|
1. Leicester City FC vs. Manchester United FC - 2
2. Fulham FC vs. Southampton FC - 2
3. Aston Villa FC vs. Crystal Palace FC - X
4. Arsenal FC vs. Chelsea FC - 2
5. Sheffield United FC vs. Everton FC - 2
6. Manchester City FC vs. Newcastle United FC - 1
7. Leeds United vs. Burnley FC - 1
8. West Ham United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC - X
9. Liverpool FC vs. West Bromwich Albion - 1
10. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC - 2
Betnomi username: hosseinimr93
|
|
|
|
It's definitely plagiarism. Below is definition of "plagiarizing" in Merriam-Webster Dictionary. : to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source
bitcoinermatt used the idea and a production made by someone else as his own. |
|
|
|
Nice catch! I doubt if it's a mistake. I think Freebitco.in intentionally left that range to significantly increase the house edge.
If the price closes in that range, all bets will be refunded. Click here to read the post already made by TheQuin. |
|
|
|
For signing a message in Bitcoin core, you need a legacy address. And for generating a legacy address in bitcoin core, go to console and use the command below. For generating a legacy address that have a label, you can use the command below. getnewaddress ("Enter the label here" "legacy")
|
|
|
|
As stated by ranochigo, if two addresses are used as inputs of a same a transaction, there is a very high probability that they have a same owner. You can use Walletexplorer to find addresses that have been co-spent with each other. If addresses A and B are spent in same a transaction, walletexplorer put both of them in a same wallet. If any other address is co-spent with either address A or address B in future, it will go to a same wallet. Just search a bitcoin address in walletexplorer. You will get all other addresses belonging to a same wallet (addresses that have been co-spent with each other). |
|
|
|
|
As a huge number of posts including numerous links are being posted every day in the forum, you are right. There's a high probability that the forum is being used for backlinks and SEO.
But since the post you referred to has been made about 9 months ago, we cannot say that service is definitely behind the current spam going on.
|
|
|
|
Like when we use quotation marks on google and other search engines to wrap multiple words in one phrase to find the exact results.
That's planned and will be possible in future. Click here to read the post already made by TryNinja. |
|
|
|
I can do this at Coingecko's rate (19 satoshi, when I am making this post). I will deduct the transaction fee. If you are not in hurry, I can set the fee at 1 sat/vbyte (It will cost you about 150 satoshi) I think you are trusted enough and I can go first. PM me your BTC address, if the offer is accepted. Update: I sent BTC to Zwei and received DOGE very fast. |
|
|
|
According to modlog, that post had been made by jorenabanu19.  Your scrapper failed to scrap the user ID of the poster, probably because it was deleted so fast. |
|
|
|
Ok, so the wallet adress and its private keys will stay the same, I can rely on the privatekey written down? I could even import it from a new computer if the old one got crashed and the wallet-files got destroyed?
If you have imported your wallet using a single private key, your wallet includes a single address now. If you send any amount less than your total balance, your transaction will have two outputs. The first output will be the address which you are trying to send the fund to and the second output will be your own address. In other words, the change address will be same as the sending address. So, the remaining balance will be in the address which you are sending the fund from and its private key is the only thing you will need to access your fund. Do you know where this roomers comes from? I mean that it is dangerous to just send a bit of the total amount when you import?
You may lose your fund if you don't specify a change address. As you are using electrum, there is nothing to worry about. Electrum will consider the sending address (or one of imported addresses, if there are more than one imported address) as the change address. The thing you should pay attention to now is that, by sending a partial amount and sending the remaining balance to the sending address, you may damage your privacy. |
|
|
|
I’ve heard that you should never transfer any amount lesser than the whole amount when you have imported a wallet, otherwise you might end with having the rest of the money ”disappearing”, is that correct?
You can send any amount you want. If you have imported a seed phrase, now you have a HD wallet and electrum will send the remaining balance to your change address. If you have imported a single private key, electrum will send the remaining balance to the sending address (the address you imported using your private key) In both cases, the remaining balance will be in your wallet and you will have full control over that. |
|
|
|
What's the minimum fees in BetBTC even if you pick the cheapest one?
The minimum fee you can pay for your withdrawal is 250 satoshi. (Look at the image below.)  The transaction they make for your withdrawal always includes one legacy input and two outputs. Therefore, the transaction size would be 225 byte (=225 vbyte). If you pay the minimum fee (250 satoshi), it leads to 1.11 sat/vbyte. |
|
|
|
But it doesn't explain why the transaction id field is empty?
I created an unsigned transaction with a watch-only address and I got the txid?
Whether the wallet has the private key or it's watch-only, you won't get the transaction hash if you don't finalize the transaction. Most probably, the OP hasn't finalized the transaction. |
|
|
|
i think it will be good if you can make a minimum fee for withdrawing? because if many people use custom withdraw with that amount it will take more than 1 day to get confirmed
If you want your withdrawal to confirm fast, maybe you choose the priority when withdrawing, that would certainly make the transaction faster, however, you have to accept that you'll pay a higher fee. entebah is right. The problem is that even if you pay a high fee while there is an unconfirmed parent (a withdrawal made by another user), your transaction wouldn't be as fast as it should be. Assume that user A makes a withdrawal and pays 1 sat/vbyte as transaction fee. betBTC send the requested amount to user A and send the remaining balance of their wallet to their change address. After that, user B makes a withdrawal and pays 100 sat/vbyte as transaction fee. The user B has payed much higher fee to have a fast transaction while there's an unconfirmed parent which is out of his control. As long as the transaction made by user A is unconfirmed, the transaction made by user B cannot be confirmed. User B is actually implementing CPFP (Child Pays for Parents) method for user A and when it comes to transactions priority, both transactions made by user A and user B are like a transaction in which 50.5 sat/vbyte has been paid as transaction fee while user A has paid 1 sat/byte (about 250 satoshi) and user B has paid 100 sat/vbyte (about 25000 satoshi). This can be much worse, if there are more unconfirmed parents. |
|
|
|
How exactly did you "cancel" this wrong address payment?
I think the OP canceled the first transaction (replaced the first transaction with a new one to himself) and then make a new transaction to a new address. He repeated this one more time. And this is probably why there are 4 unconfirmed transactions in the image posted by him. i did that twice dont know why just to be sure and then i proceed to pay the correct address but now it stuck on unconfirmed and unconformed parent ( see screenshot) how can i fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
1. Everton FC vs. Arsenal FC - 2
2. Newcastle United FC vs. Fulham FC - 1
3. Tottenham Hotspur FC vs. Leicester City FC - X
4. West Bromwich Albion vs. Aston Villa FC - 2
5. CA Osasuna vs. Villarreal CF - 2
6. Levante UD vs. Real Sociedad - 2
7. Granada CF vs. Real Betis Balompie - X
8. FSV Mainz 05 vs. Werder Bremen - 2
9. Bayer 04 Leverkusen vs. FC Bayern Munich - 2
10. VfL Wolfsburg vs. VfB Stuttgart - 1
11. Torino FC vs. Bologna FC 1909 - X
12. Atalanta BC vs. AS Roma - X
13. SS Lazio vs. SSC Napoli - 2
14. RC Strasbourg vs. FC Girondins Bordeaux - 1
15. FC Lorient vs. Stade Rennais FC - 2
Betnomi username: hosseinimr93
Bonus game:
16. FC Schalke 04 vs. DSC Arminia Bielefeld - 1
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
