You do know they regenerated the blockchain from 0 yesterday, that is why it's only on block 627 now. Any coins made before that are no good any more.
So they are not going to honor coins mined prior to their "second launch"? If you have proof of mining send a PM to Lucas Email was sent with screen shots of the pool tx log, tx.log export from qt and screen shots and old database at 2089 blocks. Think that will be enough for him or does he want the proof of work logs over 2000 blocks running since the 4th? Mind you that QT debug log retention does not run that long. |
|
|
|
You do know they regenerated the blockchain from 0 yesterday, that is why it's only on block 627 now. Any coins made before that are no good any more.
So they are not going to honor coins mined prior to their "second launch"? |
|
|
|
is it just me or has this coin forked???
Why do you think that? I'm on "blocks" : 594, Because yesterday there was a 281k difficulty at block 2085 they couldn't solve yesterday when they threw uber MHash at it which I ultimately did with a 524k with a couple of R9 280x's running at 980MHZ that took most of the day mining solo, then they brought back the blockchain and the pool back from 2085 without checking the blockchain first to see that it had been solved. Yes, it forked. "Was this a planned fork?" "no, it wasn't" They have a copy of the database, this coin is not about MHZ being tossed at it to solve a block, going to fast will result in missing share detection. This much is new and could likely be key to defeat the asic script miners. |
|
|
|
If this coin gets on an exchange there will be dumpers!! You will have pools/farms/and high hash ASIC miners will will want to dump everything they mine. There is no way to stop it... That will drive the price down, just like so many coin have seen
I chalenge the to do it, its impossible, if somebody want to make sugestion personally or have some real interest or something to propouse my skype is FERX159You're going to be upset when someone writes an optimized kernel for sgminer. However I've noted even on the Silver version of the coin it really isn't all about mhz, running to fast can result in failure to detect a share with your algo's. So what happened to CreXser.com? Why was it so slow when it was up? I would have thought that your sites would have been built on machines with much more bandwidth. Is the subtle things that make me think that there may not be big powerful people and big corporations actually behind this, in most cases they would have a few extra IP's in their block for corporate internet services to provide a simple webserver and many more nodes internationally not to mention putting up their own pool with more bandwidth on faster hardware. Elaborate 419 does come to mind yet I'm not that quick to judge. I have a question, I have under the original release of WACG-QT mined around 100 coins at a block height of 2089, upon looking at your block explorers and the pool I see that the block height is now 509? Was this a planned fork? I mined them mostly solo and some on the pool, however I see that the trans history on what I mined at the pool is all now been orphaned. What happened? The Silver client seems to be behaving the same way and I have almost 30k in WAC Silver, however I see every time I generate a new block the Allcrypt site does reflect it. I have also included in the email screen shots of what I see on my end, also included a working copy of the database if you would like to save some headache getting peoples coins back to them to the tune of about 1500 blocks worth. |
|
|
|
If this coin gets on an exchange there will be dumpers!! You will have pools/farms/and high hash ASIC miners will will want to dump everything they mine. There is no way to stop it... That will drive the price down, just like so many coin have seen
I chalenge the to do it, its impossible, if somebody want to make sugestion personally or have some real interest or something to propouse my skype is FERX159You're going to be upset when someone writes an optimized kernel for sgminer. However I've noted even on the Silver version of the coin it really isn't all about mhz, running to fast can result in failure to detect a share with your algo's. So what happened to CreXser.com? Why was it so slow when it was up? I would have thought that your sites would have been built on machines with much more bandwidth. Is the subtle things that make me think that there may not be big powerful people and big corporations actually behind this, in most cases they would have a few extra IP's in their block for corporate internet services to provide a simple webserver and many more nodes internationally not to mention putting up their own pool with more bandwidth on faster hardware. Elaborate 419 does come to mind yet I'm not that quick to judge. I have a question, I have under the original release of WACG-QT mined around 100 coins at a block height of 2089, upon looking at your block explorers and the pool I see that the block height is now 509? Was this a planned fork? I mined them mostly solo and some on the pool, however I see that the trans history on what I mined at the pool is all now been orphaned. What happened? |
|
|
|
If this coin gets on an exchange there will be dumpers!! You will have pools/farms/and high hash ASIC miners will will want to dump everything they mine. There is no way to stop it... That will drive the price down, just like so many coin have seen
I chalenge the to do it, its impossible, if somebody want to make sugestion personally or have some real interest or something to propouse my skype is FERX159You're going to be upset when someone writes an optimized kernel for sgminer. However I've noted even on the Silver version of the coin it really isn't all about mhz, running to fast can result in failure to detect a share with your algo's. So what happened to CreXser.com? Why was it so slow when it was up? I would have thought that your sites would have been built on machines with much more bandwidth. Is the subtle things that make me think that there may not be big powerful people and big corporations actually behind this, in most cases they would have a few extra IP's in their block for corporate internet services to provide a simple webserver and many more nodes internationally not to mention putting up their own pool with more bandwidth on faster hardware. Elaborate 419 does come to mind yet I'm not that quick to judge. I have a question, I have under the original release of WACG-QT mined around 100 coins at a block height of 2089, upon looking at your block explorers and the pool I see that the block height is now 509? Was this a planned fork? |
|
|
|
If this coin gets on an exchange there will be dumpers!! You will have pools/farms/and high hash ASIC miners will will want to dump everything they mine. There is no way to stop it... That will drive the price down, just like so many coin have seen
I chalenge the to do it, its impossible, if somebody want to make sugestion personally or have some real interest or something to propouse my skype is FERX159You're going to be upset when someone writes an optimized kernel for sgminer. However I've noted even on the Silver version of the coin it really isn't all about mhz, running to fast can result in failure to detect a share with your algo's. So what happened to CreXser.com? Why was it so slow when it was up? I would have thought that your sites would have been built on machines with much more bandwidth. Is the subtle things that make me think that there may not be big powerful people and big corporations actually behind this, in most cases they would have a few extra IP's in their block for corporate internet services to provide a simple webserver and many more nodes internationally not to mention putting up their own pool with more bandwidth on faster hardware. Elaborate 419 does come to mind yet I'm not that quick to judge. |
|
|
|
|
Trigeek was last active on this forum on 5/19, last post was 5/10 and no replies or any information as to what is going on in this thread. Doesn't look good, usually when someone goes unresponsive, someone split with the coins. Was my first experience with mining, have (or had) 400k in karma as I was awaiting my local wallet to sync, I guess this is why folks mine solo.
|
|
|
|
|
So is Hashstrike a gonner?
"Unable to connect to wallet RPC service: RPC call did not return 200: HTTP error: 0"
karma.hashstrike.com
Time Since Last Block
304 hours 31 minutes 11 seconds
No apparent use of any pool in almost two weeks?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
