|
I'm selling Ukash GBP for bitcoin or LR rate is $1.05 USD per GBP.
Post below or PM. MM/OMM or whatever it is called on this site is accepted.
Scans will be provided so you know the items are legitimate.
|
|
|
|
|
+1 for taking the time to post this.
|
|
|
|
I think this kid has illegitimate connections with them.
Nup, just callin' the bullshit when and where I see it.  Sure, you've been blindly riding their dick from thread to thread. How much are they paying you? Or are you Mr. Bitcoin/ Crypto. Maybe you're Mahin. Shut up troll. [/quote Transactions No. Transactions 2 Unspent Inputs 0 Total Received $ 0.01 Final Balance $ 0.00 Now you know why your donation wallet doesn't get shit. |
|
|
|
Sure, you've been blindly riding their dick from thread to thread. How much are they paying you? Or are you Mr. Bitcoin/ Crypto. Maybe you're Mahin.
Sorry I can't fulfill your gay fantasies, I have no experience there nor do I wish to have any. I'm sure if you cared to check, you would find that my writing style is way different from any of theirs. And dare I say it myself, probably a bit more precise and readable. Am I getting closer? Hm, we can see that the Crypto staff is very muchly able to change their writing styles. Hell, looking at those logs Crypto sounded illiterate himself but come time to rep. himself on the forum he's all nice and proper. So what's your hidden agenda? |
|
|
|
I think this kid has illegitimate connections with them.
Nup, just callin' the bullshit when and where I see it. Sure, you've been blindly riding their dick from thread to thread. How much are they paying you? Or are you Mr. Bitcoin/ Crypto. Maybe you're Mahin. |
|
|
|
Oh ive read them, even participated in the first which turned into one giant trollfest. Thus, the second which specifically stated that this was the reason for it and asked for no more trolling. I personally think that even if he liked that one, the prize is still up for grabs if he prefers another or even if he decides to not use the one he originally stated that he likes. This is all part of the fact that it is all up to his judgement. Notice he did not promise that he would give out 3 BTC. Also, not the word possible use here. Current possible choices:
TizzyTazzy - Solutions you'll RIOT for I'm sure if he decides to use it he will credit the user that created it. That user was me  Yep, saw that, but did you see any bitcoins from TizzyTazzy ? Nope. |
|
|
|
Received a $100 Visa Vanilla prepaid gift card as a birthday present, would like to exchange for BTC. Never used one of these cards, but I understand I can link it to my paypal. As much as I hate paypal+BTC, any offers?
I would do this for a moneypak, I might be able to do the visa though. EDIT: Nevermind. Let me know if you can do moneypak |
|
|
|
Oh ive read them, even participated in the first which turned into one giant trollfest. Thus, the second which specifically stated that this was the reason for it and asked for no more trolling. I personally think that even if he liked that one, the prize is still up for grabs if he prefers another or even if he decides to not use the one he originally stated that he likes. This is all part of the fact that it is all up to his judgement. Notice he did not promise that he would give out 3 BTC. Also, not the word possible use here. Current possible choices:
TizzyTazzy - Solutions you'll RIOT for I'm sure if he decides to use it he will credit the user that created it. That user was me |
|
|
|
I think this kid has illegitimate connections with them. |
|
|
|
I dont see where they are claiming they will keep the coins. If I had that much money invested I would be doing everything possible to comply with the document request. Personally I think its crazy to put that much money through one exchange  I have to agree with this. If I put 100 grand in an exchange and they requested AML/KYC docs, I would hand it all over. The only reason not to hand over those docs is if you have something to hide. At the end of the day, if you have nothing to hide, hand over the identification documents. Who cares whether it's crypto doing their own policing or the bank that is asking them for it, were talking about 100 grand. Look at the dates.. (Use this http://masterrussian.com/vocabulary/russian_months.htm ) This guy had a ton of cash in the exchange and then for 2 months got the run around about his withdrawl wires, Mtgox is f'n us, we sent the wires, you didn't get them??.. Then after 2 months of excuses he gets, we need your apostille docs and we have suspended your account.. Because the last 2k of coins he put in were tainted.. Seriously.. Something fishy is going on here on both sides. I like how Ken cusses out the mtgox exchange owner multiple times, and blames not sending wires on them (basically admiting they didn't have the money to pay), real professionalism there  +1 This echos my sentiments completely. It's akin to somebody loaning me $100,000 in twenty dollar bills, and when during the time they start asking for their money back, I somehow get another $2K from them in twenties. After giving the runaround for a couple months on how I have not yet been able to refund their money, I come up with another angle. It seems like that last $2K given me has a funny looking die on it, as if they came from a bank robbery. It now looks like I won't be repaying back a single bill, for I now have concerns as to where the rest of the funds came from. But if you supply me all the information I've asked of you, thus proving you are who you say you are, I will gladly give back to you every single twenty dollar bill I have right here on this funky coffee table. As you can see, I'm a reasonable guy, and trustworthy, whereas you, my friend, are a scumbag. (forgive me for going from 2nd person to 1st, or whatever it is, but you get the gist of what I'm trying to relay). ~Bruno~ +1, dye* |
|
|
|
|
Did this deal, he went first. +1
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps it's because you're 24 and still living with your father. Perhaps.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like CxC had a hidden agenda from the jump, especially because they've been spinning him in circles for so long. I wouldn't want to provide them anymore information either, who knows how they would use my information? Especially with the web of lies they had been playing around for months? I don't blame the OP. I don't know who is in the wrong here, but for now I think Crypto's fucked up. Let's also not forget that Crypto ignored his lawyer and e-mails and never had their legal team get back to him. I mean really, what kind of image does that leave?
|
|
|
|
From what I know about these matters it would be extremely expensive for the OP to take this to court and may yield little benefit. If my assumptions about Crypto are correct they are a company that is heading into the gutter whether by lack of funding or some other source and they simply don't have the funding to pay. Yes the OP could take this to court but in the end Crypto may end up declaring bankruptcy to no avail of the OP or may end up paying but at a large monetary loss of the OP. Either way Crypto goes down and the OP loses a significant amount of money.
The OP doesn't need to take this to court. AUSTRAC is the body in charge of regulating and enforcing AML/KYC/CTF compliance. They are absolutely the people to complain to if a service provider is suspected of using AML/KYC requirements to steal user funds and perfectly capable of determining whether the OP's ID documents are authentic. If AUSTRAC says the documents and transactions are fine, CryptoXchange has no AML/KYC grounds on which to retain the funds/BTC. If the OP would rather write off $100,000 than subject his ID documents to AUSTRAC's scrutiny, people need to ask themselves why that might be the case as all international funds transfer instructions must be reported to AUSTRAC anyway, regardless of value. +1, OP i suggest you look at this. |
|
|
|
So, an organisation that asks for notarized ID before transferring $100k is a scammer? Even if they were possibly forced to do so, by law?
Have I not read the thread properly, or is this what Liberty Payout is claiming?
No, a organization that claims to have sent the money several times over the course of 6 months is a scammer. They should have stated a notarised ID was required from the jump. I'm sorry but Crypto is still at fault. |
|
|
|
|
How much for your vagina. Or your dick flap.
|
|
|
|
Complying with government regulations? Where is there proof of that? That was an assumption of a user.
AML/KYC are regulations enforceable by various governmental agencies, amirite? This is true, but can we get a statement from Crypto proving that this is the case? Anyone can use AML/KYC as an excuse to suspend funds. I also don't understand how that stops Crypto from returning the OPs coins. |
|
|
|
From what I know about these matters it would be extremely expensive for the OP to take this to court and may yield little benefit. If my assumptions about Crypto are correct they are a company that is heading into the gutter whether by lack of funding or some other source and they simply don't have the funding to pay. Yes the OP could take this to court but in the end Crypto may end up declaring bankruptcy to no avail of the OP or may end up paying but at a large monetary loss of the OP. Either way Crypto goes down and the OP loses a significant amount of money.
Crypto is not going down. OP needs to file his paperwork. I think they are. You can't just pull off scams of this magnitude with sensitive currency such as BTC. You "think"? "Sensitive currency such as BTC"? "Scams"? Oh god I lol'd Complying with government regulations under threat of force isn't a "scam". Grow up and get a clue. Complying with government regulations? Where is there proof of that? That was an assumption of a user. |
|
|
|
|
I also highly doubt this is the first or the last time Crypto has done something like this. Only a matter of time before others come out.
|
|
|
|
From what I know about these matters it would be extremely expensive for the OP to take this to court and may yield little benefit. If my assumptions about Crypto are correct they are a company that is heading into the gutter whether by lack of funding or some other source and they simply don't have the funding to pay. Yes the OP could take this to court but in the end Crypto may end up declaring bankruptcy to no avail of the OP or may end up paying but at a large monetary loss of the OP. Either way Crypto goes down and the OP loses a significant amount of money.
Crypto is not going down. OP needs to file his paperwork. I think they are. You can't just pull off scams of this magnitude with sensitive currency such as BTC. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
