Show Posts
All casinos are EV- in the long run and thus all strategies. In the short run, many strategies can be profitable.
Fuck haikus for nowI'll educate you on maths
Strategies don't work
If you are advocating that strategies can be profitable then you must show non-anecdotal proof (as it is obviously invalid and can use specific sample sizes) that the expected value of each bet is positive.
However, in gambling, short-term/long-term expected value of a given strategy is the same. There is no statistical difference between them. Any claim that there IS a difference is either wrong or relies on the gambler's fallacy for a game with fixed terms. You even stated yourself in the feedback against RGBKey: "Naturally - [the script] is a mathematical fallacy, because the odds of the ten games are calculated in an isolated fashion and are not involved with each other."
How can you continue to disregard immutable proof?
Suppose we take bustabit's case: 1% house edge.
1% house edge?! So even if you cash out instantly at 1.00x, there's a 1% chance of loss? That's an overall negative trend.
For any given strategy, there's a 51:49 loss-to-win ratio. Doesn't matter what you do. That's an overall loss.
