I've heard the same basic story from a lot of people since I've been studying the issue.  Even in my own case where, by happenstance, I missed out on vaccinations for my first year and my sister did not, she was more vexed with infection type problems (ear aches in particular) and I was spared.  Nosebleeds were my thing.

As importantly I think, I did get the typical mild childhood illnesses (mumps, chicken-pox, etc) but they were no big deal to me (and I got life-long immunity from having them.)  I get seasonal bugs like everyone else (though less often than most), but almost never bad enough to even take medicine and only once or twice in 20 years have I layed around in bed all day.

A sterilization method was developed which makes women 'immune' to their own hormones necessary to maintain pregnancy.  With enough applications, women can be made permanently sterile and it is not clear what happened making it applicable for covert operations.  Tetanus vaccine was used the carrier.  Not to long after development of this technology 'they' (the WHO iirc) were stone-cold busted using it in several countries including the Philippines.  They hit a Filipino doctor who had the technical background to deduce what had happened.  More recently it seems likely (to me) that the program was dusted off and attempted in Kenya.

Seems that the vaccine industry has an Achilles heal in that if they hit a person who has some actual power or clout, it can cause a lot of problems.  In the U.S., rep Dan Burton had a grand-kid who was (possibly) impacted by vaccines.  This precipitated removal of mercury from most of the vaccines at least.  Higher precision individual medical records can 'solve' this problem by making sure that it is only the powerless prole classes who cannot do shit are the ones who get hit.

Kissinger was pretty clear about depopulation of the third-world being a high priority national security prerogative of the first-world.  I doubt that there are many 'enlightened thinkers' in the governments of most of these developing countries who would deploy eugenics programs to 'save the world'.  Nor do they probably share Kissinger's ideas that it is necessary to supply Western industry with raw materials originating in their countries.  Simple individual corruption is sufficient to make the gears turn though, and Western intelligence agencies and 'philanthropists' who have eugenics as their tax exempt hobby (e.g., Bill Gates) can and do leverage that greatly.  So it seems to me.

I suggest chewing tobacco (if one is a nicotine addict or wishes to be.)  I quit smoking 20 years ago when I went to work in the Bay Area.  Chewing tobaccos was probably more common than smoking in my native area (formerly dominated by logging, fishing, etc) and now I'm pretty sure of it.  Anyway, even though I had a chew in over about 90% of the day, most people were surprised to find that I was chewing.  More than that, since I quite smoking I never had a bug go downward from my tonsils into my lungs.  Before about half of them went upward into my sinuses and the other half went downward.

I smoked again for a month while I was working in China simply because chewing tobacco was not available there.  In fact, the store owner kind of freaked out when I asked him about it (through the language barrier.)  One would have thought I was looking for kiddie porn or something!  Perhaps he thought I was looking for opium.  Or perhaps chewing tobacco is just considered a terribly disgusting habit (and I won't deny it.)

I did try 'beetle' when I was in India.  I have a cast-iron stomach, but that just about did me in.  Not only that but the thing the guy made me was about the size of a golf ball.

On nicotine, it would not surprise me at all if there are some actual legitimate health arguments for it.  Specifically in terms of cognitive performance.  At this point, if the 'authorities' say something is bad I sort of take it as a sign that it is not.  And vice-versa (e.g., fluoridated water, aspartame, stevia,  GMO grain, etc.)

Great.  Now the Hubbell bloodline is in the mix

I would suggest mongoldb instead.

I'm guessing that this will be the sales pitch behind having all humans be fitted with a neural lace.  End violence, and dangerous behavior generally.  Basically, a AI computer will be monitoring everyone in real-time and can stop them from doing anything 'bad.'  Of course certain trustworthy people (e.g., the wealthy, higher level technocrats, etc) will not need one.

I'm sure your average soccer-mom would be all for it.  Her kids will have a safe environment to grow up in with no bullying and that sort of thing.  Many pros, and the cons (e.g., that the controllers would ever mis-use their power) are mostly crazy conspiracy theories.

Let's see.  Say 10% of the population owns a gun.  Rounding down, say, 30,000,000 people.  A 'check' is going to require several people and at least one with some law enforcement experience for safety reasons.  Let's say they average 1 check per hour (which seems highly optimistic to me in noting how government employees and their contractors tend to work.)  That's 8 checks per day.  The back of my envelope reads a cost of about $6,000,000,000.  Six Billion dollars per year.

This doesn't include the 'psycho tests'.  It also doesn't include medical care for people who get their asses shot off by either showing up at someones door demanding to inventory their guns, or the people who get their asses shot off by the swat team because they shot the bureaucrats ass off in the first place.

This is an element of the gun debate here in the U.S. that is overlooked in my opinion.  Overlooked by both sides.

People spend vast sums of money and take significant risks to enjoy a feeling of safety and security.  Airbags in cars, taxes for police and fire, alarm systems in homes, pharmaceutical products, etc.  Feeling this way is a fundamental quality-of-life issue.

Having access to a firearm for personal protection certainly gives a lot of people a noticeably enhanced sense of safety and security, and it is more-so in instances where friends and neighbors have had problems with crime or where one has had to take out a restraining order on someone and so forth.

It is important to note that whether, statistically, guns are more of hindrance to safety than a help, they do add substantively to many people's quality of life.  Especially those who are physically disadvantaged and thus more often targeted by scummy criminals.  This should be an important element of the discussions here.

A friend of mine has high blood pressure (so they say) so he takes a certain prescription medication.  The medication makes him dizzy.

I'll bet $100 that if the next guy goes to the doctor about being dizzy and there was a prescription medication that solved that but caused high blood pressure, the doctor would prescribe it and the guy would take it without any questions.

As far as I'm concerned any thinking person should consider the hypothesis that an/any event is an artifact of plans by the likes of Henry Kissinger.  And perhaps that the man himself has had a hand in them.  Kissinger absolutely exists and it's deliberate blindness to ignore that there are others like him.  To this day Kissinger can show up on the doorstep of the whitehouse unscheduled and chat with President Trump whenever he feels like doing so.  Like, say, when James Comey gets fired from FBI and Kissinger (or his sponsors) have something to input about it.

I also see no indication that the likes of Henry Kissinger care any more about the American trailer-trash than they do about third-world mud hut dwellers.  Nor about the gentrified NPR listners here in the land of the free.  Imagining that they do will be their downfall I suspect.

I'd much rather take my chances with a 'smallpox epidemic' than to live in a society where one in 50 people are autistic and 3/5 of people are so fucked up that they need pharmaceutical products.  I would feel that we even if the costs to deal with these damaged people did not come out of my pocket (as a healthy person with no such needs.)  Autism has gone from 1/10,000 when I was a kid to 1/50.  At the current trajectory, which seem to show no signs of slowing down and no sign of an 'understanding', it will be 1/2 (for males) in the not-to-distant future.  Give me a good 'smallpox epidemic' any day over that.  As shown on the charts, the death rate for smallpox was never terribly high, and not even in the same league as autism which is a life-long and highly debilitating condition for many/most sufferers.

As for anthrax, it's not on the schedule in the U.S. (or probably anywhere else except the military where I got mine) and we have zero 'epidemics'.

It looks a lot like you've bought a batch of snake-oil, and took it hook, line, and sinker.  Hopefully you will understand one-day how those of us who have not resent pressure from those who have on our well-being and the well-being of those we care about be they our immediate families, or humanity at large.

Interesting.

One of the scientists brought over from Germany for 'operation paperclip' was the Nazi regime's bio-warfare expert.  He'd set up an island as an 'animal research center'.  When he got here, he set up an island as an 'animal research center'.  It so happens to be right across from Lyme, Connecticut (though there are plans underway to move it to the center of the country so I hear.)  Dr. Erik Traub was a leading developer of the method of using ticks to distribute diseases when he was working in Germany.

Many microbes were studied for their applicability to lethal and non-lethal biological warfare at our own 'Plum Island.'  One of the main ones seem to be Borrelia Burgdofori and related species.  It is actually very close to syphilis in it's life-ways.  So much so that syphilis can be used as a model, and centuries of research have been done on the organism and it's effects on humans.  This species is the marker for Lyme disease (which should technically be referred to as borreliosis.)

Having a well understood model is key to success in research and development.

Another disease that was highly studied and thus understood, is African river blindness.  It is associated with a worm.  A nematode if I recall correctly.  The worm itself can harbor borrelia species bacteria.  The nematode which is associated with African river blindness is fairly easy to clear up (which is why I found the article interesting.)

I've paid a lot of attention to what Dr. Alan MacDonald has produced over the last few years and I am confident that he is highly competent and no fraud.  His latest findings are very very interesting.  Well worth a listen to anyone who is interested in the subject:

...  Wow ... gone from youtube, or at least well hidden!  He was finding actual worms and eggs in the cerebral-spinal fluid of all MS patients he looked at.  On top of that, with DNA dyes he was finding Borrelia bacteria within the worms.

When I was a kid 40 years ago projections were that we humans would be living easily to 100 years and all that.  In reality, we hit 'peak life expectancy' in the U.S. at least, and life expectancy is on the decline so I read.  A big sigh of relief from those seeking to deal with the anticipated Social Security issues I'm sure.  Also since many people pay their life savings to the medical/industrial complex as they march toward death, another group of people are quite delighted (and are getting stupendously wealthy.)  I think it perfect valid to entertain the hypothesis that some engineering may have been involved in getting us to the point where 3/5'ths of the population on prescription medications.  Like any other investigative work, look for means, motive, opportunity.

Actually it is fairly clear what is going on with Bundy.  And with Hammond for that matter.

Bundy leased grazing rights from the Federal Govt who, constitutionally or otherwise, holds title to the land.  Bundy considers himself the owner on constitutional grounds and because his great grandmother was one of the wives of his great-grandfather who were Mormons.  Bundy didn't even start running cattle until the 1950's or some such, but he did so with full cooperation of the owners and under a lease.  There are ecological arguments that ruminants are not suitable for this type of land.  Some of them are bullshit because of corrupt politicians, multi-national resource acquisitions, eco-fundamentalists, etc, and some are probably not.  In any case, the owner gets to make the call when the lease is up.

Bundy did develop water resources under a well prescribed set of laws.  Water is valuable in this area, and the rights are more-so.  If the leases are not to be renewed or are changed to make ranching non-economical, Bundy should be generously compensated for his water rights whether or not people now feel that the rights should never have been granted.  They were.

Hammond, not the government, owned the Hammond ranch-land.  He's problems seem to stem from the same basic snake-pit that Bundy's did: corrupt politicians, multi-national resource acquisitions, eco-fundamentalists, etc.  And, importantly, the tangled relationships between these groups.

There is a very significant differences.

 - Bundy want to use land which is owned by the Fed to run his cattle on.  Hammond owned his land.

Ownership cuts both ways.  I personally feel that the Federal govt should own little or no property in the U.S. (and nor should any multi-national corporation) but the Bundy charade(s) are exactly the wrong way to go about achieving this.  All the 'operations' achieved was to gain datapoints on individuals,  and add weight to the strongly conditioned idea that gun owners and patriots in the U.S. are crazy and dangerous.  I've little doubt that the operation was designed to do exactly this and carefully so.

I hear people say that they would rather have their kid have autism or allergies than chicken pox.  It sounds like a joke but it doesn't seem to be with some people!

I also hear people with a straight face say that it is worth dropping a few IQ points to have good teeth so they favor fluoridation of water.  Here again I could not believe what I was hearing.

I really don't think that people were this retarded back in my day (now around 50-ish.)  Perhaps they were and I didn't notice, but I don't think so.

'Gun free zones' are a more safe place to stage phony 'psychological operation' events, but one still has to hope that some armed citizen who is not in on the fraud is not breaking the rules and packing in spite of the 'gun free zone' signs.  And if they are, that they won't take any action.

The other problem is video footage.  The hoaxes are picked apart by citizen analysts right away.  To the degree possible the stages are controlled to limit this problem.  Notice that at Roseberg the authorities formed exit queues and confiscated the electronics gear from anyone who had been in the general area.  In a setting like a college campus is more practical to control information exchange.

Criminality generally is much lower in Japan for whatever reason.  For this reason it is particularly poor comparison.  Some of the ethnic nationalist types like ramzpaul will claim that ethnic homogeneity is largely responsible the phenomenon.

Japan does seem to lead the U.S. by basically infinity in sarin gas attacks on subways.  When someone is genuinely interested in terrorism we are lucky that guns are an option for them compared to a lot of other methods.  The fact of the matter seems to be that nearly every 'terrorist' act almost anywhere is actually a false flag which allows TPTB to accomplish some project they want to do, or (luckily for us here in the U.S.) a bogus hoax made possible by a consolidated, compliant, and complicit corporate media.

None of the many I know.  At least to my knowledge.  Just like any group they are obviously all over the map.  My personal experience is that Jews do tend to be unusually interesting and fun to discuss things with.

I will say that those who subscribe to certain ideas in the Babylonian Talmud are pretty damn close to ol' Nick.  That would include Kabbalahists and the many spin-offs from that belief system.  That's what my research points to at least.

I did watch an interesting presentation by one Doreen Dotan recently who seems to be a remarkably forthright person.  She claims to be from a Rabbinical family who regularly married 1st cousins to try to maintain academic achievement.  She says that her family has a lot of smart people and a lot of psychopaths and she figures that there is a relationship in brain function.  According to my own personal theories of neurology I would not rule such a thing out.  Unknown how widespread such a inbreeding structure is (if it's not complete BS from the get-go) but really it would take only a small fraction of a particular group to have a significant impact over time...human society being what it is.

From what I can see, the Swiss are some creepy motherfuckers.  That tunnel thing and the goings-on at CERN are weird as fuck, and they don't even try to hide it.  Even though I have a Swiss surname I feel no attachment to the place so I have no respect for people who support Israel just because they are supposedly ethic Jews or whatever.  I've even less respect for the Christian Zionists who follow some televangelist to was paid off by Zionists to brainwash them into support for Israel.

The galling thing is that my tax dollars go to buy M16's for the settlers to help with their ethnic cleansing while Israeli groups try to get them out of American hands.  So claimed Alex Jones recently at least.

I also noticed that the Jewish woman who lost a fake kid at Sandy Hook (Posner) was a Swiss and working for their embassy as they try to dis-arm Americans through a U.N. program.

Interesting that the countries/groups who are reputed to be most associated with global money flows also seem to have a above average propensity to dis-arm others while they are famously armed themselves.  Hmmm.

I do like the Finns, but even here it seems like they are falling victim to some of the pussification and SJW weirdness which afflict other '1st world' nations.

Lieberman for FBI!  Are you fuckin' kidding me!

If there was ever a doubt that Trump was a team player in Israel's game of controlling compromised U.S. politicians via various kinds of extortion, that's out the window.

It is really heartening to see someone who understands the fundamentals of 'legacy' science.

Actually, the real power of science would be to replicate the results using different and un-related methods as well.  Reproducible using the same methods is key, but only for verification of a method.  Arriving at a like result by use of a different method us key to progressing an idea from the hypothesis <--> theory --> fact chain.

Through it all, if one sees data and methods being hidden by any means, it is the stench of a rat.  The 'global warming' junk science is rife with such fraud.  In vaccine-land it is the same observation but the methods lean more heavily on formally legalistic frameworks more than via academic fraud.