Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 09:53:20 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
361  Other / Meta / delete on: March 30, 2018, 05:31:11 AM
delete
362  Other / Off-topic / Re: vlad230's post review service - Jr. Member and up [OPEN] on: March 30, 2018, 05:07:03 AM
How about this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3215431.msg33418944#msg33418944
or maybe this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg32956446#msg32956446
363  Other / Meta / Re: 14 merit bonus for quality users [Jr to Sr. Member] on: March 30, 2018, 03:56:04 AM
Im too nervous to do this but I still want to try.
Please read the OP, thanks.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1807652;sa=showPosts
Wow thats too fast, but anyway ill try to improve more. Thank you Smiley
Can I know what is the qualification? Is it because I have some 1 line on my first page?
364  Other / Meta / Re: 14 merit bonus for quality users [Jr to Sr. Member] on: March 30, 2018, 03:53:01 AM
Im too nervous to do this but I still want to try.
Please read the OP, thanks.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1807652;sa=showPosts
365  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 30, 2018, 03:44:13 AM
yeah you should stop replying your off topic post, thanks.
so what's wrong if I gave him or he gave me merits?
If only one of you just sent merits you did not violate any rules, but since that is merit trade its prohibited.
read the rules.
366  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 05:23:14 PM



snip


Just to clarify it, those words are for merit abusers, those sentence are before the the date of the report.



Please appeal to the right/appropriate topic, Im going to answer your questions.
367  Other / Off-topic / For those who are still confused and depressed about merits. on: March 29, 2018, 04:28:44 PM
I posted this here because I know that there are many beginners here that will benefit from this post, and beginners and help section are full of topics about merits.

Are you still confused? depressed? losing hope?

Here's a very special and useful tip for you to gain some merits.
-This tip is DYOR or Do Your Own Research, if you are going to follow this tip you can use this for a long time.

Always look at this list of recent merits that sends by everyone:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=recent

In looking to some merited post that you agreed also that that post deserves a merit.
Try to think that why this posts deserve's a merit, also look at the last posts of that person...

Also this thing will help you to be updated to some event that gives merit to a good quality post, you will comment the link of your post that you think deserves a merit.
And dont hesitate to ask if your comment dont get merits, They will answer why your posts dont get merits and what is missing.
In that way you learned something from them and for sure in the next time you join you can get some merits and if still not try and try again until you get the meaning of High Quality Content.
368  Other / Off-topic / Re: vlad230's post review service - Jr. Member and up [OPEN] on: March 29, 2018, 04:00:27 PM
I want to give this topic a try.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3189979.0
369  Other / Off-topic / Re: Merit System Upgrade on: March 29, 2018, 03:55:36 PM
Hi there, I know that Im not yet qualified to this because this event is for full member and up.
But still I want to give a try to review my post if they are qualified to get some post, any comment from you QuestionAuthority and suggestion will be appreciated. Thanks.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3058025.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3189979.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3182306.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3215431.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3201367.msg33225239#msg33225239
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2970226.msg33137332#msg33137332
370  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Let's help everyone to get merit! on: March 29, 2018, 03:32:22 PM
There are many similar topics like this one, I will just give you a little tip because I already give my answer to this question many times.

Here's a new tip review this link, it consist of all recent merit sends in the forum.
Then review those merited post and ask your self why this post get merit, of course exclude to your research those merited post that dont really deserve a merit.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=recent
371  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 02:50:50 PM
snip
Lets go back to the topic.
372  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 02:03:27 PM
It looks like you just used my post and got from your main account SM23031997 merits for "quality post".

Sherlock! you caught me.
In this statement you admitted that Craige288 is your alt, but anyway this is not the right thread to talk about it.

Lets go back to the topic.
373  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 12:21:18 PM

Haha i thought of this before, this guy will go over the limit and going rampage and suspect anyone of merit abusing.  Come on 1993jochico, your merit abusing accusation to  SM23031997 is kinda funny, if you really want to suspect people, please give valid and enough evidence rather than just seeing to other person merit. So what if anyone gives 20 merit to a post? I got 20 from QuestionAuthority and a lot of people got +20 from him/her, so you would suspect him/her giving merit to his/her alt account by using a giveaway method too???

Remember, your action can lead into a destruction
I not judging him...yet, and if I do I will add this to my report but I didnt because I know that Im lack of evidence.
"So what if anyone gives 20?" Its totally abuse especially if it is your alt.
Dont compare your 20 from QA its an event reward and you deserve it.

I can clearly see that QA's event is legit unlike the link on this OP.
I know that all of us can notice the real and fake events.

EDIT: I just want to add sir that he twice send 20 merit to his alt in one day.
374  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 12:15:19 PM
Do you think that was the abuse of merit system? If yes, think twice before you speak again. I don't think any explanation is necessary in that case.
Im sorry to say sir but I have to say Yes after seeing this.


If I were to award an sMerit to Jet Cash, then that is clearly an abuse of the system, and should be punished.
I think we can base on Jet Cash's statement.
375  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 10:28:51 AM
Besides, feedback can be removed so would that mean their merit comes back magically?
I didnt think of that, this sentence makes sense.
But what if it is only disabled and not vanish, only some of the comments here that concludes that their smerit will vanish or gone.
376  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 10:18:06 AM
Does merit abuse isnt an extreme condition? Because for me merit abuse is an extreme condition, the system is introduce to reduce spam and eliminate farmer accounts.

Yes, we want quality but we also want to reduce spammers and farmers.

Or... you are just not considering it because you once done it?



Sorry for this but most of the time I check the profiles of those who are replying on my post.
377  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 09:19:15 AM
For example, selling merit isn't illegal, but it's negative trust-worthy. You can't suddenly freeze an account's sMerit just because they sold sMerit, which is not illegal. To give an official punishment for a crime per se, rather than an official crime, is an unfair exercise of power.
Who says that selling sMerit is not illegal?
Isnt it unfair that they abuse signature campaigns many times?
They already get a big profit here from cheating bounty campaigns, are they not contented with one account?
This is the perfect time to clean the forum its time for them to payback.

May I know the reason why do you think that they dont deserve to be punished?

That said, I agree with the other person on this thread that people who gain a negative trust, then realize they can't use their account for sig campaigns, they end up holding free sMerit giveaways for people with quality posts. I've seen such threads. If you totally lock their sMerits, it disallows for this kind of opportunity.
No they didnt, they just distributing their merits to their alts.
Please read the report.

I'm unaware of the current status of sMerit flow -- is it capped, is it flowing freely, are people just not sending them? Who knows. But I'd say that it isn't a good idea at this time to lock down sMerits from someone with negative trust who may or may not have abused the merit system.
If someone gets tagged they either abuse the system, cheat or scam...

Besides, if someone sends sMerit to an alt, that alt will no doubt spam the forums and be weeded out too easily and receive a negative trust... and the number of sMerits that alt can give gets halved anyway. It continues to get halved until none are left.
Can you catch and report them all? we are looking for a better way to stop those farmers instantly.
378  Other / Meta / Re: Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 07:04:37 AM
Well, First of all, that's really good idea of yours. But I think
Disadvantage: The only disadvantage of this that I see is that those accounts with negative trust and still active because they are promoting their service and others cannot send merits anymore, but its okay because there are only few of them.
Is not the only disadvantage of your idea. Because not all account with Negative Trust are abusing Merit/Merit System. For example is this Guy Mr. Wesimon
Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=882355
As you can see, Yeah he's account is tagged with Negative Trust. But I can prove that he's not abusing his Merit. You can check this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3175633.msg32872726#msg32872726 made by Mr. Wesimon. This thread is a "Free merit for quality posts". It only proves that he's not trading or abusing his Merit and I'm sure that he is not the only Member with Negative Trust who uses Merits for good.

What do you think?
I know your higher ranked than me but I want you to search deeper on that Wesimon's profile and read my report about that and you will see that he is just hiding to that event to trick the community and not get noticed that he is transferring his merits to his alts.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2290127.msg31592514#msg31592514 3
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2726080.msg28395901#msg28395901 2
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2372313.msg32626889#msg32626889 4

to this post and your post only gets 1.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3092808.msg31919039#msg31919039

I can assure you that this is a diversion to trick the community.
379  Other / Meta / Want to get some opinion about this. [Maybe a Proposal to Eliminate Farmers] on: March 29, 2018, 06:01:10 AM
In this simple suggestion it will help a lot to stop abuse from those already tagged users with high ranks.

If an account is already tagged as a merit abuser or anything their merit will be automatically disabled.
In this way we can instantly stop their abuse to send merits in creating new accounts.

Benefits to the forum and community:

1. No more merit abuse from that account: It will lessen reports that already tagged because if that account has many sMerit he will surely create a new account and pass his merits to the newly created accounts (that is happening right now).

2. It will be easier to clean the community: If their merits is disabled they cannot abuse anymore, and they will surely start from the start, and learn how to use the forum in the right and fair way.

3. They are forced to forget the account that has red tag: If their purpose is to join a lot of signature campaign which is the only reason for them to spam the forum, for sure that account with negative trust will never be active anymore because it has no use for them.

An possible example of one account that have already been tagged and trying to make a way to distribute his merits to his alts.
LINK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3189979.0


Disadvantage: The only disadvantage of this that I see is that those accounts with negative trust and still active because they are promoting their service and others cannot send merits anymore, but its okay because there are only few of them.


Any other positive or negative suggestion's are welcome and will be appreciated.  Smiley
380  Other / Meta / Re: My list of merit abusers - Found in only 1 hour on: March 29, 2018, 03:40:18 AM
For the OP, I really dont get the purpose of putting "Found in only 1 hour" in the title.  Smiley

It is sad that merit system was introduced to get rid of the spammers but instead it created a whole new breed of spammers. They don't even try to hide themselves.  :/
No, the system dont create new breeds of spammers I have caught many alts and all of them are already residents here they are just creating new accounts to distribute their merit and this is also one of the purpose of the system to catch those cheaters.

Im really surprised that in 2months of merit system they still dont find out that they are reported on what they are doing, or maybe they dont know that everyone can see the recent merits of the community.

Cheaters are too much busy thinking on how they can cheat with this new merits system and not noticing that this is a trap.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!