Sounds like a dishonest project or one that hired a ICO pumping service.

I'll take a better look, but since you didn't quote the posts within OP or archive anything it will take some time.

---

Account 1 (Indonesian, Italian && others):

Account 2 (German, Spanish, Indonesian):

Account 3 (Romanian, Spanish, Arabic):

Account 4 (Spanish only(?), seems to have gotten hacked between 2016 and 2017):

Account 5 (Romanian, Indonesian, Greek):

Account 6 (Spanish; seems to have gotten hacked between 2016 and 2017):

Account 7 (Indonesian, Portuguese, Arabic)

Account 8 (Spanish, Russian):

Account 9 (Russian, Portuguese, Arabic)

---

Some accounts have posted in even more languages than what I've listed. I believe that 2-3 is sufficient proof, especially given the difficulty of some languages (e.g. Arabic is very difficult to learn). Also, the pattern is very obvious. Writing the negative.

---

The user red123 had 4 positive trust ratings, which is why it was used to post the ANN.
Also tagged the user (brooklynite) who posted their ANN. "Last Active:   January 19, 2018, 01:42:30 PM".

You called?

That does not sound good at all.

Do you have proof of this particular accusation?

---

I'll send the manager a PM. Failure to address this would be horrible.

---

Spreadsheet: https://archive.fo/q6QPQ#selection-8321.0-8321.16.
Address used: 0xAcBfF971aaEc80cAc1D9fe4f9a5E735841cADF68.
Articles: https://archive.fo/4iMod, https://archive.fo/8tqqZ, https://archive.fo/1UJit, https://archive.fo/biGoI, https://archive.fo/ZdW8n.

Please do not call yourself trustworthy when you have next to no trading history whatsoever (i.e. not until you've earned it). I've complained about this in a thread from another manager; this is very dishonest behavior.

---

Other than that, I don't see any other issues with the thread.

a) They are not only writing in English. Example.
b) Their writing is horrible.
c) Whether they belong to the same person or not doesn't matter (already covered by my trust rating).

If you were buying tokens, you wouldn't be sending everyone the same amount of USD at *the same time*.

Irrelevant.

---

I've given this case a lot of thought, and there is absolutely no way that you are telling the truth. If you were buying tokens, then you would be sending different amounts (at least in the decimal places; USD) of ETH. Since you are (allegedly) paying them for this spam, you are responsible for it. Therefore, no "injustice" has been done. Unless someone else wants to get involved in the case (doubtful given that all the accounts are shitposters), I consider it closed.

---

OP, what are you doing? I see that you're deleting posts. Connections 5 and 6 are now missing.

Satire =/= trolling. It looks like you still don't get it.

---

Uhm.. I wonder whether "a friend of a friend reliable unidentified source" told you that they have a video of me doing voodoo.

Huh? I think you are confusing reality with fiction.

No. Plagiarism is permanently-bannable, thus a Meta issue.

Yes, and no. It isn't a case of blatant (explicit) begging for merit, but it is anyways. The whole system was designed so that you don't need to do that (each post has a button right next to it). Now, there were a few discussions about whether people should be tagged for this or not. The general consensus, from what I remember, is that we *should let it slide* unless/(until) the user develops a chronic habit of doing this (either via posts or via PM).

---

With two posts (+ being a one line shitposter), this user is just pushing it. Obviously, he/she would only get merit in very rare instances (or not at all), which is why they are doing this.
Note: Just noticed that I had *some interactions* with this user in 2016 (visible in their post history). I wonder whether the account got compromised.

So you are telling me that you blame the two users (aTriz and slowdeath) for unknowingly meriting (a plagiarized post) what they thought was a constructive post?

Then you shouldn't run a witch hunt. In no way are slowdeath and aTriz at fault for someone else's plagiarism.

This user seems very random. I did not know aTriz had enemies.

---

This is a Meta issue, not a Reputation one.

Here we go again. How about you make up something unique for a change. I've heard this the last time some people in that section got busted. Just go away and stop abusing the forum. Statement from several days ago:

Slmn seems to be paying those accounts in equal amounts. It is very possible that you've stumbled onto someone paying others to shitpost for tokens or whatever. All of the alleged alt accounts are spamming one-liners. He/she will probably come up with a "friends and family" or "office full of workers" story.

---

Progress is being updated here.

Yes, they likely know about that.

The background noise is to be ignored. Back to the actual thread:

Anyone want to chime in before this be done?

---

Mich:



50 to pitipawn, 45 to saulzaents (50 from pitipawn; 45 from mich; 40 from mstfprcn), 30 to mstfprcn(10 from pitipawn; 10 from saulzaents).

Somewhat, yes. This is one of the examples where I believe an alt account is justified (in most other cases, it isn't).


I expected it to be written after you getting tagged, which is what busted people usually do (and/or just simply attack the user that tagged them with whatever they can think of[1]). However, that is not the case here and I did notice the date before I even read it. That means that you aren't the classic type which became pretty predictable; good.
There are some things that I don't agree with on your article. However, I believe that this is not the place to continue this or address it. You might want to open your own thread in this section (about the article or the abuse) and continue there.

---

[1] The OP and this whole thread is an example of this.

No surprise.

If you think that I was asking whether you had a piece of paper (also known as a degree), you completely missed the point.

You are a liar. I have mathematically proven this (QED) in this post.
 
Nice insinuation. You mean this guy?

I disagree with the way that you worded it. Per his statements, he clarified why it would be beneficial for everyone if she lost the bet (and not because he wants to see some video). But, yes:

---

This is related to the problem with the 'demerit' suggestions. Users, out of whatever idiotic reason, try to sabotage others (e.g. one not receiving a lot of merit is envious of someone else who does). This is what happens when you introduce complex systems instead of implementing a few simple solutions to root out the spam issue.

Very high quality post indeed. You can pick out individual posts and go after someone (see the reason stated above) should you want to (not that someone should take that seriously).

You mean farming accounts and joining campaigns? Yes, I could believe that you have that job.

Liar. It looks like you were only actually looking out for yourself.

To clarify: This is me just sharing an example of what happened to others *by someone's hand* not long ago. "Thou shalt not speak of my abuse!" - seems to be their motto.

Sure, but your concerns are misplaced and the motivation behind them isn't pristine. Even if we assume that what was done to you was abuse, you are complaining about it because it happened to you. There is abuse on a much larger scale, by higher placed members going on right now[1]. That's where the complaint should be. If the tree is rotten at the root, then you shouldn't be blaming the branches. Because of this rot, we are here today. There is an absurdly high number of cases and the number of honest DT2 members is very limited. The number of active (honest) ones is even lower.
Once fixed at the core, the tree should start rejuvenating itself.

---

[1] Backroom collusion by DT1 members.

Wrong post; multiple tabs open.

a) I was referring to posts made by nullius.
b) If you understood the meaning of "Ciphersex 101 [NSFW]" and the Off-topic section, then you wouldn't be asking this question. Then again, it seems that the thread is above your capabilities.

Sigh. There is no abuse there. The posts by nullius are better than 95% of the forum's users, also known as monkeys (idiots), could write up when combining their efforts. Both alia and nullius are users who are receiving a very high number of merit points (compared to the average).

I didn't expect you to be an educated human being, thus I am not surprised by this message. "Note: PM privacy is not guaranteed. Encrypt sensitive messages.". Your message doesn't even contain anything sensitive other than whiny bullshit about someone's children. Get a real job.
In addition to that, you make a sneaky accusation of evidence tampering against the OP and want to keep it private? What's up with all the nitwits and colluding in the backrooms?

Is this all the gang of busted people got? Yawn.