~snip
@Kemarit I’ll second your analysis about the women’s side, but I feel it’s only a matter of time before we see a consistent champion and I’m eagerly waiting to see who it’ll be. Lastly the men’s side is getting more difficult with each tournament and with Nadal fading away only Djokovic is left from the old guard, and I wonder how long will he be able to keep up against the young talents.
which young talents are you talking about? all players that we are mentioning (Medvedev, Zverev, Tsitsipas) are above 23 years - Nadal had five RG trophies at that age, they are not that young, although much younger than Djokovic it is easy to see that there is no new talents in men tennis, maybe Alcaraz would prove me wrong, or Sinner, but I would not count above mentioned three as young talents, they are great players, but certainly not young anymore, and not close to previous top three |
|
|
|
~snip
anywho, Cadiz - FC Barcelona...friendly reminder that Barca couldn't beat Cadiz last season (1-1 and 1-2), and that was a much healthier Barcelona 🤔
solid friendly reminder, Barca did not won yesterday, but as I saw you had 3:0 for Barca in the pool? shitty round for me, a lot of late goals that brought me down, really did not expect Granada to conceive three goals from Sociedad, that brought me down in Sorare as well, since I do believe that Luis Maximiano is one of the best young goalkeepers at the moment there is another round on weekend, Atletico is playing again with "all loses" team Alaves, Valencia wait for Bilbao, a Barca plays against Levante at home, is it time for a win? Sociedad against Elche seems as easiest pick |
|
|
|
It was great to see the last champions Lille winning another match in the league this season. They beat Reims by 2-1 but I must say also that it was a quite balanced match. Burak Yilmaz didn't score but made 2 assists. And I think that he was the player of the match. I hope to see Lille getting better in the coming weeks also. This is not the form we want to see from them in the end.
After watching PSG's match against Metz yesterday, I was wondering how weak their forward lineup is, depending on a defender's two goals to win against their weaker Metz! Even then PSG scored their second goal in 90 + 5 minutes. Their luck is very good, otherwise they would not have won this match. Despite having so many good players on the team, I am not enjoying their gameplay at all. Now, I think they are an average quality team. They should be stronger. yeah, somehow I have put PSG on all tickets, it was a small odds, but seemed really secure to win, and after early goal, I crossed that as done but Metz was back, and PSG scored winner six minutes into overtime, had several tickets depending on that goal, but it was a happy-end after all from now on, I will skip PSG until their first draw/lose in the league games |
|
|
|
~snip
Pravi trenutak je bio prije godinu dana kada je bull poceo, jer bi sad plivao u parama.
Mozes eventualno riskat sada i molit boga da bull traje jos par mjeseci, ili cekat iduci
donekle se slazem, s tim sto mislim da trenutak zavisi osim od samog momenta, koji je sigurno bio bolji prosle godine, ili pocetkom ove i od prave prilike zavisi naravno i sta planiras da radis, odnosno sta ti je pocetna osnova odakle kreces ukoliko kreces sa posla koji je slabo placen i tezak, uvek je pravi trenutak ukoliko imas solidno placen i interesantan posao, mozda ti nikad nece biti pravi trenutak i plivanje u parama je relativan pojam, koji se razlikuje za svakog pojedinacno |
|
|
|
~snip
I don't think the new incoming big players will be as good as the outgoing ones. It's a very unusual situation to have three players as good as Federer, Nadal and Djokovic all playing at the same time. They each have 20 slams, which is crazy... but imagine the situation if we'd only had one of these players, without the other two - whoever it was would probably have 30 slams at least, likely more.
And it's unlucky for Murray that he was playing at the same time as these three... of none of them had been there, he would likely have won 10 slams instead of 3.
agree that next three (why do we need three?) will not be the same as Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, but I would like to point out one thing that is most-probably the result of their domination, and the fact that in most GS, all rounds to semi-finals were not that interesting, since you know that tournament has three secured spots in semi-final, and just one player could join these three, and that is that: - last five US open women finals had more TV viewers than men finals - men and women share same prizes in tennis (at least on all GS), it is "the one and only sport" where women are paid the same as men it is due to simple fact that men tennis is not that interesting at the moment, because you already know winners |
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 26' 1-1
Game 2: 26' 1-0
|
|
|
|
|
1. Coventry - Over
2. QPR - Over
3. Reading - Under
4. Birmingham - Over
5. Cardiff - Over
6. Barnsley - Over
7. Bournemouth - Under
8. Draw - Under
9. Nottingham - Over
10. Sheffield U - Under
11. Stoke - Under
12. Draw - Under
|
|
|
|
I expect goals tonight in Madrid, maybe over4.5 or even over5.5, seems as perfect setup, Mallorca is not so defensive and Real could fit into this day full of goals in Spain and Italy
I hope you did put some money on the line for that ? It's 4 goals already at half time with Madrid leading 3 - 1.. yeah, I did put some money, although when saw ease with which Real scored, should have put more, nevertheless, pretty happy with the outcome yesterday Villarreal also showed solid football, maybe first time this season, and four goals against Elche and yeah, Valencia was down against Sevilla, three fast goals (one own goal) and it was a mission impossible to catch, two loses in a row, fate must be changed on weekend |
|
|
|
Yes everyone indeed,,, BTTS is quite good but I took it a step too far last night, as the two late games after Juventus were only one-sided wins, I think,,, it could be that a wiser choice for a very big parlay maybe is over 0.5 goal for all the games but then again it just needs 1 0-0 to take it all down. Still very happy with where I am even though 4 of us are tied in first place for this week  you can't expect to have BTTS in any game Serie A, Milan was expected to win, but Venezia is obviously very weak Cagliari lost against Empoli, really did not expect that to happen, but my pool position shows that I do not follow Calcio as other competitions, and what I expect from Cagliari is not in line with their team and ambitions, last season we successfully avoided relegation in last rounds, but this season seems to be a harder one |
|
|
|
|
Rennes is on fire, scored 5 goals against Clermont, looking to an easy win after three loses in a row
seems that Wednesday is full of goals in all leagues, there is a tone in France so far, over1.5 in all matches, what could PSG make in Metz tonight, maybe we could expect goals there as well, over 5.5 maybe?
Lyon should a nice pick tonight, but there is no value @1.3, waiting for HT draw to enter live
|
|
|
|
|
three fast goals by Sevilla, one own goal, but great first half and Valencia scored to make it interesting in second half as well
maybe they could be back
I expect goals tonight in Madrid, maybe over4.5 or even over5.5, seems as perfect setup, Mallorca is not so defensive and Real could fit into this day full of goals in Spain and Italy
|
|
|
|
New 4-3-free and Bet-6 are up on the sportsbook. The Highlight match is involving my team against Arsenal, the big London derby which unfortunately feels like it is no longer as prestigious as it used to be now that Chelsea is by far the biggest and best London club at the moment.
~snip
isn't Arsenal almost always in 4-3-free challenge? nevertheless, I do see Arsenal coming back to upper part of the table, and maybe even a win on weekend is an option, they had a harsh start, with gunning against City broken them apart, and international break made miracle for them, two wins in a row, and they are having good momentum to crash Tottenham, that is having two loses after break, six conceived goals and none scored Chelsea is certainly top London team at the moment |
|
|
|
~snip
Mislim da smo se krivo razumjeli. Nemam ništa protiv governance tokena tamo gdje oni imaju smisla (kao u slučaju BanklessDAO koji si spomenuo - to je odličan primjer decentraliziranog projekta koji bez governance tokena ne bi mogao funkcionirati). Nije mi jasno zašto bi jedan softver poput MetaMaska koji ima tvrtku koja stoji iza njegovog razvoja trebao imati governance token.
slazem se da smo tamo bili off-topic i da smo se krivo razumeli, ajde da pojasnim zasto mislim da je MM bas pravi primer bas za MetaMask, iza njih stoji Consensys, iza Consensys-a stoji Ethereum fondacija - oni drze prakticno osnovu Ethereum mreze: - MetaMask novcanik - Infura servis za node provision - Truffle suite za programiranje i testiranje programa u Solidity-ju - CoDeFi za pravljenje DeFi aplikacija (na njemu se i vrti MM swap usluga) - Dilligence za audit projekata - Decrypt novine (koje su "kao" nezavisne, što se tiče uređivačke politike) ukoliko oni nemaju decentralizovano upravljanje, ni sam Ethereum nije decentralizovan, s obzirom na deo ukupnog ETH trzista (projekata, igara, aplikacija, svega) koji zavisi od njih, samo jos uvek nije pravi trenutak da budu potpuno decentralizovani, verovatno ce nakon uspesnog lansiranja ETH2.0 to biti moguce pravac razvoja MM je verovatno najbitnijih od svih navedenih delova Consensys-a za masovnu adopciju, i cini se da bi prava decentralizacija MM doprinela tome da ETH betonira top mesto u kripto svetu nije ni decentralizacija svuda pozeljna, odnosno donosi plodove, negde je centralizacija odlicna, samo pogledas uspeh FTX ili Binance a naravno, ima i FT-a (fan tokena), gde sa $PSG tokenom mozes da odredis boju i tip natpisa na presvlaci za sediste u $PSG autobusu i osetis se bitno zbog toga, a biras izmedju tipova presvlaka koje je osmislio ekonom tima - ne bi o tome govorio kao o decentralizaciji |
|
|
|
This has to be my best performance ever in a starting week anywhere in any league for predictions. 1 exact and 2 close scores, and even,,, if I stuck to 2-1 I would be 2 exacts!
~snip
yeah, last night scores were mostly expected, and results came as expected, so there is many exact scores I missed Bologna, or to say it better Genoa, since I did not catch any of their results so far regarding BTTS, yeah, a lot of goals in Serie A last season, not following much, but rarely one can see results 2:0 or 0:1, it is always 2:1, 1:2, 1:3, it would be interesting to see how many matches last year were 3 goals exact, probably the most in all scoring ranges |
|
|
|
14) Brian Ortega 13) Valentina Shevchenko 12) Nick Diaz 11) Jairzinho Rozenstruik 10) Jessica Andrade 9) Marlon Moraes  Nasrat Haqparast 7) Shamil Abdurakhimov 6) Taila Santos 5) Uros Medic 4) Mayra Bueno Silva 3) Karl Roberson 2) Martin Sano 1) Omar Morales |
|
|
|
~snip
Ako je governance token, o čemu token holderi odlučuju? Nekako sumnjam da odlučuju o nekim bitnim stvarima. Općenito imam osjećaj da se ti governance tokeni izdaju za svaku glupost. Ali dobro, možda ja ne vidim "bigger picture".
ne bi da to kazem, ali onda ne razumes osnovu decentralizacije, pa samim tim za tebe nema razlike izmedju centralizovanog i decentralizovanog projekta governance token sluzi za upravljanje projektom, a kako ce samo upravljanje biti implementirano zavisi od pojedinacnog projekta i umnogome govori o tome da li je decentralizovan ili nije, mnogi su samo nazivno decentralizovani (i to su oni koji uglavnom uzimaju novac od VC), a neki su stvarno decentralizovani - npr. OpenSea je potpuno centralizovan projekat, i po meni je iluzija ocekivati da podeli airdrop, ali bi voleo da me demantuju (Sorare isto) evo, primer za Bankless - organizacija je po sezonama (sezona - tri meseca) - u svakoj sezoni imas odredjeni broj projekata i udruzenja koji ce biti finansirani iz trezora - svaki predlog se provlaci kroz Discord rasprave - kada se uoblici, salje se na glasanje na Discourse, i tu ima vise revizija, dok ne dobije vecinu glasova (svaki holder koji ima iznad 35K BANK ima jedan glas, nezavisno da li ima 100k ili 35k ili 1M BANK tokena) - kada prodje vecinu na Discourse, ide na glasanje na Snapshot, gde se glasa u skladu sa brojem tokena u novcaniku (ko ima 35K BANK, ima 35000 glasova, ko ima 1M BANK, on ima 1 miliona glasova) - kada prodje na Snapshot-u moze dobiti finansiranje i postati deo Bankless razvoja time se osigurava da ima podrsku proste vecine (51% od ukupnog broja clanova) i investitorske vecine (51% od kolicine BANK tokena u opticaju) - i nema nikakvog razvoja koji je mimo zajednice, a da je finansiran iz trezora |
|
|
|
~snip
Jedino ako MetaMask postane DAO ali ne znam koliko je to moguće budući da se ne radi samo o swap funkciji nego i o walletu.
zasto tako mislis? imas Trust wallet - i TWT token imas Math wallet - i MATH token imas Atomic wallet - i AMC token ok, neki od njih samo sluze da ti umanje fee, kao sto to uostalom rade i tokeni na centralizovanim menjacnicama, ali ne vidim nikakav problem da metamask izda governance token, MM ne zadrzava nikakve podatke o tebi, sve je na tvom racunaru, i ti mozes da prestanes da ga koristis i ubacis svoj private/mnemonic u bilo koji drugi novcanik, ukoliko ti se njihov razvoj ne svidi nakon decentralizacije putem governance tokena |
|
|
|
So, most people are saying another draw or a slim Atletico win. And that's what I'm going for too...
But is anyone actually considering them losing their perfect record today? Not that perfect means anything. Ask Villareal with 4 draws.
~snip
Getafe actually broke their perfect record last night, they did not scored against Atletico since 2011, in 20 games, they have 16 loses and 4 draws, without scoring any goals and last time when they scored, they won 3:2, so I expected them to finish the job last night, after late first half goal, but Suarez did not thought the same, and scored two late goals to keep good score for Atletico It's only 6 games but Getafe can't be feeling too good 6 games and 0 points... if I were betting, my money's going to martingale on them from next match onwards  That is very legit strategy. Was I discussing it with you last season? There was two teams from two different leagues, both without win in first 10 or 15 games. I decided to do just that, martingale until they win. They both won first game I played and I started with very small stake since martingale has a tendency of quickly getting out of hand. So successful experiment but not very profitable. agree, that it is legit, but Getafe is my first pick to get relegated this season, and would skip it for now |
|
|
|
|
1) Who will receive the ball first? Panthers
2) Will Panthers cover the -7.5 point spread? Yes
3) Game total 43.5? Under
4) Highest scoring Quarter? 3rd
5) Panthers total points? Odd
6) Texans total points? Odd
7) Sam Darnold to throw 1.5 TDs? Over
8 ) Texans QBs to throw 1.5 TDs? Over
9) Christian McCaffrey to score a TD? No
10) Mark Ingram to score a TD? Yes
Final Score prediction 23-18 Panthers
|
|
|
|
|
Sevilla vs Valencia
1. Match line - Draw
2. Both to score - Yes
3. Number of yellow cards in the game - 6+
Torino vs Lazio
1. Match line - Away
2. Both to score - No
3. Number of yellow cards in the game - 4-5
35' minute
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
