|
Gox being higher than Bitstamp is a thing of the past then :-)
|
|
|
|
Weeeee! 2673 BTC sold!
And *immediately* lapped up :-) |
|
|
|
just saying... don't be stupid and greedy, let bitcoin drop as it should... we need more PEOPLE! think long term. and you will be rewarded  . Yes, I can see all those new people right now "Oh, Bitcoin is dropping again, I really must buy in!" People want a trip to the moon, not a ride down to the gutter... |
|
|
|
还没开始？？？
开始了啊，你看一下上面贴出的微博链接 |
|
|
|
|
其实只要最后一个线索公布，所有人都可以看到是否被转走。说实话，我们做的是交易网站，如果我们连两个比特币都要欺骗大家，怎么可能生存下去。
我们在这个活动上所花的时间和心思去思考和设计这些线索远远超过2个比特币的价值，如果我们自己转走我就是自毁名誉，没有必要
|
|
|
|
|
^ LOL
So, what now? Another consolidation period with no volume? How long this time? A fortnight? 6 weeks? followed by a final rally just to have it spoilt by a dumper on a whim? I think that scenario would be too sickeningly boring to be likely.
"Wait and see" is over -- consolidation is pointless. Screw stability. Buy and laugh in the dumpers' faces.
|
|
|
|
想要得到2个免费的比特币吗？这次不拼资金，不拼机器的速度，拼的是智力  我们在下图的地址内放了2个比特币，我们会将该地址的密钥拆成5个部分。每一次我们会公布寻找到1/5密钥的线索，你需要通过我们的线索一步一步找到藏在网络中的比特币。 当您猜出了密钥时，就应该将私钥导入到你的钱包并下下面地址下里的两个比特币转到你所拥有的地址下。第一个猜出密钥并成功转出的就是此次活动的胜者了！ 我们将会陆续公布线索，准备好了吗？ 关注我们的微博，获取更多的活动和线索 http://weibo.com/rmbtb 目前公布的各个线索如下，如果您刚刚才看到，还不算太晚，赶快加入吧第三部分线索：  第二部分线索：  第一部分线索：  |
|
|
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. Actually you're wrong. I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them. The total in circulation is irrelevant to me. You misunderstand me. I mean the total number of YOU in supply is low! :p |
|
|
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. |
|
|
|
I believe "OKPay suspending Bitcoin processing" and "OKPay not sending fiat to/from exchanges" is two different things. The former doesn't matter a whit to MtGox -- if you have Bitcoin, you can deposit it directly at Gox, no need to use OKPay. I'm still trying to figure out MtGox's rather ambiguous wording on the matter, as they refer to OKPay suspending "all Bitcoin processing", but it's not clear what they mean. |
|
|
|
It's a nice idea though but would need to be applied in a different way (there's no way to distinguish between order types until they are executed anyway, which happens asynchronously).
Orders that execute against the order book take liquidity; orders that enter the order book add liquidity. That implies that you charge the fee when the order executes. yes, the fee is charged at execution time; but don't users expect to be informed of the fee rate at order time? Perhaps "the fee is 0.3% but could be cheaper" isn't so bad...? |
|
|
|
Fiat is pouring out from Gox's order book. Bears are better equipped for the next assault to $125. It's crucial for the bulls to win that battle. If they win it for the second time the battlefield will be full of bear corpses, and they won't dare to try to take that spot again. If they make it fall... Well, we will see much cheaper coins (below $120), and a mid term downtrend would be expected.  i dont belive bids or ask volume has much to do with price the volume trading has been going down since the "bubble"...(had nothing to do with dwolla etc) to me it's just silence before the storm .. and since we are trending up on the long run.. my best guess is that whoever wanted their money out of gox already did so. (like bitfinex they got all their btc and fiat out of gox ) the people who have lots of fiat cannot just simply put it on a bank without ringing some bells) and do not want to pay the withdraw fees.. on gox like that 7k wall that got bought cheap yesterday.. this guy could have made much more fiat if he wanted out by selling slow. Since there's no other place to trade this volumes.. he'll be still in the game.. i'm a bull ofcourse i'm in for the long run too. just my oppinion ^^ This. The way the initial sells register precipitously is becoming quite a "signature" by now. They certainly appear to be calculated for maximum effect, rather than any desire to sell or take profits. |
|
|
|
|
It's a nice idea though but would need to be applied in a different way (there's no way to distinguish between order types until they are executed anyway, which happens asynchronously).
I was toying with the idea of introducing new order types, such as "volatility reducing" orders that automatically lead/trail the last price by around 10% (and get re-placed every 20 minutes or so, so they would catch sudden dips/spikes).
It would take some time to implement and test, but it was on my to-do list anyway. They could carry lower fees.
Anyway, the offer is still open for arbitrageurs in the meantime :-)
|
|
|
|
|
E-mail is usually the easiest vector to compromise a user's login ID in the first place.
Many attacks go like this:
- Get access to e-mail
- request password reset (is done via e-mail usually)
- Log in
Two-factor authentication is on the verge of becoming mainstream; passwords are increasingly futile.
In 2 years, users who don't use 2FA will be in the minority -- it is really quite scary to consider how insecure passwords alone are. Not just because of keyloggers, but because most are ridiculously easy to brute-force. Let's face it: Passwords are better at locking out legitimate users these days than attackers. Most user's passwords are one or two common names or words from a dictionary, some numbers, probably between 1 - 1000 and likely consecutive or repeated numbers, and maybe one symbol. An average computer can run through all possible combinations of those in less than the time it takes to make a cup of tea.
2FA needs to be a combination of "something you know" and "something you have" -- any other way just doesn't provide much additional security.
On the site's side, they can provide some additional security for the users who don't want to use 2FA: identifying and blocking or slowing down brute force attacks, using heuristics based on IP geolocation, etc... and, of course, properly salting and hashing passwords for storage. But the onus is still on the user... as the weakest link just becomes another site they are using with the same password.
|
|
|
|
|
The giveaway is now over, as expected we had quite a lot of takers....
We're looking to build market depth. The prevailing bitcoin price in China is quite significantly lower than Mt Gox at the moment, but there is also a nice gap between the China exchanges.
If there are any potential market makers interested in exploiting the gap, please PM me -- we can cut a good deal and I can help you get money in.
|
|
|
|
|
The line you draw showing decreasing volume -- I'm not sure if it makes much sense. The first two peaks you connect are due to large sell-offs. The third, smaller peak, is the "rally" after a long consolidation. you can see that the rally is buying volume (green bars), and was slowly increasing after a period of zero-volume.
On smaller timescales, this was a bullish indicator -- price was increasing, and with each successive period, volume was increasing too.
Then volume disappeared -- likely due to the memorial day weekend.
Anyway, let's see.
|
|
|
|
When the 'weak hands' sell they often buy back at a cheaper rate with more coins.
This is most definitely true. Perhaps not for all of them but this 'weak hand' does it often.
Until they get caught in a bear trap... Then they are empty hands. This makes no sense...you either hold coins or fiat. Empty?  What am I missing here? Fiat = empty promises? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
