the money they have behind them now.
No it's not that serious, there was no hack or compromise. Some spammer abused 'Request money' feature of Coinbase with a list he already had from somewhere. Actually, it is a big deal, because the hack allowed the hacker to place a Name with an email address. It's called user enumeration, and coinbase should have known better. They are absolutely liable, and eventually will be sued over this. |
|
|
|
And per Peter R's chart, user adoption is what drives the market cap, not investor adoption.
Peter R's chart doesn't show that because: 1. it doesn't show causality, and 2. there is no way to know whether the transactions and/or addresses in use on the Bitcoin network are users or investors. A huge amount of Bitcoin activity is investors, probably a majority. Really, who "uses" Bitcoin? Who used it last November-December when his chart showed both the metrics and price skyrocketing? A better interpretation of his chart is that investors drive market cap! I use bitcoin all the time. even during the boom i used bitcoin. i've even done a few in person transactions will zealous hillbillies. Perhaps you are projecting abit.. Do you really think that is, in the aggregate, highly significant relative to the amount of speculative activity? I don't. At the height of Silk Road it is possible there were a lot of non-speculative transactions. Outside of that time period I doubt it. Admittedly I don't have any hard data either way. I wholly reject a 10x increase in non-speculative activity over a relatively short time though. That simply didn't happen. EDIT: Let me expand on this thought a bit. If the Peter R chart showed an important link between non-speculative use (what the Farewell Post Princess called "users" as opposed to "investors") then the relationship should have broken down during the 10x runups. It didn't. The chart simply shows that activity is correlated with price, but there is no basis there for disqualifying speculative activity as being critical to the correlation. Quite the contrary. Since were dealing in opinions here, this is mine. The Peter R chart only proves the willingness for people to blindly trust data as truth without investigation or research. I just don't buy the validity of the methods used to discern an investor from a "user". I think the data is invalid and made up. |
|
|
|
And per Peter R's chart, user adoption is what drives the market cap, not investor adoption.
Peter R's chart doesn't show that because: 1. it doesn't show causality, and 2. there is no way to know whether the transactions and/or addresses in use on the Bitcoin network are users or investors. A huge amount of Bitcoin activity is investors, probably a majority. Really, who "uses" Bitcoin? Who used it last November-December when his chart showed both the metrics and price skyrocketing? A better interpretation of his chart is that investors drive market cap! I use bitcoin all the time. even during the boom i used bitcoin. i've even done a few in person transactions will zealous hillbillies. Perhaps you are projecting abit.. |
|
|
|
exchange logic broken. bought 22 million btc on day 1 for about 20 cents.
Yeah. I'm still thinking on solution there. I don't want to try calculating how many BTC should exist, but do want to get some kind of time-based (and quantity-based) slippage calculation in there to prevent that. It'd allow the user to manipulate the market, which isn't something I've thought through, so think I'll wait for one of the "1/4" updates -- maybe 000425, with casino in at 00045, backgrounds in at 000475, and less-ugly buttons and boxes for 0005. cool man, its definitely a neat project. you need anyhelp shoot me a pm |
|
|
|
|
exchange logic broken. bought 22 million btc on day 1 for about 20 cents.
|
|
|
|
|
i don't hate you, i just disagree with everything you say pretty much. your opinions are slanted and your agenda is clear. pretty much sums it up for me, and i assume 99.9% of people who "hate you"
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone,
First, I'd like to congratulate all the CrackCoin supporters. Today we hit a big milesone, 150Gh/s!
Bittrex now charges 3BTC to be listed on their exchange, so we've started an official "Bittrex" fund where all donations will go directly towards being listed on bittrex.
12cfYuUjThMThKbsRiSLuPuFFj5KejvdKQ (also in the main thread)
Thanks,
CrackCoin Team.
LOL you're a funny guy |
|
|
|
you keep making alt accounts and new scams and your tired of them bitching at you? why dont u give up and stop trying to scam then and go get a job
this |
|
|
|
|
bump. starting at $15 now, any takers?
|
|
|
|
How many different threads do we need about this topic?
thirteen-leventy-thousand |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
