Bitstamp doesn't offer bank wires? Bitstamp doesn't offer assurance that they won't have their bank accounts frozen and confiscated by the US government because they haven't paid sufficient protection money in the form of licensing and permits. That's what is holding back Bitcoin exchanges at the moment.
|
|
|
The 1929 depression was due to deflation. The 1929 Depression was caused by Herbert Hoover bailing out his banking cronies, and was perpetuated by the New Deal. Incidentally, Herbert Hoover tried to do the same thing a decade earlier but was overruled. That's why you've never heard of the Great Depression of 1920-1921.
|
|
|
Do they have reason to develop further? There is so little volume, why waste money expanding or improving the platform until the demand is there? I don't think this bodes well for other US-based exchanges on the horizon. There is simply no demand for them. I won't be surprised if many months after launching they still struggle to maintain even a small fraction of whatever volume is on gox. Volume on CampBX is low because the only methods they make available for adding and removing dollars from an account are ones suitable only for hobby traders (no bank wires). There is a very strong demand for Bitcoin in the US, but the legal barriers to entry here are substantial. In the meantime, anyone willing to help fill the retail demand for Bitcoins via in-person LocalBitcoins sales can stay quite busy.
|
|
|
How did you get such a lousy trust rating? Is this due to a single complaint, or multiple complaints, and are they detailed somewhere on this forum?
In any section of the forum where trust ratings are shown, you can click on "Trust" in their profile and the link will take you to a page that gives all the details.
|
|
|
Ideally you want VPN provider to accept Bitcoin and not require email address. Sign up through TOR Browser (very hard to pin those logs to you later) Use http://yourtempmail.com/ Temp Mail over TOR if you must provide an email Signing up through Tor isn't enough - you need to connect to the VPN via Tor as well. One should never assume the VPN operators are honest, because despite their best intentions they can be coerced and also forbidden from telling your about it. From a privacy perspective the reason to use a VPN is to use sites that block connections from known Tor exit nodes.
|
|
|
CampBX is US based. It is not legitimate?
I've heard their engine can be slow, but is usually adequate for their volume. Also, didn't they recently upgrade? As an exchange, CampBX is a successful proof of concept but they haven't continued developing it beyond that point.
|
|
|
I assume someone has already mentioned bitmessage.org (even though it's not email) it could replace email someday as a secure alternative.
Unless it becomes possible to send and receive messages to non-bitmessage users I highly doubt it will gain much acceptance. There's too much network effect to overcome.
|
|
|
Care to tell us which one?
No, but I'll give you a SHA256 hash you can quote for future reference: b8b476ff6b82b9ed7f3d91a69df6cadc00ce800da0804c77dcba0f5564fc9ccd
|
|
|
I have a feeling MtGox will soon burn to the ground...
this thread will be irrelevant,
I vote that chartbuddy move the Stamps thread now.
I think that six month from now the top bitcoin-dollar exchange is going to be one that is not currently listed on bitcoinity.
|
|
|
Yeah, because I'm sure that everyone I communicate with knows what encryption is, and how to send/receive encrypted e-mails.
This video might help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bakOKJFtB-kAside from Bitmessage, anyone know of any other alternatives? There's a mail server in the I2P network that it linked to the outside internet via a relay.
|
|
|
That would be wonderful. I don't care if the information being sent is sensitive or not - I want as much of the email I receive to be encrypted.
|
|
|
That's what I figured, just couldn't rationalize why everyone jumped on this as a good thing instead of the exact opposite.
Because corruption is highly profitable.
|
|
|
I don't see why this is good as all it is doing is creating transactions that can't be traced through the blockchain. Doesn't this allow for massive corruption?
Yes it does. Giving third parties control over your private keys is always a bad idea.
|
|
|
I agree, it will be interesting to see where this goes. I think the information that TORMail was included in the compromise will be giving a few people some anxious moments
Anybody who was using Tormail should have been encrypting their messages anyway.
|
|
|
This actually represents one of the most informative PR releases that's ever come out of Mt Gox.
Now all they need to learn is how to give out specific explanations for their problems when those problems first start to appear, not after months of letting everybody speculate because of a lack of information.
|
|
|
Yeah they are part of the problem. Now that war's been privatised, we've got an entire global military industry dedicated to perpetual war/profits. Government is the name the most successful mafia in a particular region calls itself. Regardless of whether or not that mafia is engaging in conflict with other mafias, they are always at war with the people unfortunate enough to live in their area of influence.
|
|
|
This is the third "Bitcoin is doomed" story I've seen today.
I think some people just want to buy in cheaper.
|
|
|
One major bearish sign is that there have been no recent bitcoin music videos made as far as I'm aware.
Zhou Tonged, Zhou Tonged, why have you forsaken us?
|
|
|
But are you asserting that under the VPN/Tor Evil Twins, the question of locus outside or inside the US does not exist?
And also, I think my prior question remains as valid, for those modes of use that can't allow the sllllooooooowwwww down that seems to plague Tor. It depends on what you're trying to access and your threat model. A VPN alone will protect you from ISP-level surveillance, but the VPN provider can compromise your privacy. That might be an acceptable risk if the provider is located in a different country. Tor is potentially more secure if used correctly, but many web sites block Tor exit nodes. I'd like to see some VPN providers allow access to their system via I2P, as that network is better optimized for hidden services so should get better performance than a Tor connection.
|
|
|
Otherwise you get into silly situations like if you sell bitcoin to re-buy more, you are helping Bitcoin, etc...
I've helped more than 100 people buy Bitcoins for the first time by reselling Bitcoins. Most of them probably would have bought eventually, but more than one has told me they only bought because there was somebody in their area with a good reputation that was willing to meet them and explain the process. Maybe that's not what you meant, but it certainly is one way to help adoption of the currency grow.
|
|
|
|