Boom, Tua does it again with 2 running TDs. That was a great game, also especially because I won. First time New England's been out of the playoffs for 20 years... pretty remarkable. Can't help but think Belichick is looking forward to a bit of off time during the holidays since its been a while. I am not feeling great about the afternoon games but I do kinda like KC -3 vs the Saints. I kinda figured Brees could be a bit rusty and they will be with out Thomas. Any thoughts on this game?
Sounds like Winston is out on the rona list and the Saints aren't planning on having Brees play the entire game, which definitely favors the Chiefs IMO. So I took Chiefs ML.
|
|
|
Elwar is a likable guy, but I've never understood his obsession with seasteading. I guess that, when you become super-rich, something screws up in your head and you become obsessed with pointless, impossible tasks. Risto Pietila comes to mind. It's sad, really.
Trying to go against nature is a futile, pointless task, as is trying to go against the establishment without a feasible plan. Taking the law on your hands and setting up a seastead in the middle of the ocean is madness and delusion combined.
IMHO.
What's worse is having the chance to do something extraordinary but being too afraid to take it. What's even worse than that, is being able to do wonderful and meaningful things, but wasting your time and wealth pursuing pointless tasks. Risto Pietila's story is a good example. Possibly, but Elwar has a vision, and I say its better to spend your time on the planet pursuing that than ways to re-invest your already substantial wealth. Breakthroughs are made by giving new ideas a go, ala Bitcoin in our mutual instance. That kind of spirit should be encouraged. Also, all that doesn't really apply to Risto, RIP. Risto was, AFAIK, born wealthy and suffered from mental illness. He was very grandiose and by all means his lifestyle should not be emulated. Risto just kind of flailed about, driven by a combination of bipolar disorder, narcissism and a bit of histrionic personality disorder, whereas Elwar is on an actionable mission. Plus, you'll never catch Elwar posing for a photo op next to a classic car, much less painted in pink. (Again, RIP Risto) He should probably do that though for the LOLs.
|
|
|
Elwar is a likable guy, but I've never understood his obsession with seasteading. I guess that, when you become super-rich, something screws up in your head and you become obsessed with pointless, impossible tasks. Risto Pietila comes to mind. It's sad, really.
Trying to go against nature is a futile, pointless task, as is trying to go against the establishment without a feasible plan. Taking the law on your hands and setting up a seastead in the middle of the ocean is madness and delusion combined.
IMHO.
What's worse is having the chance to do something extraordinary but being too afraid to take it.
|
|
|
Good catch, definitely a scam project, thanks for writing up the scam accusation for it. I have tagged the OP of the bounty thread and have created a flag based on this thread... Hopefully this will help to stop other accounts from wasting their time advertising a scam.
|
|
|
crypto experts is referencing an inside joke from the hex telegram.
OK, so nobody actually said or thinks that Hex is going to a dollar, or even 50 cents. Focus on remaining above 1 cent first. Watch some of Richard Heart's streams and you will get a better understanding of hex and why something on the platform can exceed its value.
I'd rather watch my flesh burn under a magnifying glass in the hot sun but thanks for the offer. You say hex is doing nothing new or interesting. It was the first certificate of deposit on the blockchain. There are trillions of dollars in CDs in the real world.
"First certificate of deposit." That's a great series of words for marketing purposes but its ultimately meaningless. Who certified it? JP Morgan? Also, Hex isn't locking the coins, Ethereum is. Hex is a token that rides on top of the Ethereum network, its not its own "crypto." Certainly nobody uses it as an actual method of payment. The only thing you can do with it is stake it and hope some fool pays more than you did when you sell it. What other crypto can you lock your coins up for 15 years?
Bitcoin has had the ability to make timelocked transactions since 2016.
|
|
|
Crypto experts are projecting hex to be around 50 cents - $1 next year. Keep in mind that this is on the conservative side and we all know Richard designed HEX to surpass bitcoin and become the #1 cryptocurrency.
Oh, those mysterious "crypto experts" say that do they? Would you mind revealing who these experts are by any chance? How can a token's market cap surpass that of its platform? It can't. Hex might pump again but its garbage. It has a uniquely designed smart contract that recreates Proof of Stake coin generation. So its not really doing anything new or interesting, and there's no reason for anybody to own it... unless you're hoping to dump it on someone else at a higher price in the future. There's already thousands of coins whose only fundamental value is the same -- no reason to enrich Heart or the sleazebags trying to emulate him.
I hope your right OP, I put all my savings into hex (8 bitcoin) , because I'm tired of being broke and really need to be a millionaire soon. Lets hope for the best.
This is the saddest thing I've read all day. You had 8 BTC -- you are in no way broke! That's enough money for anyone to start a comfortable life just about anywhere in the world! You let greed get the best of you.
|
|
|
You are assuming that when there are two contradictory statements, that Trump is automatically wrong.
Trump has access to more intelligence than Pompeo and a wider range of people are advising Trump. There is the obvious incentive for Trump to blame China versus Russia for the hack, considering that China is in bed with Biden and the Democrats.
Without concrete evidence one way or another, I would not assume that either party is wrong based solely on their word.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia4.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2F5YedtTZYMb1k0ryqYl%2Fsource.gif&t=664&c=5qF7MwnvSVlhIg) No, I literally said none of that. Nice dance moves though. I think they call that one The Worm. You're a perfect example of who this thread is about though, so while you're here, answer me this: Is the reason why you still believe Trump's lies because you are a. stupid b. full of shit It must be one or the other, so which is it?
|
|
|
What if Putin told him that he didn't do it. You can't expect Trump to trust US intelligence experts over a former KGB officer, can you?
I don't know why he would trust a former KGB officer. Oh, sorry I misspoke. I meant to say, I don't know why he wouldn't trust a former KGB officer.
|
|
|
Brave bet, bordering on nutty IMO. If you win this I will reward you with 3 whole merits. Bills @ -17.5? You must be expecting quite a stomping.
The 17.5 is the Bills team total, not the HC ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) If it was HC, the odds would be way higher than 2.28; HC-17.5 for the Bilils you could get for around 4.50. And you can't parlay ML+HC of course (would be nice, if one could though ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) ). Oh.. yeah apparently I didn't get it. Nope, that's Bills total points Over 17.5, not spread, nothing crazy here ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Edit: Well they covered 17.5 and you won your bet anyway, so I am awarding you the 3 merits.
|
|
|
It was very hard to find something interesting for BUF/DEN game, but i ended up with Bills O17.5 pts + Bills ml + J.Allen 25+ rush yards for 2.28 total odds.
Brave bet, bordering on nutty IMO. If you win this I will reward you with 3 whole merits. Bills @ -17.5? You must be expecting quite a stomping.
|
|
|
@DireWolfM14 said that Allen is on the injury report, but I can't find him there, so he will be fit I guess. Do you have a link Dire ? The official NFL site's injury report: https://www.nfl.com/injuries/The list doesn't specify the injury, but I think it's a lingering knee and ankle sprain he suffered a couple of weeks ago. He's been practicing all week, so I'm sure he'll start. Yeah, it looks like he is: https://www.buffalorumblings.com/2020/12/19/22190288/buffalo-bills-vs-denver-broncos-broadcast-info-announcers-streaming-radio-television-week-15I was tempted to bet Buffalo ML just to make the game more interesting, but its dropped to 1.39x... Not worth risking IMO. Bills ML looks the obvious choice, but the odds are a bit low for my liking. Will wait for 1.80 inplay.
Sounds reasonable. Technically its not a "must-win" game for the Bills; even though they didn't clinch their division there's almost no chance they won't end up in the playoffs. Broncos... somehow technically still in it but an unappetizing team to bet on.
|
|
|
Sorry for replying almost 3,5 years later, but I've just noticed this warning in my Trust.
Unfortunately, somebody has hacked me back then. Despite using a password manager, my password was leaked. Luckily I acted quick and noticed that some scammer was trying to use my account to advertise his scam to other people. Bitcointalk should seriously consider implementing 2FA.
You'll have to send a message to the member that left you your trust if you want it removed. I would also delete the feedbacks your accounts wrote as it looks like they must have been written by the person who hacked your account. One other thing you can do is edit the text of your old posts to state that you didn't write the original post.
|
|
|
I have one pick with a decent degree of confidence for Sunday and that is Miami @ -1.5. They have been doing relatively well the second half of this season and need this game to help their playoff chances... a loss here could potentially eliminate them from contention. Miami also covers the spread more often than any other team this year while the Pats are less than average in that regard. One telling sign is that the Pats only beat the Jets by 3 points whereas Miami beat them by 17... I'm expecting some of that difference to carry over in Sunday's game.
I feel pretty confident about this one so I'm actually upping the line to -2.5 and taking my bet on that.
The conservative version of the bet (Miami -1.5) pays out ~1.91x.
The riskier version (Miami -2.5) pays out ~2.02x.
|
|
|
Well, that was another exciting game! Could have gone either way for quite a length of it. Even though Marriota didn't turn things around to a W, they were damn close, and I don't think the Raiders are going to forget about that going forward, and next year. Quite a morale buster for Raiders fans who were still clinging to Super Bowl hopes. Maybe next year.
|
|
|
OK, I'll change it to something else -- wouldn't want to be accused of leaving false feedback.
|
|
|
- Somebody advertising something (sig campaigns).
Therefore, you are shilling for bestchange, I wouldn't agree with that though. Only in the loosest sense of the word as what I'm doing falls under the broad umbrella of what shilling could mean to some people. Going by the definition linked above, shilling means: to help another person to persuade people to buy something, especially by pretending to be a satisfied customer So for most of us, the second part is right out. Though I've had pleasant experiences using some services I've advertised before, and indeed talking about them would be shilling. The first part: wearing a sig could arguably be interpreted as "persuading people to buy something" as the ad wouldn't be there without your post. I don't personally have a problem with this and probably wouldn't call it "shilling," but some undoubtedly would and do. All the nonsense pedantry over what is considered shilling or not shilling doesn't matter when the end-goal of the entire pursuit is to place the idealized negative semantic association of "shill" upon the grouping you decide corresponds to the given parameters.
If the terminology used to define a set is so flexible that there are many connotations to vast groups of individuals, then the clear solution is to increase the granularity and restrict one's definition to a new term.
You could have just said "shilling means different things to different people."
|
|
|
Betting on the Raiders ? Dangerous ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Since they had the Chiefs on the brink of defeat, they basically have done nothing. Losing 6-43 to ATL, barely beating the tanking Jets and last week that bad loss to the Colts. A divisional matchup is always a good possibility to get back on track, I just don't find this 1.5x very appealing. Ordinarily I would like a team in the Raiders' position but the truth is they are pretty awful and yeah, like you pointed out, they only beat the Jets by 3 points. They also have less offensive yards across the season than the Chargers and have given up more defensive yards. Who knows, maybe they will find something within themselves to pull it together enough to potentially qualify for the playoffs. Maybe not! Gonna take the Chargers @ +3.5 here for 1 mBTC, just to make the game a little bit more exciting. But I give it a low-confidence level rating as it goes against my prevailing theory (that playoff-contending teams find creative ways to put a little extra "oomph" in their games to secure the all-important V).
|
|
|
Sometimes I'll get a merit or two back after sending one or some to somebody, I'd say within a day or so. But it doesn't happen to me nearly as often as this guy, and it seems to be pre-planned behavior. His merit activity is definitely suspicious but it would require more evidence of the merit trade agreement before I'd say its worth getting grumpy about...
What are these accounts (merit customers) doing? If they are a spam farm then they should def. be tagged. If they are just bounty hunters, I don't think there's enough evidence to accuse them of anything specifically, so far. But that's just my take on it. If they turn out to all be owned by the same person, its worth waiting to see what they are trying to accomplish.
|
|
|
|