And the full results are as follows  ~ Thanks for sharing! I wasn't able to watch any fights this time, so I was just reading this article to find out what happened, and then I saw your post. Very helpful. All the needed info in one place. So, this time I got 8 of them right: 15) Jose Aldo
14) Rafael Fiziev
13) Clay Guida
12) Jamahal Hill
11) Brendan Allen
10) Bryan Barberena
9) Dusko Todorovic
8 ) Zhalgas Zhumagulov
7) Jake Matthews
6) Cheyanne Buys
5) Alonzo Menifield
4) Chris Gruetzemacher
3) Azamat Murzakanov
2) Alex Morono
1) Louis Smolka
But I'm especially glad that I was right about Clay Guida, "a caveman", as he is called sometimes. Few people believed in his victory, but I did.  I like betting on the underdog. Now I regret that I didn't bet on Chris Curtis. I just didn't have the balls. And he won! Damn. |
|
|
|
I can say nobody can actually graduate from the institute of cryptocurrency trading. Every season needs its peculiar strategy. It is better to be involved in both other normal business and cryptocurrency trading. Getting rich in cryptocurrency trading needs the right strategy.
It's a strategy that no one has invented yet. Luck is still a big factor in cryptocurrency trading, and this will hardly change any time soon, if ever. So, I agree with you on the "normal business" part. Imo, it should be the primary source of income. Same with stocks trading: most people are doing it as a hobby, having a regular job at the same time. |
|
|
|
~
I did not say gambling websites are not trustworthy. However you would have to agree that there a lot of questions regarding trustworthiness of gambling websites popping up on here. Talking of strangers, I take it you really know the person who you bet with? Have a nice day. Maybe I don't know them personally, but I can see what is their reputation here, and make my conclusions. Hang around here for a while, build up some reputation, a good one, then open a thread with practically the same words, and I will never say that there's something wrong with that. Only I'm pretty sure that after spending some time reading this forum, your words won't be the same. At least regarding the organizer fee, they won't. |
|
|
|
There are many ways to make online money. First so many people started with survey sites where you can earn some good money
Is it true? I've never tried it myself because I've always thought that it's like $1 per hour at best. Well, at one point I was making probably less than $1/hour solving captures, so it would be interesting to know what did I miss back then. But main online job after Bitcoin in market, trading has been a new source on money. Crypto trading has now become a part of our daily life. I have been in market since 2017 so much fluctuation has been happened I can say it's too much. Crypto airdrop and bounty are also a good online earnings system but these are long process to earn so might not be handled by everyone. Trading is a way, but a very risky one. To potentially earn good money, you have to risk significant amounts. It's never guaranteed that you won't lose a big part of them. It is better to find a job where you can apply skills that you have and earn money with that. |
|
|
|
Finally a higher win on Free Spin than the Base Amount! I thought they were out.  The jackpot would also be nice, with now over 8700 spins...   With nearly the same amount of free spins made,  , I got 3 or 4 in the range 9994 - 9997($2 award), and many of those higher than base amount. And yeah, the jackpot would also be nice some time soon. Good luck to both of us! Just thought of checking my winnings and found that I have played 1060 rolls till date. It's so less compared to you guys. I have won 0.00135 BTC from the free roll Now that was quite surprising. But the stats say that I won 0 jackpot winnings but I think I did score the jackpot of 300 sats approximately 2-3 times. I have won 480k sats,  , from free rolls, but it's only 4 times more than you have while you've made like 8 times less rolls, so you are lucky. As of Jackpots, I won them 2 times, 100k and 10k sats, and here's my stats for them:  Also I think you must be missing something regarding Jackpots.  The minimum prize for rolling 8888 has always been 10k sats. |
|
|
|
what a shitty round, Liverpool beat us to 1:4, ~
Tell me about it, mate. Yet again, being a Liverpool fan, I wasn't confident enough in my favourite team. I predicted 1-3 for their away win. Only one guy from our pool  was exactly right with his prediction. [...] It's not even first week December and already the scores are all over the place. I'd love to still finish top by Boxing Day but it's a long road ahead.
You should try harder and make your predictions more carefully as some of us are on your tail. For example, this week I went up by 10 points at once, taking the 12th line ~ Congrats, @icopress! With this pace you can find yourself in the top 3 in no time. I'm rooting for you, mate! ~
This is still a long season we arent even at the halfway mark. Anything can happen,for me its good that i am picking up pace and i am really close to that top 10 spot and even first place is just 11 points far and that can change in 1-2 rounds. I hope this week i can reach top 10
Why not? All of you guys in the top 15 are super close to each other, and in a round or two anyone can be in the top 3. And my goal is to be in the top 30 in a round or two. |
|
|
|
|
@Hhampuz, I'm sorry if it's a stupid question, but can we submit entries with negative ROI for this one?
|
|
|
|
@Betwrong
Joker Max is a great slot, don’t be so down on yourself. We are all unlucky gamblers until we’re not, if you know what I mean. Jackpots are out there & somebody has to win them so why not us? Bitcasino.io have some of the best jackpots & most exciting games to play. Let’s keep our fingers crossed, who knows what can happen in the future.
After reading your post and seeing that not a single Jackpot has been won yet, and also that all Jackpots have become significantly higher  I tried again, but to no avail. Idk, maybe it's because I'm not accustomed to play slots with such high bets. I usually play $0.10 or $0.20 max, and here, if I'm not mistaken, the minimum bet is almost $0.60?  When I play with those bets, man, my balance is decreasing so fast! Well, you are right, someone should hit it. But maybe it won't be me this time". |
|
|
|
Money back on 2 previous games.   That's not that bad. I lost several bets recently, but I'm still in profit from participating in Soccer Blackjack, because most of the time I was getting my money back, and one time I won. Hope to win again with this "Fulham v Bournemouth" game. |
|
|
|
Regarding online poker schools, I just have an opinion that is different to yours. I think most of them are harmful, because they are teaching the old style that no longer works. Poker is a living thing, and it is evolving, it is not static. For example, look at how Daniel Negreanu was playing 10 years ago, and what he was teaching at the time, and how he plays today. Indeed he's a genius, because he has found the strength to abandon his old style and adapt to the new reality. ... Well, that's just my opinion, of course, but if it means something to you, I am a 2 times winner of the Bitcointalk Poker Series. (I know bragging is wrong, but I hope it's relevant, just this once. ) Just interesting for me. I`m playing soccer for more then 15 years and i see how it changes. I see how change boots, ball, training ground. It is the one side. On the other side - team work between players in different situations. And the rules changes too. But when you playing poker - you playing with the same rules and same cards. Can it be so, that the old strategy will be better then new? Even because the new player don`t know about it? Yes, anything can happen, because luck is a factor in the game of poker. An absolute newbie can beat the best poker player in the world in one game or even more. But the more games played, the more obvious the importance of experience and skill, so a weak player, or someone using an outdated strategy, doesn't stand a chance in the long run. Surely, we spoke about random And what about tournament? Old school player have a strategy, he knows the game, he can bluff. As for me - if he catch some luck, his chances to win are enough high. But i meant another thing. What changes in the strategy if nothing changes technically? For example: I`ve read a book about 10 years ago. There was a base strategy from the start of the game: depending on the seat at the table and starting cards the player have a decision to raise, to check, or to drop his cards. Is it constant or element of changing strategy?It's not constant, that's what I'm trying to say. In the old days, like 5-6 years ago and more, the best players were much more bluff oriented than they are today. It was considered that a good player could play(and win) with any pocket cards. First you wait for a miracle, so that your 67s makes you holding a straight flush, or quads, or full house. Then if it doesn't happen, you bluff the hell out of it and grab the pot.  ^^^This was their motto. And they were right at the time. Some people won millions of dollars following this amazing strategy. But the thing is that it's not working anymore. |
|
|
|
~ If we caught your attention, join the Pizza Prediction competition and become the ultimate pizza winner ~ It's an another great promo from Bitcasino.io. I just made my prediction, and I want to say, don't miss it, guys, make yours, and Good Luck! Tip: I think that you need to change your username to 'Betcorrect' at this point instead of 'Betwrong' since you are clearly really good at predicting stuff and winning consistently. Thank you very much for these kind words! It's not like I'm winning all the time, but indeed I can't say that I'm the world's unluckiest gambler.
Today I was playing for half an hour several Kalamba Games' slots trying to trigger a Jackpot, participating in this amazing promo Christmas show must go on with Kalamba Jackpots, and I haven't succeed, but hey no one has so far:  From all the participating games I liked Joker Max the most. Won more than 6x of my bet with this combination  Maybe not that much, but this was the best I got today. Keep in mind that the jackpot pools are progressive, so I hope I have contributed something to your future wins, guys! Good luck!  |
|
|
|
|
15) Jose Aldo
14) Rafael Fiziev
13) Clay Guida
12) Jamahal Hill
11) Brendan Allen
10) Bryan Barberena
9) Dusko Todorovic
8 ) Zhalgas Zhumagulov
7) Jake Matthews
6) Cheyanne Buys
5) Alonzo Menifield
4) Chris Gruetzemacher
3) Azamat Murzakanov
2) Alex Morono
1) Louis Smolka
|
|
|
|
~
Damn bro you so close yet so far from winning the betting round. I hope you win but it doesn't look like BTC will fall by $3.5k in the matter of few hours. Only if a big red candle similar to 5 days ago drops in the 1D chart then may be BTC could dump below $55k and you could win this round. It would have been great if you would have put some satoshis in the $55k - $57.5k range as well. Yeah, I lost my bets, all of them. Why I didn't bet on "$55,001 - $57,500" is becuase of the multiplier for that range, 5.05x. For the ranges I bet on they were: 54.31x, 43.61x and 13.11x.(Also there was 2523.01x for "More than $1,000,000", but of course I bet only jokingly on this range). Well, retrospectively you are right, I shudda bet all my money on "$55,001 - $57,500". Finally a higher win on Free Spin than the Base Amount! I thought they were out. The jackpot would also be nice, with now over 8700 spins... With nearly the same amount of free spins made, , I got 3 or 4 in the range 9994 - 9997($2 award), and many of those higher than base amount. And yeah, the jackpot would also be nice some time soon. Good luck to both of us! |
|
|
|
They become a beggar and stay online in gamble sites with really2 long is not really good, for my experience the people who keep gambling they gambling small amount with high multiplier like "Dice" chasing maximum multiplier payout.
I feel sad and at the same time feel like they're doing dumb activity, from my 2 cent.
I have to agree to call those who spend most of their time in gambling sites looking for free cents through the faucet, rains, or other bonuses as dumb. On the other side, I do not agree to call those who betting small amount to chase maximum multiplier as dumb. As long as they are chasing it with their deposited money, they are not doing dumb activity IMO because it is their own betting style (bet small to win big). Thank you. Because that's exactly what I'm doing on dice games most of the time. Today my gambling activity is not all dice as it used to be several years ago, but when I play dice I'm doing it with multipliers like 99x, 198x, 990x(Very rarely I play 9900x these days although it used to be my favorite multiplier for years at the beginning). Here's an example of my today's game:  I didn't bet much, and what I won was just $0.58 in ETH, but the fact that it was 99x of my bet made me happy. |
|
|
|
Yeah, got my stake back with that one. I think we are lucky it wasn't over 21, we were close to that too. And on Soccer Blackjack #312 I bet 2 times more than usually. Soon we'll find out whether I was right or wrong. Looking on the past games between them I can see that normally not much goals scored, with the exception of this anomaly:  A video about it is called "Biggest-Ever Premier League Away Win". Well, it's a lotta goals even for a home win, I'd say. |
|
|
|
|
1. Rotherham
2. Buxton
3. AFC Wimbledon
4. Bristol Rovers
5. Doncaster
6. Ipswich, match with most goals scored
7. Leyton Orient
8. Portsmouth
9. Yeovil
10. draw
11. draw
12. FC Halifax
Sportsbet username: Betwrong
|
|
|
|
|
1. Fulham - over - 38'
2. draw - under - 39'
3. Barnsley - under
4. Blackburn - over
5. draw - under
6. Derby - under
7. Cardiff - over
8. Swansea - under
9. Millwall - over
10. Nottingham - over
11. Reading - over
12. QPR - over
Sportsbet username: Betwrong
|
|
|
|
~
I am really looking forward to that day happening, even though many are seeing Khamzat Chimaev is just pure hype, for me, I have seen potential with his technical striking, and wrestling he is an all-rounder and has the strength to push his takedowns, and just like Cyril Gane that everyone is saying is just a pure hype I think he can move his way up until he reach that title match he deserves.
~
It's true that media loves to write about him, they want to write clickbaity articles, and his name is clickbait already. But, idk, are there examples of someone hyped that much while being unworthy? I don't mean artists, singers and stuff, I mean MMA fighters. Not a single word about Clay Guida on last pages of this topic Previously this guy gained a lot of attention. They guy has fought nearly every decent start of his division. This weekend I think we will expect his another loss. He really looks like a caveman  Well, with that look you may not look convincing on a philosophical conference, and hardly anyone will invest in a new crypto token that you promote, but it's a perfect look to scare the sh*t out of your opponent. Regarding his possible loss to Leonardo Santos, idk, I think Clay can beat him. Imo Santos is too old to continue with fighting. Did you see how he lost to Grant Dawson? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
