Coinseeker
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:05:04 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable.
|
|
|
|
BitPirate
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
RMBTB.com: The secure BTC:CNY exchange. 0% fee!
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:06:36 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you.
|
|
|
|
Coinseeker
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:10:14 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. Actually you're wrong. I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them. The total in circulation is irrelevant to me.
|
|
|
|
BitPirate
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
RMBTB.com: The secure BTC:CNY exchange. 0% fee!
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:12:32 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. Actually you're wrong. I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them. The total in circulation is irrelevant to me. You misunderstand me. I mean the total number of YOU in supply is low! :p
|
|
|
|
Rampion
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:15:43 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. Actually you're wrong. I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them. The total in circulation is irrelevant to me. Maybe you have some trouble to grasp the concept of very scarce a non-inflatable currency.
|
|
|
|
Coinseeker
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:16:07 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. Actually you're wrong. I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them. The total in circulation is irrelevant to me. You misunderstand me. I mean the total number of YOU in supply is low! :p LOL... There's more of me than there are Bitcoins, so yet another fail....but funny. I'll give you that.
|
|
|
|
Coinseeker
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:18:28 PM |
|
If the US Government does, we'll see sub 50 in the long term.
$50 it's a lot if you consider that we were at $20 at the end of January. Anyhow, long term you will see at least 4 figures unless a superior, decentralized and trust-free crypto is developed, or a fatal vulnerability is exposed - regardless of what the US Government decides to do. There are only 21 millions, did you know? This is that newbie investor thinking that just because something is rare, it's automatically going to be valuable. Case in point: you. Actually you're wrong. I base Bitcoins value on the markets and what people are willing to pay for them. The total in circulation is irrelevant to me. Maybe you have some trouble to grasp the concept of very scarce a non-inflatable currency. Unfortunately, Bitcoin is not a currency. It's a commodity. If it can actually survive a while longer and achieve mass adoption, it could be considered a currency but just being able to buy a bag of weed, doesn't make something a currency. Bitcoin is far more like gold as a store of value, but not nearly as safe.
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:25:03 PM |
|
Is btccharts broken for anyone else?
|
|
|
|
Dargumin
Member
Offline
Activity: 107
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:32:03 PM |
|
Unfortunately, Bitcoin is not a currency. It's a commodity. If it can actually survive a while longer and achieve mass adoption, it could be considered a currency but just being able to buy a bag of weed, doesn't make something a currency. Bitcoin is far more like gold as a store of value, but not nearly as safe.
Agreed. Bitcoin needs to be the crypto-commodity the crypto-currency running alongside it would have its transactions confirmed much faster with built in deflation too. Like a faster version of Freicoin for example.
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 2243
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
May 28, 2013, 11:49:54 PM |
|
governments have already come out and said bitcoin was ok
Something else the US government said:
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1800
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 29, 2013, 12:05:14 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
MAbtc
|
|
May 29, 2013, 12:05:40 AM |
|
Maybe you have some trouble to grasp the concept of very scarce a non-inflatable currency.
Yeah, and perhaps onecoin truly is the most expensive coin ever. Scarcity principle doesn't apply without the proper demand.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1800
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 29, 2013, 01:02:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
kentrolla
|
|
May 29, 2013, 01:14:05 AM |
|
up from here
|
|
|
|
Abandon
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 29, 2013, 01:21:19 AM |
|
A little bit of random speculation? everytime we touched this resistance we moved up This is interesting! Thanks for showing us this indicator.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1800
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
May 29, 2013, 02:02:28 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
May 29, 2013, 02:03:23 AM |
|
A little bit of random speculation? everytime we touched this resistance we moved up This is interesting! Thanks for showing us this indicator. Bullshit. Here is the graph: http://bitcoincharts.com/charts/mtgoxUSD#rg90zig12-hourztgSzm1g10zm2g25zxzi1gOBVzvzcvStart playing. For me the OBV does not look bullish at all but maybe it would help to know more about it than just gut feeling about a rising chart.
|
|
|
|
Abandon
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 29, 2013, 02:46:59 AM |
|
It did break through the support once, but it is mostly reliable, so I think it does have some meaning.
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 29, 2013, 03:00:12 AM |
|
It did break through the support once, but it is mostly reliable, so I think it does have some meaning. The only meaning it has is that a medium term bull trend has been broken if it breaks.
|
|
|
|
|