Smear, misdirect, gaslighting, rinse and repeat. Classy. "Reputable". I saw somewhere Lauda did the same things (selling accounts) some years ago, am I right?
Nope. |
|
|
|
I'm right as I am a 40 year old bloke, not a cheap sausage frying wanna be Porno baron
This one really cranked me up. +1 for the creativity.  |
|
|
|
I believe it is most likely a troll account created to show how obvious the nullis or whatever his name is, account is a sock puppet of someone who is not new here.
 |
|
|
|
I remember being somewhat perplexed by vitriol towards QS a while ago but not anymore. I've seen cockroaches that could be more valuable members of this forum than QS.
Being new here, I know exactly what you mean. Looks like the cartel has started mocking this part of your previous posts. You even got a dedicated account. See here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2945878.msg30360729#msg30360729. In contrast to the poor roaches, Quickseller is a somewhat less intelligent version of Iago: Treacherous, manipulative, seething with jealousy, skilled at insinuating himself into others’ trust and cultivating a false reputation for honesty, poisonous to the relations of all around him—why, yes, methinks “the Bitcoin Forum’s Iago” is my new nickname for Quickseller.
Sounds like a nice description. Did he ever deny being Iago? |
|
|
|
Why isn't blazed on that list? Pretty sure he is much more trusted than you
Since blazed is a part of Crypto Escrow Team, he is not listed seperately. It's quite obvious what is going on here and the intentions behind these actions, unless you are blind of course.
 How to sabotage ratings? Step 1: Make up lies in order to cover up the real intentions behind a negative rating, and neg. rate 1 member (preemptive defense?). Average trust rating, thus score goes down. Voila. One plays by the cheap smear tricks books, the other plays by the manipulative narcissist book. Look both up and you'll identify most of them pretty quickly. |
|
|
|
It might be easier to have a list of apprved escrow members for financial transactions.
We have that hereThat is a nice list. It's nice to be publicly recognized by 3rd parties as the most trusted escrow service on this forum. Thanks for posting! -snip- Lauda, it's weird how much you try to damage my escrow service. I don't think you realize how pathetic it makes you look. It's like you're threatened by anyone trying to keep the community safe with positive actions. Are you so desperate for funds and insecure that you need to attack the most trusted escrow on the forum for attention in the hopes someone will use you for something other than hiring spammers? Ironic. Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business?  -snip- Boy do I smell hypocrisy and irony much here? If only we have enough proof of the obvious. Too bad we don't.  It's quite obvious what is going on here and the intentions behind these actions, unless you are blind of course. |
|
|
|
|
Fix this ugly font size. Nobody is going to take a serious look at the case otherwise.
|
|
|
|
I tagged him back in 2016, so it's no surprise this dude is still selling accounts. Hopefully a DT member will put the red on him and he'll get the message--but he probably won't.
I have one doubt you are a green trusted member but why his account not turned RED? Click on this link, and change your trust list to the following: ~HostFat
gmaxwell
~OgNasty
qwk
Vod
~Tomatocage
DiamondCardz
KWH
ibminer
~defcon23
Mitchell
~cyclops
Blazed
hilariousandco
~shorena
~jonald_fyookball
~CryptoImperator
~chronicsky
~Quickseller
Zepher
actmyname
The Pharmacist
Lutpin
Gunthar
SaltySpitoon
Handled. You can lock this thread. |
|
|
|
I saw a newly-posted thread with funny comments
Without reviewing too many posts, I guess you could assume ICO bumping services are at play again. |
|
|
|
Assuming the picture that someone posted (somewhere around here) of that little hut shack is real, you're the one who needs help with their financial situation. Here's a video of my "shack" for your viewing pleasure. Tell me again why your opinion has value? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKisxNn1ueQIt may not be perfect, but it is paid off and I'm quite happy with it. Being new here, I came across this amazing drone footage of the mansion belonging to the venerable member of our community - OgNasty. It is quite impressive indeed. It has been called a 'shack' multiple times already by anonymous individuals with dubious intentions and bad mannerisms. Now, I kindly challenge the 'illustrious' members included in this list to record and show their fellow forumites their own 'shacks' so we could have a little 'Bitcointalk shack contest'. It's only fair if we could see for ourselves where they live. For all we know, they could be living under a bridge or sleeping on a bench in the park. So, without further ado, I present to you the first Bitcointalk shack pissing contest! Wildcard participants : TMAN
Lauda
isoneguy
aTriz
minifrij
EcuaMobi
cryptodevil
suchmoon
owlcatz
Zepher
The Pharmacist
Lutpin
Hhampuz How much are you willing to wager on this ?? I doubt a shill account is going to put money where their mouth is. We do know one *person* who likes to use alts for this very purpose.  |
|
|
|
Instead of trade blames and literary interpretations and misinterpretations of words and sentences, what would it cost you Lauda to review the said account of this user as he has alleged that your neg rating was done in error of what he didn't know even after three months? I believe that should be a subtle way of resolving some of these things.
Instead of complaining only about my actions, how about you review the ratings of all DT members (most notably the DT1 members involved) and ask them to review those that seem *inappropriate*? Don't jump on the Lauda this, Lauda that bandwagon. Additionally, this childish obsession that has been displayed by the cartel has wasted several hours of multiple users. This time could have been spent reviewing existing and new cases. Oh wait, the cartel does not care about other users. Are we likely going to see a repentant Lauda or a more stiffened Lauda after this drama?
They are very likely plotting behind the scenes again. Therefore, this is far from over and I have no idea what shall happen. Your reference was that he tried to cheat the SMAS list. Isn't that a bit harsh of a punishment?
People get negged for not reading the auction rules and thus commenting or bidding. Isn't that a bit harsh? I'd say mine isn't on that level (as you require several actions to get there for the SMAS abuse cases). Take a look in the mirror and replace the first word with 'abuser'. I am not even remotely, in any way whatsoever, a racist of any kind. I have, repeadetly, stated that I do not care about other's nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing they like to to associate themselves with.
Are you sure? No, that is not the intended spirit of Satoshi, who founded this forum.
He certainly did not intent for 3rd world monkeys to shitpost left and right. They ruined this forum, and are the reason that almost all *Bitcoin experts* have stopped posting here (or are not posting as often as they used to). Yes, I am sure. Both "3rd world" and "monkeys" have nothing to do with race. Liberals can be true nutjobs at times. If you get in contact the ThePharmacist, the information will be conveyed to lauda, automatically
The amount of smearing and lies is getting ridiculous. Generalizing all as 3rd world monkeys is rather insulting to such persons since they come from the '3rd' world countries though.
a) I have not generalized it to everyone, neither has TMAN. b) An insult =/= racist (although it can be a racist insult). That statement is in no way related to any race, unless you see "3rd world user" as a race[1]. In that case, I advise you to seek professional help.
[1] I should submit this to urban dictionary. |
|
|
|
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back? For who knows when do I have to still wait till shorena removes the neg on you before you undo mine? That wasn't a literally "wait for X, then do y"; you missed the point. I addressed your case in a previous post: No. If you aren't self-biased, then you would complain about very similar cases not solely about you. OP is a prime example of this; don't be like OP.
Where I have served out your ban for (3 months and counting) - a mistake you alleged on me that wasn't mine originally.
You are not banned. |
|
|
|
|
What exactly are you talking about? His post count being 'leet'? That's a built in *Easter egg*. It happens when your post count reaches 1337.
Picture finally loaded.
|
|
|
|
Well you may not, but I know for a fact that MJ keeps ALL of his shipping addresses that he has shipped too, not sure for how long he keeps them for but I know that he does
I am not sure how that is relevant, unless you're trying to imply that MJ reported Og or gave someone the information to report Og (if he even has their information)? Well because you are a member of CET and so is MJ. I don't know if shipping addresses counts as saving DOX information Yes, but that doesn't mean that we share shipping information. Why would you do that? That's a huge liability on its own. I always kind of wondered who had OGs information besides theymos, but then again, I think anyone with enough willpower can find OG if they truly wanted to.
I do not know, and given the recent collusion I probably might not want to know. |
|
|
|
Well you may not, but I know for a fact that MJ keeps ALL of his shipping addresses that he has shipped too, not sure for how long he keeps them for but I know that he does
I am not sure how that is relevant, unless you're trying to imply that MJ reported Og or gave someone the information to report Og (if he even has their information)? |
|
|
|
Isn't there a high ranking SEC guy that is pretty active on the fourm here?
There is? I am sure someone who wanted to report OG probably already done so, wouldnt you think?
I wouldn't know. Unlike OP, who is strongly supported by OgNasty, I do not keep the DOXX of people who I have traded (or have not traded) with. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
|
|
|
maybe others do not want to be tied to anything nasty and the ticking time bomb that is the security he raised IPO funds for??
The SEC could come knocking on the door any day, so who knows? |
|
|
|
Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET. A lot of collectors avoid OgNasty for obvious reasons.
This is a flat out lie. First off, CET is no competition to me. Applied appropriately. You saying something doesn't make it true.
The only collectors that avoid me are the people who have been force fed so many lies by you and your extortion cronies, that they don't know what to believe.
That is a flat out lie. Most of the people that avoid you have made their own opinions about you, and most of them I have barely had any interaction with them whatsoever (the excluded owlcatz, and in recent times this applies to hhampuz (and anduck, who is not excluded) as well; outside of the spectrum of collectors, Ecuamobi, cryptodevil, suchmoon; very little-to-no interaction and especially not about you). I think it's time for it to be abundantly clear that you are an extortionist, a racist, a liar, and you do not deserve any sort of authority.
Take a look in the mirror and replace the first word with 'abuser'. I am not even remotely, in any way whatsoever, a racist of any kind. I have repeadetly stated that I do not care about other's nationality/race/religion or whatever useless thing they like to associate themselves with. Classic cheap smear tactics. |
|
|
|
Surely, it is "best practice" to get some of the details straight when asserting any facts that are found to be completely and totally true through admission by failure to timely deny.
According to OP, anything someone some random says about you that you don't explicitly deny on request is true. Watch out. |
|
|
|
PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?
I mean like tit for tat? Serving it back? No. If you aren't self-biased, then you would complain about very similar cases not solely about you. because OGnasty holds like what 500 BTC of the fourms BTC, that makes him pretty fucking trustworthy to me
CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again? how are they holding more? Holding more than 500 BTC in escrow as of time of writing. What is it that you fail to understand? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
