Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: Getting http://127.0.0.1:8332/ took longer than 5 seconds. Impossible - because they on the same server + I don't see any errors in log anyway. Does bitcoin or p2pool use IPV6? I see this strange pattern in monitoring  |
|
|
|
Another question... can somebody comment why it is such big variance in mining speed?  Is it because of intensity in miner is not on maximum? Can somebody explain why it is better to set intensity 20% below maximum? ( like -I 8 is better than -I 10 in cgminer) |
|
|
|
|
p2pool - latest from git ( edit : 5250df6)
cgminer 2.2.3
-I 8 -g 1
PS. How can I separate workers on the graph? where to config it. Each of mine miners runs under different username
|
|
|
|
Guys, why "local dead on arrival" spikes so much ( 20% rate)? I have a feeling that it has something to do with blocks being found. After I restart p2pool everything goes back to normal 1-2% rate, sometimes even without restart |
|
|
|
Let it rain!  2 blocks in one hour... Guys, we need to work on the variance  |
|
|
|
I just finished my rig set up. Can somebody look at this output and confirm I'm doing this right... 2012-02-10 04:29:16.181656 New work for worker! Difficulty: 2.994499 Share difficulty: 462.391754 Total block value: 50.034500 BTC including 110 transactions
2012-02-10 04:29:17.304420 P2Pool: 17493 shares in chain (10253 verified/18398 total) Peers: 10 (0 incoming)
2012-02-10 04:29:17.304594 Local: 1854MH/s in last 10.0 minutes Local dead on arrival: ~1.7% (0-6%) Expected time to share: 17.7 minutes
2012-02-10 04:29:17.304716 Shares: 9 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Stale rate: ~0.0% (0-26%) Efficiency: ~111.4% (82-112%) Current payout: 0.0520 BTC
2012-02-10 04:29:17.304826 Pool: 210GH/s Stale rate: 10.2% Expected time to block: 7.8 hours
|
|
|
|
|
Have you ever tried funding primary development team? Just curious
|
|
|
|
Share analysis, please.
Problem is, there’s lots of resistance at 5.85, 6.2, 7.2.
Multi signature Bitcoin client is just around the corner. + Last month building triangle which is definitely corrective structure ( may not be finished thou) and trend will follow All this "levels" will be cancelled when price is on the move... It's not stop loss/take profit orders... |
|
|
|
|
You must be blind not to see that something is going on with BTC today... MTGOX has new record volume since Nov 15
Let's talk about facts now:
1. Somebody sold 120K of BTC
2. Somebody bought 120K of BTC
3. Price did not move a shit.
4. We have both fundamental and technical analysis pointing for upside move.
5. The person who bought 120K @ 5.6 will unlikely to sell it lower that price.
Now let's guess what it can be.
1. Early adopter(s) cashing out. Outcome - price did not stumble - means demand is great and people who were selling now have less 120K BTC in their pockets to move prices down
2. MTGOX scam in progress ( It's very unlikely) - they are selling non existent BTC. Outcome - when people start to withdraw BTC shit will hit the fan very fast. Lack of BTCs on the market will be uncovered and we will have price breaking ceiling
3. MTGOX scam in progress ( It's very unlikely) - they are buying BTC with non existent USD. Outcome - when people start to withdraw USD shit will hit the fan but slower. MTGOX will promise to pay everything in next 2 or 3 months but still... Lack of BTCs on the market will be uncovered and we will have price breaking ceiling
4. Somebody crazy shorting BTC with leverage full scale on Bitcoinica. Outcome - price will need to go up a little bit and he will receive margin call.. Price will get rid of resistance and will go up with speed.
5. Somebody crazy buying BTC with leverage full scale on Bitcoinica. Outcome - price will need to go down a little bit and he will receive margin call.. But we will remember him as a guy that donated fortune to stop BTC price drop and held current price levels with his own money
I can't imagine what news must be there to trigger massive sell off of the rest 6M BTC...
What do you think about it?
|
|
|
|
i still get problems connecting to your pool
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Can you comment why P2Pool disappeared from pool chart?
|
|
|
|
|
Valid concern... as far as I can see.. But user does not have to spend 10 times same amount.
For example, I have 100 BTC on some address. I make 1 BTC transaction. The minute later I make another transaction for 100 BTC.
|
|
|
|
I would probably put a huge bid wall up at $5/BTC and as people buy, sell at $5.50 for at least a year to give some price stability in the early stage.
you can't... because I will buy out your reserves of BTC very fast with my $10M.. so for price to hold there you will need more BTC... guess where you go than? Yes, you will go to me... and I will sell it for 10 USD and we will continue... |
|
|
|
Are you saying then that you've met Satoshi Nakamoto?
ROFL!!!!! This is what I read during my 2nd minute I woke up... You just made my day! |
|
|
|
|
"Imagine another bitcoin boom by this summer"
my wet dream
|
|
|
|
|
We have proverb in x-USSR after WWII (doubt a lot of people follow it now) "We,Russians, don't abandon our people"
If Luke wants Bitcoin to succeed, if he is putting effort into it he is "our" guy... You can not simply "boot off" him from Bitcoin bus.
We have a SAME goal but different views on it... if we will boot off people like this - nobody will be there to reach it...
We must find a way how to solve this rumble, but don't say "he must step back"...
Fuck - let this Bitcoin to be what it is and write new, better Bitcoin, I don't know... This will be an achievement and not a life hack!
|
|
|
|
Luke, you need to step back, take a breather
It's not called to step back... it's called step forward... because our goal is more important than us. The only thing I can "find on" Luke - other developers do not support his idea... |
|
|
|
Luke possesses a bunch of wonderful skills, but extremely poor judgment.
You must put fat IMHO after your words.. You guys starting to behave like a bitches that decide which of the guys will spend more money on them.... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
