The weird thing is that there is no backstory alongside the image. I’ve looked through the whole Twitter thread and sought through www, but alas came back empty handed. The image unfortunately does not tell us if the book was used for promotional purposes within the classroom, whether this is a one-off or a regular presence in that school/more schools, whether is down to a nerdy teacher’s interest, or whatever. Context matters ...
I also conducted a search, and what got into my answers directly says that the goal was precisely to draw the attention of people of different ages to Bitcoin at an elementary level. It’s a book for all ages. The book contains sections like trading, money, printing bitcoin & little information about Satoshi.
Aim of introducing the book about bitcoin at the elementary level to make aware children of trending crypto & bitcoin. https://www.cryptoknowmics.com/news/slovakians-in-a-classroom-learn-the-basics-of-bitcoin |
|
|
|
Instead of saying they participated in same bounty campaign, can you provide proof? I couldn’t exactly find our where they abuse campaign with multiple account. How did I miss lol? Share the proof with relevant link. That would be good to evaluate.
I already provided the Proof. * Look at their Forum name: it's a bright Gang. brightology, bright4mech, Crypto Bright. I think you should also learn how to use the site https://bpip.org/If you looked at this site or LoyceV site https://loyce.club/bans/usernames.txtyou would notice that all of your found accounts were previously banned. But yes, according to your investigations, there is one live account, and I will also add that I found another one. And they all break rule 25. Ban evasion. And yes, it is clear that you know how to use the search, so in the future, be careful, since the creation of a topic about killed accounts sometimes does not bring any benefit. Ban evasion. bright4mech Autoban userCryptocb Autoban userBrightcrypto Autoban userBright4Real Autoban userCrypto BrightChelsea2021[ archive ] [ archive ] [ archive ] |
|
|
|
Give and Share are two different words that means their meanings are different too.
I give you one apple and I share one apple with you, they are completely different ?
Sharing is caring & giving is loosing when we give something to someone to overcome our emotions our way of dealing become different.
So, its a very important subject when we consider quality posting.
OP, can I ask you a question about your recent topic? This is by no means "scratching" you. You copied the article by cutting out parts of it, then you were offered to add a link, and also showed you that your information is not correct. You started to justify yourself that you didn't copy, you just wanted to TEACH the community on a few things. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5372896.msg58517154#msg58517154Now the question. How to relate to your topic, did you give or share? Since you're assured that you helped the community, it can be assumed that you gave, but thereby did not have the proper knowledge. But if you share, and even more so not your knowledge, but what can be questioned, you must admit that this activity may not always be useful. So your metaphors "Give and share" don't apply to knowledge. If a person gives, that is, and teaches something, he will not lose anything for himself, don’t you think so ?? |
|
|
|
Dear sir please remove my negative trust. Im never do any things wrong my Life. Im so sorry. Dear sir any information need im send you. Please remove. Im so sorry. I hop im get my account.
Man, I know you won't hear me anyway, but anyway, just go away. For you, the words " I'm never do any things wrong in my Life." have completely different meanings. How many of your accounts were caught by DT and tagged with negative tags? Think, and the rest awaits the same fate. Your attempts to be "honest" on the forum are useless. |
|
|
|
I saw that there was a campaign of fight among account from Indonesia against rozak. Rozak catches them and they start looking for rozak's fault. LOL
This time he apparently disrupted the life of the Turkish section. Since the OP writes there and came here almost two weeks later to "annoy" Rozak.  As for your questions, if there is compelling evidence of the link between alternative accounts and their violation in the participation of companies where the participation of alts is prohibited, the accounts may be marked with a negative trust. Simply transferring tokens to one wallet cannot be hard evidence. We still need other matches, the same social networks, wallets, transfer of merit between accounts, and so on. Anything else is a simple attack on the account without reliable evidence. |
|
|
|
Honestly, I doubt thinking that where should I post this topic then later on I decided to post it here in reputation cause this thread is all about mine to share with everyone here in the forum and newbies get inspired when they read this. In the B&H section, there are many topics that newbies can gather more information in the forum and crypto.
I would suggest not to create a topic like this at all. But it has been created, and nothing can be done. You are number 990. Let's imagine those who are above you, -989 people. Have you ever wondered how many such topics there would be? Why is this topic? Have you been taught that humility adorns a person? I could understand when someone created a similar topic when he entered the top ten. For example, Ratimov walks with giant strides, but I don't see anything like it. But as for you, I am sure that by creating such topics, sooner or later you will receive your recognition. Some people do not care what they say about them, just to draw attention to themselves. Sorry, the topic is another fishing. Nothing more. |
|
|
|
|
Well, if not TOR, then VPN.
It's very easy on the internet. I have nothing against you, but having different IP addresses cannot serve as proof. There are thousands of VPNs with a permanent address, which completely changes all data about the system. Location, time, language, and more.
In general, any evidence of different personalities, including KYC, can be questioned. A big argument will be the difference in the style of writing, as you say that accounts are written from different languages.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if he found out about the forum later. I am more inclined to fight 1xbit. We regularly see newcomers with almost the same complaints. The COOLCRYPTOVATOR asked the right question, how did the OP know about the forum?
Read his subsequent posts. How can a person, registering here for the first time, create threads wherever 1xbit is discussed?
I have already written somewhere about the war. There is a 1xbit army and there is an army against 1xbit.
The same behavior, always the same template. First, the loss of money, then a search in Google. Why not the other way around?
There are a lot of scams, fraudulent casinos, and so on the Internet, but most of all victims come here from 1xbit, isn't it strange?
|
|
|
|
Not right. Read the rules again. If you think that it is possible to create a new account, and after it is discovered, a person receives a negative tag, then this is absolutely not the case. No matter how many accounts are created, after the first account was banned, everyone else will face the same fate. It is strange that you and your rank do not know this.  What do you mean not knowing?. All I explained is about the possible outcome and not about everyone face the same fate. Why everyone always tells me read the rules when it is bookmarked and if ever I forgot one then I'll have to recheck. Care to explain about what I didn't know. I'm open for corrections and your expertise. Okay, I'll explain. There shouldn't be any negative tag. Whether an account is banned is up to the moderators to decide. In principle, the tag does not need to be set in this case. Only a ban. Is it better now? 25. Ban evasion (using or creating accounts while one of your accounts is banned) is not allowed.[e]
|
|
|
|
The chances of getting your account unbanned is very low as explained in post above. Creating another account is a ban evasion and would get red trusted for ban evasion. Explaining your reasons why you should be given a second chance is not good then i'm sorry to say that unbanning of your account is impossible. Try to appeal and you may be one of those people or one of those 2.98% people who appeal to unbanned their account.
Not right. Read the rules again. If you think that it is possible to create a new account, and after it is discovered, a person receives a negative tag, then this is absolutely not the case. No matter how many accounts are created, after the first account was banned, everyone else will face the same fate. It is strange that you and your rank do not know this. |
|
|
|
With the departure of some cult persons, more and more so-called forum policemen appear on the forum who, in one way or another, try to take their place. There are those who really pursue noble goals, but there are also those who are doing the supposedly right things actually trying to assert themselves and from the side it looks really disgusting.  Somewhat roughly said: "the so-called policemen"OH, weren't you previously also a "so-called policeman"? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5122895.msg50246232#msg50246232Yes, of course, you probably consider yourself, like this, a cult? I have already told you more than once that you are too sycophant to some "cult" personalities, isn't that so? This is striking. I agree that hunting for cheaters is a waste of time. Cheaters rise from the ashes. But this should not sound from someone who was directly involved in the fishing and also marked the cheaters with negative tags. These new cops, as you say, at least are not doing anything wrong. How many cheaters have @bitbollo, @Awaklara, @YOSHIE caught? I don't think you should call it personal goals. If we talk about time, then this is only their time, not yours. And if you have direct evidence that these people are pursuing some selfish goals, tell us. Why speak in the third person? There is an expression that people are divided into two types: my person and a stranger. Once again, you prove that you are a stranger. And yes, your idols are gone, get used to the young trend. |
|
|
|
The above is right the source came from cnbcindonesia but the 3rd one seems not to be a copy-pasted tried to check it with that tool and also tried to search it through Google but no result. So the first and 2nd are plagiarism and the 3rd one is not unless someone will point that its plagiarism. But even though he already broke one of the important rules here on this forum so he must be punished.
The third was copied from an Indonesian news site, and translated by a Google translator. One hundred percent plagiarism, including the picture. The account needs an urgent ban. a source: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20211125095826-17-294269/bitcoin-ethereum-bergairah-tapi-kripto-big-cap-lainnya-loyoI informed the moderators |
|
|
|
This is the most obvious reason for the ban. Spam. And plagiarism. Here is just one of the posts that got nuked: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5835/58351191.htmlHere is one of the posts where the information could have been taken from. But maybe that one is also plagiarized from somewhere else and is not the original one: The change of basic technology will bring application innovation. Ethereum's two-tier and three-tier technologies are becoming more and more mature. The opportunity of industry transformation still lies in Ethereum's layered technology. It should be proficient in two-tier and three-tier technologies as familiar with bitcoin technology. Bitcoin is very stable and unchanged. It is the best investment. But I think Ethereum is more fun. I am sure there are more examples like the one above. For those who would like to check it out, this is the member's complete record of scrapped posts. Well, exactly. You're right. Here's another example. This is the farm DdmrDdmr asked about. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373347.0Engaged in necroposting and plagiarism, they again change "strategies" Here's an example of copying the same post. The accounts that copied someone else's post refer to a recently discovered farm. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg58543550#msg58543550 |
|
|
|
|
Each post contains an ad for chainlist.finance. You don't have to advertise everywhere. This is the most obvious reason for the ban. Spam.
|
|
|
|
18. Having multiple accounts and account sales are allowed, but account sales are discouraged.
The statement that something is allowed and at same time discouraged is somewhat ambiguous. My dear, it's really the height of a hidden paradox. Frankly, I have tried to wrap my head around that part too of something being allowed but then discouraged and it keeps beating me hallow. To put it mildly, it doesn't make sense to me. Could that be that it's either I've a minimal grasp of English idioms or I simply don't understand basic English language 🤔. Maybe it's about time theymos reviewed that rule so we could understand it better. I guess it was made at a time when there was skeletal traffic here and the forum needed to coax posters to stay active but the rhythm has obviously changed now and it should call for a change of parade too. I think everything is clear enough. The forum declares freedom. You can do whatever you want, but at the same time, you need to understand that this is unacceptable, and for some actions, there may be a response, such as a negative tag. But this is by no means an account ban. Therefore, anyone who wants to walk with a negative mark in their account can buy an account. Everything seems clear enough.
That means is not sure before taking decision and is under assumptions, because i think some people don't fall the victim of plagarism intensionally, except it's the person method of life is to mimic someone kind of research, i think the best is to pm the user base on the rank, and if happened to be old user it's very obvious that such Skip the memory and it deserve to be corrected through private information or communication, so if the user refused to accept it's mistake within some hours, the function to report to the mod can be carried out without hesitation and that indicates intensionally Plagiarism instead of unintentional mistake.
If you report plagiarism to the moderators, I can tell you from experience that mods are also very good at viewing the account you are filing a plagiarism complaint with. If this is an isolated case, then the account will not be banned. More examples may be needed to prohibit. So there is no need to worry. Just let mods know, and the moderators will make the right conclusions themselves. Otherwise, in some cases, supposedly helping someone, you take the side of the one who is considered to be a violation of the rules.  |
|
|
|
Whoever is behind the account is so annoying. They just bumped very old posts in some boards like Politics and society, pushing away new topics to the second page. I wish mods could just nuke them if it were possible. More accounts 1. KidmooN Date Registered: November 24, 2021 2. _optimus_ Date Registered: November 24, 2021 3. etHPirate Date Registered: November 23, 2021 4. ExPloreR-xx Date Registered: November 23, 2021 5. ratfactory Date Registered: November 24, 2021 They just shifted to another topic, hoping that there they will remain unnoticed. The same picture again. One day of registration, and there is plagiarism in every account. I informed the moderators.  They will be banned. |
|
|
|
You are all exaggerating the importance of the fact that it is very difficult to deal with newbie accounts. Let's see how many participants there will be in the bounty if managers restrict the participation of new accounts, but will accept them with at least one merit? How can such lawlessness be realized if the rules of the companies are a little more complicated? The conclusions are simple. Our efforts to combat cheating are the most Sisyphean work ever. Companies need ads, and they don't care how many cheaters participate to advertise. And all the rules about prohibiting the participation of alternative accounts, this is the creation of the image of "HONESTY", although this is not so. The interests of advertising come first. But YOSHIE, I give a standing ovation. You never cease to amaze the audience. I express my respect to you!  |
|
|
|
In my country, Google issues a forum first, and it pleases.  If something hasn't changed, and if I'm not mistaken about your location - isn't the forum blocked in your country (Ru), and it is only possible to access it with VPN and maybe Tor? You are a little mistaken, I do not live in Russia. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
