|
Is there a guarantee that borrowing money will make a profit? This is always very risky, especially when it comes to cryptocurrencies. You should always remember the expression: "You take someone else's and for a while - you give yours and forever!". Therefore, borrowing money is a very dubious action. I am used to relying only on myself and I do not advise relying on others, constantly worrying about whether I can pay on time or not.
By the irony of life, more often than not, borrowed money always gives out some kind of unpleasant surprise, but only those who have already had losses and gained experience know this.
|
|
|
|
Some of them are android app and I didn't include them. Can anyone have been used this or are there other good alternatives aside from privnote?
In addition, we can recommend one more service. Since many here trust open-source services that can be verified, there is a service that contains open sources. This plays a big role for lovers of anonymity since closed sources can contain anything. https://github.com/onetimesecret/onetimesecrethttps://onetimesecret.com/ |
|
|
|
OP, how long did it take you to check all the holders and donors of merits? Your screenshots say little, it was enough just to say about it. In my opinion, it is quite easy to get merits today. Some sources of merit, in order to spend the entire treasury, send merit in a circle for the same posts. Others help to distribute merit, not in their local section, but where they are not even a native speaker, using and evaluating posts through Google Translate. Isn't that enough? And as for those who only receive merit, but do not distribute it. Referring to their message history, most often these are people who are not at all interested in receiving merit, and when receiving such, they most likely do not worry about not giving back. Is there a rule that when we receive something, we must return it?  |
|
|
|
11 years have passed without Satoshi. Exactly 11 years ago, Satoshi wrote a post on the forum and disappeared from the net forever. During this time, we saw many people claiming to be Satoshi. But so far, we have not seen any evidence that all these impostors are indeed the anonymous creator of Bitcoin. Just say whatever you would like to say to Satoshi. Bitcoin has already been mined by 90 percent, and I really want to know that the creator of Bitcoin knows that his brainchild is growing and developing with great success.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2228.msg29479#msg29479 |
|
|
|
Although, if you have highly developed paranoia, then it is better for you not to use any services at all, because everywhere you see a catch and a keen eye of your big brother.
Yes, you are probably right. I prefer not to trust the Internet at all and only communicate with people I see and know. Nevertheless, the story of the privnote.com fake site, although old, is not safe from its repetition. A similarly named phishing site that masqueraded as an anonymous note service was stealing bitcoins. https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2020/06/15/encrypted-messaging-site-privnote-cloned-to-steal-bitcoin/ |
|
|
|
|
I used this service a long time ago. Through it on the forums, various kinds of "freebies" are often distributed, intended for distribution on one hand.
But for private messages, I would also be more careful. Passing important information to the service is a dubious matter. This reminds me of VPN services that swear they don't keep their clients' logs. Which is ultimately sheer nonsense. If such services exist, they are unlikely to have only good intentions.
|
|
|
|
OP, I can say the same thing too. I remember that I bought something, maybe Bitcoin, or maybe not Bitcoin. But I remember I spent over 200 bucks on something. All your data is so vague that it seems like a fantasy. You know that you are a millionaire, but you do not know where your millions are.  Well, if it's easier for you to live, knowing that you have bitcoins, and not knowing where they are, you can only say one thing - everyone is going crazy in their own way. |
|
|
|
|
I see calls on social media to buy bitcoin. And I also see complaints from people who are provoked by scammers to buy cryptocurrency, referring to the fact that there is still a chance. Naive people run for loans, hoping for future profits. But these are the people who have only heard about the growth of bitcoin, relying on the fact that it is constantly growing.
In any case, information literacy and vice versa, illiteracy plays an important role in people's lives. Those who are little educated in the field of cryptocurrencies make mistakes much more often. It is a pity that people first do, and only then think about what they have done.
|
|
|
|
Can we just be plain for once The forum supports buying and selling of an account so it probably means there is nothing wrong with it. It is only when you make a LAW' that someone can be a defaulter when he/she goes against it; not when there is no law! I'm not totally in support of account farming but it is either made a taboo or reserved for the ones that are comfortable on the trade and the shouldn't be any restrictions (no red tag). If they don't wanna barn these law so it means anyone that does this is right and doesn't need to be penalized... Bitter truth Do you probably read the rules to the point? The rules say that selling accounts is not prohibited, but not recommended. That is, the emphasis is on the second part. Accordingly, the forum adheres to freedom of action, but there should be a reasonable limit to all freedoms. Everyone understands, and one should not think that the purchase of an account is being done for good purposes, and, understandably, a lie is being planned. Thus, the red tag is placed as a warning that all transactions associated with the purchased account may be deceiving. I laugh at people who are used to living in a rigid framework, "can" and "not". |
|
|
|
What account traders likely don’t have easy access to, I figure, are Merits. Although they too get traded in some of those backchannel sites, the amount one can obtain, I guess, is pretty small, with perhaps some unseen exceptions.
I’m not sure if the Merit requirement for campaigns is only looked at during enrolment, or whether Campaign Managers look at it more regularly for longer lasting campaigns at least. Were the requirements based on a moving window, the Merit bar would effectively be more difficult to meet in general terms, but likely even more so for traded accounts.
It is likely though, that traded accounts opt mostly for the lower-end type campaigns, where merit requirements are small (or even non-existent), being the better paid campaigns out of their reach.
As far as I have seen, signature managers paid in bitcoins sometimes require a minimum of 5 merit received in the last six months. And of course, you can track which posts this minimum was received, from whom and in what period. Therefore, it will not be difficult for managers to understand what kind of account they are going to take into their company. But as far as the bounty is concerned, no merit is required to participate. Therefore, it is there that purchased accounts are in demand. After all, it's not at all difficult to buy yourself a new account in the event of a ban or receiving a negative tag. It has been discussed many times that a good obstacle to cheating would be the rule of having a certain amount of merit to participate in the bounty. |
|
|
|
|
Someone at one time created thousands of accounts and put them on regular sale. Sometimes you can meet newcomers with a registration date of 2016 and their excuses that they were on the forum a long time ago, and then forgot about it, and so on. Although, it's not hard to guess that they own the purchased account. And how many accounts we see from bumping services, also most likely purchased cheap newbies. And of course, most often all purchased accounts will have one bad fate, this is either a ban or a negative tag. But the fact that buyers are helping to grow someone's business of selling accounts cannot be denied.
And while there is a demand for such accounts, there will be supply.
|
|
|
|
|
If Nutildah has already been unlocked but has not appeared on the forum, we can admit that he does not agree with the ban that was issued to him by the moderators. I like the forum because some people really take all situations that arise on it seriously and painfully. It would seem that this is just the Internet. But even here we waste our emotions and nerves, regularly proving something in general for us to complete strangers. And this can be very sincere, which cannot be said about hunters who stupidly use the forum for their own selfish purposes.
Although we do not see each other in the face, the characters of people, stubbornness, and their principles are captured even in the texts.
|
|
|
|
I will not point out the thread and quotes from where I got this, since there is no point in reporting this, because formally he did not violate anything. I'll just leave this here as a reminder to myself and others.  I will help everyone who is interested and does not want to waste time searching. The post is copied with the provision of the source. The post is taken in a quote. But the further, which is called "Summary" looks like its own summary of the entire article. The link is present. The post cannot be called plagiarism, but the way it is presented can be called the appropriation of someone else's results. Summary- the year-over-year percent change in the M2 supply is now north of 23%. To put that in perspective, year-over-year growth in the M2 money supply had never exceeded 15% until 2020, according to Fed records dating back to 1981.
- Normally characterized by slow, steady growth, the M2 supply has grown 20% from $15.33 trillion at the end of 2019 to $18.3 trillion at the end of July.
- The “Fed may not be in control of Money Supply growth which means they won’t have control of inflation either, if it gets going,” Morgan Stanley writes.
- Economist and former Treasury official Nathan Sheets counters that if businesses aren’t inclined to spend, the larger money supply may do little to fan inflation].
The following point is very interesting: “Rates were very low and central bank balance sheets (and money creation) had surged. But the liquidity then sat in the banking system—including as excess reserves at the Fed,” he wrote in an email. “Money creation must translate into increased lending and spending in order for it to be inflationary.” The mainstream media acknowledges the US monetary supply is growing at its fastest rate since the 1980s. Inflation is becoming a legitimate concern. Savvy investors are putting their money in gold and bitcoin in an effort to avoid having their wealth be devalued. This scenario is one that has been mentioned and discussed on this forum countless times over the years. I wonder what people think of this. Something is included in the quote, and some are not. So we must take this for the opinion of the author?  =========================================================================================== PlagiarismUser: tnyldzerdm60Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376015.msg58659235#msg58659235( archive)
The main purpose of BitTorrent is to decentralize the existing structure of the entertainment industry and the way users acquire content. With the original developer Bram Cohen seeing the benefits of distributing content directly among internet users, it was aimed to eliminate expensive and inefficient distribution networks. In the early 2000s, BitTorrent It became the first P2P file sharing platform to refer to, and then TRON stepped in in 2018. Under TRON, BitTorrent has increased its appeal to users by offering decentralized solutions in addition to its own user base, and has also reached users in the cryptocurrency space. Among the added features, a part of transactions BitTorrent has also entered the field of paid services by offering several "Premium" versions of its platform, including VPN features and ad-free search.
 https://fantokenz.net/what-is-bittorrent-token-btt/ https://tokensboss.com/what-is-bittorent-btt-how-much-is-bittorent-coin/ |
|
|
|
|
I see a contradiction. Calling people who know about bitcoin does not mean that they are, as you call them, "bitcoiners", that is, bitcoin fans.
I would call people "bitcoiners", those people who sincerely believe in bitcoin, invest in it by spending their money in fiat, or even make money on the forum, but do not immediately run to cash it out. These people are holders who are not bothered by volatility, whether it is falling or, on the contrary, rising. These are the people affected by the Bitcoin religion. Everyone who simply earns bitcoin and quickly exchanges it for fiat for their vital needs is ordinary people who need to earn at any cost. They do not care what and what currency will be paid for their work.
On the contrary, I met here people who do not see any alternative for their financial freedom other than bitcoin. These people can be called bitcoin fans, and I consider them to be real bitcoiners.
|
|
|
|
PlagiarismUser: meant2bePost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376015.msg58659235#msg58659235( archive) The price of a bitcoin is influenced by supply and demand. When demand for bitcoins increases, the price increases, and when demand falls, the price falls. There is only a limited number of bitcoins in circulation and new bitcoins are created at a predictable and decreasing rate, which means that demand must follow this level of inflation to keep the price stable. That’s to say Bitcoin is mostly influenced by the supply of Bitcoin and the market's demand for it. Also the cost of producing a bitcoin through the mining process. Because Bitcoin is still a relatively small market compared to what it could be, it doesn't take significant amounts of money to move the market price up or down, so the price of a bitcoin is still very volatile.
 https://u24.co/en/about-bitcoin/what-determines-bitcoins-price
|
|
|
|
|
When I came to the forum, I was surprised by the lack of a lot of banners in all kinds of advertisements that I periodically saw on other forums and removed using uBlock Origin. Also, the lack of animation, stickers, and everything that is full-on other forums, personally, is very convenient for me.
As a person, I am often distracted by various animations, I prefer that they are completely absent. Only in this case, it is easier to concentrate and read useful information correctly.
|
|
|
|
Proton VPN and Nord VPN are also on that list and they are one of the bigger VPN services, so my question is how many VPN services now actually work in Russia and is there a way to work around this ban?
It is not necessary to use VPN. There are long-lived elite proxy servers, as well as sosks5, which can be run through Proxifier or any other program that supports traffic tunneling. In terms of cost, proxy servers are sometimes more expensive than VPNs, but they can be tied to only one user. |
|
|
|
|
I think you are a little paranoid.
What system are you using? Which password manager?
Or is it a regular browser that stores passwords? Then what is this browser?
If you are using Linux, it is doubtful that the software could have gotten there without your knowledge and permission. If Windows disconnect the laptop from the network, check the laptop with several antiviruses, Kaspersky offers several solutions.
Clear all cookies from your browser. Check the Task Manager for new processes that may have left a virus running in the background or a keylogger.
If you didn’t download anything from a phishing site, didn’t enter your data and passwords, but simply closed the site and left, there should be no drama. We often find ourselves on phishing sites, but without entering our information there, we simply leave them, erasing everything in the browser in the future. And also a lot depends on the password manager. Some of them also store their information encrypted, which is also a kind of protection.
|
|
|
|
|
All the years that are determined by Generation Z are associated with the development of computer technology. And of course, here one cannot but recall bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. The youngest areas of technology, of course, fall on the age of young people. And I agree that there will be many millionaires among them, but it's hard to imagine that among all of them. Only those who have the time and desire to study, to develop their knowledge and experience will become a gatherer. Even today, investing in bitcoin and managing these investments correctly for several years promises profit to young people.
But to round off that they are all sitting on sofas, and without acquiring any knowledge, but only hanging out on social networks and in online games, they will become rich, I think this is ridiculous.
The one who makes great efforts to his win always wins.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
