Well, it just confirmed, so what do I know? lol
That's really strange, actually. They shouldn't have confirmed - oh well, lol  I got quite a bit more to throw there, you gotta make a profit somehow. Scratch that; someone threw in a .01 with a .005 fee. Damn. It seems to also be funds that were originally given to them...for endorsing BlockRun. * DiamondCardz gasps |
|
|
|
No, you are not trusted by theymos so like me your "trust" is irrelevant. Kind of ironic that the trust system doesn't actually do anything unless you are one of the elite board warriors. Tomato's tag made oldsport disappear. My pleading with theymos for more than a month amounted to nothing.
I'm on DefaultTrust, and anyone who has the default trust depth of 2 will see my rep as trusted, lol. It isn't irrelevant  http://gyazo.com/e630eaae73193cf2e294dcf44c5a41f6 |
|
|
|
|
Do it in secret, people will dump for profit and to ruin your investment when they know you are pumping.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the update, John.
|
|
|
|
1Diaz9Nhs8d8GEXcwTJQKDkwzKj34UH2r4 |
|
|
|
Why would it be? owner's first name "An", last name "Onymous" -- looks legit, huh!? I know, right! Anyway, if he scams us, we can just go to Where Some and beat him up, right? |
|
|
|
 It has cata, and like 8 days of play time from the 10day mop trial on it right now. Hmmm, ok, i'll think about it. |
|
|
|
...if you would have check the maskedarmory link you would know...
Oh derp, didn't notice that link  |
|
|
|
"The coin to add value to your wealth"? Are you 9 years old or just high on glue?
I think it's safe to assume both, actually.  |
|
|
|
|
Brb, just going to make my own altcoin and pre-mine 1 billion of the coin.. Let's call it UltraWealthyBillionaireCoin, because the higher the pre-mine, the "richer" the name, right?
|
|
|
|
Open Bitcoin-QT's debug console (I believe there is a button, look for it). Copy the address. Type this: dumpprivkey YourBitcoinAddress If you get the private key, you can either import it to a service such as blockchain.info and stop dealing with bitcoin-qt and get your BTC back, or, if it's too difficult for you, i'm sure a trusted member will extract your BTC for you and send it back to a different address of yours  Don't post it here! |
|
|
|
So this is an unresolved scammer post calling oldsport a scammer, yea? Why is this not tagged Theymos? I just neg repped him. * Viceroy bows before greatness I neg repped him too - will you bow before me? * DiamondCardz laughs Seriously though, this was a harsh scam @OP, hope that wasn't a massively important amount to you  |
|
|
|
There is no law against holding your money if you don't give them ID.
{{citation needed}} There is a law? Wait, where? {{citation needed}} Are you insane? Do you think there is not a law agains you holding my money? Like, in, I don't know, theft? Either there is a specific clause claiming you can hold my money, or you are breaking the law. Requesting ID and giving the money after ID is provided in order to not break the law (if you just give and take money, even after they file a support ticket, it's still breaking the law if you don't follow the proper procedures) =/= stealing. There is no requirement for MSB collect ID before returning funds from an incomplete transaction. However you are asking someone to disprove a negative. The regs for MSBs are publicly available you claim the law requires them to "hang on to" = "steal" so provide a cite for the reg requiring this activity. As someone who has attended BSA training I will save you some time. There is no requirement, no obligation, there isn't even the right for a company to "hang on to funds". The company can refuse the transaction at which point they are required to return the funds. If the company believes the transaction is suspicious they are obligated to file a SAR. If the company knows ID will be required they are obligated to collect that PRIOR to starting the transaction. The company asking the client to report the transfer as fraudulent with their bank in order to have funds returned should set off some alarm bells. Does that sound "normal" to you? Hmmm, that is true, it isn't normal. I'll think about it some more, but it does partially seem like an over-reaction. |
|
|
|
1G4oHDZzPDWbpba32w7yhabWtw9ZHCytC1
Thanks.
I'm pretty sure double posting is foul play and will get you disqualified...meaning the person who is above me should win. |
|
|
|
Also gave you both a positive rep for the help in bringing these scammers to justice !
Much appreciated, biggie. Just make sure to use escrow next time |
|
|
|
Is the 0.01 still available?
User: 1864
122 2013-06-24 18:33:38 (1) manually crediting user 1864 with amount 0.01 maryanne23
User # 2128  Amazing site! I mean, at least TRY Lmfao, good stuff. OTT: It's a unique idea, it'll be interesting to see it pan out. |
|
|
|
Thank you, greatly appreciate it for confirming Aquaman is a scammer and also that Mahav guy who tried to scam me pretending John K send him an escrow contract for another BTC<->LTC deal !
Everyone, please give a negative rating to AquaMan and Mahav while at it. It has been proven they are scammers so let us prevent them from scamming other people !
No problem, it's a pleasure to put scammers into the shitcan. |
|
|
|
There is no law against holding your money if you don't give them ID.
{{citation needed}} There is a law? Wait, where? {{citation needed}} Are you insane? Do you think there is not a law agains you holding my money? Like, in, I don't know, theft? Either there is a specific clause claiming you can hold my money, or you are breaking the law. Requesting ID and giving the money after ID is provided in order to not break the law (if you just give and take money, even after they file a support ticket, it's still breaking the law if you don't follow the proper procedures) =/= stealing. |
|
|
|
To sit here and complain its the Moderators fault is just stupid. The fault lies in the people that have given their money to this company and they deserve to feel the pain of bad judgement. As I am recalling that is what capitalism is all about.
Prosperity is in general the result of the working of free markets. The one caveat to this observation is that market participants have to be responsible. It doesn't matter so much if they are intelligent or not, it doesn't really matter if they're good christians or devout muslims or anything else, but they do have to be responsible.
When some people behave irresponsibly the result is that they lose their money, which flows, albeit indirectly and circumvolutedly but nevertheless unerringly, to more responsible participants.
When a small majority* of participants behave irresponsibly however the net result is not just pain to their own fortunes, but pain spread across the board. All of a sudden you have to be very intelligent, and very experienced, and very well informed to manage to keep your money safe, and often enough even that's not going to suffice.
Learn it already. Yeah, karma doesn't bring your money back when you send someone $20k. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
